Research Article Published 10 December 2015

Keberkesanan Organisasi dalam Penyampaian Perkhidmatan: Penilaian Berdasarkan Paradigma Servqual dan Model Kano

How to Cite

How to Cite

Abu, N. H., Othman, A. A., Abidin, R., & Mansor, M. F. (2015). Keberkesanan Organisasi dalam Penyampaian Perkhidmatan: Penilaian Berdasarkan Paradigma Servqual dan Model Kano. Journal of Business Management and Accounting, 5(1), 123-139. https://doi.org/10.32890/jbma2015.5.0.8865
Noor Hidayah Abu
Pusat Pengajian Pengurusan Teknologi dan Logistik, Kolej Perniagaan Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia
Abdul Aziz Othman
Pusat Pengajian Pengurusan Teknologi dan Logistik, Kolej Perniagaan Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia
Rahimi Abidin
Pusat Pengajian Pengurusan Teknologi dan Logistik, Kolej Perniagaan Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia
Mohd Fitri Mansor
Pusat Pengajian Inovasi Perniagaan dan Teknousahawan Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Kangar, Perlis, Malaysia
Full text
PDF View full text 194 KB · 17 pages XML JATS full text 59 KB · machine readable HTML Read online 40 KB
DOI 10.32890/jbma2015.5.0.8865 Cite this article
Share this article
Citations
1
OpenAlex, highest of the sources checked
Reads
541 +2
Abstract + full text
Downloads
649 +2
PDF and XML
Percentile
88th
By citations, works of the same year

Article

Abstract

Departments under the government sector needs to offer the best quality service to meet the needs and requirements of customers. At the same time, the departments should ensure that service delivery to the customer is always relevant from time to time in line with Malaysia government policies, changes in technology, economic development and the dynamics of consumer preferences. The main objective of this study are to measure the quality of service delivery by Department MG using paradigma SERVQUAL and to measure customer satisfaction against the services offered using the Kano Model. Based on paradigma of SREVQUAL, the findings show 20 items out of 21 items that are measured situated in very strong position. Based on Kano model, the findings also shows the level of customer satisfaction are at 79-75% per cent. This indicates MG Department has successfully met the needs and requirements of its customers. But to remain competitive in the services market, MG Department needs to improve the items that are rated below 75%. The results obtained will help improve the performance of the Department MG in offering services to its customers. It is in line with government policy, namely people first, performance now. In fact, the results can be used as a guide in the development of policy and strategy of departments under government sector.

Keywords
Customer satisfaction service quality SERVQUAL Kano model Malaysian government sector

Metrics & impact

Citations by source

Harvested 15-09-2026

Counts differ by index because each source crawls a different corpus. Crossref counts only registered reference lists; Google Scholar includes theses, preprints and grey literature.

OpenAlex
1
Open corpus, updated daily View →
OpenCitations
0
Open references only View →
Crossref
0
Deposited reference lists only View →
Scopus
0 Not indexed
Indexed titles only View →
Google Scholar
Publishes no citation count that can be read automatically.
Includes theses and preprints Search →
Dimensions
Publishes no citation count that can be read automatically.
Includes policy documents Search →

Citations over time

New citations recorded in each year, as reported by OpenAlex.

1
0
0
0
0
0
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026

Reads & downloads

Abstract views 541
PDF downloads 649
XML downloads 0
Full-text HTML 0
Counted under COUNTER Release 5 rules; known robots excluded.

Attention beyond citation

Citation percentile 88th
Field-weighted citation impact 0.31
Works this article cites 13

From OpenAlex. A field-weighted impact of 1.00 is the world average for work of the same field, type and year. No Altmetric key is configured, so news, policy and social attention are not shown.

