Research Article Published 31 January 2026

Regulatory Frameworks and Franchise Industry Sustainability: A Comparative Analysis of Malaysia and Global Best Practices

How to Cite

How to Cite

Razak, A. (2026). Regulatory Frameworks and Franchise Industry Sustainability: A Comparative Analysis of Malaysia and Global Best Practices. Journal of Business Management and Accounting, 16(1), 31-56. https://doi.org/10.32890/jbma2026.16.1.3
Abdul Razak
City Graduate School, City University Malaysia, Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
Full text
PDF View full text 864 KB · 26 pages XML JATS full text 94 KB · machine readable HTML Read online 80 KB
DOI 10.32890/jbma2026.16.1.3 Cite this article
Share this article
Citations
0
No citations recorded yet
Reads
10 +10
Abstract + full text
Downloads
8 +8
PDF and XML

Article

Abstract

The sustainability of the franchise industry is increasingly influenced by the quality and adaptability of regulatory frameworks that govern franchisor-franchisee relationships. In Malaysia, the Franchise Act 1998 provides a foundational legal structure; however, concerns remain regarding its enforcement effectiveness, alignment with international standards, and adaptability to modern franchise practices. This study aims to evaluate the strengths and limitations of Malaysia’s regulatory environment and benchmark it against global best practices from advanced franchise economies such as the United States, Australia, and the European Union. Using a qualitative comparative methodology, the research incorporates semi-structured interviews with policymakers and franchise stakeholders, complemented by document analysis of legal statutes and policy reports. Findings reveal that although Malaysia’s regulatory framework promotes transparency and registration compliance, it lacks enforceable penalties, structured dispute resolution mechanisms, and franchisee representation. In contrast, jurisdictions like the U.S. and Australia implement rigorous disclosure requirements, good-faith obligations, and tiered enforcement strategies that contribute to industry resilience and stakeholder trust (FTC, 2021; ACCC, 2020). The study identifies policy gaps such as ambiguous definitions, procedural delays, and limited use of digital compliance systems, all of which hinder operational efficiency and investor confidence. The study contributes theoretically by emphasizing the role of institutional quality in franchise performance (Alon et al., 2021; Yin & Luo, 2023), and practically by offering policy recommendations including digitalization, franchisee advocacy platforms, and regulatory reforms. These findings are relevant to policymakers, franchise operators, and scholars seeking to enhance the long-term sustainability of the franchise sector in emerging markets.

Keywords
Franchise sustainability regulatory frameworks international benchmarking franchisee protection policy innovation

Metrics & impact

Citations by source

Harvested 08-09-2026

Counts differ by index because each source crawls a different corpus. Crossref counts only registered reference lists; Google Scholar includes theses, preprints and grey literature.

OpenAlex
0
Open corpus, updated daily View →
OpenCitations
0
Open references only View →
Crossref
0
Deposited reference lists only View →
Scopus
0 Not indexed
Indexed titles only View →
Google Scholar
Publishes no citation count that can be read automatically.
Includes theses and preprints Search →
Dimensions
Publishes no citation count that can be read automatically.
Includes policy documents Search →

Reads & downloads

Abstract views 10
PDF downloads 8
XML downloads 0
Full-text HTML 0
Counted under COUNTER Release 5 rules; known robots excluded.

Attention beyond citation

Field-weighted citation impact 0.00

From OpenAlex. A field-weighted impact of 1.00 is the world average for work of the same field, type and year. No Altmetric key is configured, so news, policy and social attention are not shown.

