Pendekatan abduktif menggunakan ATLAS.ti dalam kajian kualitatif (The abductive approach using ATLAS.ti in qualitative research)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Analisis data kualitatif melibatkan proses pengekodan dan pembinaan tema melalui pendekatan deduktif atau induktif. Namun, perkembangan terkini dalam metodologi penyelidikan kualitatif menunjukkan peningkatan penggunaan pendekatan abduktif sebagai strategi analisis yang menggabungkan kelebihan kedua-dua pendekatan tersebut. Pendekatan abduktif membolehkan penjelasan yang lebih komprehensif terutamanya dengan sokongan perisian analisis kualitatif berbantukan komputer ATLAS.ti. Kajian ini bertujuan membentangkan panduan sistematik pelaksanaan pengekodan menggunakan pendekatan abduktif melalui ATLAS.ti dalam konteks kajian kualitatif. Kajian ini dilaksanakan dalam bidang kajian bahasa dengan menggunakan data Terjemahan surah Yasin sebagai sumber analisis. Pendekatan abduktif dilaksanakan melalui tiga peringkat utama, iaitu pengekodan deduktif berasaskan konsep dan kerangka teori sedia ada, pengekodan induktif berasaskan interpretasi data dan penjanaan kod kejadian bersama yang membentuk tema abduktif. Proses analisis dijalankan dengan merujuk kepada Prosedur Analisis ATLAS.ti Bersistematik untuk memastikan ketekalan pada setiap peringkat pengekodan. Nilai keefisien digunakan sebagai kaedah saringan dalam mengenal pasti kod berpotensi bagi pengekodan deduktif dan induktif. Kebolehpercayaan tema abduktif yang dihasilkan dinilai menggunakan pekali Krippendorff’s Alpha. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa tema abduktif yang dihasilkan mencapai nilai Krippendorff’s Alpha melebihi 0.80, iaitu tahap kebolehpercayaan yang diterima dalam kajian kualitatif. Kajian ini menyumbang kepada pemahaman baharu terhadap interpretasi unsur dalam teks terjemahan dan memperluaskan kaedah pengekodan dalam analisis data kualitatif melalui penerapan pendekatan abduktif yang sistematik, berasaskan perisian, serta berorientasikan penjanaan dapatan baharu.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-14Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
References
Allonnes, A. R., Akdag, H., & Bouchon-Meunier, B. (2007). Selecting implications in fuzzy abductive problems. 2007 IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computational Intelligence, 597–602. https://doi.org/10.1109/FOCI.2007.371533
Armborst, A. (2017). Thematic Proximity in Content Analysis. SAGE Open, 7(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017707797
Baker, V. (2019). The abductive approach to synthetic autonomous reasoning. In M. S. Islam & T. George (Eds.), Micro- and Nanotechnology Sensors, Systems, and Applications XI (Vol. 10982, p. 75). SPIE. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2519151
Bellucci, F., & Pietarinen, A.-V. (2023). Peirce’s abduction. In Handbook of Abductive Cognition (pp. 7–20). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10135-9_7
Bellucci, & Pietarinen. (2020). Icons, interrogations, and graphs: On Peirce’s integrated notion of abduction. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, 56(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.56.1.03
Bochman, A. (2007). A causal theory of abduction. Journal of Logic and Computation, 17(5), 851–869. https://doi.org/10.1093/logcom/exm045
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brito, M. J. M., da Silva Caram, C., Montenegro, L. C., Rezende, L. C., Rennó, H. M. S., & Ramos, F. R. S. (2017). Potentialities of Atlas.ti for data analysis in qualitative research in nursing. In Studies in Systems, Decision and Control (Vol. 71, pp. 75–84). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43271-7_7
Burks, A. W. (1946). Peirce’s theory of abduction. Philosophy of Science, 13(4), 301–306. https://doi.org/10.1086/286904
Campos, D. G. (2011). On the distinction between Peirce’s abduction and Lipton’s inference to the best explanation. Synthese, 180(3), 419–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9709-3
Chiffi, D., & Andreoletti, M. (2023). Abduction in prognostic reasoning. In Handbook of abductive cognition (pp. 419–441). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10135-9_11
