ONLINE LEARNING MOTIVATION DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC

THE ROLE OF LEARNING ENVIRONMENT, STUDENT SELF-EFFICACY AND LEARNER-INSTRUCTOR INTERACTION

Authors

  • Shee Mun Yong UOW Malaysia KDU University College, Malaysia
  • Lip Sam Thi, Dr. School of Business Management, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2022.19.2.8

Keywords:

COVID-19 pandemic, online learning motivation, location learning environment, student self-efficacy, learner-instructor motivation

Abstract

 Purpose - Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Malaysian government declared a Movement Control Order (MCO) to prevent the spread of the virus. Educational institutions were forced to switch their pedagogy to online learning to complete the semester curriculum, catching academicians and students off-guard that resulted in makeshift online lesson delivery. Previous online learning motivation studies have neglected the impact of an unplanned or sudden transition to online learning during a pandemic on student motivation to learn. This study aims to examine location learning environment, learner-instructor interactions, and self-efficacy of students more succinctly on their learning motivation during an unplanned transition to online learning.

Method - This study used a sequential explanatory mixed method strategy with a sample size of 535 randomly collected from a public and two private higher education institutions in Malaysia. IBM SPSS statistical software v22 was used for descriptive statistics. Regression testing was carried out using AMOS statistical software v21 structural equation modeling.

Findings - Revealed the importance of location learning environment in fostering student motivation and the positive influence of learner-instructor interactions on students achieving the desired learning outcomes during an unplanned transition to online learning. However, there is no evidence to suggest a causal effect between student self-efficacy and online learning motivation during such conditions. The theoretical implication indicates that having conducive hygiene factors are essential to driving student motivation under such situations.

Significance - The COVID-19 pandemic provides opportunities for researchers to examine the role of various motivational theories to explain student motivation in learning under challenging conditions. Educators and students would benefit on ways to increase student online learning motivation in lockdown conditions. Setting up a more efficient online delivery approach could lead to higher student satisfaction and potential enrolment.

 

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Lip Sam Thi, Dr., School of Business Management, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

 

 

References

Ainaa, A. (2020, June 19). Online learning a struggle, say lecturers, students. FMT News. https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/ category/nation/2020/06/19/online-learning-a-struggle-say-lecturers-students/

Al-Kumaim, N. H., Alhazmi, A. K., Mohammed, F., Gazem, N. A., Shabbir, M. S., & Fazea, Y. (2021). Exploring the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on university students’ learning life: An integrated conceptual motivational model for sustainable and healthy online learning. Sustainability, 13(5), 2546. https://doi. org/10.3390/su13052546

Alqurashi, E. (2019) Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education, 40(1), 133–148. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1206863

Artino, A. R. (2008). Motivational beliefs and perceptions of instructional quality: Predicting satisfaction with online training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(3), 260– 270. https://doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00258.x

Artino, A. R., & Stephens, J. M. (2006). Learning online: Motivated to self-regulate? Academic Exchange Quarterly, 10(4), 176– 182. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Anthony-Artino/ publication/267362438_Learning_Online_Motivated_to_Self- Regulate/links/5460b2e10cf2c1a63bff2594/Learning-Online- Motivated-to-Self-Regulate.pdf.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.

Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2(1), 21–41. https://www. uky.edu/~eushe2/Bandura/Bandura1999AJSP.pdf

Bates, R., & Khasawneh, S. (2007). Self-efficacy and college students’ perceptions and use of online learning systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 175–191. https://doi: 10.1016/j. chb.2004.04.004

Bell, P. D. (2007). Predictors of college student achievement in undergraduate asynchronous web-based courses. Education, 127(4), 523–533. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/102042/

Berry, J. (2018, February 6). Endorphins: Effects and how to increase levels. Medical News Today. https://www.medicalnewstoday. com/articles/320839

Bickle, M. C, Rucker, R. D., & Burnsed, K. A. (2019). Online learning: Examination of attributes that promote student satisfaction. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 22(1), 7. https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring221/bickle_ rucker_burnsed221.html

Biedinger, N. (2011). The influence of education and home environment on the cognitive outcomes of preschool children in Germany. Child Development Research. http://www.oalib. com/paper/22179#.Xque6J4zbIU.