Identifiers
DOI · 10.32890/jbma2015.5.0.8865
OpenAlex · W4318712253

References

References 26
Deposited to Crossref with the article DOI
  1. Agus, A., Barker, S. and Kandampully, J., (2007). An exploratory study of service quality in the Malaysian public service sector, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 24(2), 177-190.
  2. Akinboade, O., Kinfack, E. and Mokwena, M., (2012). An analysis of citizen satisfaction with public service delivery in the Sedibeng district municipality of South Africa, International Journal of Social Economics, 39(3), 182-199.
  3. Asubonteng, P., McCleary, K. and Swan, J., (1996). SERVQUAL revisited: a critical review of service quality, Journal of Services Marketing, 10(6), 62-81.
  4. Berger, C., Blauth, R., Bolster, C., Burchill, G., DuMouchel, W., Pouliot, F., Richter, R., Rubinoff, A., Shen, D., Timko, M. and Walden, D., (1993). Kano’s methods for understanding customer-defined quality, The Center for Quality Management Journal, 2(4), 3-36.
  5. Bigne, E., Moliner, M. and Sanchez, J., (2003). Perceived quality and satisfaction in multiservice organisations: The case of Spanish public services, Journal of Services Marketing, 4, 420-442.
  6. Bloemer, J., Ruyter, K. and Peeters, P., (1998). Investigating drivers of bank loyalty and customer satisfaction, International Journal of Bank Marketing, 16(7), 276-286.
  7. Brysland, A. and Curry, A., (2001). Service improvements in publics services using SERVQUAL, Managing Services Quality, 11(6), 389-401.
  8. Busacca, B. and Padula, G., (2005). Understanding the relationship between attribute performance and overall satisfaction: Theory, measurement and implications, Marketing Intelligence and Planning, 23(6), 543-61.
  9. Franceschini, F. and Terzago, M., (1998). An application of quality function deployment to training courses, International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 15(7), 753-68.
  10. Ganguli, S. and Roy, S., (2011). Generic technology-based service quality dimensions in banking: Impact on customer satisfaction and loyalty, International Journal of Bank Marketing, 29(2), 168-189.
  11. Huiskonen, J. and Pirttila, T., (1998). Sharpening logistics customer service strategy planning by applying Kano’s quality element classification, International Journal of Production Economics, 56-57, 253-60.
  12. Jannadi, O. and Al-Saggaf, H., (2000). Measurement of quality in Saudi Arabian service industry, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 17(9), 949-966.
  13. Kano, N., Seraku, K. Takahaski, F. and Tsuji, S., (1984). Attractive quality and must-be quality, Hinshitsu (Quality, The Journal of The Japanase Society for Quality Control), 14(2), 39-48.
  14. Kiran, K., (2010). Service quality and customer satisfaction in academic libraries: Perspectives from a Malaysian university, Library Review, 59(4), 261-273.
  15. Lim, P.C., Tang, N. K. H. and Jackson, P. M., (1999). An innovative framework for health care performance measurement, Managing Service Quality, 9(6), 423-433.
  16. Matzler, K. and Hinterhuber, H. H., (1998). How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano’s model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment, Technovation, 18(1), 25-38.
  17. Negi, R., (2009). User’s perceived service quality of mobile communications: Experience from Ethiopia, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 26(7), 699-711.
  18. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. and Berry, L., (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perception of service quality, Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12-40.
  19. Program Transformasi Kerajaan, (2015). Pelan Hala Tuju 20: Memangkin Transformasi ke Arah Masa Depan Yang Lebih Cerah, Jabatan Perdana Menteri.
  20. Pinho, J. and Macedo, I., (2008). Examining the antecedents and consequences of online satisfaction within the public sector: The case of taxation service, Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 2(3), 177-193.
  21. Redfern, R. and Davey, C. L., (2003). Supply chain market orientation in new product development in the UK: A pilot case study, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 7(1), 65-77.
  22. Santouridis, I. and Trivellas, P., (2010). Investigating the impact of service quality and customer satisfaction on customer loyalty in mobile telephony in Greece, The TQM Journal, 22(3), 330-342.
  23. Shen, S., Tan, K. C. and Xie, M., (2000). An integrated approach to innovative product development using Kano’s model and QFD, European Journal of Innovation Management, 3(2), 91-9.
  24. Tan, K. C. and Shen., (2000). Integrating Kano’s model in the planning matrix of quality function deployment, Total Quality Management, 11(8), 1141-51.
  25. Wisniewski, M., (2001). Using SERVQUAL to access customer satisfaction with public sector services, Managing Service Quality, 11(6), 380-388.
  26. Witell, L. and Lofgren, M., (2007). Classifaction of quality attributes, Managing Service Quality, 17(1), 54-73.

Most read articles by the same author(s)