Research Article Published 31 July 2025

The The Role of Internal Audit in Promoting Organisational Ethics and Integrity

How to Cite

How to Cite

Geraldo, J. E. (2025). The The Role of Internal Audit in Promoting Organisational Ethics and Integrity. Journal of Business Management and Accounting, 15(2), 209-217. https://doi.org/10.32890/jbma2025.15.2.7
Josephine Eyra Geraldo
Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Ghana
Full text
PDF View full text 478 KB · 9 pages XML JATS full text 49 KB · machine readable HTML Read online 33 KB
DOI 10.32890/jbma2025.15.2.7 Cite this article
Share this article
Citations
0
No citations recorded yet
Reads
249 +7
Abstract + full text
Downloads
179 +3
PDF and XML

Article

Abstract

Internal auditing has evolved from a traditional compliance function into a strategic mechanism for promoting ethical governance and institutional integrity. Amid increasing public scrutiny over corruption, unethical conduct, and fragile accountability, particularly in public sector institutions, there has been less research to assess how it affects these practices. This paper critically examines the underexplored yet vital role of internal audit in fostering organisational ethics and integrity. The findings reveal that internal audit possesses significant but underleveraged potential in promoting ethical culture and values. Key barriers include insufficient support from top management, inadequate resources, weak integration of ethics into audit planning, and pervasive negative perceptions of the audit function. The study further identifies structural, cultural, and institutional factors that limit the ethical influence of internal auditors.

 

Keywords
Internal Audit Organisational Ethics Integrity Governance Accountability

Metrics & impact

Citations by source

Harvested 08-09-2026

Counts differ by index because each source crawls a different corpus. Crossref counts only registered reference lists; Google Scholar includes theses, preprints and grey literature.

OpenAlex
0
Open corpus, updated daily View →
OpenCitations
0
Open references only View →
Crossref
0
Deposited reference lists only View →
Scopus
0 Not indexed
Indexed titles only View →
Google Scholar
Publishes no citation count that can be read automatically.
Includes theses and preprints Search →
Dimensions
Publishes no citation count that can be read automatically.
Includes policy documents Search →

Reads & downloads

Abstract views 249
PDF downloads 179
XML downloads 0
Full-text HTML 0
Counted under COUNTER Release 5 rules; known robots excluded.

Attention beyond citation

Field-weighted citation impact 0.00

From OpenAlex. A field-weighted impact of 1.00 is the world average for work of the same field, type and year. No Altmetric key is configured, so news, policy and social attention are not shown.

