DEFINING THE PRODUCT-BASED NON-CONFORMANCE CLASSIFICATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/jtom2013.8.1.1Keywords:
Non-conformance, mistakes proofing, product design and developmentAbstract
This paper focuses on the identification of non-conformances to facilitate improved product validation and aids the pre-production team in product assessment. The manifestation of mistakes which results in non-conformances and their relationship with the characteristics of the product under validation is explained. A new non-conformance classification has been defined based on the manifestation of mistakes and product characteristics. The classification has been evaluated by experts on consumer electronic products from multinational manufacturing companies through closed and open ended questionnaires. The respondents described the classification to be feasible and applicable in pre-production. The proposed classification contributes to the understanding of mistakes and product quality deficiencies which can be minimised by addressing non-conformances during product validation.
Metrics
References
Bal, J. (1998). Process analysis tools for process improvement. Total Quality Management Magazine, 10 (5), 342-354.
Booker, J.D. (2003). Industrial practice in designing for quality. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 20 (3), 288-303.
Cheung, Y. & Bal, J. (1998). Process analysis techniques and tools for business improvements. Business Process Management Journal, 4 (4), 274-290.
Crosby, P. B. (1979). Quality is free: The art of making quality certain. McGraw-Hill, New York.
de Castro, P.M.S.T. & Fernandes, A.A. (2004). Methodologies for failure analysis: a critical survey. Journal of Materials and Design, 25 (2), 117-123.
Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts.
Dorador, J.M. & Young, R.I.M. (2000). Application of IDEF0, IDEF3 and UML methodologies in the creation of information models. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 13 (5), 430-445.
Gillingham, D.W., Blanco, J. & Lewko, J.H. (1997). An integrated model of error management. Disaster Prevention and Management, 6 (3), 186-190.
Hinckley CM, & Barkan P. (1995). The role of variation, mistakes, and complexity in producing non-conformities. Journal of Quality Technology, 27 (3), 242-249.
Hinckley, C.M. (1997). Defining the best quality-control systems by design and inspection. Clinical Chemistry Forum, 43 (5), 873-879.
Hinckley, C.M. (2001). Make no mistake, Productivity Press, Portland.
Hinckley, C.M. (2003). Make no mistake - errors can be controlled. Journal of Quality, Safety, and Health Care, 12 (5), 359-365.
Jamaludin, R. & Young, R.I.M. (2005). The pre-production process: A pre-emptive improvement strategy. Proceedings of The 3rd International Conference on Manufacturing Research (ICMR2005), September 6 – 8, 2005, Cranfield University.
Jamaludin, R (2008). A product-based non-conformance classification. Proceedings of 9th. Asia Pacific Industrial Engineering & Management Systems Conference (APIEMS 2008), December 3-5, 2008, Bali, 2846-2854.
Juran, J.M. & Godfrey, A.B. (1999). Juran’s Quality Handbook, 5th ed, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Liu, W. & Cheraghi, S.H. (2006). A hybrid approach to non-conformance tracking and recovery. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 17 (5), 149-162.
Nagasaka, Y. (2000). Knowledge management for pre-production processes. The Brimacombe Memorial Symposium, Poster Proceedings, October 1 - 4, 2000. Vancouver.
Nikkan Kogyo Shimbun, Ltd./Factory Magazine (1988). Poka-yoke: Improving product quality by preventing defects, Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Disclaimer
The Journal of Technology and Operation Management (JTOM) has taken all reasonable measures to ensure that material contained in this website is the original work of the author(s). However, the Journal gives no warranty and accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or the completeness of the material; no reliance should be made by any user on the material. The user should check with the authors for confirmation. Articles published in the Journal of Technology and Operation Management (JTOM) do not represent the views held by the editors and members of the editorial board. Authors are responsible for all aspects of their articles except the editorial screen design.