Research Article Published 30 July 2024

Evaluating the Application of Components Governance and Culture Based on COSO ERM at PT. Agro

How to Cite

How to Cite

Yuwono, M. A., & Ellitan, L. (2024). Evaluating the Application of Components Governance and Culture Based on COSO ERM at PT. Agro. Journal of Business Management and Accounting, 14(2), 307-338. https://doi.org/10.32890/jbma2024.14.2.5
Matias Andika Yuwono
Faculty of Business, Widya Mandala Catholic University, Indonesia
Lena Ellitan
Faculty of Business, Widya Mandala Catholic University, Indonesia
Full text
PDF View full text 2 MB · 32 pages XML JATS full text 92 KB · machine readable HTML Read online 75 KB
DOI 10.32890/jbma2024.14.2.5 Cite this article
Share this article
Citations
1
OpenCitations, highest of the sources checked
Reads
664
Abstract + full text
Downloads
527 +2
PDF and XML

Article

Abstract

This article explores the effective establishment of governance and corporate culture within companies by implementing the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) Enterprise Risk Management (ERM). Utilizing COSO ERM provides an understandable framework for shaping corporate governance, defining company strategy, instilling culture and values, and appreciating competent employees. The study demonstrates that companies implementing COSO ERM's governance and culture components can attain their anticipated goals by minimizing potential risks. By employing a qualitative case study analysis, researchers explored the topic in depth; the research focuses on PT. Agro, revealing its successful implementation of COSO ERM's governance and culture components. The findings showcase PT. Agro established robust directorial supervision, an effective assessment system, adoption of a three-line organizational structure prioritizing risk control, and cultivation of an influential work culture through applying the BISA culture and IACE company values. The article emphasizes the significance of employees as valuable assets for companies, with PT. Agro consistently develops competent individuals for mutual benefit. Through ongoing training, skill-building workshops, and mentorship programs, PT. Agro invests in its workforce, fostering a culture of excellence and innovation. This commitment strengthens internal capabilities and nurtures employee satisfaction and loyalty. This study contributes to the limited discussion on the COSO ERM governance and culture components, providing a detailed exploration of the five principles and serving as a valuable material for future research in other companies.

Keywords
Governance and culture COSO ERM ERM risk management

Metrics & impact

Citations by source

Harvested 08-09-2026

Counts differ by index because each source crawls a different corpus. Crossref counts only registered reference lists; Google Scholar includes theses, preprints and grey literature.

OpenCitations
1
Open references only View →
OpenAlex
0
Open corpus, updated daily View →
Semantic Scholar
0
S2AG corpus View →
Crossref
0
Deposited reference lists only View →
Scopus
0 Not indexed
Indexed titles only View →
Google Scholar
Publishes no citation count that can be read automatically.
Includes theses and preprints Search →
Dimensions
Publishes no citation count that can be read automatically.
Includes policy documents Search →

Reads & downloads

Abstract views 664
PDF downloads 527
XML downloads 0
Full-text HTML 0
Counted under COUNTER Release 5 rules; known robots excluded.

Attention beyond citation

Field-weighted citation impact 0.00
Works this article cites 25

From OpenAlex. A field-weighted impact of 1.00 is the world average for work of the same field, type and year. No Altmetric key is configured, so news, policy and social attention are not shown.

Identifiers
DOI · 10.32890/jbma2024.14.2.5
OpenAlex · W4401236148
Semantic Scholar · CorpusID 271667823

