Research Article Published 20 July 2017

A Proposed TEV Framework for Pulau Payar Marine Park

How to Cite

How to Cite

Osman, N. H., Mohtar, S., Juli, A. M., Ahmad, A., Chan, A. A., & Ibrahim, J. A. (2017). A Proposed TEV Framework for Pulau Payar Marine Park. Journal of Business Management and Accounting, 7(2), 77-84. https://doi.org/10.32890/jbma2017.7.2.8820
Nor Hasni Osman
School of Technology Management and Logistics, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Malaysia
Shahimi Mohtar
School of Technology Management and Logistics, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Malaysia
Abd. Muntalib Juli
Department of Marine Park Malaysia, Malaysia
Azhar Ahmad
School of Technology Management and Logistics, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Malaysia
Albert Apollo Chan
Department of Marine Park Malaysia, Malaysia
Jafni Azhan Ibrahim
School of Technology Management and Logistics, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Malaysia
Full text
PDF View full text 929 KB · 8 pages XML JATS full text 30 KB · machine readable HTML Read online 21 KB
DOI 10.32890/jbma2017.7.2.8820 Cite this article
Share this article
Citations
0
No citations recorded yet
Reads
385 +1
Abstract + full text
Downloads
269
PDF and XML

Article

Abstract

This paper aims to propose Total Economic Value (TEV) framework for Pulau Payar Marine Park (PPMP). Currently, TEV framework for PPMP revealed a few components despite infeasibility of certain main scientific data to be acquired and also under assumption of non-climate change phenomenon. With the MPA exposures towards recent climate change phenomenon, this paper explored the extended areas in Pulau Payar that might contribute either positively or negatively to the value of the PPMP which will assist in marine park management in their policy making. This study conducted along the qualitative paths in which information are gathered through focus group discussions and empirical study relevant to the calamity of coral bleaching. The findings illustrate that there are eight (8) items would contribute to the use and non-use value of the TEV framework.

Keywords
Total economic value marine park use value non-use value

Metrics & impact

Citations by source

Harvested 15-09-2026

Counts differ by index because each source crawls a different corpus. Crossref counts only registered reference lists; Google Scholar includes theses, preprints and grey literature.

OpenAlex
0
Open corpus, updated daily View →
OpenCitations
0
Open references only View →
Crossref
0
Deposited reference lists only View →
Scopus
0 Not indexed
Indexed titles only View →
Google Scholar
Publishes no citation count that can be read automatically.
Includes theses and preprints Search →
Dimensions
Publishes no citation count that can be read automatically.
Includes policy documents Search →

Reads & downloads

Abstract views 385
PDF downloads 269
XML downloads 0
Full-text HTML 0
Counted under COUNTER Release 5 rules; known robots excluded.

Attention beyond citation

Field-weighted citation impact 0.00
Works this article cites 15

From OpenAlex. A field-weighted impact of 1.00 is the world average for work of the same field, type and year. No Altmetric key is configured, so news, policy and social attention are not shown.

