Bacaan rekreasi bercetak dan digital dalam kalangan murid sekolah rendah dwibahasa di Singapura (Print and digital leisure reading among bilingual primary school students in Singapore)
Main Article Content
Abstract
Kajian ini meneliti bacaan rekreasi dalam bentuk bercetak dan digital dalam kalangan murid dwibahasa sekolah rendah di Singapura dengan memberi perhatian khusus kepada murid dwibahasa Melayu. Tabiat membaca dalam bahasa Inggeris dibandingkan dengan tabiat membaca dalam bahasa ibunda, iaitu Melayu, Cina dan Tamil. Selain itu, perbezaan antara bacaan bercetak dan bacaan digital turut dianalisis, khususnya semasa tempoh penutupan sekolah akibat Circuit Breaker 2020. Data dikumpulkan melalui soal selidik yang dijalankan di sekolah, melibatkan 5,133 orang murid daripada lapan buah sekolah rendah, serta perbincangan kumpulan fokus bersama 72 orang murid. Berteraskan perspektif penglibatan membaca atau engaged reading, dapatan kajian menunjukkan bahawa murid membaca dengan lebih kerap dalam bahasa Inggeris berbanding bahasa ibunda, dengan bacaan dalam bahasa Melayu berada pada tahap yang jauh lebih rendah berbanding bacaan dalam bahasa Cina. Bacaan bercetak kekal sebagai medium utama bagi semua kumpulan murid, manakala bacaan digital hanya diamalkan oleh sebilangan kecil murid. Dalam konteks ini, murid Melayu khususnya menghadapi kesukaran mencari dan mengakses bahan digital yang sesuai dalam bahasa Melayu. Secara keseluruhan, dapatan ini menimbulkan persoalan tentang kelestarian bacaan rekreasi bahasa ibunda, terutamanya bahasa Melayu, dalam landskap pendidikan dwibahasa di Singapura yang semakin didominasi oleh bahasa Inggeris dan penggunaan teknologi digital. Oleh itu, strategi bersepadu diperlukan untuk meningkatkan akses dan penglibatan dalam bacaan rekreasi bahasa ibunda, termasuk melalui sokongan institusi, bahan digital, serta pendekatan pedagogi yang menyeluruh.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-14Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
References
Afflerbach, P., & Harrison, C. (2017). What is engagement, how is it different from motivation, and how can I promote it? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 61(2), 217–220.
Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Olson, L. S. (2007). Lasting consequences of the summer learning gap. American Sociological Review, 72(2), 167–180.
Allington, R. L., & McGill-Franzen, A. M. (2021). Reading volume and reading achievement: A review of recent research. Reading Research Quarterly, 56, S231-S238.
Baron, N. S. (2015). Words onscreen: The fate of reading in a digital world. Oxford University Press.
Baron, N. S. (2021). How we read now: Strategic choices for print, screen, and audio. Oxford University Press.
Clark, C. (2012). Children’s and young people’s reading today: Findings from the 2011 National Literacy Trust’s annual survey. National Literacy Trust.
Clark, C., & Rumbold, K. (2006). Reading for pleasure: A research overview. National Literacy Trust.
Clark, C., Picton, I., Cole, A., & Oram, N. (2024). Children and young people’s reading in 2024: Findings from our annual literacy survey. National Literacy Trust. https://nlt.cdn.ngo/media/documents/Children_and_young_peoples_reading_in_2024_Report.pdf
Cremin, T., & Scholes, L. (2024). Reading for pleasure: scrutinising the evidence base - benefits, tensions and recommendations. Language and Education, 38(4), 537-559.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.
Cummins, J. (2001). Negotiating identities: Education for empowerment in a diverse society (2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: California Association for Bilingual Education.
Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method (4th ed.). Wiley.
