Collaborative Learning in Tertiary Education Classrooms : What Does It Entail?

Authors

  • Rosna Awang-Hashim School of Education, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Norhafezah Yusof School of Multimedia Technology and Communication, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Abderrahim Benlahcene College of Humanities and Sciences, Humanities and Social Sciences Research Center (HRC), Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
  • Amrita Kaur Wenzhou-Kean University, Zhejiang Province, China
  • S. Kanageswari Suppiah Shanmugam School of Education, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2023.20.2.1

Keywords:

Collaborative learning, teaching quality, student-faculty interaction, relatedness, reflective and integrative learning, higherorder thinking

Abstract

Purpose - Collaborative learning has been increasingly recognized as an effective approach to promote students’ success in higher
education. To better understand the factors that contribute to successful collaborative learning, this study applied the Biggs’ presage-processproduct (3P) general model of learning to investigate the role of teaching quality, student-faculty interaction, and relatedness as presage factors, collaborative learning as process factor, and reflective and integrative learning and higher-order thinking as product factors.

Methodology - A cross-sectional approach was applied in this study, which included 1,892 Malaysian undergraduates. The study used
the Quality of University Learning Experience (QULEX) survey to measure various constructs. First, confirmatory factor analysis
(CFA) was conducted to establish the psychometric properties of the instruments. Thereafter, structural equation modeling (SEM) was
employed to evaluate the latent variables relationships.

Findings - Based on the findings, collaborative learning fully mediated the prediction of student-faculty interaction, teaching
quality, and relatedness on reflective and integrative learning and higher-order thinking.

Significance - These findings suggest that collaborative learning with social components and effective teaching maximize students’ learning activities, and they should be fostered in academic institutions to improve students’ academic success. Implications for improving teaching and learning are also discussed in this paper.

Author Biography

  • Norhafezah Yusof, School of Multimedia Technology and Communication, Universiti Utara Malaysia

    UUM College of Arts and Sciences, Multimedia Technology and Communication

References

Arvaja, M., Häkkinen, P., & Kankaanranta, M. (2008). Collaborative learning and computer-supported collaborative learning environments. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 267–279). Springer.

Alqurashi, E. (2020). What do students engage with the most? A comparative study between high and low achieving students within online learning environments. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 1–16. Awang-Hashim, R., Kaur, A., Yusof, N., Manaf, N. A. A., Zubairi,

A. M., Voon, A. Y. S., & Malek, M. A. (2021). Reflective and integrative learning and the role of instructors and institutionsEvidence from Malaysia. Higher Education, 83(3), 1–20. Awang-Hashim, R., Yusof, N., Suppiah Shanmugam, K., Kaur, A., Abd Manaf, N., Zubairi, A., Jaafar, M.S., Yee, A. S. V., &

Abdul-Malek, M. (2019). Development and validation of an assessment tool to measure quality of undergraduate learning experiences. Technical Report submitted to MOHE. Putrajaya, Malaysia: MOHE.

Ayub, U., Yazdani, N., & Kanwal, F. (2020). Students’ learning behaviours and their perception about quality of learning experience: The mediating role of psychological safety. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 1–17.

Bai, H., & Xu, H. (2020). Fostering lifelong learning in higher education: A narrative review of recent trends and developments. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(7), 1371–1385.

Beachboard, M. R., Beachboard, J. C., Li, W., & Adkison, S. R. (2011). Cohorts and relatedness: Self-determination theory as an explanation of how learning communities affect educational outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 52(8), 853–874.

Biggs, J. B. (1993). From theory to practice: A cognitive systems approach. Higher Education Research and Development, 12(1), 73–85.

Biggs, J. B., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. (2001). The revised twofactor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 133–149.

Bong, M., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2003). Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they really?. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 1–40.

Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. 1991 ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports. Washington, DC: School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University: ERIC Clearinghouse on Higher Education.

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2018). How people learn II: Learners, contexts, and cultures. National Academies Press. (p. 132)

Brown, S. A., & McIntyre, D. (1993). Making sense of teaching. Open University Press.

Bruno, A., & Dell’Aversana, G. (2018). Reflective practicum in higher education: The influence of the learning environment on the quality of learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(3), 345–358.

Buitrago, A. G. (2017). Collaborative and self-directed learning strategies to promote fluent EFL speakers. English Language Teaching, 10(5), 139–157.

Bunce, L., & Bennett, M. (2019). A degree of studying? Approaches to learning and academic performance among student ‘consumers’. Active Learning in Higher Education, 22(3), 203–214.

Chen, C., Jones, K. T., & Xu, S. (2018). The association between students’ style of learning preferences, social presence, collaborative learning and learning outcomes. Journal of Educators Online, 15(1), 1–16.

de Borba, G. S., Alves, I. M., & Campagnolo, P. D. B. (2020). How learning spaces can collaborate with student engagement and enhance student-faculty interaction in higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 45(1), 51–63.