Blasiman, R. N., Larabee, D., & Fabry, D. (2018). Distracted students: A comparison of multiple types of distractions on learning in online lectures. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 4(4), 222–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000122

Boddy, C. R. (2016). Sample size for qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research, 19(4), 426–432. https://doi.org/10.1108/ QMR-06-2016-0053

Bowen, P., Rose, R., & Pilkington, A. (2017). Mixed methods theory and practice. Sequential, explanatory approach. International Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods, 5(2), 10–27. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317545024_ MIXED_METHODS-THEORY_AND_PRACTICE_ SEQUENTIAL_EXPLANATORY_APPROACH/citation/ download

Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.

Cavalcante, P. A. M., Gregnani, M. F., Henrique, J. S., Ornellas, F. H., & Araújo, R. C. (2017). Aerobic but not resistance exercise can induce inflammatory pathways via toll-like 2 and 4: A Systematic Review. Sports Medicine – Open, 3(42). https://doi. org/10.1186/s40798-017-0111-2

Chen, K. C., & Jang, S. J. (2010). Motivation in online learning: Testing a model of self-determination theory. Computers in Human Behaviour, 26, 741–752. http://www.anitacrawley. net/Resources/Articles/Chen%20Self%20Determination%20 Theory.pdf

Cherry, K. (2021, March 15). Self-determination theory and motivation.https://www.verywellmind.com/what-is-self-determination-theory-2795387

Ching, Y. H., Hsu, Y. C., & Baldwin, S. (2018). Becoming an online teacher: An analysis of prospective online instructors’ reflections. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 29(2), 145–168. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/181339/

Chuang, H. G., NurNaznee, H. A. A., Wong, J. H., Muzaimi, M., Jafri, M. A., Zamzuri, I., Zuraidah, A., Aziza, A., & Muthuraju, S. (2021). Role of toll-like receptor 4 antagonist Lipopolysaccharide- Rhodobacter sphaeroides on acute stress-induced voluntary ethanol preference and drinking behaviour: In vivo Swiss Albino mouse model. European Neuropsychopharmacology, 45(1), 59–72, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.12.121

Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.

Concordia University. (2004, July 23). Online Learning/ Distance Education Questionnaire Fall Term. https:// www.concordia.ca/content/dam/artsci/research/cslp/docs/ OnlineInstrument_23Aug04.pdf

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.

Croft, N., Dalton, A., & Grant, M. (2015). Overcoming isolation in distance learning: Building a learning community through time and space. Journal for Education in the Built Environment, 5(1), 27-64, https://doi.org/10.11120/jebe.2010.05010027

Croxton, R. A. (2014). The role of interactivity in student satisfaction and persistence in online learning. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 10(2), 314–325. https://jolt.merlot.org/ vol10no2/croxton_0614.pdf

Dallas, M. E. (2017, August 31). Eating feeds ‘feel good’ hormones in the brain. Healthday. https://www.webmd.com/brain/ news/20170831/eating-feeds-feel-good-hormones-in-the-brain

De la Varre, C., Keane, J., & Irvin, M. J. (2011). Enhancing online distance education in small rural US schools: A hybrid, learner-centred model. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 15(4), 35–46. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ908104.pdf

Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018

Edwards, B. (2016). A model of auditory-cognitive processing and relevance to clinical applicability. Ear and Hearing. 37(1). 85S-91S. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000308

Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2007). Perceived learning environment and students’ emotional experiences: A multilevel analysis of mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 17(1), 478–493. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download ?doi=10.1.1.461.7651&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Fincham, J. E. (2008). Response rates and responsiveness for surveys, standards, and the journal. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72(2), 43. https://doi.org /10.5688/aj720243

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi. org/10.2307/3151312

Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi. org/10.4324/9780203838761

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

Gniewosz, B., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). Home environment. In: J. Hattie, & E. M. Anderman (Eds.), International Guide to Student Achievement (pp. 89–91). Routledge.

