Keupayaan Mengajar Guru-Guru Bahasa Melayu Sekolah Menengah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2004.1.1.9Abstract
Keupayaan mengajar merupakan salah satu peramal kepada prestasi kerja guru. Dua dimensi penting bagi keupayaan mengajar ialah pengetahuan asas dan pengetahuan pedagogi isi kandungan guru. Kajian ini bertujuan untuk ( 1) mengukur keupayaan mengajar di kalangan guru-guru bahasa Melayu sekolah menengah dan (2) membandingkan keupayaan mengajar guru-guru ini mengikut jantina, kelayakan akademik dan pengalaman mengajar. Kajian korelasi ini menggunakan sebanyak 370 guru mata pelajaran Bahasa Melayu dari 108 buah sekolah menengah di negeri Kedah. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan sebahagian besar responden mempunyai keupayaan mengajar yang tinggi tetapi terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan dari segi keupayaan mengajar mengikut jantina, umur, kelayakan akademik dan pengalaman mengajar.
References
Aini Hassan. (1996). A study of Malaysian history teachers’ subject matter and pedagogical content knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Monash Universiti, Australia.
American Psychological Association (1985). Standard for educational and sychological testing. Washington: APA.
Amir bin Salleh Mohd Salleh. (1993). Inservive training needs assessment for Malaysian secondary school teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Michigan.
Ball, D. L., & McDiarmid, G. L. (1990). The subject-matter preparation of teachers. In. W. R. Houston, (Ed.), Handbook of research in teacher education, 38, 2-8.
Berliner, D. C. (1992). The nature of expertise in teaching. In F. K. Oser, A. Dick, J-L Patry (Eds.), Effective and responsible teaching. The new synthesis (pp. 227-248). San Francisco: Josey-Bass.
Doyle, M. L. (1992). Learning to teach: Case studies of elementary preservice teachers reflective thinking about early field experiences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Northern Colorado.
Doyle, M. (1997). Beyond life history as a student: Preservice teacher’s beliefs about teaching and learning. College Student Journal, 31(4), 519.
Druva, C., & Anderson, R. D. (1983). Science teacher characteristics by teacher behavior and by student outcome: A meta-analysis of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 467-79. www.mjli.uum.edu.my mijli Vol. I No. 1, Jan. 2004, 179-
Ehrenberg, R., & Smith, R.S. (1987). Modern labour economics. Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman.
Fullan, M. G., & Stiegelbauer, S. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. (2" ed.). New York: Teacher College Press.
Goens, G. A., & Clover, S. I. R. (1991). Mastering school reform. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Good, T. L. (1990). Building the knowledge base for teaching. In. D. D. Dill (Ed.), What teachers need to know. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Grossman, H. (1991). Multicultural classroom management. Contemporary Education, 62 (3), 161-166.
Hunter, J.E., & Hunter, R.F. (1984). Validity and utility of alternative pre-dictors of job performance. Psychological Bulletin, 96 (1), 72-97.
Louden, W. (1991). Understanding teaching: Continuity and change in teachers’ knowledge. London: Casell & New York: Teachers College Press.
Mohd Majid Konting & Zakaria Kasa. (2002). Pengetahuan dan kemahiran pengajaran: Satu kajian kes di kalangan guru pelatih Universiti Putra Malaysia. Kertas kerja yang dibentangkan dalam Seminar Kebangsaan Pendidikan Guru 2002. Hotel Holiday Villa, Alor Setar.
Needels, M. C. (1991). Comparisons of student, first year and experience teachers interpretations of a first-grade lessons. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7, 269-278.
Peter, R. (1977). Education and education of teachers. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Peterson, P. L., & Comeaux, M. A. (1987). Teachers schemata for class-room events: The mental scaffolding of teachers’ thinking during class-room instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 319-331. www.mjli.uum.edu.my myli Vol. 1 No. 1, Jan. 2004 179-
Ree, M.J., & Earles, J.A., Teachout, M.S. (1994). Predicting job perfor-mance. Not much more than g. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 518-524.
Shulman, L. S. (1986a). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Hand-book of research on teaching. New York: Macmilan.
Shulman, L. S. (1986b). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teach-ing. Educational Researcher, 15 (2), 4-14.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57 (1), 1-22.
Strahan, D. B. (1989). How experienced and novice teachers frame their views of instruction: An analysis of semantic ordered trees. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5, 53-67.
Wilson, S.M., Shulman, L.S., & Richert, A. E. (1987). “150 different ways” of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In F. Calderhead (Ed)., Exploring teacher thinking. Sussex: Holt, Rinehart and Wilson.
Winitzky, N., Stoddart, T., & O’keefe, P. (1992). Theme: Professional de-velopment school. Journal of Teacher Education, 42 (1), 37-42.
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-09Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