References

References 35
Deposited to Crossref with the article DOI
  1. Alazzabi, W. Y. E., Mustafa, H., & Karage, A. I. (2023). Risk management, top management support, internal audit activities and fraud mitigation. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(2), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-11-2019-0147
  2. Arisandy, F. N., Wardayati, S. M., Sayekti, Y., Arif, A., Warsito, Prita, S., & Wahyuni, N. E. (2022). Kajian teoritis tentang ukuran perusahaan dan jumlah dewan direksi terhadap kinerja keuangan perusahaan melalui penerapan model COSO Enterprise Risk Management. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Pajak, 23(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.29040/jap.v23i1.5317
  3. Attaf, W. F., & Bensbahou, A. (2023). Governance of internal audit and its role in adding value A field study at Al-Watania Cement Company (Aden) in the context of improving its environmental management. E3S Web of Conferences, 412, 01080. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202341201080
  4. Clarke, T. (2010). Recurring Crises in Anglo-American Corporate Governance. Contributions to Political Economy, 29(1), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/cpe/bzq002
  5. Conyon, M., Judge, W. Q., & Useem, M. (2011). Corporate governance and the 2008-09 financial crisis. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(5), 399–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1467-8683.2011.00879.x
  6. Dhyana Putra, I. G., & Asri Dwija Putri, I. G. A. M. (2020). Pengaruh penerapan prinsip-prinsip good governance dan budaya organisasi terhadap kinerja keuangan. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 30(8), 2078. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2020.v30.i08.p14 du Plessis, J. J., Hargovan, A., & Harris, J. (2018). Principles of Contemporary Corporate Governance. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108329453
  7. Febrianti, I., & Novita, N. (2021). COSO’s Enterprise Risk Management framework in agriculture startup to support the achievement of SDGs pillars. TIJAB (The International Journal of Applied Business), 5(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.20473/tijab. V5.I1.2021.18-36
  8. Fernando, Y., Chiappetta Jabbour, C. J., & Wah, W.-X. (2019). Pursuing green growth in technology firms through the connections between environmental innovation and sustainable business performance: Does service capability matter? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.09.031
  9. Gleim Publications. (2021). Study Unit Four Risk Management.
  10. Handoko, B. L., Septianto, D., & Alyssa, A. (2019). Aplikasi penggunaan enterprise risk management (ERM) integrated framework Coso untuk mendeteksi risiko kecurangan pada transaksi tidak biasa unit bisnis Pt. Doremi Pizza Indonesia [Application of integrated enterprise risk management (ERM) COSO framework to detect fraud risk in unusual transactions at PT. Doremi Pizza, Indonesia]. DeReMa (Development Research of Management): Jurnal Manajemen, 14(1), 134. https://doi.org/10.19166/derema.v14i1.1181
  11. Hardjomidjojo, H., Pranata, C., & Baigorria, G. (2022). Rapid assessment model on risk management based on ISO 31000:2018. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1063(1), 012043. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1063/1/012043
  12. Hassan, M. K., Abdulkarim, M. E., & Ismael, H. R. (2022). Risk governance: Exploring the role of organisational culture. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 18(1), 77–99. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-01-2021-0003
  13. Hock, B., Burch, C., Hock, K., & Kaluhiokalani, K. (2019). CIA Part I Essentials of Internal Auditing.
  14. Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as Ecology. Harvard Business Review, 82(3), 68-78.
  15. Institute of Internal Auditor. (2022). The IIA’s CIA Learning System Part 1. Insitute Internal Auditor.
  16. Isensee, C., Teuteberg, F., Griese, K.-M., & Topi, C. (2020). The relationship between organizational culture, sustainability, and digitalization in SMEs: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 122944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jclepro.2020.122944
  17. Kalia, A., & Gill, S. (2023). Corporate governance and risk management: A systematic review and synthesis for future research. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 20(3), 409–461. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-07-2022-0151
  18. Karanja, E. (2017). Does the hiring of chief risk officers align with the COSO/ISO enterprise risk management frameworks? International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 25(3), 274–295. https://doi.org/10.1108/ IJAIM-04-2016-0037
  19. Karsono, B. (2023). Good Corporate Governance: Transparency, accountability, responsibility, independency dan fairness (literature review). Dinasti International Journal of Management Science, 4(5), 811–821. https://doi.org/10.31933/ dijms.v4i5.1860
  20. Musallam, S. R. M. (2023). Board of directors and financial performance: The role of risk management in Palestinian-listed companies. Management & Sustainability: An Arab Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/MSAR-06-2023-0030
  21. Nasal, T., & Gani, L. (2023). Evaluation of internal audit role as a governance, risk and compliance partner, trusted advisor and value driver to implement strategy. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi, 7(2), 346–362. https://doi.org/10.23887/jia.v7i2.47931
  22. Poddar, A., Narula, S. A., & Zutshi, A. (2019). A study of corporate social responsibility practices of the top Bombay Stock Exchange 500 companies in India and their alignment with the Sustainable Development Goals. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1184–1205. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1741
  23. Rajab, B., & Schachler, M. H. (2009). Corporate risk disclosure by UK firms: Trends and determinants. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 5(3), 224. https://doi.org/10.1504/WREMSD.2009.026801
  24. Ricardianto, P., Lembang, A. T., Tatiana, Y., Ruminda, M., Kholdun, A. I., Kusuma, I. G. N. A. G. E. T., Sembiring, H. F. A., Sudewo, G. C., Suryani, D., & Endri, E. (2023). Enterprise risk management and business strategy on firm performance: The role of mediating competitive advantage. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 11(1), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.5267/j. uscm.2022.10.002
  25. Rikaz, S., Ulhaq, A. D., Mulyono, R. H., & Cahyaningtyas, R. (2022). Perancangan COSO Enterprise Risk Management Pada Perusahaan Penerbit Dan Percetakan (Studi Kasus Pada CV.Gema Insani Press). 3rd National Conference on Accounting and Fraud Auditing, 1.
  26. Roberts, J. J., & Van den Steen, E. (2000). Shareholder interests, human capital investment and corporate governance. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.230019
  27. Scherer, A. G., Rasche, A., Palazzo, G., & Spicer, A. (2016). Managing for political corporate social responsibility: New challenges and directions for PCSR 2.0. Journal of Management Studies, 53(3), 273–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12203
  28. Sekar, M. (2022). Three lines of defense. In Machine Learning for Auditors (pp. 3–12). Apress. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-8051-5_1
  29. Sugiyono. (2010). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
  30. Sun, W., Stewart, J., & Pollard, D. (Eds.). (2011). Corporate Governance and the Global Financial Crisis. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511736599
  31. Tang, J., & Karim, K. E. (2019). Financial fraud detection and big data analytics – implications on auditors’ use of fraud brainstorming session. Managerial Auditing Journal, 34(3), 324–337. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-01-2018-1767
  32. The Institute of Internal Auditors. (2017). International Professional Practices Framework (IPPF). The IIA Research Foundation.
  33. Wahyuni, R. S., & Novita, N. (2021). COSO ERM Framework as the Basis of Strategic Planning in Islamic Banking. Jurnal Keuangan Dan Perbankan, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.26905/ jkdp.v25i1.5123
  34. Yeoh, P. (2010). Causes of the global financial crisis: Learning from the competing insights. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 7(1), 42–69. https://doi.org/10.1057/jdg.2009.18
  35. Zain, M. (2022). Study Book CIA Part 1.

Most read articles by the same author(s)