Research Article Published 23 January 2018

Determinants of Productivity: A Conceptual Review of Economic and Social Factors

How to Cite

How to Cite

Danlami, I. A., Hidthiir, M. H., & Hassan, S. (2018). Determinants of Productivity: A Conceptual Review of Economic and Social Factors. Journal of Business Management and Accounting, 8(1), 63-71. https://doi.org/10.32890/jbma2018.8.1.8798
Ibrahim Abdulhamid Danlami
School of Economics Finance and Banking, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia
Mohammad Helmi Hidthiir
School of Economics Finance and Banking, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia
Sallahuddin Hassan
School of Economics Finance and Banking, College of Business, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Sintok, Kedah, Malaysia
Citations
4
OpenAlex, highest of the sources checked
Reads
509
Abstract + full text
Downloads
555 +1
PDF and XML
Percentile
88th
By citations, works of the same year

Article

Welfare improvement is always a key and one of the major objectives of many nations. One of the most important ways of improving societal welfare is through productivity improvements hence various studies have been conducted in relation to this topic. in addition to the current developments in this area of research, this paper attempts to provide in-depth review of previous studies on the determinants of productivity with the aim of identifying both economic and social factors that affect the level of productivity. The paper shows that previous studies on the determinants of productivity are of different folds (on a different basis). The basis of the previous studies includes – that of economic factors and social factors –that of statistical method of analysis and non-statistical method of analysis, some studies are based on tangible “goods†while some are based on intangible “servicesâ€, some factors influence productivity positively while some negatively. Even though, the positive and negative effects of some variables are recognized to be non-mutually exclusive as the same variable might have both positive and negative influence on productivity in two different studies or countries due to the existence of discrepancy of some socio-economic conditions, technological strength and factor intensity among countries, areas of studies and organizations. Also, few studies exist on the determinant of productivity in the service sector compared with those in the goods sector. This paper suggests more empirical studies to be conducted in different countries, organizations and areas of studies especially, on the service sector productivity, as generalizations without empirical studies could be inconclusive and the effects of the determinants may be understated or overstated.

Determinants of productivity productivity productivity improvements developing economies

Metrics & impact

Citations by source

Harvested 10-09-2026

Counts differ by index because each source crawls a different corpus. Crossref counts only registered reference lists; Google Scholar includes theses, preprints and grey literature.

OpenAlex
4
Open corpus, updated daily View →
OpenCitations
3
Open references only View →
Crossref
2
Deposited reference lists only View →
Scopus
0 Not indexed
Indexed titles only View →
Google Scholar
Publishes no citation count that can be read automatically.
Includes theses and preprints Search →
Dimensions
Publishes no citation count that can be read automatically.
Includes policy documents Search →

Citations over time

New citations recorded in each year, as reported by OpenAlex.

1
1
0
0
2
0
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026

Reads & downloads

Abstract views 509
PDF downloads 555
XML downloads 0
Full-text HTML 0
Counted under COUNTER Release 5 rules; known robots excluded.

Attention beyond citation

Citation percentile 88th
Field-weighted citation impact 0.52
Works this article cites 9

From OpenAlex. A field-weighted impact of 1.00 is the world average for work of the same field, type and year. No Altmetric key is configured, so news, policy and social attention are not shown.

Identifiers

References

References 14
Deposited to Crossref with the article DOI
  1. Ahmad, E. M. & Kialashki, R. (2017). Asia Pacific productivity development determinants. World Journal Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 13(1), 57–64.
  2. Armistead, C., Johnston, R. & Slack, N. (1988). The strategic determinants of service productivity. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 8(3) 95–108.
  3. Arranz-Aperte, L. (2014). The Impact of wage dispersion on labor productivity: Evidence from Finnish workers. In Polacheck, S. W. (Ed.) New analysis of workers well-being, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 77–103.
  4. Auzina-Emsina, A. (2014). Labor productivity, economic growth and global competitiveness in post-crisis period. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156, 317–321.
  5. Belay, A. M., Kasie, F. M., Helo, P., Takala, J. & Powell, D. J. (2014). Adoption of quality management practice: An investigation of its relationship with labor productivity for labor-intensive manufacturing companies. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 21(1), 77–100.
  6. Boghean, C. & State, M. (2015). The relation between foreign direct investment (FDI) and labor productivity in European Union countries. Procedia – Economic and Finance, 32, 278–285.
  7. Callaghan, B. (1990). Productivity for Profit. Work Study, 39(2), 6–19.
  8. Chapman, R. & Al-Khawaldeh, K. (2002). TQM and labor productivity in Jordanian industrial companies. The TQM Magazine, 14(4), 248–262.
  9. Chen, S. (2013). What determines bank productivity? International evidence on the impact of banking competition, bank regulation and the global financial crisis. In Jeon, B. N. & Olivero, M. P. (Ed.) Global Banking, Financial Markets and Crises (International Financial Review, Vol. 14), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 141–171.
  10. Honeycutt, A. (1989). Maximizing the employee productivity factor. International Journal of Manpower, 10(4), 24–27.
  11. Islam, S. & Shazali, S. T. S. (2011). Determinants of manufacturing productivity: Pilot study on labor-intensive industries. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 60(6), 567–582.
  12. Sharma, S. K. & Dalip, R. (2014). Efficiency and productivity analysis of Indian banking industry using Hicks-Moorsteen approach. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(1), 57–84.
  13. Sukurai, K. (1986). Japanese worker attitudes: A key factor in productivity. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 6(1), 42–53.
  14. Tsauni, A. M. (2013). Productivity in Nigeria: conceptual, measurement and empirical issues. Cypress Concepts and Solutions Ltd, Ibadan.