Choe, Y., Lee, J., & Lee, G. (2022). Exploring values via the innovative application of social media with parks amid COVID-19: A qualitative content analysis of text and images using ATLAS.ti. Sustainability, 14(20), 13026. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013026
Desai, S., McGrath, C., McNeil, H., Sveistrup, H., McMurray, J., & Astell, A. (2022). Experiential value of technologies: A qualitative study with older adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), 2235. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042235
Friese, S. (2019). Grounded theory analysis and CAQDAS: A happy pairing or Remodeling GT to QDA? In The SAGE handbook of current developments in grounded theory (pp. 282–313). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526485656.n16
Gupta, A. (2023). Qualitative methods and data analysis using ATLAS.ti (Third Edition). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49650-9
Jiang, Y. (2024). The relation of Peirce’s abduction to inference to the best explanation. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 20(3), 485–496. https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2024-2022
Kalpokaite, N., & Radivojevic, I. (2020). Teaching qualitative data analysis software online: a comparison of face-to-face and e-learning ATLAS.ti courses. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 43(3), 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2019.1687666
Klichowicz, A., Lippoldt, D. E., Rosner, A., & Krems, J. F. (2021). Information stored in memory affects abductive reasoning. Psychological Research, 85(8), 3119–3133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-020-01460-8
Krippendorff, K. (2022). Reliability standards. In The reliability of generating data (pp. 267–281). Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003112020-16
Mastrobattista, L., Munoz Rico, M., & Cordon Garcia, J. A. (2024). Optimising textual analysis in higher education studies through computer assisted qualitative data analysis (CAQDAS) with ATLAS.ti. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 14(2), 622. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.2516
Mohd Sufian, I., & Anida, S. (2022). Analisis kata kunci dalam soalan karangan Bahasa Melayu peringkat Sijil Pelajaran Malaysia (SPM) dengan menggunakan perisian ATLAS.ti 9. RENTAS: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastera Dan Budaya, 1(1), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.32890/rentas2022.1.8
Mohd Sufian, I., & Anida, S. (2023). Sorotan literatur bersistematik: Interpretasi partikel wacana “Lah” dalam ujaran masyarakat Malaysia (Systematic literature review: Interpretation of “Lah” discourse particles in Malaysian speech). GEMA Online® Journal of Language Studies, 23(1), 261–290. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2023-2301-14
Mohd Sufian, I., & Anida, S. (2024). Representation of the use of the adjective “Love” between human and AI Using ATLAS.ti software. In Z. Rarastesa, R. Gajjala, H. Isam, & D. Djatmika (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Communication, Language, Literature, and Culture (ICCoLliC 2024) (Vol. 883, Number ICCoLliC, pp. 608–616). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-321-4
Mohd Sufian, I., & Anida, S. (2025). Representasi fungsian partikel wacana “Lah” dalam terjemahan Surah Yasin berdasarkan pendekatan abduktif. Jurnal Bahasa, 25(1), 99–128. https://doi.org/10.37052/jb25(1)no4
Mohd Sufian, I., Anida, S., Mohd Hafiz, M. T., Rozita, H. O., Khairulanuar, I., Nor Azimah, A., Nor Anita, M. I., Ahmad Jihadi, A. S., & Nor Anis Izzati, M. S. (2025). ABCDE dalam objektif pembelajaran Rancangan Pengajaran Harian (RPH) Bahasa Melayu. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education, 15, 20–29. https://doi.org/10.37134/jrpptte.vol15.1.3.2025
Mohd Sufian, I., Anida, S., & Mohd Hafiz, M. T. (2024). Prosedur analisis ATLAS.ti bersistematik: Pembinaan kata kunci utama soalan karangan Bahasa Melayu SPM. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 32(1), 37–68. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.32.1.03
Navarro, M. G. (2012). La interpretacion como evento cognitivo expresado en razonamientos abductivos. Trans/Form/Ação, 35(3), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31732012000300012