Fishman, J. A. (1991). Reversing language shift: Theoretical and empirical foundations of assistance to threatened languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403–422). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Guthrie, J. T., McRae, A., & Klauda, S. L. (2007). Contributions of concept-oriented reading instruction to knowledge about interventions for motivations in reading. Educational Psychologist, 42(4), 237–250.
Harun Baharudin. 2025. Perspektif guru sekolah rendah daerah Telupid, Sabah: Isu dan pendekatan simulasi lisan frasa bahasa Arab: (Primary schools teachers’ perspectives in Telupid district, Sabah: Issues and approaches to verbal simulation of Arabic phrases). (2025). RENTAS: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastera Dan Budaya, 4(1), 23-51. https://doi.org/10.32890/rentas2025.4.1.2
Hennessy, M., Bleakley, A., & Fishbein, M. (2001). Conducting focus groups with middle and high school students: Methodological, strategic, and ethical considerations. Evaluation Review, 25(1), 65–85.
Krashen, S. D. (2011). Free voluntary reading. Libraries Unlimited.
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2015). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (5th ed.). SAGE.
Loh, C. E., & Sun, B. (2022). The impact of technology use on adolescents' leisure reading preferences. Literacy, 56(4), 327-339.
Loh, C. E., Sun, B., & Weninger, C. (2023). “Because I have my phone with me all the time”: The role of device access in developing Singapore adolescents’ critical news literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 66(5), 319-329.
Loh, C. E., Cremin, T., & Scholes, L. (2024). What is the future of young people’s volitional reading? Exploring diverse perspectives. Language and Education, 38(4), 531-536.
Luke, A. (2019). Educational policy, narrative and discourse: The construction of social and educational “problems”. Journal of Education Policy, 34(3), 333–356.
Majid, S., Ng, S. S., & Su, M. L. (2018). Reading habits of children in Singapore. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 50(3), 251–265.
Ministry of Education, Singapore. (tanpa tarikh). Learning a Mother Tongue Language in school. Ministry of Education. Learning a Mother Tongue Language in primary school | MOE.
Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2025). Education Statistics Digest 2025. ESD-2025.pdf
Mukhlis Abu Bakar (dalam penerbitan). Rebalancing bilingualism: Rethinking mother tongue language education in English-dominant Singapore through the lens of Allan Luke. Journal of Education, Language and Ideology.
Nakanishi, T. (2015). A meta-analysis of extensive reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 49(1), 6-37.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [NICHD]. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Neuman, S. B., & Celano, D. (2001). Access to print in low-income and middle-income communities: An ecological study of four neighborhoods. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(1), 8–26.
Samaon, S., Subet, M. F., & Daud, M. Z. (2025). Penginterpretasian sikap positif dan nilai kemanusiaan dalam sumber pengajaran dan pembelajaran seni bahasa berdasarkan teori relevans. RENTAS: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastera dan Budaya, 4(1), 121–136.
Shaharir M. Zain. 2022. Beberapa isu pemeribumian linguistik bahasa Melayu: (Issues in indigenisation of Malay linguistics). RENTAS: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastera Dan Budaya, 1(1), 1-50. https://doi.org/10.32890/rentas2022.1.1
Sun, B., Loh, C. E., & Curdt-Christiansen, X. L. (2020). Leisure reading in multilingual Singapore. Journal of Multilingual Theories and Practices, 1(2), 313-339.
Sun, B., Loh, C. E., O’Brien, B. A., & Silver, R. E. (2021). The Effect of the COVID-19 Lockdown on Bilingual Singaporean Children’s Leisure Reading. AERA Open, 7(1).
Sun, B., Loh, C. E., & Nie, Y. (2021). Report on the Reading Habits of Bilingual Children in Singapore 2021. National Institute of Education.
Torppa, M., Niemi, P., Vasalampi, K., Lerkkanen, M. K., Tolvanen, A., & Poikkeus, A. M. (2020). Leisure reading (but not any kind) and reading comprehension support each other-A longitudinal study across grades 1 and 9. Child development, 91(3), 876-900.