Trainee Teachers’ Critical Thinking in an Online Discussion Forum: A Content Analysis

Authors

  • Irfan Naufal Umar Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Noor Hazita Ahmad Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2010.7.4

Keywords:

online discussion forum, critical thinking, teacher Training

Abstract

Purpose â€“ The application of asynchronous mode of computermediated communication such as the online discussion forum is becoming more prevalent in our learning environment. Online forum is important for learning to take place as it allows the creation of a "virtual community of inquiry" that encourages problem solving, critical thinking, and knowledge construction. Thus, this study sought to analyse the content of trainee teachers’ discussion in an online forum, especially in terms of their critical thinking levels. An online discussion forum was created for the trainee teachers to discuss their experience and problems encountered during the teaching practicum.
 
Method â€“ A total of 30 Universiti Sains Malaysia pre-service teachers who underwent 20 weeks of teaching practice in secondary schools were involved in this study. The Newman, Webb and Cochrane (1995) framework was used to analyse the students’ levels of critical thinking skills as indicated in their messages or reflections. The depth of the their critical thinking in terms of relevance, importance, novelty, accuracy, linking ideas or interpretation, justification, critical assessment, and practical utility were of interest in this study.
 
Findings â€“ Throughout the 20 weeks of teaching practice, a total of 896 positive critical thinking indicators were recorded from the participants’ discussion. Their reflections focused mainly on the aspects of relevance, importance, and justification of the issues being discussed. However, the trainees hardly tried to bring outside knowledge or experience to address problems, and their input barely refl ected their width of understanding in discussing the issues. The online discussion forum, nevertheless, has provided a platform for the trainees to share and reflect their problems during the teaching practicum session.
76
Value â€“ The paper explores the potential of an online discussion forum to be applied during teacher practice session. Based on these findings, it is recommended that our teacher training institutions integrate this technology into their curriculum.
 

References

Abu, B. (2006). Tahap kesediaan pedagogi guru pelatih Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia dalam latihan mengajar. Paper presented at the Faculty of Education Colloquium, Johor.

Chan, F. M. (2002). ICT in Malaysian schools: Policy and strategies. Retrieved August 28, 2009 from http://www.apdip. net/projects/ 2003/asian-forum/resources/my-ict-edu.pdf

Chung, C. J. (2005). Teacher experiences of learning in a computer-mediated communication context. Retrieved October 20, 2009 from www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/Research/ NECC Research Palper Archives/NECC2005/Chung-Chia-Chung-NECC05.pdf 84 MJLI VOL. 7 (2010)

Garrison, D. R. (1992). Critical thinking and self-directed learning in adult education: An analysis of responsibility and control issues. Adult Education Quarterly, 42(3), 136-148.

Gokhale, A. A. (1995). Collaborative learning enhance critical thinking. Journal of Technology Education,

Greenlaw, S. A. & DeLoach, S.B. (2003). Teaching critical thinking with electronic discussion. Journal of Economic Education, 34 (Winter), 36-53.

Kasa, Z., Asimirin S., Jamian, A. R., & Othman, Y., (2001). Persepsi pelatih terhadap latihan mengajar. Suara Pendidik, 23, 20-30. http://mjli.uum.edu.my

Kassim, A. H., Kamaruddin M. I., Ali M. B., Abu M. S., & Osman (1994). Penilaian penyeliaan latihan praktik mengajar dari perspektif guru pelatih. Paper presented at the Teacher Practice Seminar.

Landis, M., Swain, K. D., Friehe, M. J. & Coufal, K. L. (2007). Evaluating critical thinking in class and online: Comparison of the Newman Method and the Facione rubric. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 28(3), 135-143.

MacKnight, C. B. (2000). Teaching critical thinking through online discussions. Educause Quarterly, 4, 38-41.

Meyer, K. (2003). Face-to-face versus threaded discussion: The role of time and higher-order thinking. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3).

Newman, D. R., Webb, B., & Cochrane, C. (1995). A content analysis method to measure critical thinking in face-to-face and computer supported group learning. Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century, 3(2), 67-88.

Ngah N. A. (1994). Using compter network as an educational tool: A case study of education online. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Purdue University.

Othman, H., & Hamzah M. D. (2001). Latihan mengajar kendalian sekolah: Penerokaan komponen-komponen kecekapan mengajar guru pelatih pra-siswazah. Paper presented at the Conference on Challenges and Prospects in Teacher Education. Kuala Lumpur.

Ou, C., Ledoux, T., & Crooks, S. M. (2004). The effects of instructor presence on critical thinking in asynchronous online discussion. In C. Crawford et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, (pp. 2989-2993). Chesapeake,VA; AACE. MJLI VOL. 7 (2010) 85

Schafersman, S. D. (1991). An introduction to critical thinking. Retrieved February 18, 2008, from http://www.freeinquiry. com/criticalthinking.html

Schriven, M., & Paul, R. (n.d.). Defining critical thinking: A draft statement for National Council for Critical Thinking. Retrieved January 27, 2009, from www.criticalthinking.org/ university/defining.html

Toh, W. S. (2001). Measuring practicum student teachers’ reflectivity: The reflective pedagogical thinking scale. Retrieved October 20, 2009, from www.ipbl.edu.my/inter/ http://mjli.uum.edu.my penyelidikan/ 2001/2001_toh.pdf

Yahya, A., Subuh, A., Zurihani, & Yahya, F. (2005). Aplikasi kognitif dalam pendidikan. 86 MJLI VOL. 7 (2010)

Downloads

Published

31-01-2010

Issue

Vol. 7 (2010): Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction (MJLI) Vol. 7, 2010

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Umar, I. N., & Ahmad, N. H. (2010). Trainee Teachers’ Critical Thinking in an Online Discussion Forum: A Content Analysis. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 7, 75-91. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2010.7.4

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-09
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/mjli2010.7.4 OpenAlex W4384636383