Gregory, G., & Kaufeldt, M. (2015). The motivated brain: improving student attention, engagement, and perseverance. ASCD.

Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Prentice-Hall Inc.

Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice-Hall Inc.

Hara, N., & Kling, R. (2003). Students’ Distress with a Web-based Distance Education Course: An Ethnographic Study of Participants’ Experiences. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 4(1), 1-49. https://doi.org/10.17718/ TOJDE.02638

Hart, C. (2012). Factors associated with student persistence in an online program of study: A review of the literature. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 11(1), 19–42. https://www.ncolr. org/jiol/issues/pdf/11.1.2.pdf

Hartnett, M. K. (2016). The importance of motivation in online learning. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0070- 2_2.

Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the nature of man. World Publishing Company.

Hodges, C. B. (2008). Self-efficacy in the context of online learning environments: A review of the literature and directions for research. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 20(3–4), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.20001

Iriste, S., & Katane, I. (2018). Expertise as a research method in education. Proceedings of the 11th International Scientific Conference (pp. 74−80). https://agris.fao.org/agris-search/ search.do?recordID =LV2018000424

Johnson, B., & Stevens, J. J. (2001). Confirmatory factor analysis of the school level environment questionnaire (SLEQ). International Journal of Learning Environments Research, 4(3), 325–344. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014486821714

Keeton, M. T. (2004). Best online instructional practices: Report of phase I of an ongoing study. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 8(2), 75–100. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/ download?doi=10.1.1.203.3723&rep=rep1&type=pdf

Kenny, D. A. (2011, Sept 11). Respecification of latent variable models. http://davidakenny.net/cm/respec.htm

Kotera, Y., Chircop J., Hutchinson, L., Rhodes, C., Green, P., Jones, R. M., Kaluzeviciute, G., & Garip, G. (2021). Loneliness in online students with disabilities: Qualitative investigation for experience, understanding and solutions. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00301-x

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000308

Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. E. (2013). A predictive study of student satisfaction in online education programs. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(1), 16–39. https://doi.org/10.19173/ irrodl.v14i1.1338

Lee, S. (2020, Apr 14). Poor Internet connections, no computers hinder online learning in Sabah. The Star.https://www.thestar. com.my/news/nation/2020/04/14/poor-internet-connections-no-computers-hinder-online-learning-in-sabah

Leech, N., & Onwuegbuzie, A. (2007). An Array of Qualitative Analysis Tools: A Call for Data Analysis Triangulation. School Psychology Quarterly, 22(1), 557-584. http://dx.doi. org/10.1037/1045-3830.22.4.557

Lin, Y. M., Lin, G. Y., & Laffey, J. M. (2008). Building a social and motivational framework for understanding satisfaction in online learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38(1). 1–27. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/69298/

Lorenzetti, J. (2013.). Academic administration - Running a MOOC: Secrets of the world’s largest distance education classes. Magna Publications.

Lotto, A., & Holt, L. (2011). Psychology of auditory perception. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2(5). 479–489. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcs.123

Love, L. (2017, Dec 13). Distractions make retaining information harder. https://www.uofmhealth.org/news/archive/201712/ distractions-make-retaining-information-harder

Ludtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Trautwein, U., & Kunter, M. (2009). Assessing the impact of learning environments: How to use student ratings of classroom or school characteristics in multilevel modeling. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34(1), 120–131. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.12.001

Lynch, K. (1999, May). The social impact of on-line learning. Office of Technical and Further Education [Paper presentation]. Melbourne, Australia. https://www.ascilite.org/conferences/ brisbane99/papers/lynch.pdf

Lynch, R., & Dembo, M. (2004). The relationship between self-regulation and online learning in blended learning context. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v5i2.189

Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission. (2017 August 2). Facts and Figures, 1Q 2017. https://www.mcmc. gov.my/skmmgovmy/media/General/pdf/1Q17-facts-figures. pdf

Martens, R. L., Gulikers, J., & Bastiaens, T. (2004). The impact of intrinsic motivation on e-learning in authentic computer tasks. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(1), 368-376. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2004.00096.x

Martens, R. L., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). Predicting intrinsic motivation. Proceedings of Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 1(1), 621–630. https://files. eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED485061.pdf

Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346

McKinsey. (2020, October 5). How COVID-19 has pushed companies over the technology tipping point—and transformed business forever [Data set]. McKinsey & Co. https://www.mckinsey. com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/ our-insights/how-covid-19-has-pushed-companies-over-the-technology-tipping-point-and-transformed-business-forever#

Mikecz R. (2012). Interviewing elites: Addressing methodological issues. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(6), 482–493. https://doi. org/10.1177/1077800412442818

Milatovic, D., Zaja-Milatovic, S., Breyer, R. M., Aschner, M., & Montine, T. J. (2017). Neuroinflammation and oxidative injury in developmental neurotoxicity. In R. C. Gupta (Ed.), Reproductive and developmental toxicology (2nd ed., pp. 1051–1061). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0- 12-804239-7.00055-X

Moos, D. C., & Azevedo, R. (2009). Learning with computer-based learning environments: A literature review of computer self-efficacy. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 576–600. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308326083

Moos, D. C., & Marroquin, E. (2010). Review: Multimedia, hypermedia, and hypertext: Motivation considered and reconsidered. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(1), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.11.004

Mukhara, D., Oh, U., & Neigh, G. N. (2020). Neuroinflammation. In R. Lanzenberger, G. S. Kranz & I. Savic (Eds.), Handbook of Clinical Neurology, (175(1), pp. 235–259). Elsevier. https:// doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-64123-6.00017-5

Narayanan, S., & Selvanathan, B. (2017). Online education: It’s implication towards undergraduate students’ at private higher learning institution and Malaysian education system from educator perspectives. Journal of Global Business and Social Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 84–92. http://gbse.com.my/ v1no2jan17/Paper-28-.pdf

Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Sage Publications.

Ni, A. Y. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of classroom and online learning: Teaching research methods. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 19(2), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803. 2013.12001730

Nind, M., Kilburn D., & Wiles, R. (2015). Using video and dialogue to generate pedagogic knowledge: Teachers, learners and researchers reflecting together on the pedagogy of social research methods. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(5), 561–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/136455 79.2015.1062628

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Isik, O. (2006). E-learning satisfaction factors. https://citeseerx.ist. psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.540.9689&rep=rep1& type=pdf

Park, J. H., & Choi, H. J. (2009). Factors influencing adult learners’ decision to drop out or persist in online learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 207-217. https:// www.learntechlib.org/p/74987/.

Peechapol, C., Na-Songkhla, J., Sujiva, S., & Luangsodsai, A. (2018). An exploration of factors influencing self-efficacy in online learning: A systematic review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(9). 64–86.

Prasad, R. (2020 July 23). Re: What to do if survey participation exceeds sample size calculation? https://www.researchgate.net/ post/What-to-do-if-survey-participation-exceeds-sample-size-calculation/5f19796cf731e6081b486e18/citation/download

Protopsaltis, S., & Baum, S. (2019). Does online education live up to its promise? A look at the evidence and implications for federal policy. The Laura and John Arnold Foundation, 1–50. https:// jesperbalslev.dk/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/OnlineEd.pdf

Ramos-Vera, C. (2020, July 22). Re: What to do if survey participation exceeds sample size calculation? https://www.researchgate.net/ post/What-to-do-if-survey-participation-exceeds-sample-size-calculation/5f18a05d4e348b27dc69a6a1/citation/download

