Perbezaan Gender dalam Sokongan Pembelajaran dan Pencapaian Akademik : Peranan Perantara Keterlibatan Murid di Sekolah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2014.11.12Keywords:
pencapaian akademik, perbezaan gender, keterlibatan murid di sekolah, sokongan guru, sokongan ibu bapa, sokongan rakan, analisis perantaraanAbstract
References
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D. & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 427–445.
Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., & Furlong, M. J. (2008). Student engagement with school: Critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 369–386.
Archambault, I., Janosz, M., Fallu, J-S., & Pagani, L. S. (2009). Student engagement and its relationship with early high school dropout. Journal of Adolescence, 32, 651–670.
Assor, A. (2012). Allowing choice and nurturing an inner compass: Educational practices supporting students’ need for autonomy. http://mjli.uum.edu.my/ In Sandy L. Christenson, Amy L. Reschly & Cathy Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 421–440). New York: Springer.
Ayodele, M. O. (2009). Gender differences in mathematics and integrated science achievement among junior secondary school students. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 6, 41–53.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
Bempechat, J., & Shernoff, D. J. (2012). Parental influences on achievement motivation and student engagement. In L. Sandy Christenson, Amy L. Reschly & Cathy Wylie (Eds.), handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 315–342). New York: Springer.
Benner, A. D., Graham, S., & Mistry, R. S. (2008). Discering direct and mediated effects of ecological structures and processes on adolescents’ educational outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 44, 840–854.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Towards an experimental ecology of human development American Psychologist, 32, 513–531.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1989). Ecological systems theory. Annals of Child Development, 6, 187–249.
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modelling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and programming (2nd ed.). Multivariate Applications Series. New York: Routledge. CDEG (Steering Committee for Equality between Women and Men). (2011). Combating Gender Stereotypes in Education. Retrieved from http://www.coe.int
Chen, J. J.-L. (2005). Relation of academic support from parents, teachers and peers to Hong Kong adolescents’ academic achievement: The mediating role of academic engagement. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 131, 77–127.
Croninger, R. G., & Lee, V. E. (2001). Social capital and dropping out of high school: Benefits to at-risk students of teachers’ support and guidance. Teacher College Record, 103, 548–581.
Darensbourg, A. M., & Blake, J. J. (2014). Examining the academic achievement of black adolescents: Importance of peer and parental influences. Journal of Black Psychology, 40,191–212.
Darom, E., & Rich, Y. (1988). Sex differences in attitudes toward http://mjli.uum.edu.my/ school: Student self-reports and teacher perceptions. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 350–355.
Dee, T. S. (2007). Teachers and the gender gaps in student achievement. The Journal of Human Resources, 42, 528–554.
Ding, W., & Lehrer, S. F. (2007). Do peers affect student achievement in China’s secondary schools? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89, 300–312.
Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., Mac Iver, D. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48, 90–101.
Epstein, D., Elwood, J., Jey, V., & Maw, J. (1998). Failing boys: Issues in gender and achievement. Buckingham, PA: Open University Press.
Fall, A. M. & Roberts, G. (2012). High school dropouts: Interactions between social context, self-perceptions, school engagement, and student dropout. Journal of Adolescence, 5, 787–798.
Finn, J. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 5, 117–42.
Finn, J. D., Pannozzo, G. M. & Voelkl, K. E., (1995). Disruptive and inattentive withdrawn behavior and achievement among fourth graders. The Elementary School Journal, 95, 421–454.
Fredericks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109.
Freudenthaler, H. H., Spinath, B. & Neubauer, A. C. (2008). Predicting school achievement in boys and girls. European Journal of Personality, 22, 231–245.
Furlong, M. J., & Christenson, S. L. (2008). Engaging students at school and with learning: A relevant construct for all students. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 365–368.
Furrer, C. & Skinner, E. (2003); Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic achievement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 148–162.
Gerber, S. B., Finn, J. D., Achilles, C.M., & Zaharias, J. B. (2001). Teacher aides and students’ academic achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 123–143.
Hair F. J., Black W. C., Babin B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). United States: Prentice Hall.
Hays, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation http://mjli.uum.edu.my/ analysis in the new millenium. Communication Monographs, 76 (4), 408–420.
Hipkins, R. (2012). The engaging nature of of teaching for competency development. In Sandy L. Christenson, Amy L. Reschly & Cathy Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp.441–456). New York: Springer.
Juvonen, J., Espinoza, G. & Knifsend, C. (2012). The role of peer relationships in student academic and extracurricular engagement. In Sandy L. Christenson, Amy L. Reschly & Cathy Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 387–403). New York: Springer.
Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi. (2012). Enrolmen pelajar di IPTA dan IPTS mengikut bidang pengajian 2010 dan 2011. Capaian daripada http://www.mohe.gov.my
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2001). Kajian pencapaian akademik pelajar lelaki dan perempuan. Zalizan Mohd Jelas, Khadijah Rohani Mohd Yunus, Hazadiah Mohd Dahan & Ma’rof Redzuan (Penyelidik), Laporan yang diserahkan ke Jabatan Pengajian Tinggi, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. UKM: UKM Pakar runding.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013–2025. Dicapai daripada http://www.moe.gov.my
Kelley, K. & Preacher, K. J. (2012). On effect size. Psychological Methods, 17 (2), 137–152.
Kenny-Benson, G. A., Pomerantz, E. M., Ryan, A. M. & Patrick, H. (2006). Sex differences in math performance: The role of children’s approach to schoolwork. Developmental Psychology, 42, 11–26.