Identifiers
DOI · 10.32890/jbma2017.7.2.8820
OpenAlex · W2945954650

References

References 21
Deposited to Crossref with the article DOI
  1. Akhter, S., & Yew, T. S. (2015). Tourists’ willingness to pay for marine resource conservation at Pulau Perhentian Marine Park, Malaysia. Greener Journal of Economics and Accountancy, 4(2), 29–41.
  2. Ayenew, B., & Tesfay, Y. (2015). Economic valuation of forest ecosystems service’s role in maintaining and improving water quality. Economics, 4(5), 71-80. doi: 10.11648/j.eco.20150405.11
  3. Baig, S. P., Rizvi, A. R., Pangilinan, M. J., & Palanca-Tan, R. (2016). Cost and benefits of ecosystem based adaptation: The case of the Philippines. Retrieved from https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/2016-009.pdf
  4. Bakaki, Z., & Bernauer, T. (2016). Measuring and explaining the willingness to pay for forest conservation: Evidence from a survey experiment in Brazil. Environ. Res. Lett., 11, 1-9.
  5. Bockarjova, M., & Botzen, W. J. W. (2017). Review of Economic Valuation of Nature Based Solutions in Urban Areas. Retrieved from https://naturvation.eu/sites/ default/files/result/files/naturvation_review_of_economic_valuation_of_ nature_based_solutions_in_urban_areas.pdf
  6. Boyle, K. J., & Parmeter, C. F. (2017). Benefit transfer for ecosystem services. Retrieved from https://www.bus.miami.edu/_assets/files/repec/WP2017-07.pdf
  7. Del Giudice, V., & Del Paola, P. (2016). The contingent valuation method for evaluating historical and culture ruined properties. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 223, 595–600.
  8. DMPM (2017). The official portal of Department of Marine Park Malaysia. Retrieved from http://www.dmpm.nre.gov.my/ptl_kedah.html?uweb=jtl&lang=en
  9. Edwards, L. (2014). Cost benefit analysis and marine park planning in the South Coast Marine Conservation area, St Vincent and the Grenadines. United Nations University Fisheries Training Programme, Iceland [final project]. http://www. unuftp.is/static/fellows/document/luc13prf.pdf
  10. Faizana, M., Sasekumar, A., & Chenayah, S. (2016). Estimation of local tourists willingness to pay. Regional Studies in Marine Science, 7, 142–149.
  11. Gatto, P., Vidale, E., Secco, L., & Davide Pettenella, D. (2014). Exploring the willingness to pay for forest ecosystem services by residents of the Veneto Region. Bio-based and Applied Economics 3(1): 21-43.
  12. GIZ. (2012). Economic valuation of ecosystem services. Retrieved from https://www. giz.de/expertise/downloads/giz2013-en-biodiv-economic-valuation-ecosystem-services.pdf
  13. Hasnan, N., Ibrahim, K., & et al. (2012). Investigating total economic value of eco-tourism in Pulau Payar Marine Park. Department of Marine Park Malaysia, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment: Putrajaya, Malaysia, pp 148.
  14. Hjerpe, E. E., & Hussain, A. (2016). Willingness to pay for ecosystem conservation in Alaska’s Tongass National Forest: a choice modeling study. Ecology and Society, 21(2), 8-22.
  15. Ibrahim, M. S., Yacob, M. R., Samdin, Z., Ishak, M. Y., & Abdullahi, S. I. (2017). Economic valuation for improve conservation of Yankari game reserve, Bauchi, Nigeria. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 7 (3), 198–205.
  16. IUCN (2017). IUCN website. Retrieved from https://www.iucn.org/theme/marine-and-polar/our-work/marine-protected-areas
  17. Jala, & Nandagiri, L. (2015). Evaluation of Economic Value of Pilikula Lake Using Travel Cost and Contingent Valuation Methods. Aquatic Procedia, 4, 1315–1321.
  18. Lee, Y., Kim, H., & Hong, Y. (2016). Revealed Preference and Effectiveness of Public Investment in Ecological River Restoration Projects: An Application of the Count Data Model. Sustainability, 8, 353–366.
  19. Liu, K., & Ichinose, T. (2017). Hedonic Price Modeling of New Residential Property Values in Xi’an City, China. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 5(9), 42–56.
  20. O’ Garra, T. (2007). Estimating the total economic value (TEV) of the Navakavu LMMA (Locally managed marine area) in Vitu Levu island (Fiji). Final report. The University of the South Pacific, pp 140.
  21. Yacob, M. R., Radam, A., & Shuib, A. (2009). A contingent valuation study of marine parks ecotourism: The case of Pulau Payar and Pulau Redang in Malaysia. Journal of Sustainable Development, 2(2), 95-105.

Most read articles by the same author(s)