De Hei, M. S. A., Strijbos, J.-W., Sjoer, E., & Admiraal, W. (2015). Collaborative learning in higher education: Lecturers’ practices and beliefs. Research Papers in Education, 30(2), 232–247.

Douglass, J. A., Thomson, G., & Zhao, C.-M. (2012). The learning outcomes race: The value of self-reported gains in large research universities. Higher Education, 64(3), 317–335.

Erten, I. H., & Erten, S. (2021). Collaborative learning and its effects on students’ academic achievement and attitudes towards business ethics. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 37(1), 20–31.

Evertson, C. M., & Weinstein, C. S. (2013). Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues. Routledge.

Farrell, T. S. (2013). Reflective Teaching. TESOL International Association. Fauth, B., Wagner, W., Bertram, C., Göllner, R., Roloff, J., Lüdtke,

O.,... Trautwein, U. (2020). Don’t blame the teacher? The need to account for classroom characteristics in evaluations of teaching quality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(6), 1284–1302.

Fedesco, H. N., Bonem, E. M., Wang, C., & Henares, R. (2019). Connections in the classroom: Separating the effects of instructor and peer relatedness in the basic needs satisfaction scale. Motivation and Emotion, 43(5), 758–770.

Fryer, L. K., & Bovee, H. N. (2016). Supporting students’ motivation for e-learning: Teachers matter on and offline. The Internet and Higher Education, 30, 21–29. Gasiewski, J. A., Eagan, M. K., Garcia, G. A., Hurtado, S., & Chang, M.

J. (2012). From gatekeeping to engagement: A multicontextual, mixed method study of student academic engagement in introductory STEM courses. Research in Higher Education, 53(2), 229–261.

Ghavifekr, S. (2020). Collaborative learning : A key to enhance students’ social interaction. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 8(4), 9–21. Gleason, B. L., Peeters, M. J., Resman-Targoff, B. H., Karr, S.,

McBane, S., Kelley, K.,... Denetclaw, T. H. (2011). An active-learning strategies primer for achieving ability-based educational outcomes. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 75(9), 1–12.

Grace, D., Weaven, S., Bodey, K., Ross, M., & Weaven, K. (2012). Putting student evaluations into perspective: The course experience quality and satisfaction model (CEQS). Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38(2), 35–43.

Guo, J. (2018). Building bridges to student learning: Perceptions of the learning environment, engagement, and learning outcomes among Chinese undergraduates. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 195–208.

Hair, J., Black, W., & Babin, B. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice Hall.

Hair, J., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.

Hu, Hung, C.-H., & Ching, G. S. (2015). Student-faculty interaction: Mediating between student engagement factors and educational outcome gains. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 4(1), 43–53.

Hurst, B., Wallace, R. R., & Nixon, S. B. (2013). The impact of social interaction on student learning. Reading Horizons, 52(4), 375–398.

Ismail, S. N., Kanesan, A. G., & Muhammad, F. (2018). Teacher collaboration as a mediator for strategic leadership and teaching quality. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 485–498.

Kaendler, C., Wiedmann, M., Leuders, T., Rummel, N., & Spada, H. (2016). Monitoring student interaction during collaborative learning: Design and evaluation of a training program for preservice teachers. Psychology Learning & Teaching, 15(1), 44–64.

Kaur, A., Noman, M., & Nordin, H. (2017). Inclusive assessment for linguistically diverse learners in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(5), 756–771.

Kember, D., Ho, A., & Hong, C. (2011). The importance of establishing relevance in motivating student learning. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(1), 3–15.

Kim, Y. K., & Lundberg, C. A. (2016). A structural model of the relationship between student–faculty interaction and cognitive skills development among college students. Research in Higher Education, 57(3), 288–309.

King, A. (2019). The effects of teacher quality on collaborative learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(4), 739–750.

King, N., & Bunce, L. (2020). Academics’ perceptions of students’ motivation for learning and their own motivation for teaching in a marketized higher education context. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(3), 790–808.

Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford publications.

Koh, J. H. L. (2019). Four pedagogical dimensions for understanding flipped classroom practices in higher education: A systematic review. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 19(4), 14–33.

Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. FT press

Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2021). Learning how to learn: A neglected aspect of education. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8(1), 46–54.

Košir, K., & Tement, S. (2014). Teacher–student relationship and academic achievement: A cross-lagged longitudinal study on three different age groups. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 29(3), 409–428.

Kumar, V., & Kaur, A. (2019). Supervisory practices for intrinsic motivation of doctoral students: A self-determination theory perspective. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 14, 581–595.

Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and genesis of second language development. Oxford University Press.

Le, H., Janssen, J., & Wubbels, T. (2018). Collaborative learning practices: Teacher and student perceived obstacles to effective student collaboration. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(1), 103–122.

