Research Article Published 24 January 2016

Using Action Research in Business: Developing New Practical Framework of Financial Planning Process for a New Franchise System

How to Cite

How to Cite

Mohd Harif, M. A. A., & Perry, C. (2016). Using Action Research in Business: Developing New Practical Framework of Financial Planning Process for a New Franchise System. Journal of Business Management and Accounting, 6(1), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.32890/jbma2016.6.1.8849
Mohd Amy Azhar Mohd Harif
School of Economics, Finance and Banking, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia
Chad Perry
Graduate College of Management, Southern Cross University, Coolangatta Qld, Australia
Citations
1
OpenAlex, highest of the sources checked
Reads
318 +1
Abstract + full text
Downloads
236 +2
PDF and XML
Percentile
89th
By citations, works of the same year

Article

Franchising is the fastest growing method of doing business these days, however, there is little academic research to guide or regulate industry practices. Thus, this research investigated the financial planning process in developing a new franchise system. This  study  used  action  research  methodology  to  develop  a  new  practical  framework of financial planning for a new franchise system within the Malaysian government department  franchise  regulators.  Three  main  action  research  cycles  were  conducted with  three  new  franchise  systems  seeking  to  register  with  the  Registrar  of  Franchise Malaysia (ROF). To triangulate the findings of the action research, the researcher also presented  them  at  a  National  Franchise  Workshop  (NFW).  These  activities  showed that the process of financial planning for a new franchise system should comprise 14elements with specific linkages. These practical frameworks for financial planning in a new franchise system were adopted by the ROF to be used as guideline in the process of  developing  a  new  franchise  system  and  serve  as  evaluation  tools  for  franchise registration.

Franchising action research qualitative research

Metrics & impact

Citations by source

Harvested 08-09-2026

Counts differ by index because each source crawls a different corpus. Crossref counts only registered reference lists; Google Scholar includes theses, preprints and grey literature.

OpenAlex
1
Open corpus, updated daily View →
OpenCitations
0
Open references only View →
Crossref
0
Deposited reference lists only View →
Scopus
0 Not indexed
Indexed titles only View →
Google Scholar
Publishes no citation count that can be read automatically.
Includes theses and preprints Search →
Dimensions
Publishes no citation count that can be read automatically.
Includes policy documents Search →

Citations over time

New citations recorded in each year, as reported by OpenAlex.

1
0
0
0
2023 2024 2025 2026

Reads & downloads

Abstract views 318
PDF downloads 236
XML downloads 0
Full-text HTML 0
Counted under COUNTER Release 5 rules; known robots excluded.

Attention beyond citation

Citation percentile 89th
Field-weighted citation impact 0.21
Works this article cites 17

From OpenAlex. A field-weighted impact of 1.00 is the world average for work of the same field, type and year. No Altmetric key is configured, so news, policy and social attention are not shown.

Identifiers

References

References 32
Deposited to Crossref with the article DOI
  1. Abdul, K. M. (1995). Financing your franchise. Paper from the proceedings The Second Malaysian International Franchise Conference and Exhibition, Kuala Lumpur.
  2. Adzmi, A. W. (1999). Malaysian-gateway to Asian franchising. Malaysia Franchise, (May-June), 6-7.
  3. Altricther, H. (1990). Do we need an alternative methodology for doing alternative research? In O. Zuber-Skeritt (Ed.), Action-research for change and development, Centre for the Advancement of Learning and Teaching.
  4. Baucus, D. A., & Baucus, M. S. (1997). Variations in base fees and royalties in franchising contracts. Franchising Research: An International Journal, 2(1), 15-31.
  5. Bawden, R., & Zuber-Skerritt, O. (2000). The concept of process management. Action learning, action research and process management: Theory, practice, and praxis. Brisbane, Australia: Action Research Unit, Faculty of Education, Griffith University.
  6. Berg B. L. (1989). Qualitative research methods for the social science research. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  7. Bryman, A., & Burgess, R. G. (1994). Reflection on qualitative data analysis. In A. Bryman and R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analysing qualitative data, London: Routledge. 216-226.
  8. Burgess, R. G. (1984). In the field: An introduction to field research. London: George Allen and Unwin Ltd. 44 Journal of Business Management and Accounting, 6(1) 2016: 29-
  9. Burns, R. (1994). Introduction to research methods in education. Longman Cheshire, Melbourne.
  10. Bustaman, A. (1995). Legal issues on franchising in Malaysia. Paper from the proceedings of The Second Malaysia International Franchise Conference and Exhibition, Kuala Lumpur.
  11. Carson, D., Gilmore, A., Perry, C., & Gronhaug, K. (2001). Qualitative research in marketing. London: Sage.
  12. Denzin, N. K. (1978). Sociological methods: A sourcebook. New York: McGraw Hill.
  13. Dick, B. (1992). You want to do an action research thesis? Interchange Document, University of Queensland.
  14. Dyl, E. A. (1991). Financial issues in franchising in advances in small business finance, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
  15. Franchise and Vendor Development Division. (1999). Franchise business in Malaysia: A handbook. Kuala Lumpur: The Ministry of Entrepreneur Development.
  16. Frazer, L. (1998). Motivations for franchisors to use flat continuing franchise fees. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 15(6), 587-597.
  17. Justis, R. T. (1995). What, why, and when franchising? Global trends in franchising: USA and Europe. Paper from the proceedings of The Second Malaysian International Franchise Conference and Exhibition, Kuala Lumpur.
  18. Justis, R. T., & Judd, R. (1998). Franchising. United States of America: Cincinnati South Western Publishing Company.
  19. Katz, B. G., & Owen, J. (1992). On the existence of franchise contracts and some of their implications. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 10, 567-593.
  20. Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34-46.
  21. Malaysia Franchise Act. (1998). Franchise Act 1998, Malaysia: PNMB.
  22. Marquardt, M. J. (2001). Action learning and leadership: The learning organization. 7 (5), 233-241
  23. Mat Hassan, E. (1998). PNS role in financing your franchise business. Paper from the proceedings of The Malaysia Franchise Exhibition and Conference, Kuala Lumpur.
  24. Mendelsohn, M. (1995). New bank franchise finance scheme introduced in U.K. Franchising World, 27(1), 69-70.
  25. Mendelsohn, M. (1999). The guide to franchising (6th ed.). London: Casell.
  26. Miranda, G. (1995). Franchising an overview. Kuala Lumpur: Malaysian Franchise Association.
  27. Mohd Ali, A. (1995). The franchise development program in Malaysia: A public/ private sectors synergy to promote Bumiputera participation in franchising. Paper from the proceedings of The Second Malaysian International Franchise Conference and Exhibition, Kuala Lumpur.
  28. Perry, C. & Zuber-Skerritt, O. (1992). Action research in graduate management research programs. Higher Education, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  29. Rapoport, R. N. (1970). Three dilemmas of action research. Human Relations, 23, 499-513.
  30. Sherman, A. J. (1995). International franchising: Strategies for building bridges between Asia and North America. Paper from the proceedings of The Second Malaysia International Franchise Conference and Exhibition, Kuala Lumpur.
  31. Swartz, L. N. (1995). Worldwide franchising statistics: A study of worldwide franchise association, Arthur Anderson (in co-operation with the World Franchising Council).
  32. Welsh, D. H. B. (1996). Editorial. Franchising research: An International Journal, 1(1), 3.

Most read articles by the same author(s)