Niiniluoto, I. (2024). Peirce’s abduction and its interpretations. In The Oxford Handbook of Charles S. Peirce (pp. 208–225). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/ 9780197548561.013.19
Ordonez Lopez, P., & Agost, R. (2022). Future translatorsʼ views on translation theory: a qualitative approach. The Interpreter and Translator Trainer, 16(2), 158–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750399X.2021.2001189
Paavola, S. (2004). Abduction as a logic and methodology of discovery: the importance of strategies. Foundations of Science, 9(3), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FODA.0000042843.48932.25
Patino, R. A., Chaves, A. M., & de Farias, F. R. (2015). Estado e grupos armados na Colombia: Carrascos, salvadores e experiência traumatica. Psicologia e Sociedade, 27(3), 629–639. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-03102015v27n3p629
Paulus, T. M., & Bennett, A. M. (2017). ‘I have a love–hate relationship with ATLAS.ti’TM: integrating qualitative data analysis software into a graduate research methods course. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 40(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2015.1056137
Peirce, C. S. (2011). How to make our ideas clear. In The Pragmatism Reader (pp. 50–65). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvcm4fzv.6
Peirce, C. S., & Dewey, J. (2017). Deduction, induction, and hypothesis 1. In M. R. Cohen (Ed.), Chance, love, and logic (pp. 131–153). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315823126-7
Piazza, M., Pulcini, G., & Sabatini, A. (2023). Abduction as deductive saturation: A proof-theoretic inquiry. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 52(6), 1575–1602. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-023-09718-3
Pietarinen, A.-V. (2021). Abduction and diagrams. Logic Journal of the IGPL, 29(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzz034
Plowright, D. (2016). Inferential Logic and Inquiry. In SpringerBriefs on Key Thinkers in Education (pp. 37–50). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7356-0_4
Rademaker, L., Grace, E., & Curda, S. (2015). Using computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS) to re-examine traditionally analyzed data: Expanding our understanding of the data and of ourselves as scholars. The Qualitative Report, 17(22). https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2012.1765
Råholm, M.-B. (2010). Abductive reasoning and the formation of scientific knowledge within nursing research. Nursing Philosophy, 11(4), 260–270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-769X.2010.00457.x
Rambaree, K., & Rambaree, B. B. (2021). ‘Out of the frying pan into the fire’: Mauritian social workers’ perspectives on disaster governance in Mauritius. The British Journal of Social Work, 51(5), 1585–1604. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab102
Ramirez Figueroa, A. (2011). Inferencia abductiva basada en modelos. Una relacion entre logica y cognicion. Critica (Mexico D. F. En Linea), 43(129), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.22201/iifs. 18704905e.2011.786
Schebesta, H. (2018). Content analysis software in legal research: A proof of concept using ATLAS.ti. Tilburg Law Review, 23(1), 23-33. https://doi.org/10.5334/tilr.1
Shodikin, A., Purwanto, P., Subanji, S., & Sudirman, S. (2021). Students’ thinking process when using abductive reasoning in problem solving. Acta Scientiae, 23(2), 58–87. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.6026
Sjoberg, S., Tobbe-Schukalla, M., Singh, S., & Martinss, K.-H. (2018). Community work in Germany and Sweden in context of changing welfare models. International Social Work, 61(4), 553–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872816666622
Soratto, J., Pires, D. E. P. de, & Friese, S. (2020). Thematic content analysis using ATLAS.ti software: Potentialities for researchs in health. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 73(3), e20190250. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0250
Vila-Henninger, L., Dupuy, C., Van Ingelgom, V., Caprioli, M., Teuber, F., Pennetreau, D., Bussi, M., & Le Gall, C. (2024). Abductive coding: Theory building and qualitative (Re)Analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 53(2), 968–1001. https://doi.org/10.1177/00491241211067508