Identifiers
DOI · 10.32890/jbma2025.15.2.7
OpenAlex · W6965062096

References

References 42
Deposited to Crossref with the article DOI
  1. Ahmad, R., Hashim, R. A., & Abdul Latiff, A. R. (2024). Ethical Behaviour and Integrity Among Employees In The Public Sector: A Critical Review. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Management Practices, 7(25), 467–496. https://doi.org/10.35631/ijemp.725036
  2. Aikins, A. E., Mensah, J. V., & Kumi-Kyereme, A. (2022). Investigating the conditions under which internal auditing is carried out in selected local governments in the Central Region of Ghana. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-10-2021-0186
  3. Ali, C. Ben. (2020). Agency Theory and Fraud. In Corporate Fraud Exposed. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78973-417-120201009
  4. Alzeban, A., & Gwilliam, D. (2014). Factors affecting the internal audit effectiveness: A survey of the Saudi public sector. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 23(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2014.06.001
  5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  6. Chambers, A. D., & Odar, M. (2015). A new vision for internal audit. Managerial Auditing Journal, 30(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-08-2014-1073
  7. Chang, Y. T., Chen, H., Cheng, R. K., & Chi, W. (2019). The impact of internal audit attributes on the effectiveness of internal control over operations and compliance. Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2018.11.002
  8. Coetzee, P. (2016). Contribution of internal auditing to risk management: Perceptions of public sector senior management. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 29(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-12-2015-0215
  9. Cohen, A., & Sayag, G. (2010). The effectiveness of internal auditing: An empirical examination of its determinants in Israeli organisations. Australian Accounting Review, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-2561.2010.00097.x
  10. Corsi, C., & Prencipe, A. (2015). Corporate governance and capital structure interactions in new technology-based firms. The effects of ownership structure and board of directors on firm’s …. In … International Journal of Contemporary Research.
  11. Creswell, J. W., Vicki L., & Plano Clark. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research 2018. In Beyond Bullying.
  12. Davis, P. E., Bendickson, J. S., Muldoon, J., & McDowell, W. C. (2021). Agency theory utility and social entrepreneurship: issues of identity and role conflict. Review of Managerial Science, 15(8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-020-00423-y
  13. Donaldson, L., & Davis, J. H. (1991). Stewardship Theory or Agency Theory: CEO Governance and Shareholder Returns. Australian Journal of Management, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/031289629101600103
  14. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271992
  15. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (2016). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence and Implications. In The Corporation and Its Stakeholders. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442673496-011
  16. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4279003
  17. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Agency Problems and Residual Claims. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.1086/467038
  18. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman: London. In Business Ethics Quarterly (Vol. 4, Issue 4).
  19. Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2013). Stakeholder Theory, Value, and Firm Performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.5840/beq20132314
  20. Hung, P. H. (2023). The Influence of Cultural, Legal and Institutional Factors on Auditors’ Roles, Responsibilities and Perceptions of Audit Quality. European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, 1(5). https://doi.org/10.59324/ejtas.2023.1(5).99
  21. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  22. Junior, B. (2023). Determinants of Procurement Ethics Among Public Institutions in Ghana: An Empirical Study. Determinants of Procurement Ethics Atiga & Tanzubil African Journal for Management Research. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajmr
  23. Kinyera, J. P. (2019). Developing policy framework for optimising internal audit services to a wide range of stakeholders in corporate governance structure.
  24. Leung, P., Cooper, B. J., & Perera, L. (2011). Accountability structures and management relationships of internal audit: An Australian study. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26(9). https://doi.org/10.1108/02686901111171457
  25. Lund, T. (2012). Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches: Some Arguments for Mixed Methods Research. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 56(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2011.568674
  26. Mahajan, R., Lim, W. M., Sareen, M., Kumar, S., & Panwar, R. (2023). Stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Research, 166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114104
  27. Menza, S. K., Aga, A., & Jerene, W. (2019). Determinants of Internal Audit Effectiveness (IAE) in the Ethiopian Public Enterprise, Case of Southern Region. Journal of Resources Development and Management. https://doi.org/10.7176/jrdm/52-02
  28. Mihret, D. G., & Yismaw, A. W. (2007). Internal audit effectiveness: An Ethiopian public sector case study. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(5). https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900710750757
  29. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1997.9711022105
  30. Njui, R. (2012). The Effectiveness of Internal Audit in Promoting Good Governance in the Public Sector in Kenya. International Journal for Management Science and Terchnology, November.
  31. Omolaye, K. E., & Jacob, R. B. (2018). The Role of Internal Auditing In Enhancing Good Corporate Governance Practice in an Organization. International Journal of Accounting Research, 06(01). https://doi.org/10.4172/2472-114x.1000174
  32. Panda, B., & Leepsa, N. M. (2017). Agency theory: Review of theory and evidence on problems and perspectives. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686217701467
  33. Pangastuti, L. A. (2023). The Role of Internal Auditing in Upholding Corporate Governance Standards. Advances in Managerial Auditing Research, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.60079/amar.v1i3.
  34. Parker, S., & Johnson, L. A. (2017a). The Development of Internal Auditing as a Profession in the U.S. During the Twentieth Century. In Source: The Accounting Historians Journal (Vol. 44, Issue 2).
  35. Parker, S., & Johnson, L. A. (2017b). The Development of Internal Auditing as a Profession in the U.S. During the Twentieth Century. In Source: The Accounting Historians Journal (Vol. 44, Issue 2).
  36. Sarens, G., & De Beelde, I. (2006). The Relationship between Internal Audit and Senior Management: A Qualitative Analysis of Expectations and Perceptions. International Journal of Auditing, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-1123.2006.00351.x
  37. Singh, K. S. D., Ravindran, S., Ganesan, Y., Abbasi, G. A., & Haron, H. (2021). Antecedents and internal audit quality implications of internal audit effectiveness. International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 16(2).
  38. Ta, T. T., & Doan, T. N. (2022). Factors Affecting Internal Audit Effectiveness: Empirical Evidence from Vietnam. International Journal of Financial Studies, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs10020037
  39. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010a). Putting the human back in “human research methodology”: The researcher in mixed methods research. In Journal of Mixed Methods Research (Vol. 4, Issue 4). https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689810382532
  40. Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010b). SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural. In SAGE publications (Vol. 42, Issue 5).
  41. Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Applied Social Research Methods Series, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.1097/00001610-199503000-00004
  42. Zardkoohi, A., Harrison, J. S., & Josefy, M. A. (2017). Conflict and Confluence: The Multidimensionality of Opportunism in Principal–Agent Relationships. Journal of Business Ethics, 146(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2887-7