The letter killeth: Writing and scriptism (“The letter killeth”: Penulisan dan skriptisme)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Linguistics has always stood against the belief, widespread across many cultures, that the true, primary, correct form of a language is located in its written version. Roy Harris called this belief ‘scriptism’, and made it one of the component fallacies of his ‘integrationist’ critique of mainstream linguistics, which he regarded as ‘segregationist’ in its aim of separating a language system from actual verbal communicative acts. Yet Harris’s treatment of spoken and written language is not entirely consistent with his own critique. In particular, it takes for granted that writing changes not only the way people think about language, but their cognitive capacity generally. The present article explores other arguments that have been made for and against such a view, and proposes that integrationists should be sceptical of Harris’s position concerning scriptism, and should think about ways of undertaking empirical research into the question of whether literacy entails or is required for a particular way of conceiving language, or whether on the contrary literacy already requires such a conception.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-14Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
References
Baron, N.S. (2005). The written turn. English Language and Linguistics, 9, 359-376.
Bernstein, B. (1964). Social class, speech systems and psycho-therapy. British Journal of Sociology, 15, 54-64.
Bloomfield, L. (1927). Literate and illiterate speech. American Speech, 2, 432-439.
Cole, M., & Cole, J. (2006). Rethinking the goody myth. In Olson, D.R., Cole, M. (Eds.), Technology, literacy, and the evolution of society: Implications of the work of Jack Goody. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 305-324.
Davis, H.G. (1999). Typography, lexicography and the development of the idea of ‘standard English’. In Bex, T., Watts, R. (Eds.), Standard English: The Widening Debate. Routledge, pp. 69-88.
Derrida, J. (1967). De la grammatologie. Minuit, Paris. English version, of grammatology, Chakravorty Spivak, G. (Trans.), Johns Hopkins University Press.
Eisenstein, E.L. (1979). The printing press as an agent of change: Communications and cultural transformations in early modern Europe. Cambridge University Press.
Gauchat, L. (1905). L’unité phonétique dans le patois d’une commune. In Aus romanischen Sprachen und Literaturen: Festschrift für Heinrich Morf [...]. Max Niemeyer, pp. 175-232.
Goody, J. & Watt, I. (1963). The consequences of literacy. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 5, 304-345.
Grosswiler, P. (2004). Dispelling the alphabet effect. Canadian Journal of Communication, 29 (2), 145-158.
Halverson, J. (1992). Goody and the implosion of the literacy thesis. Man, 27 (2), 301-317.
Harris, R. (1998). Introduction to integrational linguistics. Pergamon.
Havelock, E.A. (1963). Preface to Plato. Basil Blackwell.
Joseph, J.E. (1987). Eloquence and power: The rise of language standards and standard languages. Frances Pinter & Basil Blackwell.
Joseph, J.E. (1997). The ‘Language Myth’ myth; or, Roy Harris’s red herrings. In Love, N., Wolf, G. (Eds.), Linguistics inside out: Roy Harris and his critics. John Benjamins, pp. 9-41.
Joseph, J.E. (2000). Limiting the arbitrary: Naturalism and its opposites in Plato’s Cratylus and modern theories of language. John Benjamins.
Joseph, J.E. (2003). Orthodox unorthodoxy. Language Sciences, 25, 99-109.
Joseph, J.E. (2004). Language and identity: National, ethnic, religious. Palgrave Macmillan.
Joseph, J.E. (2006). Language and politics. Edinburgh University Press.
Joseph, J.E. (2012). Saussure. Oxford University Press.
Joseph, J.E. (2015). In memoriam Roy Harris (1931-2015). Cahiers Ferdinand de Saussure, 68, 251-255.
Joseph, J.E. (2018). Language, mind and body: A conceptual history. Cambridge University Press.
Joseph, J.E. (2020). Is/Ought: Hume’s guillotine, linguistics, and standards of language. In Chapman, D., Rawlins, J.D. (Eds.), Language prescription: Values, ideologies and identity. Multilingual Matters, pp. 15-31.
Linell, P. (1982). The written language bias in linguistics. Dept. of Communication Studies, University of Linköping.
Logan, R.K. (1986). The alphabet effect: The impact of the phonetic alphabet on the development of Western civilization. St. Martin’s Press.
Lord, A.B. (1960). The singer of tales. Harvard University Press.
Love, N. (1990). The locus of languages in a redefined linguistics. In: Davis, H.G., Taylor, T.J. (Eds.), Redefining Linguistics. Routledge, pp. 53-117.
Love, N. (1998). Integrating languages. In Harris, R., Wolf, G. (Eds.), Integrational linguistics: A first reader. Pergamon, pp. 96-110.
Love, N. (2004). Cognition and the language myth. Language Sciences, 26, 525-544.
Mulholland, J. (2013). Sounding imperial: Poetic voice and the politics of empire, 1730-1820. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Ong, W.J. (1967). The presence of the word: Some prolegomena for cultural and religious history. Yale University Press.
Ong, W.J. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. Methuen.
Pablé, A., Hutton, C. (2015). Signs, meaning and experience: Integrational approaches to linguistics and semiotics. de Gruyter Mouton.
Parry, M. (1971). The making of Homeric verse: The collected papers of Milman Parry. A. Parry (Ed.). Clarendon Press.
Saussure, F. de (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. Bally, C., Sechehaye, A. (Eds.). Payot. English version, Course in general linguistics, Baskin.
Saussy, H. (2016). The Ethnography of rhythm: Orality and its technologies. Fordham University Press.
Steffensen, S.V. (2015). Distributed language and dialogism: Notes on non-locality, sense-making and interactivity. Language Sciences 50, 105-119.
Tannen, D. (1982). The myth of orality and literacy. In Frawley, W. (Ed.), Linguistics and literacy. Plenum, pp. 37-50.
Weinreich, U. (1953). Languages in contact: Findings and problems. Linguistic Circle of New York.