Reflecting on Malaysian Teacher Trainees’ Journals

Authors

  • Aizan Yaacob School of Education and Modern Languages, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Lynne Masel Walters Texas A&M University, United States
  • Ruzlan Md Ali School of Education and Modern Languages Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Sarimah Shaik Abdullah School of Education and Modern Languages Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Timothy Walters School of Multimedia Technology and Communication Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2014.11.1

Keywords:

Action research, critical thinking, Malaysia, teacher trainees, reflection, journals

Abstract

Purpose â€“ In this study, 37 English Language Teaching (ELT) teacher trainees from a Malaysian university conducted an action-research project to determine whether journals kept during their fi eldwork in primary schools located in an area close to the university allowed them to reflect on their beliefs and behaviors in the classroom.
 
Methodology â€“ Themes were revealed using emergent coding in their journals. Van Manen’s (1977) three-stage model (practical, technical and critical) was used to determine the issues raised and the level of critical reflection reached in the journal entries
 
Findings â€“ The findings indicated that the teacher trainees demonstrated practical and technical level thinking, but rarely rose to the critical level of reflection. Nonetheless, they also demonstrated changes in their beliefs and behaviours, essential for professional development.
 
Significance â€“ Reflective thinking is critical to teaching and is important in the United States and in countries striving to replicate its pedagogical tools and techniques. However, many Western practices associated with the nurturing of critical thinking are not familiar to Malaysian teacher trainees. We conclude that prospective teachers here do use their journals to reflect on their educational practice, but not at the deepest levels of insight. Critical thinking must be taught to Malaysian teacher trainees and filtered through the local culture if it is to improve teaching and learning in the nation’s classrooms.
 

References

Adler, S. (1991). The reflective practitioner and the curriculum of teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 17(2), 139–150.

Bailin, S. W., & Siegel, H. (2003). Critical thinking. In Blake, H., Smeyers, P., Smith, R. & Standish, P. (Eds.), The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Education (pp. 181–193). Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell. http://mjli.uum.edu.my/

Bean, T. & Stevens, L. (2002). Scaffolding reflection for preservice and inservice teachers. Reflective Practice, 3(2), 205–218.

Boyd, P.C., Boll, M., Brawner, L., & Villaume, S.K. (1998). Becoming reflective professionals: An exploration of pre-service teacher’s struggles as they translate language and literacy into practice. Action in Teacher Education, XIX(4), 61–75.

Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical. London: Falmer Press.

Collier, S. (1999). Characteristics of reflective thought during the student teaching experience. Journal of Teacher Education, 50(3), 173–181.

Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Educational Review, 57, 23–48.

Flores, B. (2001). Bilingual education teachers’ beliefs and their relation to self-reported practices. Bilingual Research Journal, 25(3), 251–275.

Francis, D. (1995). The reflective journal: A window to preservice teachers’ practical knowledge. Teaching & Teacher Education, 11(3), 229–241.

Gore, J., & Zeichner, K. (1991). Action research and reflective teaching in preservice teacher education: A case study from the United States. Teaching and teacher education, 7(2), 119–136.

Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching & Teacher Education, 11, 33–49.

Hoover, L. (1994). Reflective writing as a window on preservice teachers’ thought process. Teaching & Teacher Education, 10(1), 83–93.

Isikoglu, N. (2007). The role of reflective journals in early childhood pre-service teachers professional development. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 7(2), 819–825.

Kabilan, M.K. (2007). English language teachers reflecting on reflections: A Malaysian experience. TESOL Quarterly, 41(4), 681–705.

Kaur Sidhu, G., & Kaur, S. (2010). Pathways to reflective learning and teacher development: Insights from teacher trainees’ diaries. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 35(1), 47–57. http://mjli.uum.edu.my/

Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner. Melbourne, Australia: Deakin University.

Kennedy, J. (1993). Meeting the needs of teacher trainees on teaching practice. ELT Journal, 47(2), 157–165.

Karabenick, S., & Noda, P. (2004). Professional development implication of teachers’ beliefs and attitudes toward English language learners. Bilingual Research Journal, 28(1), 55–61.

Lasley, T. (1992). Promoting Teacher Reflection. Journal of Staff Development, 13, 24–29.

Lai, G., & Calandra, B. (2007). Using online scaffolds to enhance preservice teachers’ reflective journal writing: A qualitative analysis. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 3(3), 66–81.

Maarof, N. (2007). Telling his or her story through reflective journals. International Education Journal, 2007, 8(1), 205–220.

McGee, A. (2008). Critical Reflections of action research used for professional development in a Middle Eastern Gulf State. Educational Action Research, 16(2), 253–250

Ministry of Education. (1994). Practicum I guidebook for five-semester teacher training programme at teacher colleges in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Education.

Noffka, S., & Brennan, M. (1988, April). The dimensions of reflections, A conceptual and contextual analysis. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AERAA, New Orleans, Louisiana.

Phipps, J. J. (2005). E-Journaling: Achieving interactive education online. Educause Quarterly (1), 62–65.

Risko, V., Vukelich, C., & Roskos, K. (2002). Preparing teachers for reflective practice: Intentions, contradictions, and possibilities. Language Arts, 80(2), 134–144.

Smith, D., & Lovat, T. (1991). Curriculum: Action on reflection (2nd ed.). Wentworth Falls, New South Wales: Social Science Press.

Subramanian, M. (2012). Journal writing as a tool for teacher trainees: Reflection on teaching. Retrieved from http://www. ipbl.edu.my.

Usher, K., Tollefson, J., & Francis, D. (2001). Moving from technical to critical reflection on journaling: An investigation of students’ ability to incorporate three levels of reflective http://mjli.uum.edu.my/ writing. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19(1), 15–19.

Valli, L. (1990). Moral imperatives in reflective teacher education programs. In R.T. Clift, W.R. Houston, & M. Pugach (Eds.)’ Encouraging reflective practice: An examination of issues and exemplars (pp. 39–56). New York: Teachers College Press.

Van Manen, M. (1977). Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical. Curriculum Inquiry, 6, 205–228.

Van Manen, M. (1991). Reflectivity and the pedagogical moment: The normativity of pedagogical thinking and acting. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 23, 507–53.

Walters, L., Green, M., Wang, L., & Walters T. (2011). From heads to hearts: Digital stories as reflection artifacts of teachers’ international experience. Issues in Teacher Education, 20 (2), 37–52.

Wellington, J. (2000). Educational research: Contemporary issues and practical approaches. New York, New York: Continuum.

Yinger, R. & Clark, C. (1981). Reflective journal writing: Theory and practice. Institute for Research on Teaching. East Lansing, Michigan: Michigan State University.

Downloads

Published

25-12-2014

Issue

Vol. 11 (2014): Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction (MJLI) Vol. 11, 2014

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Yaacob, A., Walters, L. M., Md Ali, R., Abdullah, S. S., & Walters, T. (2014). Reflecting on Malaysian Teacher Trainees’ Journals. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 11, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2014.11.1

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-21
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/mjli2014.11.1 OpenAlex W7033454596