Economic Valuation of Household Preference for Solid Waste Management in Malaysia: A Choice Modeling Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/ijms2006.13.1.1Abstract
Downloads
References
Agamuthu, P. (2001). Solid Waste: Principles and Management, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Malaya: Kuala Lumpur.
Adamowicz, W., Louviere J. & Williams M. (1994). Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods for Valuing Environmental Amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26, 271-292.
Boxall, P., Adamovicz, W., Swait, J., Williams M., & Louviere, J. (1996). A Comparison of Stated Preference Methods for Environmental Valuation. Ecological Economics. 18, 243-253.
Morrison, M. D., Bennett, J. W., & Blamey, R. K. (1999). Valuing Improved Wetland Quality Using Choice Modelling. Water Resources Research, 35(9): 2805-2814.
Mourato, S. (1999). Household Demand for Improved Solid Waste Management in Malaysia. Paper presented at the Workshop on Economic Valuation of Environmental Resource, organized by EPU and DANCED, Renaissance Palm Garden Hotel, Puchong, May 13-15. IJMS 14 (1), 189-212 (2006) 211
Othman, J., Bennett, J. & Blamey, R. (2004). Environmental Values and Resource Management Options: A Choice Modelling www.ijms.uum.edu.my Experience in Malaysia. Environment and Development Economics, 9 Part 6.
Othman, J. (2002). Household Preferences for Improved Solid Waste Management in Malaysia. EEPSEA Research Report Series #8, Dec.
The World Bank. (1999). What a Waste: Solid Waste Management in Asia. Urban Development Sector Unit, East Asia and Pacific Region, Washington D.C, May. 212 IJMS 14 (1), 189-212 (2006)
Published
Issue
Section
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-08Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.












