Parental Attachment as Predictor of Delinquency

Authors

  • Maria Chong Abdullah Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Lee Phaik Gaik Faculty of Educational Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Habibah Elias Faculty of Educational Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Jegak Uli Faculty of Educational Studies Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2013.10.5

Keywords:

Delinquent behaviour, parental attachment, communication, trust, alienation

Abstract

Purpose â€“ The purpose of this study is to find out the relationship between adolescents’ parental attachment and delinquent behaviour in the aspects of trust, communication and alienation. In this study, delinquent behaviour refers to the set of behaviours which is against any mainstream established rules or norms. It is believed that delinquent behaviour has the potential to cause school failure, impairments in socio-emotional development, peer rejection, and adult crime.
 
Methodology â€“ Data were gathered from a sample of 300 secondary school students aged 15-18 years old in Selangor. These students were selected from the “hardcore schools†which was obtained from the so called "hardcore schools" listed by the School Division for serious disciplinary problems. Two instruments, namely surveys on the “Behaviour of Students†and “Parental Attachmentâ€(PA) were utilized to collect the research data. The researchers employed correlational research design in this study.
 
Findings â€“ Data showed that the highest delinquency among the adolescents was misbehaviour in school, followed by crime, vandalism, pornography, dishonesty and drugs. Results also revealed a negative linear relationship between parental attachment (r=-0.282,p=0.0001) and delinquent behaviour, implying that adolescents with better parental attachment had lower levels of delinquency. In addition, findings showed that adolescents trusted in their mothers (M=3.70,SD=0.63) more than they trusted in their fathers (M=3.51, SD=0.72) in relation to communication and alienation. It is suggested that close supportive parents and frequent communication between parents and their children serve to prevent adolescent delinquency.
 
Significance â€“ This research is significant to parents, school, teachers, counselors and the community.
 

References

Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Ainsworth, M.D.S. (1989). Attachment beyond infancy. American Psychologist, 44, 709-716

Arbona, C., & Power, T.G. (2003). Parental attachment, self-esteem, and antisocial behaviors among African American, European American, and Mexican American adolescents. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 50(1), 40-51.

Armsden, G. C., & Greenberg, M.T. (1987). The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 16, 427-454

Bogels, S.M., & Brechman-Toussaint, M.L. (2006). Family issues in child anxiety: Attachment, family functioning, parental rearing and beliefs. Clinical Psychology Review, 26, 834–856.

Bowlby, J. (1969/1982). Attachment and loss: Vol 1. New York: Basic Books.

Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base. New York: Basic Books:

Bracken, B. B. (Ed.). (1996). Handbook of self-concept. United States of America: John Wiley & Sons, Inc

Cooper, M. L., Shaver, P. R., & Collins, N.L. (1998). Attachment styles, emotion regulation, and adjustment in adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1380-1397.

Elgar, F.J., Knight, J., Worrall, G.J. & Sherman, G. (2003).

Downloads

Published

26-12-2013

How to Cite

Abdullah, M. C., Gaik, L. P., Elias, H., & Uli, J. (2013). Parental Attachment as Predictor of Delinquency. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 10, 99-117. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2013.10.5

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-21
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/mjli2013.10.5