Psychometric Properties of a Sublime Social Attitude Scale for Prospective of Buddhist Education Teachers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2023.20.2.4Keywords:
development and validation, social desirability, sublime social attitude scale, prospective teacherAbstract
Purpose - A sublime social attitude (brahmavihāra) has been identified as a crucial aspect of Buddhist Education (BE) for fostering prosocial behavior. Therefore, this study aims to construct and establish the validity of a sublime social attitude scale for prospective teachers of BE, as well as to detect social desirability bias (SDB).
Methodology – This is a development research through a survey method using a quantitative approach that produces a scale to measure the brahmavihāra of prospective Buddhist education teachers. The content validity was quantitatively analysed by calculating and comparing three statistical methods for item relevance, namely content validity index, binomial test, and asymmetric score confidence nterval, based on the evaluation of nine experts. Furthermore, empirical testing was conducted using second-order confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with 233 respondents from a population 1012. The identification of item susceptibility to SDB was carried out through qualitative rating by three raters on a draft of a sublime social attitude scale and empirically confirmed by CFA.
Findings - The results showed that brahmavihāra, a psychological attribute consisting of four dimensions, namely loving-kindness,
compassion, sympathetic joy, and equanimity, were empirically proven by CFA. Empirical testing resulted in 24 valid items having a
fit model with the goodness of fit criteria fulfilled. Further, five items were identified by the experts as potentially vulnerable to SDB, and only one was empirically confirmed to be vulnerable based on the CFA.
Significance - The instrument developed in this study could serve as an effective assessment tool for BE instructors and a psychological scale for other stakeholders to measure brahmavihāra in the recruitment of BE teachers.
References
Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and an validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 131–145.
Analayo. (2015). Compassion and emptiness in early Buddhist meditation. Windhorse Publications.
Analayo. (2021). Relating equanimity to mindfulness. Mindfulness, 12, 2635–2644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-021-01671-z
Bentler, P. M., & Bonnet, D. G. (1980). Significant test and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin,88(3),588-606.https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
Bodhi. (2007). A comprehensive manual of abhidhamma: The abhidhammattha sangaha of ācariya anuruddha. Buddhist Publication Society. Pariyatti Editions.
Buddhaghosa. (2011). Visuddhimagga the path of purification (The classic manual of Buddhist doctrine and meditation). Translated from Pali to English by Ñāṇamoli. Buddhist Publication Society.
Buddharakkhita. (2014). Metta: The philosophy and practice of universal love (Rev. ed.). Buddha Vachana Trust, Maha Bodhi Society.
Carnell, J. S. (2021). An introduction to the brahmaviharas: For lawyers, law students, and judicial officers. (Unpublished thesis). Lesley University: Cambridge.
Cho, H., Noh, S., Park, S., Ryu, S., Misan, V., & Lee, J. S. (2018). The development and validation of the lovingkindness-compassion scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 124, 141–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.12.019
Ciptadi, B., & Umar, Y. (2012). Metode alternatif untuk mendeteksi bias respon social desirability pada item-item tes kepribadian. Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi dan Pendidikan Indonesia, 1(1), 1–20.
Conover, W. J. (1999). Practical nonparametric statistics (3rd edition). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Dhammadinna & Chawhan, N. (2020). Brahamvihara: A theravada perspective. Scholary Research Journal for Humanity Science & English Language, 8(42), 10646–10653.
Edwards, A. L. (1957). The social desirability variable in personality assessment and research. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
Ferrando, P. J. (2005). Factor analytic procedures for assessing social desirability in binary items. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40(3), 331–349. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr4003_3
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behaviour an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Gable, R. K., & Wolf, M. B. (1993). Instrument development in the affective domain measuring attitudes and values in corporate and school settings (2nd ed.). Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
Hadash, Y., Segev, N., Tanay, G., Goldstein, P., & Bernstein, A. (2016). The decoupling model of equanimity: Theory, measurement, and test in a mindfulness intervention. Mindfulness, 7, 1214–1226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0564-2
Hair. J. F., Black. W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate data analysis. England and Associated Companies.
Iqbaria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P., & Cavaye, A. L. M. (1997). Personal computing acceptable factors in small firms: A structural equation model. MIS Quarterly, 21(3), 279–305. http://www.jstor.org/stable/249498
Jo, M. S. (2000). Controlling social-desirability bias via method factors of direct and indirect questioning in structural equation models. Psychology & Marketing, 17, 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200002)17:2<137::AID-MAR5>3.0.CO;2-V
King, M. F., & Bruner, G. C. (2000). Social desirability bias: A neglected aspect of validity testing. Psychology and Marketing, 17(2), 79–103. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200002)17:2<79::AID-MAR2>3.0.CO;2-0
Kosnik, C., & Beck, C. (2009). Priorities in teacher education: The 7 key elements of pre-service preparation. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
Kraus, S., & Sears, S. (2009). Measuring the immeasurables: Development and initial validation of the self-other four immeasurables (SOFI) scale based on Buddhist teachings on loving kindness, compassion, joy, and equanimity. Social Indicators Research, 92, 169–181. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11205-008-9300-1
Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–386. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
Maulana, D. (2017). The exclusivism of religion teachers: Intolerance and radicalism in Indonesian public schools. Studia Islamika, 24(2), 395–401. https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v24i2.5707
MicDiarmid, G. W., & Clevenger-Bright, M. (2008). Rethinking teacher capacity. In M. Cochran-Smith Editor., S. Feiman-Nemser Editor., D. J. Mclntyre Editor., & K. E. Demers Editor (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Miller, B. S. (1979). On cultivating the immeasurable change of heart: The Buddhist brahmavihara formula. Journal of Indian Philosophy, 7(2), 209–221. https://www.jstor.org/ stable/23440381
Nandasara. (2014). Four sublime states of mind in brahmavihara sutta: A philosophical re-understanding. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda College, Chennai, India.
