Expression of emotion as impoliteness markers in Instagram comments section in Indonesia: A pragmatic study (Ekspresi emosi sebagai penanda ketidaksantunan dalam ruangan komen Instagram di Indonesia: Satu kajian pragmatik)
Main Article Content
Abstract
The development of social media in Indonesia has increased sharply and is marked by the use of social media by almost half of Indonesia's population. One of the social media that Indonesians are interested in is Instagram. On Instagram, users can carry out social, economic, cultural, and language interactions. Thus, it is significant to study language interactions used to mark the emotional expression of speakers through the use of curses. The present study is entitled “Expression of Emotion as Impoliteness Markers in Instagram Comments Section in Indonesia: A Pragmatic Study”. The study aims to describe the form, reference, and impact of using emotional expressions as impoliteness markers. The meaning of the emotional expression in this study is limited to the use of swear words on three popular Instagram accounts in Indonesia. This study used the descriptive qualitative method. Data were collected using observation and note-taking techniques and then classified based on form, reference, and impoliteness. The theory used in this research is the theory of the form and reference of swear words in Indonesian developed by Wijana (2004) and the theory of impoliteness by Culpeper (2008). Based on the results of the study, it is known that the swear words in the Instagram accounts which are used based on their form consist of words, phrases, and clauses. The references of swear words that appeared include characteristics/conditions, animals, objects, body parts, spirits, activities, and professions. The form and reference to the curse words mark (a) positive impoliteness, (b) negative impoliteness, and (c) sarcasm or pseudo-politeness. These three forms of impoliteness occurred because what the speakers said contradicted what was considered by the interlocutors, and what was stated by the speakers was considered to violate the cultural norms/values that exist in Indonesia, so the interlocutor resorted to scolding to express their emotional expressions. The research findings can be used to understand the culture of how Indonesians express their thought and feeling on social media. Furthermore, the research contributes to increasing literacy of language politeness in social media.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-14Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
References
Ardi, H., Nababan, M. R., Djatmika, & Santosa, R. (2018). Characters' politeness strategies in giving command: Should translators keep them? 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 24(2), 181-193. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2018-2402-14
Arndt, H., & R. J. (1985). Politeness revisited: Cross-modal supportive strategies. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 23.
Beebe, L. (1995). Polite fictions: Instrumental rudeness as pragmatic competence. In Linguistics and the education of language teachers: Ethnolinguistic, psycholinguistic, and sociolinguistic aspects. Georgetown University Press.
Bousfield, D. (2007). Beginnings, middles, and ends: A biopsy of the dynamics of impolite exchanges. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(12).
Brown & Levinson. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Caballero, J. A., Vergis, N., Jiang, X., & Pell, M. D. (2018). The sound of im/politeness. Speech Communication, 102(July), 39-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2018.06.004
Crystal, D. (Ed. ). (1997). The Cambridge encyclopedia of language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Culpeper, Jonathan, Derek Bousfield, and A. (2003). Impoliteness revisited: With special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. Journal of Pragmatics.
Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 23(3).
Etae, S., Krish, P., & Hussin, S. (2016). Politeness strategies by Thai EFL tertiary learners in an online forum. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 24(February), 67-80.
Fasya, M., & Suhendar, E. (2013). Variabel sosial sebagai penentu penggunaan makian dalam bahasa Indonesia. Linguistik Indonesia, 53(9), 81-102.
Izadi, A. (2013). Politeness in spoken review genre: Viva voce context. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 21(4), 1411-1429.
Jay, T., & Janschewitz, K. (2008). The pragmatics of swearing. Journal of Politeness Research, 4.
Johari, D., Ali, A. M., & Paramasivam, S. (2015). Aliterature review of rapport management in business meetings. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 23(December), 71-88.
Kasper, G. (1990). Linguistic politeness: Current research issues. Journal of Pragmatics, 14.
Kusno, A. (2015). Pematuhan dan pelanggaran prinsip kesopanan serta fungsinya dalam wacana terkait usulan dana aspirasi DPR di rubrik politik kompasiana. Jurnal Widyaparwa, 43(1).
Lakoff, R. (. (1989). The limits of politeness: Therapeutic and courtroom discourse. Multilingua, 8.
Locher, M. and R. W. (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research, 1.
Mayasari, I., & Muzaki, A. (2018). Types and markers of politeness depicted in. Inovish Journal, 3(1).
Mayasari, I., & Muzaki, A. (2019). Abusive swearing variations in the Temanggung Javanese dialect: Type and social reality. Hortatori, 3(01), 64-72.
Mirzaei Jegarlooei, S. H., & Allami, H. (2018). (Im)politeness strategies and use of discourse markers. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2018.1461048
Natisha, A. (2017). Pengguna instagram di Indonesia capai 45 juta. Antaranews.
Shum, W., & Lee, C. (2013). (Im)politeness and disagreement in two Hong Kong internet discussion forums. Journal of Pragmatics, 50(1), 52-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.01.010
Sulistyorini, H. (2019). The pragmatics of swearing: How it contextually counts. English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC), 3, 324-333.
Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4.
Tongwanchai, F. (2015). Pragmatic competence in requests of Thai learners of Spanish. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 23(December), 131-141.
Wijana, I. D. P. (2004). Makian dalam bahasa Indonesia: Studi tentang bentuk dan referensinya. Humaniora, XVI, 242-251.
Yaqin, L. N., & Shanmuganathan, T. (2020). Politeness strategies of the pembayun(s) in the bride-kidnapping practices of Sasak culture. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 28(1), 89-102.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.