Teacher Autonomy Support: Does it Hinder Motivation among Thai Students?

Authors

  • Amrita Kaur School of Education and Modern Languages, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Rosna Awang Hashim School of Education and Modern Languages, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Mohammad Noman School of Education and Modern Languages, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2014.11.9

Keywords:

teacher autonomy support, motivation, quasi experimental, Thai education reforms, Self-determination theory

Abstract

Purpose â€“ This article examined the relevance of teacher autonomy support [TAS] among Thai students. It is based on a study conducted to compare the effects of TAS on motivation among Thai students. The issue of motivation among Asian students has invited controversy as few cross-cultural relativists have claimed that Asian students get motivated when teachers use controlling strategies.
 
Methodology â€“ The study collected data through a quasiexperimental study with an appended ABA withdrawal design. The subjects were 105 Thai students who completed self-reported questionnaires that assessed perceived autonomy support, intrinsic motivation and self-regulation, before, after and on withdrawal of experiment intervention.
 
Findings â€“ MANOVA results revealed that students in the experimental group who were in the autonomy supportive teachinglearning environment reported greater interest, effort, relatedness and integrated regulation compared to the control group taught using a traditional approach. Furthermore, students in the experimental group experienced less pressure and reported less external regulation compared to the control group.
 
Significance â€“ The findings support the claim in Self-determination theory (SDT) that autonomy is not a culturally bound value, and is a pedagogical concept equally relevant to Thai students as it facilitates motivation. The fi ndings will encourage Thai educators to adopt autonomy as a pedagogical concept that will help facilitate motivation among their students.

References

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Razavieh, A. (2005). Introduction to research in education (7th ed). Wadsworth: Thomson learning.

Assor, A., Kaplan, H., & Roth, G. (2002). Choice is good, but relevance is excellent: Autonomy-enhancing and suppressing teacher behaviours in predicting student’s engagement in school work. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 261–278.

Atagi, R. (2002). Thailand education reform project. School reform policy, final report. ADB TA 3585 THA. Retrieved from http://www.worldedreform.com

Bao, X., & Lam, S. (2008). Who makes the choice? Rethinking the role of autonomy and relatedness in Chinese children’s motivation. Child Development, 79, 269–283.

Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84, 740–756.

Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in a work organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 580–590.

Deci, E. L., Eghrari, H., Patrick, B. C., & Leone, D. (1994). Facilitating internalization: The self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62, 119–142.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Facilitating optimal motivation and psychological well-being across life’s domains. Canadian Psychology, 49, 14–23.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behaviour. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. http://mjli.uum.edu.my/

Chalapati, S.( 2007b). The internationalisation of higher education in Thailand: case studies of two English-medium business graduate programs (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://researchbank.rmit.edu.

Chirkov, V. I., Ryan, R. M., Kim, Y., & Kaplan, U. (2003). Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: A self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 97–110.

Fry. G. W. (2002).Synthesis Report: From crisis to opportunity, the challenges of educational reform in Thailand. Report for the Office of the National Education Commission and the Asian Development Bank (TA 3585-THA).

Hardré, P. L., Chen, C. H., Huang, S. H., Chiang, C.T., Jen, F. L., & Warden, L. (2006). Factors affecting High School Student’s Academic Motivation in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 26(2),189–207.

Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127.

Iyengar, S. S., & De Voe, S. E. (2003). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. In V.Murphy – Berman & J. J. Berman (Eds), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Cross-cultural differences in perspective on self (Vol. 49, pp. 129–174). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (1999). Rethinking the value of choice: A cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 349–366.

Jang, H., Reeve, J., Ryan, R. M., & Kim, A. (2009). Can self-determination theory explain what underlies the productive, satisfying learning experiences of collectivistically-oriented Korean adolescents? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 644–661.

Jordon, J. V. (1997). Do you believe that the concepts of self and autonomy are useful in understanding women? In J.V. Jordon (Ed), women’s growth in diversity, (pp. 29–32). New York: The Guilford Press.

Littlewood, W. (1999). Defining and developing autonomy in East Asian contexts. Applied Linguistics, 20, 1, 71–94.

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. K. (2003). Models of agency: Sociocultural diversity in the construction of action. In V. Murphy-Berman & J. J. Berman (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium http://mjli.uum.edu.my/ on Motivation: Vol. 49. Cross cultural differences in perspectives on the self (pp. 1–57). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 92, 224–253.

McAuley, E. Duncun, T. & Tammen, V. V. (1989). Psychometric properties of the intrinsic motivation inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sports, 60(1), 48–58.

Miserandino, M. (1996). Children who do well in school: Individual differences in perceived competence and autonomy in above-average children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 203–214.

Muongmee, S. (2007). The role of lifelong learning and self-directed learning in educational reform in Thailand. Educational Journal of Thailand, 33(1), 1 January-December 2007.

Nguyen, T. H. (2005). Cultural background for ESL/EFL teachers cuyahoga community college. Paper appeared in a multicultural project at Northeast ABLE Resource Center (Ohio).

Pennington, M., (1999). Asia takes a crash course in educational reform. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org

Reeve, J. (1998). Autonomy support as an interpersonal motivating style: Is it teachable? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 312–330.

Reeve, J. (2006). Teachers as facilitators: What autonomy-supportive teachers do and why their students benefit. Elementary School Journal, 106, 225–236.

Reeve, J., Bolt, E., & Cai, Y. (1999). Autonomy-supportive teachers: How they teach and motivate students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 537–548.

Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 147–169.

Reeve, J. & Jang, H. (2006). What teachers say and do to support students’ autonomy during a learning activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 209–218.

Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, http://mjli.uum.edu.my/ 749–761.

Ryan, R. M., Connell, J. P., & Plant, R. W. (1990). Emotions in non-directed text learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 2, 1–17.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). An overview of self-determination theory. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3-33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74, 1557–1586.

Wallace, M. (1996, October) Traditional cultural themes in the hearts of today’s Northern Thai youth. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Thai Studies: Theme III (pp. 201-212). Chiangmai University Thailand.

Weiss, H. M., & Beal, D. J. (2005). Reflections on affective events theory. In N. M. Ashkanasy, W. J. Zerbe, & C. E. Hrtel (Eds.), Research on emotions in organizations: The effect of affect in organizational settings (vol. 1, pp. 1-21). UK: Elsevier, Ltd.

Yamauchi, H., & Tanaka, K. (1998). Relations of autonomy, self-referenced beliefs and self-regulated learning among Japanese children. Psychological Reports, 82, 803–816.

Zhou, M., Ma, W. J., & Deci, E. L. (2009). The importance of autonomy for rural Chinese children’s motivation for learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 492–498.

Downloads

Published

25-12-2014

Issue

Vol. 11 (2014): Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction (MJLI) Vol. 11, 2014

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Kaur, A., Awang Hashim, R., & Noman, M. (2014). Teacher Autonomy Support: Does it Hinder Motivation among Thai Students? Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 11, 171-189. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2014.11.9

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-21
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/mjli2014.11.9