Raspopovic, M., Cvetanovic, S., Medan, I., & Ljubojevic, D. (2017). The effects of integrating social learning environment with online learning. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(1), 141–160. https://files.eric.ed.gov/ fulltext/EJ1136097.pdf

Reupert, A., Maybery, D., & Chittleborough, P. (2009). The importance of being human: Instructors’ personal presence in distance programs. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21(1), 47–56. https://files.eric. ed.gov/fulltext/EJ896241.pdf

Robert, S., Irby, T. L., Wynn, J. T., & McClure, M. M. (2012). Investigating students’ satisfaction with e-learning courses: The effect of learning environment and social presence. Journal of Agricultural Education, 53(3), 98–110. https://www.jae-online. org/attachments/article/1687/53.3.98% 20 Strong.pdf

Robinson, P. B., Stimpson, D. V., Huefner, J. C., & Hunt, H. K. (1991). An attitude approach to the prediction of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15(4), 13–32. https:// doi.org/10.1177/104225879101500405

Sani, R. (2020, July 1). Staying motivated with online learning. New Straits Times. https://www.nst.com.my/ education/2020/07/605116/staying-motivated-online-learning

Sharp, A. (2012) Humanistic approaches to learning. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6

Shen, D., Cho, M. H., Tsai, C. L., & Marra, R. (2013). Unpacking online learning experiences: Online learning self-efficacy and learning satisfaction. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.04.001

Stewart, T. R. (2001). Improving reliability of judgmental forecasts. In J. S. Armstrong (Ed.), Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners (pp. 81–106). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Syazwina, Y. (2020, April 09). MCMC: Bandwidth usage surge causes 4G download speeds to drop by a third in Week 2 of MCO. The Edge. https://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/ mcmc-bandwidth-usage-surge-causes-4g-download-speeds-drop-third-week-2-mco

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Allyn & Bacon.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Pearson.

Thach, E. C., & Murphy, K. L. (1995). Competencies for distance education professionals. Educational Technology Research and Development, 43(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF02300482

UNESCO. (2020, March 24). COVID-19 Educational Disruption and Response. https://en.unesco.org/news/covid-19-educational-disruption-and-response

Van Teijlingen, E., & Hundley, V. (2002). The importance of pilot studies. Nursing Standard (Royal College of Nursing), 16(40), 33–6. https://doi.org/10.7748/ns2002.06.16.40.33.c3214

Varrea, C. D. L, Irvinb, M. J., Jordana, A. W., Hannuma, W. H., & Farmer, T. W. (2014). Reasons for student dropout in an online course in a rural K–12 setting. Distance Education 35(3), 324– 343. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2015.955259

Wang, S. L., & Wu, P. Y. (2008). The role of feedback and self-efficacy on web-based learning: The social cognitive perspective. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1589–1598. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.03.004

Widjaja, A. E., & Chen, J. V. (2017). Online learners’ motivation in online learning: The effect of online participation, social presence, and collaboration. Learning Technologies in Education: Issues and Trends, 72–93. https://www.researchgate. net/profile/Andree-Widjaja/publication/321992187

Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 85–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ isre.1050.0042

Xie, K., DeBacker, T. K., & Ferguson, C. (2006). Extending the traditional classroom through online discussion: The role of student motivation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(1), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.2190/7BAK-EGAH-3MH1-K7C6

Zureick, A. H, Burk-Rafel, J., Purkiss, J. A., & Hortsch, M. (2018). The interrupted learner: How distractions during live and video lectures influence learning outcomes. Anatomical Sciences Education. 11(4), 366–376. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1754

Additional Files

Published

31-07-2022

How to Cite

Yong, S. M., & Thi, L. S. (2022). ONLINE LEARNING MOTIVATION DURING COVID-19 PANDEMIC: THE ROLE OF LEARNING ENVIRONMENT, STUDENT SELF-EFFICACY AND LEARNER-INSTRUCTOR INTERACTION. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 19(2), 213–249. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2022.19.2.8