Neff, K. D. (2003). The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and Identity, 2(3), 223–250. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309027
Nottingham, E. K. (2002). Religion and society. Anybook Ltd.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Nyanaponika. (1999). The four sublime states: Contemplations on love, compassion, sympathetic joy, and equanimity. Inward Path.
Ohnuma, R. (2012). Ties that bind, maternal imagery and discourse in Indian Buddhism. Oxford University Press.
Olendzki, A. (2006). Transformative impact of non-selft. In D. K. Nauriyal Editor., M. S. Drummond Editor., & Y. B. Lal. Editor (Eds.), Buddhist thought and applied psychological research: Transcending the boundaries (250–261). Routledge.
Pagis, M. (2015). Evoking equanimity: Silent interaction rituals in vipassana meditation retreats. Qualitative Sociology, 38(1), 39-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-014-9295-7
Parker, W. R. (2017). The four brahmaviharas - Four attitudes of consciousness. https://mandala-of-love.com/2017/05/24/the-four-brahmaviharas-four-attitudes-of-consciousness/
Penfield, R. D., & Miller, J. M. (2004). Improving content validation studies using an assymetric confidence interval for the mean of expert ratings. Applies Measurement in Education, 17(4), 359-370. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame1704_2
Raes, F., Pommier, E., Neff, K. D., & Van Gucht, D. (2011). Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the self-compassion scale. Clinical Psychology & Psychotheraphy, 18(3), 250–255. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.702
Rangari, V., & Mehta, K. (2016). Psychometric assessment of karuna (compassion) scale. Indian Journal of Positive Psychology, 7, 269–278. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/ psychometric-assessment-karuna-compassion-scale/ docview/1837539844/se-2
Rhys Davids, T. W., & Stede, W. (1925). Pali-English dictionary pali text society. London.
Soloway, G. B. (2011). Preparing teacher candidates for the present: Exploring the praxis of mindfulness training in teacher education. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Toronto, Canada.
Sprecher, S., & Fehr, B. (2005). Compassionate love for close others and humanity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 629–651. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407505056439
Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C. (1980). Statistically based test for the number of common factors. Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
Strauss, C., Taylor, B. L., Gu, J., Kuyken, W., Baer, R., Jones, F., & Cavanagh, K. (2016). What is compassion and how can we measure it? A review of definitions and measures. Clinical Psychology Review, 47, 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. cpr.2016.05.004
Sulani, P. (2017). Pandangan guru agama Buddha terhadap pendidikan nilai agama Buddha. Vijjcariya, 4(2), 1–14.
Tejadhamma. (2015). Concept of the brahmavihara in pali literature: An analytical and critical study. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pali of University of Calcutta, Kolkata, India.
Thānissaro. (2014). The sublime attitudes a study guide on the brahmāviharas. Metta Forest Monastery.
Thittila. (2010). The book of analysis (vibhanga). The Pali Text Society.
Thrush, C. R., Vander Putten, J., Rapp, C. G., Pearson, L. C., Berry, K. S., & O’Sullivan, P. S. (2007). Content validation of the organizational climate for research integrity (ocri) survey. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: An International Journal, 2(4), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1525/ jer.2007.2.4.35
Vajirañāna. (1940). Brahma vihara bhavana or the cultivation of divine sentiments. The Maha-Bodhi Journal of the Maha Bodhi Society, 48, 1–5.
Waltz. C. F., Strickland, O. L., & Lenz, E. R. (2005). Measurement in nursing and health research (3rd ed.). Springer Publishing Company.
Zeng, X., Li, M., Zhang, B., & Liu, X. (2014). Revision of the philadelphia mindfulness scale for measuring awareness and equanimity in Goenka’s vipassana meditation with chinese buddhists. Journal of Religion and Health, 54(2), 623–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-014-9870-y
Zeng, X., Liao, R., Zhang, R., Oei, T. P. S., Yao, Z., Leung, F. Y. K., & Liu, X. (2016). Development of the appreciative joy scale. Mindfulness, 8(2), 286–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0599-4
Zeng, X., Rong, W., Chan, V. Y. L., Oei, T. P. S., & Leung, F. Y. K. (2018). The development of the difficulties during meditation involving immeasurable attitudes scale. Mindfulness, 10, 812–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-1051-8
Ziegler, M., & Buehner, M. (2009). Modelling social desirable responding and its effects. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69(4), 548–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164408324469
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-21Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