Lam, S. F., Jimerson, S., Kikas, E. Cefai, C., Verga, F. H., Nelson, B., Hatzichristou, C., Polychroni, F., Basnett, J., Duck, R., Farrell, P., Liu, Y., Negovan, V., Shin, H., Stanculescu, E., Wong, B. P. H., Yang, H. & Zollneritsch, J. (2012). Do girls and boys perceive themselves as equally engaged in school? The results of an international study from 12 countries. Journal of School Psychology, 50, 77–94.
Li, Y., Lerner, J. V., & Lerner, R. M. (2010). Personal and ecological assets and academic competence in early adolescence: The mediating role of school engagement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 801–815.
Mahatmya, D., Lohman, B. J., Matjasko, J. L., & Farb, A. F. (2012). In Sandra L. Christenson, Amy L. Reschly & Cathy Wylie http://mjli.uum.edu.my/ (Eds.), Handbook of research on Student Engagement. New York: Springer.
MCEETYA Gender Equity Taskforce, (1996). Gender equity framework for Australian schools. Retrieved from http://www.mceecdya.edu.au
Morton, B. S. & Chen, R. (2009). Peer and parent influences on school engagement among early adolescents. Youth & Society Journal, 41, 3–25.
Nor Aniza Ahmad, Zalizan Mohd Jelas & Manisah Mohd Ali. (2010). The relationship of learning styles and learning strategies with academic achievement between gender and type of school. International Journal on Learning, 17, 265–278. Nor Aniza Ahmad, Zalizan Mohd Jelas & Manisah Mohd Ali. (2011). The relationship of learning styles and strategies based on gender and type of school. International Journal of Learning, 17, 265-278.
Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26, 237–257.
Perry, J. C., Liu, X. & Pabian, Y. (2010). School engagement as a mediator of academic performance among urban youth: The role of career preparation, parental career support, and teacher support. The Counseling Psychologist, 38, 269–295.
Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K. & Allen, J. P. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualising, measuring and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In Sandy L. Christenson, Amy L. Reschly & Cathy Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp.365-386). New York: Springer.
Raftery, J. N, Grolnick, W. S. & Flamm, E. S. (2012). Families as facilitators of stududent engagement: Toward a home-school partnership model. In Sandra L. Christenson, Amy L. Reschly & Cathy Wylie (Eds.). Handbook of research on student engagement (343–364). New York: Springer.Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In Sandra L. Christenson, Amy L. Reschly & Cathy Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement New York: Springer.
Roeser, R., Eccles, J. S. & Sameroff, A. J. (2000). School as context of early adolescent’s academic and social-emotional http://mjli.uum.edu.my/ development: A summary of research findings. Elementary School Journal, 100, 443–471.
Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher-student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81, 493–529.
Ryan, A. M. (2001). The peer group as a context for the development of young adolescent motivation and achievement. Journal Society for Research in Child Development, 72, 1135–1150.
Ryan, A. M. & Patrick, H. (2001). The classroom social environment and changes in adolescents’ motivation and engagement during middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 437–460.
Ruban, L., & McCoach, D. B. (2005). Gender differences in explaining grades using structural equation modelling. The Review of Higher Education, 28, 475–502.
Sharifah Azizah Syed Sahil & Rosna Awang Hashim. (2011). The roles of social support in promoting adolescents’ classroom cognitive engagement through academic self-efficacy. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 8, 49–69.
Steinmayr, R., & Spinath, B. (2008). Sex differences in school achievement: What are the roles of personality and achievement motivation? European Journal of Personality, 22, 185–209. United States Agency for International Development (U.S.A.I.D.) (2005). A gender analysis of the educational achievement of boys and girls in the Jamaican educational system. Retrieved from http://pdf.usaid.gov
Waanders, C., Mendez, J., & Downer, J. (2007). Parent characteristics, economic stress and neighbourhood context as predictors of parent involvement in preschool children’s education. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 619–636.
Wang, M. T., Willett, J. B. & Eccles, J. S. (2011). The assessment of school engagement: Examining dimensionality and measurement invariance by gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 465–480.
Wang, M. T., & Holcombe, R. (2010). Adolescents’ perceptions of classroom environment, school engagement, and academic achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 633–662.
Warrington, M., Younger, M., & Williams, J. (2000). Student http://mjli.uum.edu.my/ attitude, image and the gender gap. British Educational Research Journal, 26, 393–407.
Wentzel, K. R. (1999). Social-motivational processes and interpersonal realthionship: Implication for understanding students; Academic success. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 76–97.
Wentzel, K.R. (2005). Peer relationship, motivation, and academic performance at school. In A. Elliot & C. Dweck (Eds), Handbook of competence and motivation. New York: Guilford.
Wentzel, K. R. (2009). Students’ relationships with teachers ad motivational context. In K. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school. Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
Wilson, C. M. (2009). The relation among parental factors and achievement of African American urban youth. The Journal of Negro Education, 78, 102–113.
Woolley, M. E. & Grogan-Kaylor, A. (2006). Protective family factors in the context of neighborhood: Promoting positive school outcomes. Family Relations, 55, 95–106.
Zalizan Mohd Jelas & Hazadiah M. Dahan. (2010). Gender and educational performance: The Malaysian perspective. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 7, 720 –727. Zalizan Mohd Jelas, Saemah Rahman, Roselan Baki & Jamil Ahmad. (2005). Prestasi akademik mengikut gender. Jurnal Pendidikan, 30, 93–111.
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-21Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
- OpenCitations 0 View →
- Crossref 0 View →
- Scopus 0 not indexed View →
- Google Scholar no free count Search →
- Dimensions no free count Search →