Lee, H., & Mori, C. (2021). Reflective practices and self-directed learning competencies in second language university classes. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 41(1), 130–151.

Leech, N. L., Barrett, K. C., & Morgan, G. A. (2005). SPSS for intermediate statistics: Use and interpretation. Psychology Press.

Liu, Y., Carless, D., & Lee, I. (2019). Peer feedback in higher education: A framework for designing pedagogical interventions. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(2), 175–185.

MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., & Williams, J. (2004). Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), 99–128.

McClenney, K. M. (2006). Benchmarking effective educational practice. New Directions for Community Colleges, 134, 47–55.

Meeuwisse, M., Severiens, S. E., & Born, M. P. (2010). Learning environment, interaction, sense of belonging and study success in ethnically diverse student groups. Research in Higher Education, 51(6), 528–545.

Michael, J., & Modell, H. I. (2003). Active learning in secondary and college science classrooms: A working model for helping the learner to learn. Routledge.

Mu, L., & Ribera, A. K. (2016). Mediation effect of collaborative learning for student-faculty interaction. Paper presented at the Association for Institutional Research Annual Forum.

Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom: Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133–144.

Prokess, A. M., & McDaniel, A. (2011). Are nursing students engaged in learning? A secondary analysis of data from the National Survey of Student Engagement. Nursing Education Perspectives, 32(2), 89–94. Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi,

S. Q. (2021). Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–21.

Rabu, S. N. A., & Badlishah, N. S. (2020). Levels of students’ reflective thinking skills in a collaborative learning environment using Google docs. TechTrends, 64(3), 533–541.

Ruan, J., & Griffith, P. L. (2011). Supporting teacher reflection through online discussion. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 3(4), 548–562.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.

Song, L., & Hill, J. R. (2017). Exploring the role of the instructor in the implementation of collaborative learning in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 10(1), 1–14

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.

Umbach, P. D., & Wawrzynski, M. R. (2005). Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 153–184. Üstünlüoğlu, E. (2017). Teaching quality matters in higher education: A case study from Turkey and Slovakia. Teachers and Teaching, 23(3), 367–382.

Veenman, M. V. (2011). Alternative assessment of strategy use with self-report instruments: A discussion. Metacognition and learning, 6(2), 205–211.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental processes. Harvard University Press.

Weigold, I. K., Weigold, A., Ling, S., & Jang, M. (2021). College as a growth opportunity: Assessing personal growth initiative and self-determination theory. Journal of Happiness Studies, 22(5), 2143–2163. White, P. J., Larson, I., Styles, K., Yuriev, E., Evans, D. R., Rangachari,

P.,... Davie, B. (2016). Adopting an active learning approach to teaching in a research-intensive higher education context transformed staff teaching attitudes and behaviours. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(3), 619–633. Witcher, A. E., Jiao, Q. G., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Collins, K. M., James,

T. L., & Minor, L. C. (2008). Preservice teachers’ perceptions of characteristics of an effective teacher as a function of discipline orientation: A mixed methods investigation. The Teacher Educator, 43(4), 279–301.

World Economic Forum. (2022). Skills of the future: Assessing the demand for high-value skills in the global labour market. https://www.weforum.org/reports/skills-of-the-future-assessing-thedemand-for-high-value-skills-in-the-global-labour-market

Xiao, Q., Zhu, P., Hsu, M. K., Zhuang, W., & Peltier, J. (2016). Reflective learning in a Chinese MBA programme: Scale assessment and future recommendations. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 40(1), 1–22.

Xie, K., & Ke, F. (2011). The role of students’ motivation in peermoderated asynchronous online discussions. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(6), 916–930.

Yaacob, A., & Asraf, M. (2021). Empowering learners’ reflective thinking through collaborative reflective learning. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 709–726.

Yin, H., & Wang, W. (2015). Assessing and improving the quality of undergraduate teaching in China: The course experience questionnaire. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(8), 1032–1049.

Yurdakul, B., & Dagli, G. (2020). Faculty interaction and collaborative learning: A study on student perceptions. Education and Information Technologies, 25(2), 1053–1067.

Yusof, N., Awang-Hashim, R., Kaur, A., & Abdul Malik, M. (2020). The role of relatedness in student learning experiences. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(2), 235–243.

Zhang, L.-f. (2006). Preferred teaching styles and modes of thinking among university students in mainland China. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 1(2), 95–107.

Additional Files

Published

31-07-2023

How to Cite

Awang-Hashim, R., Yusof, N., Benlahcene, A., Kaur, A., & Suppiah Shanmugam, S. K. (2023). Collaborative Learning in Tertiary Education Classrooms : What Does It Entail? Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 205-232. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2023.20.2.1

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-21
11 citations, from Scopus — the highest of the sources checked

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/mjli2023.20.2.1 OpenAlex W4386103069 Scopus 85169424365