A Phenomenological Inquiry of Digital Research Advising
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2026.23.1.4Keywords:
Digital research advising, lifeworlds, research advisers, remote advising, phenomenological inquiryAbstract
Purpose – Digital research advising to address the emerging needs of student researchers across different levels has become popular in recent times. This phenomenological study is aimed at exploring digital research advising as it is experienced by senior research advisers.
Methodology – Using a hermeneutic phenomenological design, the participants’ lifeworlds, their lived body, lived time, lived space, lived human relations, and lived things were analyzed using Van Manen’s contemporary model. Data was collected through in-depth interviews. Categories of themes were identified after the process of linguistic transformation.
Findings – The following five themes captured the lifeworlds of the research advisers: acknowledging corporeal connections, redefining academic space, humanizing digital advising, leveraging the digital toolbox, and investing time.
Significance – This study renders value to academic institutions and active researchers who want to appreciate and understand the meaning ascribed to the nuanced experiences of senior research advisers transitioning from traditional to digital advising. It also offers a foundation of initial insights to inform future research in diverse academic settings.
References
Argüello, G. (2020). Virtual academic advising in challenging times. In Naumovska, L. (Eds.). The impact of COVID on the international education system (pp.184–196). Proud Pen Ebooks. https://doi.org/10.51432/978-1-8381524-0-6_14
Bacus, R., Dayagbil, F., Monacillo, V., & Bustos, R. (2022). Higher education institutions’ emergency remote teaching amid the pandemic. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(8), 762-771. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.8.1682
Bower, M. (2019). Technology‐mediated learning theory. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1035–1048. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12771
Cadosales, M. N. Q., Bacus, R. C., Abao, E. L., Boholano, H. B., & Dayagbil, F. T. (2024). Online instructional supervision in an advanced higher education. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(10), 395–414. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.10.19
Campbell, S. L. (2019). Capitalizing on achievement: A critical examination of school-based mentoring programs and student achievement. Mentoring Students of Color, 13-35. https://doi.org/10.1163/ 9789004407985_002
Campbell, T., & Campbell, D. (1997). Faculty/Student mentor program: Effects on academic performance and retention. Research in Higher Education, 38, 727–742. https://doi.org/10.1023/A: 1024911904627
Commission on Higher Education. (2019). CHED Memorandum Order No. 15, s.2019. Policies, standards, and guidelines for graduate programs. https://ched.gov.ph/2019-ched-memorandum-orders/
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publication.
Dezuanni, M., Marshall, A., Cross, A., & Burgess, J. (2019). Digital mentoring in Australian communities. QUT ePrints.
Eller, L. Lev, E. L., & Feurer, A. (2014). Key components of an effective mentoring relationship: A qualitative study. Nurse Education Today, 34(5), 815–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt. 2013.07.020
Everwise. (2019). Online or in-person mentoring: Which is better? Modern Work. https://www.geteverwise.com/mentoring/online-or-in-person-mentoring-which-is-better/
Fricker, T. (2015) The Relationship between academic advising and student success in Canadian Colleges: A review of the literature. College Quarterly, 18(4).
Garringer, M., Kaufman, M., Shane, J., & Kupersmidt, J. (2019). e-mentoring. (MENTOR | Become or Find a Mentor). https://www.mentoring.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/E-Mentoring-Supplement-to-EEP-1.pdf
Gruber, J., Hargittai, E., & Nguyen, M. H. (2022). The value of face-to-face communication in the digital world: What people miss about in-person interactions when those are limited. Studies in Communication Sciences, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.24434/j.scoms.2022.03.3340
Hagan, D., Sanchez, B., Cascarino, J., & White, K. (2019). Social and emotional development in early adolescence: Tapping into the power of relationship and mentoring. MENTOR | Become or Find a Mentor. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/2236191
Holland, C., Westwood, C., & Hanif, N. (2020). Underestimating the relationship between academic advising and attainment: A case study in practice. Frontiers in Education, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00145
Ilinykh, T. (2023). The role of academic advising of students research teams in shaping student engagement and learning ownership in Russian universities. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10. 2139/ssrn.4468705
Iqbal, H. (2020). E-mentoring: An effective platform for distance learning. e-Mentor, 2(84), 54-61. https://doi.org/10.15219/em84.1463
Jaeger, A., Sandmann, L., & Kim, J. (2011) Advising graduate students doing community-engaged dissertation research: The advisor-advisee relationship. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15(4). https://compact.org/sites/default/files/2022-06/EJ957105.pdf
Kaufman, M. (2022). E-mentoring model - National Mentoring Resource Center. National Mentoring Resource Center. https://nationalmentoringresourcecenter.org/resource/e-mentoring-model/
Liang, N., Grayson, S. J., Kussman, M. A., Mildner, J. N., & Tamir, D. I. (2024). In-person and virtual social interactions improve well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 15, 100455–100455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100455
Ligadu, C., & Anhony, P. (2015). E-mentoring ‘MentorTokou’: support for mentors and mentees during the practicum. CORE – Aggregating the world’s open access research papers. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/82093778.pdf
Liu, J., Tang, T., Kong, X., Tolba, A., AL-Makhadmeh, Z., & Xia, F. (2020). Understanding the advisor-advisee relationship via scholarly data analysis. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv. 2008.08743
Liu, C., & Ammigan, R. (2022). Humanizing the academic advising experience with technology: An integrative review. In R. Ammigan, R. Y. Chan, & K. Bista (Eds.), COVID-19 and higher education in the global context: Exploring contemporary issues and challenges, 185–202. STAR Scholars.
