Benchmarking Framework for Productivity Frontier Firms in the Malaysian Electrical and Electronics Industry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/jtom2026.21.1.2Keywords:
Benchmarking, Productivity, Electrical and Electronics, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), Malmquist Productivity IndexAbstract
The objective of this study is to develop a benchmarking framework using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to measure and identify frontier firms in Malaysia’s Electrical and Electronics (E&E) industry. This framework equips policymakers and business leaders with a decision-making tool to allocate resources efficiently and promote productivity improvements. The study assesses the relative efficiency of 21 Bursa Malaysia-listed E&E firms using firm-level productivity data from 2017 to 2019, identifies frontier firms as benchmarks, and quantifies inefficiencies for non-frontier firms. The Malmquist Productivity Index is then applied to analyse productivity growth, decomposing technical change, pure efficiency change, and scale efficiency change. Findings reveal fluctuating frontier firm compositions, with few consistently efficient firms and significant sectoral productivity contributions from frontier firms. Non-frontier firms can improve by aligning with benchmarks, although productivity trends vary across the subsector. The analysis combines quantitative DEA with a qualitative case study to provide a holistic assessment of productivity, capturing organizational and managerial factors beyond numerical data. This comprehensive approach supports targeted productivity-enhancement policies and strategic resource allocation at the enterprise level, providing valuable insights into firm-level performance dynamics in the Malaysian Electrical and Electronics industry.
References
Aparicio, J., Lopez-Espin, J. J., Martinez-Moreno, R.,& Pastor, J. T. (2014). Benchmarking in data envelopment analysis: An approach based on Genetic Algorithms and Parallel Programming. Advances in Operations Research, 1, 431749. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/431749
Alam, T. E., González, A. D., & Raman, S. (2023). Benchmarking of academic departments using data envelopment analysis (DEA). Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 15(1), 268–285. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-03-2021-0087
Bank Negara Malaysia. (2024). Annual report 2024. https://www.bnm.gov.my/documents/20124/939919/AR2024.pdf
Berlingieri, G., Blanchenay, P., Calligaris, S., & Criscuolo, C. (2017). The multiprod project: A comprehensive overview. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 4, OECD Publishing.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
Chen, S., Wu, T., & Liu, J. (2023). Productivity dispersion among firms in emerging markets. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 140, 104240.
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., & Zhang, Z. (1994). Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. The American Economic Review, 84(1), 66–83.
Fernandez, J., Lopez, M., & Santos, A. (2024). Managing innovation and operations agility in E&E firms: A benchmarking study. International Journal of Operations Management, 38(3), 553–572.
Garcia, L., & Thompson, A. (2022). Frontier firms and innovation: Drivers of industrial growth. Research Policy, 51(6), 104540.
Ismail, R., Abidin, S.Z., & Hajinoor, M.S. (2007). Contribution of technical efficiency change and technical change to total factor productivity growth in electrical and electronics industry in Malaysia. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 41, 161-181.
Ismail, F., & Abdullah, Z. (2025). Productivity growth and economic policy alignment in Malaysia under the MADANI Framework. Asian Economic Papers, 24(1), 70–92.
Johnes, J. (2006). Data envelopment analysis and its application to the measurement of efficiency in higher education. Economics of Education Review, 25(3), 273–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2005.02.005
Kohl, S., & Brunner, J. O. (2020). Benchmarking the Benchmarks: Comparing the accuracy of data envelopment analysis models in constant returns to scale settings. European Journal of Operational Research, 285(3), 1042–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.02.
Kumar, R., & Tan, C. (2025). Digital transformation and productivity in the electronics industry. Journal of Business Research, 160, 113929.
Lee, H., Chen, Y., & Wilson, P. (2024). Benchmarking and continuous improvement: The role of performance measurement systems. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 44(1), 45–62.
Mahadevan, R. (2002). A DEA approach to understanding the productivity growth of Malaysia's manufacturing industries. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 19(4), 587-600. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020595322868
Malaysia External Trade Development Corporation (MATRADE). (2025). Malaysia deepens semiconductor market reach at SEMICON SEA 2025: Local firms showcase advanced tech solutions. https://www.matrade.gov.my/en/about-matrade/media/press-releases/6365-malaysia-deepens-semiconductor-market-reach-at-semicon-sea-2025-local-firms-showcase-advanced-tech-solutions
Malaysia Productivity Corporation. (2022). Productivity report 2022: Electrical & electronics industry. Malaysia Productivity Corporation.
Malaysia Productivity Corporation. (2024). Malaysia productivity blueprint 2021-2025. Official Publication. https://www.mpc.gov.my/
Ministry of Economic Affairs. (2025). MADANI economic framework: Empowering the people. Government of Malaysia.
Mordor Intelligence. (2025). Malaysia semiconductor market report. https://www.mordorintelligence.com/industry-reports/malaysia-semiconductor-market
Nguyen, V., Tran, H., & Lee, J. (2022). Benchmarking firm productivity in Southeast Asia: DEA applications. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 30(2), 158–176.
O’Donnell, C., & Coelli, T. (2023). Data envelopment analysis for efficiency benchmarking in Multi-product manufacturing firms. European Journal of Operational Research, 305(1), 361–374.
Patel, S., & Shah, R. (2023). Applications of data envelopment analysis in industrial productivity studies: A review. International Journal of Production Economics, 262, 108575.
Rahman, A., Ismail, F., & Abdullah, Z. (2024). Firm-level productivity analysis in Malaysia’s manufacturing sectors. International Journal of Economics and Management, 18(1), 91–110.
Ray, S. C., & Desli, E. (1997). Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. The American Economic Review, 87(4), 890–910. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2951340
Rusli, N.A.E., Ramli, N.A., Shariff, S.S.R., Zahid, Z., & Hussin, S.A.S. (2022). Evaluating the efficiency and productivity of Malaysian logistics companies using epsilon-based measure and malmquist index during the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 15(4), 521-537. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.4022
Singh, P., & Kumar, N. (2024). Efficiency measurement in technology firms using DEA: A sectoral analysis. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 175, 109246.
Smith, J., & Brown, S. (2023). Strategic benchmarking for productivity improvement in manufacturing sectors. Journal of Productivity Studies, 45(2), 123–138.
Sulaiman, N., & Ismail, R. (2021). Technical efficiency and productivity growth in the Malaysian palm oil industry: A firm-level analysis. Oil Palm Industry Economic Journal, 21(1), 1–12.
Podinovski, V. V., & Wan Husain, W. R. (2017). The hybrid returns-to-scale model and its extension by production trade-offs: An application to the efficiency assessment of public universities in Malaysia. Annals of Operations Research, 250(1). pp. 65-84. ISSN 0254-5330
Wang, Y., & Li, X. (2024). Benchmarking firm performance: Identifying leading firms in technology sectors. Industrial and Corporate Change, 33(1), 58–77.
Zhao, Q., & Huang, X. (2023). Technological innovation and productivity in electrical and electronics manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 67, 382–393.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Technology and Operations Management
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Disclaimer
The Journal of Technology and Operation Management (JTOM) has taken all reasonable measures to ensure that material contained in this website is the original work of the author(s). However, the Journal gives no warranty and accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or the completeness of the material; no reliance should be made by any user on the material. The user should check with the authors for confirmation. Articles published in the Journal of Technology and Operation Management (JTOM) do not represent the views held by the editors and members of the editorial board. Authors are responsible for all aspects of their articles except the editorial screen design.
