Voices of Practice: Teachers' Perceptions of Sexism in Business English Textbooks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2004.1.1.8Abstract
This study looks at how instructors perceive sexism and respond to the portrayal of gender in a textbook. A total of six instructors of an institution of higher learning were interviewed. These instructors were asked three basic questions: (1) Do you discuss gender issues in the classroom? (2) Were you aware of the gender stereotypes in the textbook? (3) How are you going to respond to gender stereotypes in the textbook after being aware? Findings indicate that the instructors did not intend to discuss gender in the classroom. Discussions on gender would be incidental, depending on the topic of the units covered in the textbook. In addition, the instructors did not discuss gender because they had not been aware of gender stereotypes in the textbook. However; most of them felt reluctant to discuss issues on gender even after they were made aware of gender stereotypes in the textbook. Reasons for this include time constraints in completing the syllabus, students' level of proficiency and students' awareness of gender issues. The avoidance of discussions on gender issues was also due to two main reasons: one, gender issues were not part of the syllabus to be covered and two, these issues were not part of the local culture. It is suggested that the instructors should attempt to discuss gender stereotypes and the idea of equality among gender in the classroom, especially if sexism existed in the textbook, to avoid gender stereotypes being part of the hidden curriculum.
References
Abraham, J. (1989). Teacher ideology and sex roles in curriculum texts. British Journal of Sociology Education, 10(1), 33-51.
Bergvall, V.L., Bing, J.M., & Freed, A.F, (1996). Rethinking language and gender research: Theory and practice.Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman. www.mjli.uum.edu.my
Bushnell, G. (1986). In defence of our methods - an editor speaks. TESOL 6(1), 49-50.
Christian-Smith, L. K. (1989). Gender, popular culture and curriculum: Adolescent romance novels as gender text. Curriculum Inquiry, 17, 365-406.
Cincotta, M.S. (1978). Textbooks and their influence on sex role stereo-types formation. Journal of Australian Federation of MLTS Assoc, 14(3), 24-9.
Danner, M., Fort, L., & Young, G. (1999). International data on women and gender, resources, issues, critical use. Women Studies International Forum, 22(2), 249-259.
Gaff, R. (1982). Sex stereotyping in modern language teaching. British Journal of Language Teaching, 20(3), 71-78.
Graci, J.P. (1989). Are foreign language textbooks sexist? An Exploration of Modes of Evaluation. Foreign Language Annals, 22 (5), 477-485.
Gupta, F.A., & Yin, L.S (1990). Gender representation in the English language. Language and Education, 4(1), 29-50.
Hartman, P.L., & Judd, E. L. (1978). Sexism and TESOL materials. TESOL Quarterly, 12(4), 383-393.
Hellinger, M. (1980). For men must work and women must weep: Sexism in English language textbooks used in German schools. In Kramarae, C. (Ed.), The voices and words of women and men. Special Issue of Women‘s Studies International Quarterly, 13, 67-75.
Jaworki, A. (1983). Sexism in textbooks. British Journal of Language and Teaching, 21(2), 109-113.
Joshi, G.P., & Anderson, J. (1994). Female motivation in the partriarchal school: An analysis of primary textbooks and school organization in Nepal and some strategies for change. Gender and Education, 6(2), 169-181. www.mjli.uum.edu.my
Kessler, S. Ashenden, D.J., Connell, R.W., & Dowsett, G.W. (1985). Gen-der relations in secondary schooling. Sociology of Education, 58, 34-48.
Lott, B. (1994). Women’s lives: Themes and variations in gender learning. (2™ ed.). California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co.
Mannheim, C. (1994). The boss was called Mr. Power: Learners’ perspec-tives on sexism in EFL materials. In Sunderland, J. (Ed.), Exploring gender: Questions and implications for English Language Education. Hemel! Hempstead: Prentice Hall.
Meece, J.L., & Eccles, J.S. (1993). Introduction: Recent trends in research on gender and education. (pp 23-33) Gender and Educational Achieve-ment. A Special Issue of Educational Psychologist, 28 (4).
Noraini Abdullah (1984). Gender ideology and the public lives of Malay women in Peninsular Malaysia. An unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.
Ornstein, A.C., & Levine, D.U. (1989). Foundations of education. (4" ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Porecca, K. (1984). Sexism in current ESL textbooks. TESOL Quarterly, 18(4), 705-724.
Saedah Siraj (1990). An analysis of gender stereotyping in Malay Language Elementary Reading Textbooks: Implication for Malaysian Education. An unpublished doctoral dissertation. Ann Arbor: UMI.
Sunderland, J. (1994). Exploring gender: Questions and implications for English Language Education. PrenticeHall International: Hertfordshire.
Talansky, S. (1986). Sex role stereotyping in TEFL teaching materials. Perspectives A Journal for Teachers of English as a Foreign Language, (Convention Issue) X1(3), 32-42.
Titus, J. J. (1993). Gender messages in education foundations textbooks. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(1), 38-44.
Westbury, I. (1990). Textbooks, textbook publishers and the quality of schooling. In Elliott, D.L. and Woodward, A. (Eds.), Textbooks and schooling in the United States. IMinois: The National Study for the Study of Education.
Whyld, J. (1983). Sexism in secondary curriculum. London: Harper and Row.
Willeke, A.B., & Sanders, R.H. (1978). Walter ist intelligent und Brigitte ist blond: Dealing with sex bias in language texts. TESOL France News, 11, 60-65. www.mjli.uum.edu.my myjli Vol. 1 No. 1, Jan. 2004, 163-
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-08Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