Majoni, C., & Nyaruwata, L. (2015). Achieving effective mentoring during teaching practice in teacher education institutions. International Journal of Development Research, 5(3), 3698-3701.
Mangundu, J. (2022). Higher education institutional innovation: An analysis of challenges to e-academic advising during emergency remote teaching. South African Journal of Information Management, 24(1), a1569. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajim.v24i1.1569
Mendez, M. G., & Arguello, G. (2020). Best practices of virtual advising: The application of an online advising portal. NSUWorks.
McGill, C. (2017). The Professionalization of academic advising. FIU Digital Commons. https://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/dissertations/AAI10931604/
McGill, C. M., Ali, M., & Barton, D. (2020). Skills and competencies for effective academic advising and personal tutoring. Frontiers in Education, 5,135. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00135
Mondo, C. B. (2021). Examining the practices and challenges of virtual academic advising in higher education during COVID-19. Journal of Student Affairs, New York University, 17, 124–135.
Miraj et al. (2022). Could the academic advisor, intrinsic motivation, and time management influence students’ attitudes towards research work on campus? Work, 73(4), 1365–1378. https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-205237
Mynard, J., Kato, S., & Shelton-Strong, S. J. (2023). Learner and advisor perceptions of online advising during a pandemic. Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 14(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10. 37237/140104
Pelletier, K. (2021). The changing relationship between advising and technology. New Directions for Higher Education, 2021(195–196), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.20407
Ragins, B., & Kram, K. (2008). The handbook of mentoring at work: Theory, research, and practice. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976619
Rich, S., Graham, M., Taket, A., & Shelley., J. (2013) Navigating the terrain of lived experience: The value of lifeworld existentials for reflective analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691301200125
Santiago, E. A., Brown, C., Mahmoud, R., & Carlisle, J. (2020). Hermeneutic phenomenological human science research method in clinical practice settings: An integrative literature review. Nurse Education in Practice, 47, 102837–102837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102837
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2018). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
Schwartz et al. (2014) Mentoring in the digital age: Social media use in adult-youth relationships. Children and Youth Services Review, 47 (3), 205-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.09.004
Shrestha, C., Burke, L., May, S., & Edirisingha, P. (2009). From face‐to‐face to e‐mentoring: Does the “e” add any value for mentors? ERIC - Education Resources Information Center. Technology in education - 2023 GEM Report. (2023, November 8). 2023 GEM Report. https://gem-report-2023.unesco.org/technology-in-education/
Thuan, N. & Hiep, P. (2021). Virtual classroom connections: Enhancing three presence elements via online tools. THE Campus Learn, Share, Connect. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/campus/ virtual-classroom-connections-enhancing-three-presence-elements-online-tools
Tindowen, D. J., & Gavino, R. M. (2022). Students’ satisfaction on research advising. International Journal of Advances in Education, Social Sciences and Innovation, 1(1), 1–1.
Tinoco-Giraldo, H., María, E., & Francisco José García-Peñalvo. (2020). E-mentoring in higher education: A structured literature review and implications for future research. Sustainability, 12(11), 4344–4344. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114344
Tippayakulpairoj, D., Traiwichitkhun, D. & Piromsombat, C. (2022). Strategies for enhancing the effectiveness of theses advisor’s supervision customized to students in digital age. Journal of Education and Innovation, 24(2), 122–135.
Tindowen, J. D., & Gavino, M. R. (2022). Students’ satisfaction on research advising. International Journal of Advances in Education, Social Sciences and Innovation, 1(1), 1–1.
Wang, C. Houdyshell, M., & Plescia, M. (2022). Synchronous communication technology for remote academic advising at a state university. Scholar Works.
Weldon, D. (2020). The benefits and challenges of remote mentorship programs. CMSWire.com.
Wang, C. & Houdyshell, M. (2021). Remote academic advising using synchronous technology: Knowledge, experiences, and perceptions from students. NACADA Journal, 41(2), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.12930/nacada-20-27
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-09Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
