The Role of Attention and Consistency with Schema Expectation in Memory for Objects in Place

Authors

  • Norehan Zulkiply Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Malaysia
  • John M. Gardiner University of Sussex, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2007.4.2

Abstract

The role of attention and consistency with schema expectation in memory for objects in place were examined in one experiment. Forty participants were asked to study a picture of either the graduate student office or the preschool classroom, and either under full attention condition or under divided attention condition. Sixteen stimulus items, half consistent and half inconsistent with schema expectation about the room settings were placed throughout the room. Participants were later given a free recall test, followed by a same-changed recognition memory test immediately after that. The results show that participants remembered better under full attention condition than under divided attention condition. Items inconsistent with schema expectation were better recalled and recognized than items consistent with schema expectation both under full attention and divided attention conditions. These results support the findings on the consistency effect in some previous studies. More importantly, the present study reveals the influence of manipulation of attention on the consistency effect. The results show that consistency effect occurs in both conditions, with a greater effect reported under divided attention condition than under full attention condition. Reducing the participants’ attention increases the consistency effect.

 

References

Baroni, M.R., Job, R., Mainardi Peron, E., & Salmaso, P. (1980). Memory for natural settings: Role of diffuse and focused attention. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 51, 883-889.

Bobrow, D.G., & Norman, D.A. (1975). Some principles of memory schemata. In Bobrow, D.G. & Collins, A.M. (Eds.), Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science. New York: Academic Press, 1975.

Brewer,W.F, & Treyens, J.C. (1981). Role of schemata in memory for places. Cognitive Psychology, 13, 207-230.

Friedman, A. (1979). Framing pictures: The role of knowledge in automatized encoding and memory for gist. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 316-355.

Hastie, R., & Kumar, P.A. (1979). Person memory: Personality traits as organizing principles in memory for behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 25-38.

Lampinen, J.M., Farries, J.M., Neuschatz, J.S., Toglia, M.P. (2000). Recollections of things Schematic: The influence of scripts on recollective experience. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 543-554.

Light, L.L., Kayra-Stuart, F, & Hollander, S. (1979). Recognition memory for typical and unusual faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 212-228.

Loftus, G.R., & Mackworth, N.H.(1978). Cognitive determinants of fixation location during picture viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4, 565-572.

Mandler, J.M., & Parker, R.E. (1976). Memory for descriptive and spatial information in complex pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2, 38-48.

Pezdek, K., Whetstone, T., Reynolds, K., Askari, N., & Dougherty, T. (1989). Memory for real-world scenes: The role of consistency with expectation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 587-595.

MJLI VOL. 4 (2007) 1

Downloads

Published

31-01-2007

How to Cite

Zulkiply, N., & Gardiner, J. M. (2007). The Role of Attention and Consistency with Schema Expectation in Memory for Objects in Place. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 4, 17-34. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2007.4.2

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-09
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/mjli2007.4.2 OpenAlex W160521831