Nilai Ekonomi Khidmat Rekreasi Taman Pertanian Malaysia, Shah Alam

Authors

  • Jamal Othman Fakulti Ekonomi dun Pengurusan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Basri Abdul Talib Fakulti Ekonomi dun Pengurusan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Redzuan Othman Fakulti Ekonomi dun Pengurusan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms2004.11.1.10

Keywords:

Taman Pertanian Malaysia, Pelancongan tani, Isu Normatif, Kaedah Kos Perjalanan, Faedah Rekreasi

Abstract

Pembangunan pesat prasarana berdekatan dengan lokasi Taman Pertanian Malaysia (TPM) di Shah Alum Selangor telah menimbulkan persoalan ekonomi normatif sama ada TPM wajar terus beroperasi bagi menjayakan matlamat asal atau ditukar kepada kegunaan alternatifsejajar dengan arus pembangunan kawasan sekeliling. Kajian ini cuba menganggar nilai ekonomi faedah rekreasi di kalangan pelancong-pelancong domestik ke TPM dengan menggunakan Kaedah Kos Perjalanan. Kajian mendapati nilai faedah bersih sebanyak RM4.33 bagi setiap lawatan per pelawat. Berdasarkan kadar diskaun sosial 10%, nilai kini faedah kasar agregat dianggar sebanyak RM8.4 juta (RM6700 per hektar) manakala nilai kini faedah bersih sebanyak RM5.5 juta (RM4345 sehektar). Dapatan nilai faedah bersih bagi setiap pelawat mencadangkan perkhidmatan rekreasi TPM yang sedia ada tidak menawarkan faedah yang tinggi kepada pengunjung. Namun, TPM berpotensi menjadi destinasi pelancongan eko-tani yang berdaya maju dalam negara dun di rantau ASEAN sekiranya dilakukan usaha-usaha pembaikan yang inovatif dun radikal, termasuk meningkatkan kecekapan pengurusun TPM.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Faber, S. (1988). The value of coastal wetlands for recreation: An appli-cation of travel cost and contingent valuation methodologies. De-partment of Economic, Lousiana State University, Baton Rouge, L.A. Journal of Environmental Management. 26: 299-312 Fletcher, ]., Adamowicz, W. & Graham-Tomasi, T. (1990). The Travel Cost Model of Recreation Demand: Theoretical and Empirical Is-sues. Leisure Science, 12:119-147

Hanley, N. & Splash, C. L. (1993). Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Environ-ment. Aldershot: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.

Jamal Othman & Redzuan Othman (1998). Economic benefits of wetlands biodiversity: Case of fireflies recreation. Tropical Biodiversity 5(1), 65-74.

Jamal Othman (2000). Economic benefits of wetland-based recreation: Case of Kuala Selangor fireflies and nature park. Malaysian Jour-nal of Environmental Management. (1), 41-54.

Kealy, M.J. & Bishop, R.C. (1986). Theoretical and empirical specifica-tion issues in Travel Cost Demand Studies. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 68(3): 660-667.

Larson, D. M. (1992). Further results on willingness to pay for nonmarket goods. Journal of Environmental Economics and Manage-ment. (23): 101-122.

Shuib, A. (1991). Effects of time cost on recreational benefit estimation. Malaysian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 8, 41-51. Taman Pertanian Malaysia, Bukit Cahaya Seri Alam, Shah Alam. Brosur 2001.

Willis, K., Garrod, G. & Chee T. (1996). Valuation and analysis of con-sumer demand for forest recreation areas in Peninsula Malaysia. In S. Lee, D. May, I. Gauld and J. Bishop (Eds). Conservation, Man-agement and Development of Forest Resources, Proceedings of the Malaysia-UK Programme Workshop. Forest Research Institute Malaysia. IJMS 11 (1), 165-179 (2004) 179 Aw npa'wnn'swli' MMM

Downloads

Published

05-06-2004

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-08
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/ijms2004.11.1.10 OpenAlex W7020981292

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>