Role Play: The Relationship between Self-concept and Learner Participation in an Experiential Learning Process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2004.1.1.5Abstract
This study was carried out to find out how far students' self-concept affect their participation in the experiential learning process of role play and the extent of improvement in their self-concept as a result of participation in the role play activities. The study was guided by the four steps in Kirk's (1987) Cycle of Experiential Learning: Do, Review, Learn, Apply. Although an individual's general self-concept is determined by the interplay of various facets, only three facets of self-concept were explored, which are, Academic Self-concept, Emotional Self-Concept andSocia1 Self- Concept. The research design adopted was that of a qualitative case study. Five participants from the Pre-Commerce course of UiTM Arau Campus were selected based on homogenous characteristics. Fourteen hours of role plays were conducted and data were gathered through classroom observations, journal entries and interviews with the students and their lecturer; who was the key informant. Several pertinent themes emerged from the data. It was found that there is a positive relationship between self-concept and students' participation in role play. This could be seen from several indicators such as prolonged nervousness, language proficiency, peer influence, the role of lecturer; the impact of dominators, task suitability as well as learners' moods. It was also found that the participants experienced a certain degree of improvement in their self-concept, as reflected by reduced anxiety, an awareness of their strengths, weaknesses and gaining of insights into the situations, improvement in language proficiency, positive relationship among peers and adaptability to the tasks. It can be concluded that role play is a profitable learning activity and is useful towards improving students' self-concept.
References
Al-Arishi, A. Y. (1994). Role-play, real play, and surreal-play in the ESOL classroom. English Language Teaching Journal, 48/4, 337-346.
Armstrong, D. G., & Savage, T. V. (1998). Teaching in the secondary school. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc. www.mjli.uum.edu.my
Bambrough, P. (1994). Simulations in English teaching. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1989). Educational research (5" ed.). New York: Longman.
Cardoza, L. F. (1994). Getting a word in edgewise: Does “not talking mean not learning?” TESOL Journal, 24-27.
Coopersmith, S., & Feldman, R. (1974). Fostering a positive self-concept high self-esteem in the classroom. In Cop, R.H. & White, K. (Eds.), Psychological concepts in the classroom. New York: Harper & Row.
Dennison, B., & Kirk, R. (1990). Do, review, learn, apply: A simple guide to experiential learning. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Di Pietro, R. J. (1987). Strategic interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity Press.
Freimuth, V. S. (1982). Communication apprehension in the classroom. In Barker, L. L. (Ed.), Communication in the classroom. (pp. 121-145) Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Fogarty, R. (1995). Best practices for the learner-centred classroom. Illi-nois: Skylight Training and Publishing Inc.
Gaies, S. J. (1985). Peer involvement in language learning. Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc.
Hurt, H. T., Scott, M. D., & McCroskey, J.C. (1978). Communication in the classroom. West Virginia: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Jones, K. (1987). Simulations: A handbook for teachers and trainers. Lon-don: Kogan Page.
Jones, K. (1988). Interactive learning events: A guide for facilitators. Lon-don: Kogan Page.
Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Showers, B. (1992). Models of teaching (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. www.mjli.uum.edu.my mijli Vol. I No. 1, Jan. 2004, 85-
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning : Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Kirk, R. (1987). Learning in action activities for personal and group development.Oxford: Basil Blackwell Limited.
Ladousse, G. P. (1987). Role Play. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and cases study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Nunan, D. (1988). The learner-centred curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reid, J. (1987).The learning style preferences of ESL students. Tesol Quarterly, 21(1) 87-106.
Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York: Basic Books.
Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407-441.
Tedick, D. J., & Walker, C. L. (1994). Second language teacher education: The problems that plague us. The Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 300-312.
Tedick, D. J., & Walker, C. L. (1995). From theory to practice: How do we prepare_teachers for second language classrooms? Foreign Language Annals, 28 (4) 499-515.
Thatcher, D. (1990). Experience as learning: Implications for training and operation. Simulations/Games for Learning, 20 (3) 276-302.
Van Ments, M. (1989). The effective use of role play. (Revised Edition). London: Kogan Page.
Van Ments, M. (1990). Active talk. London: Kogan Page. www.mjli.uum.edu.my myjli Vol. I No. 1, Jan. 2004, 85-
Wolsk, D. (1975). An experience-centered curriculum. France: The Unesco Press.
Young, J. D. (1977). Role play in language teaching. RELC Journal, 8(1) 61-68. www.mjli.uum.edu.my myjli Vol. 1 No. 1, Jan. 2004, 85-
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-10Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
