Dysphemism in Sundanese comment columns on social media news: A sociopragmatic study of the Ridwan Kamil–Lisa Mariana case (Penggunaan disfemisme dalam ruangan komen berita media sosial berbahasa Sunda: Satu kajian sosiopragmatik terhadap kes Ridwan Kamil–Lisa Mariana)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
While rapid digitalisation facilitates online cross-cultural communication, it also accelerates the proliferation of online impoliteness, particularly through the weaponisation of regional languages in political discourse. This study aims to investigate the sociopragmatic use of Sundanese-language dysphemism in social media comment sections, specifically focusing on the viral controversy involving public figures Ridwan Kamil and Lisa Mariana on Instagram. In conducting this research, we opted for a qualitative descriptive approach with purposive sampling. A final sample of 24 comments was extracted from platform X and Instagram, specifically from Ridwan Kamil’s official accounts and related trending news pages between March 2025 and August 2025, using observation and recording techniques. The data were then analysed and categorised based on Allan and Burridge’s (1991) framework of dysphemism. The results indicate that netizen responses come out as abusive language that can be put into two main groups: (1) taboo language that goes along with taboo actions, and (2) derogatory swearing. The latter frequently appears through human-to-animal comparisons, nicknames targeting physical conditions, nicknames related to mental disorders, and expressions of contempt toward an individual’s character. Practically, these insights serve as a critical reflection on digital etiquette and regional language literacy, highlighting the pressing need for character development and healthier online interaction guidelines among the younger generation. This study offers a significant contextual contribution to sociopragmatics by explicitly mapping how a regional language (Sundanese) is utilised as a tool for digital aggression within contemporary Indonesian political discourse, a domain under-explored in previous literature.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-14Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
References
Allan, K., & Burridge, K. (1991). Euphemism and dysphemism: Language used as shield and weapon. Oxford University Press.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa, Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. (n.d.) Kamus besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI). Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa, Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia.
Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings (pp. 269–293). Penguin Books.
Idzni, N. F. (2024). Arti kata goblok dan 13 sinonimnya dalam KBBI, jangan asal katakan. detikcom. https://www.detik.com/jabar/berita/d-7670386/arti-kata-goblok-dan-13-sinonimnya-dalam-kbbi-jangan-asal-katakan
Laili, E. N. (2017). Disfemisme dalam perspektif semantik, sosiolinguistik, dan analisis wacana. Jurnal LiNGUA, 12(2), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.18860/ling.v12i2.4038
Leech, G. (1993). Prinsip-prinsip pragmatik. Penerbit Universitas Indonesia.
Mudjiono, Y. (2007). Strategi komunikasi. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 1(2), 126.
Mulyana, D. (2017). Ilmu komunikasi: Suatu pengantar. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Noda, H., Takayama, Y., & Kobayashi, T. (2014). Nihongo no hairyo hyougen no tayousei: Rekishiteki henka to chiriteki shakaiteki hen'i. Kuroshio Shuppan.
Prayitno, H. J. (2017). Studi sosiopragmatik (G. K. Assidik, Ed.). Gallant Karunia.
Rahardi, K., Setyaningsih, Y., & Dewi, R. P. (2019). Pragmatik fenomena ketidaksantunan berbahasa. Erlangga.
Searle, J. R. (1996). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.
Suganda, D., Yuliawati, S., & Darmayanti, N. (2022). Expression of emotion as impoliteness markers in comment columns in Instagram Indonesia: A pragmatic study. RENTAS: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastera dan Budaya, 1, 119–136. https://doi.org/10.32890/rentas2022.1.4
Tuan Ibharim, M. Z., & Alimi, K. F. (2024). Subtitling Malay taboo language into English: The case of The Assistant (2022). RENTAS: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastera dan Budaya, 3, 121–143. https://doi.org/10.32890/rentas2024.3.6
Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding pragmatics. Arnold.
Wijana, I. D. P., & Rohmadi, M. (2006). Sosiolinguistik: Kajian teori dan analisis. Pustaka Pelajar.