ERGONOMIC RISK ASSESSMENT IN AN OFFICE ENVIRONMENT USING THE CORNELL MUSCULOSKELETAL DISCOMFORT QUESTIONNAIRE (CMDQ) AND RAPID OFFICE STRAIN ASSESSMENT (ROSA)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/jtom2026.21.1.4Keywords:
Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire, Ergonomics, Office Workers, Rapid Office Strain Assessment, Sedentary JobAbstract
Prolonged sitting and suboptimal workstation design are key contributors to musculoskeletal discomfort among office workers. This study aimed to identify ergonomic risks in a sedentary office setting, focusing on discomfort patterns and workstation design deficiencies. A mixed-methods approach was adopted involving the Cornell Musculoskeletal Discomfort Questionnaire (CMDQ) and the Rapid Office Strain Assessment (ROSA). Fifty office workers completed the CMDQ, from which seven individuals with high-discomfort scores were further assessed using the ROSA method. Results indicated that the most affected body regions were the shoulders (56%), lower back (46%), and neck (44%). The ROSA evaluations revealed a high average risk score of 5.42, with poor chair ergonomics (mean score: 5.29) identified as the primary concern. Other workstation components, such as the monitor and keyboard setup, showed moderate risk levels. The study concludes that ergonomic interventions, particularly in chair design and usage, are urgently required. Recommendations include replacing non-ergonomic chairs, promoting ergonomic awareness, and incorporating physical activity into daily routines to reduce musculoskeletal risks in sedentary workplaces.
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Technology and Operations Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Disclaimer
The Journal of Technology and Operation Management (JTOM) has taken all reasonable measures to ensure that material contained in this website is the original work of the author(s). However, the Journal gives no warranty and accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or the completeness of the material; no reliance should be made by any user on the material. The user should check with the authors for confirmation. Articles published in the Journal of Technology and Operation Management (JTOM) do not represent the views held by the editors and members of the editorial board. Authors are responsible for all aspects of their articles except the editorial screen design.