GLOBAL POVERTY METRICS AND THE PROBLEM OF MISSING CONTEXT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/jbma2026.16.2.3Kata kunci:
Multidimensional poverty index, poverty-environment nexus, Sub-Saharan Africa, sustainable development goals (SDGs), deprivations.Abstrak
This study employs a mixed conceptual and secondary data analysis approach to investigate the poverty-environment nexus in Sub-Saharan Africa. Drawing on the Alkire-Foster Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI) and World Bank data from 41 Sub-Saharan African countries, it challenges the over-reliance on standardized global indices for contextual understanding of poverty and environmental sustainability. Grounded in a tripartite theoretical framework integrating behavioral, structural, and political theories of poverty, the study demonstrates how aggregated MPI metrics conceal localized deprivation patterns and how variation in survey recency across countries introduces significant methodological bias. Critically, the six countries showing MPI improvement (Benin, Comoros, Kenya, Eswatini, Mozambique, and Tanzania) are also those with the most recent data (2021–2023), raising questions about whether observed gains reflect genuine progress. The analysis also reveals there is a disconnection between the numbers of national agro-environmental policies and their implementation effectiveness, underscoring the fact that policies alone do not result in poverty reduction or environmental sustainability. To address these gaps, the study recommends the adoption of disaggregated local data, community-based poverty indicators, and more frequent dataset updates. The findings advance understanding of context-specific poverty measurement and offer a framework for evaluating the applicability of global indices across diverse national settings.
Muat turun
Diterbitkan
Terbitan
Bahagian
Lesen

Kerja ini dilesenkan di bawah Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Disclaimer
The Journal of Business Management and Accounting (JBMA) has taken all reasonable measures to ensure that material contained in this website is the original work of the author(s). However, the Journal gives no warranty and accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or the completeness of the material; no reliance should be made by any user on the material. The user should check with the authors for confirmation.
Articles published in the Journal of Business Management and Accounting (JBMA) do not represent the views held by the editors and members of the editorial board. Authors are responsible for all aspects of their articles except the editorial screen design.


















