Creating Shared Values through Human Resource Activities: Toward an Effective Transformation Programme
How to Cite
How to Cite
Article
Numerous literature works emphasised on shared values and the role it plays in the organisation. The value and system form the basis of a strong culture that enables the organisation to better react to any transformation plan. As with most of the public organisations in Malaysia, the government has set up the Government Transformation Programme (GTP), an ambitious, broad-based programme of change to fundamentally transform the government organisation into an efficient and citizen-centred institution. Hence,all Malaysian government organisations need to work fast and smart in order to realise the objectives of Vision 2020. The shared values concept is considered as the prerequisite to shape the standards and expectations held by employees of these organisations that help to guide aspects of practice performance. Generally in services, the core values of support, respect of choice, collaboration, and customer service form the basic foundation of a trusting therapeutic relationship. Hence, this paper presents acase of a government agency which is in the process of implementing a transformation plan. Before the department can move forward with the transformation agenda, it is critical to understand the current values and practices, which would subsequently enable to identify the values that can be formed through human resource activities. The case provides valuable insight into the necessary parts of the transformation process, particularly in developing the right values and practices in the government sector.
Metrics & impact
Citations by source
Harvested 08-09-2026Counts differ by index because each source crawls a different corpus. Crossref counts only registered reference lists; Google Scholar includes theses, preprints and grey literature.
Citations over time
New citations recorded in each year, as reported by OpenAlex.
Reads & downloads
Attention beyond citation
From OpenAlex. A field-weighted impact of 1.00 is the world average for work of the same field, type and year. No Altmetric key is configured, so news, policy and social attention are not shown.
References
-
Amah, E, and Ahiauzu, A., (2014). Shared values and organisational effectiveness: A study of a Nigerian Banking Industry, Journal of Management Development, 33(7), 694–708.
-
Ayuso. S., Rodriguez, M. A., and Ricart, J. E., (2006). Using stakeholder dialogue as a source for new ideas: A dynamic capability underlying sustainable innovation. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 6(4), 475-490.
-
Bondarouk, T. V., (2004). Using group learning to enhance the implementation of information technology: The results of discourse analysis, unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Twente, Enschede.
-
Chesbrough, H., (2003). Open Innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA. Harvard Business School Press.
-
Cooke, F. L, (2000). Modelling an HR shared service centre: Experience of a MNC in the United Kingdom, Human Resource Management, 45(2), 211-27.
-
Farndale, E., Paauwe, J, and Hoeksema, L., (2009). In sourcing HR: Shared service centres in the Netherlands, in Martin, G., Reddington, M. and Alexander, H. (Eds.), Technology Outsourcing and Transforming HR, pp 105-35.
-
Florin, J. and Schmidt, E., (2011). Creating shared value in the hybrid venture arena: A business model innovation perspective, Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 2(2), 165-97.
-
Freeman, R. E., (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Pitman, Boston, MA.
-
Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C. and Parmar, B., (2004). Stakeholder and the corporate objective revisited, Organisation Science, 15(3), 364-9.
-
Hansen, E. G., Große-Dunker, F. and Reichwald, R., (2009). Sustainability Innovation Cube– a framework to evaluate sustainability-oriented innovations, International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(4), 683-713.
-
Hart, S, and Milstein, M., (2003). Creating sustainable value, Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 56-67.
-
Nelson, J., (2001). Building Partnerships: Cooperation between the United Nations and the Private Sector, Department of Public Information, United Nations, New York, NY.
-
Nelson, J., (2006). Leveraging the development impact of business in the fight against global poverty, Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative Working Paper No. 22, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
-
Palatkova, M., (2011). The 7-S-McKinsey Model: An implementation tool of a destination marketing strategy in the Czech Republic. Letter from the editor Peter Odrakiewicz.
-
Peters, T. J., and Waterman, R. H., (2004). In search of excellence: Lessons from America’s best-run companies. Harper Business.
-
Porter, M. and Kramer, M. R., (2011). The big idea: creating shared value, Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62-77.
-
Porter, M. E., (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for analysing industries and competitors, The Free Press, New York, NY.
-
Porter, M. E. and Kramer, M. R., (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy, Harvard Business Review, December, 3-14.
-
Porter, M. E. and Kramer, M. R., (2006). Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility, Harvard Business Review, 85(12), 78-92.
-
Prahalad, C. K., (2005). The fortune at the bottom of the Pyramid, Wharton School Publishing, Philadelphia, PA.
-
Prahalad, C. K., and Hart, S., (2002). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid, strategy + business, 26, 2-14.
-
Sink, D. W., (1991). Transorganisational development in urban policy coalitions, Human Relations, 44(11), 79-95.
-
Spitzeck, H., (2009). Organisational moral learning: what, if anything, do corporations learn from NGO critique?, Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 157-73.
-
Spitzeck, H. and Hansen, E., (2010). Stakeholder governance – how do stakeholders influence corporate decision-making?, Corporate Governance, 10(4), 378-91. https://hbr.org/2011/01/the-big-idea-creating-shared-value