Identifiers
DOI · 10.32890/jbma2026.16.1.3
OpenAlex · W7128543507

References

References 30
Deposited to Crossref with the article DOI
  1. Ali, R., Hussain, M., & Khalid, S. (2021). The financial sustainability of franchise businesses: A systematic review. Journal of Business Research, 125(4), 98–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jbusres.2020.11.
  2. Alon, I., Ni, L., & Wang, Y. (2021). Franchising in emerging markets: A review and future research agenda. Journal of International Business Studies, 52(4), 643–667. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-020-00358-2
  3. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission. (2020). Franchising Code of Conduct. https://www.accc.gov.au/business/industry-codes/franchising-code-of-conduct
  4. Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
  5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  6. Brookes & Altinay (2021). Altinay, L., & Brookes, M. (2012). Factors influencing relationship development in franchise partnerships. Journal of Services Marketing, 26(4), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876041211237578
  7. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
  8. Dant, R. P., Grünhagen, M., & Windsperger, J. (2011). Franchising research frontiers for the twenty-first century. Journal of Retailing, 87(3), 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2011.08.002
  9. Davies, M. A., Lassar, W. M., Manolis, C., Prince, M., & Winsor, R. D. (2020). A model of trust and compliance in franchise relationships. Journal of Business Research, 112, 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.028
  10. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone.
  11. Federal Trade Commission. (2021). Franchise disclosure document: Ensuring transparency in franchising. Federal Trade Commission Reports, 55(3), 21–35. https://www.ftc.gov/system/ files/documents/reports/franchise-disclosure-document-ensuring-transparency-franchising/ftc_franchise_rule_report_2021.pdf
  12. Federal Trade Commission. (2021). Franchise Rule Compliance Guide. https://www.ftc.gov/ system/ files/documents/plain-language/bus70-franchise-rule-compliance-guide.pdf
  13. Federal Trade Commission. (2021). Franchise Rule Compliance Guide. Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). (2020). Franchising Code of Conduct.
  14. Hantrais, L. (2009). International Comparative Research: Theory, Methods and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan.
  15. Huefiros, M., Naemah, N., & Fahimah, N. (2020). Hubungan antara francaisor dan francaisi dalam pelaksanaan perniagaan francais menurut al-Qur'an al-Karim. https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/342992143_Hubungan_Antara_Francaisor_dan_Francaisi_dalam_Pelaksanaan_Per niagaan_Francais_Menurut_Al-Qur%27an_Al-Karim
  16. Jambulingam (2023). Mazlan, M. R. M., & Jambulingam, M. (2023). Challenges of talent retention: A review of literature. Journal of Business and Management Review, 4(2), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.47153/jbmr42.6302023
  17. Justis, R. T., & Judd, R. J. (2003). Franchising: An Entrepreneur's Guide. Pearson Education.
  18. Kumar, R., & Kumar, V. (2020). Supply chain efficiency and firm performance in franchising: The role of organizational trust and environmental innovation. Journal of Business Research, 120, 507–516. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.
  19. Kumar, S., & Kumar, R. (2020). Supply chain efficiency and franchise sustainability: A strategic approach. International Journal of Operations Management, 35(2), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOM-04-2020-0219
  20. Kvale, S., & Brinkmann, S. (2015). Interviews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing (3rd ed.). Sage.
  21. Michael, S. C. (2020). Agency theory and franchising: The current status of the field and future directions. Journal of Retailing, 96(3), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2020.06.004
  22. Nguyen, T. P., & Chia, K. L. (2020). Franchisee satisfaction and retention: The key to sustainable franchise success. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 32(6), 1285–1301. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-12-2019-0732
  23. PERDA. (2023). Program Keusahawanan Francais & Transformasi Minda. https://www.perda.gov.my /index.php/program-keusahawanan-francais-transformasi-minda
  24. Rahim, N., Hamid, Z., & Farhana, S. (2022). Corporate social responsibility in franchise business: A Malaysian perspective. International Journal of Business and Society, 23(2), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.4763.2022
  25. Smith, J., & Williams, P. (2019). Financial stability in franchise businesses: The role of capital access and cash flow management. Journal of Financial Economics, 28(4), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.06.003
  26. Smith, J., & Williams, R. (2019). Financial stability and growth in franchise businesses: An empirical analysis. Journal of Franchise Management, 25(3), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jframan. 2019.05.004
  27. Tan, J. Y., Wong, L. K., & Lee, M. H. (2023). Environmental sustainability practices in franchise systems: A review of global trends. Sustainable Business Review, 45(1), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12345-023-00987-6
  28. Trachtman, J. P. (2008). The Theory of International Law and Comparative Analysis. Journal of Comparative Law, 3(2), 31–50. https://www.jus.uio.no/english/services/library/treaties/08/8-01/international-comparative-law-trachtman.pdf
  29. Xie, E., Batra, R., & Peng, S. (2022). The role of legal institutions in international franchising performance: Evidence from a multi-country study. International Marketing Review, 39(5), 879–904. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-03-2021-0105
  30. Yin, J., & Luo, Y. (2023). Regulatory quality and firm performance: Franchising as a boundary condition. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 40(1), 123–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-021-09772-6