A bibliometric mapping of discourse analysis research in Türkiye: Trends, collaboration and scholarly impact (Pemetaan bibliometrik penyelidikan analisis wacana di Türkiye: Trend, kolaborasi dan impak kesarjanaan)

Main Article Content

Ferdi Bozkurt

Abstract

This article, which presents a bibliometric analysis of discourse analysis research in Türkiye, systematically evaluates nearly 50 years of production in the field using the Scopus database. The findings of the research indicate that discourse studies in Türkiye are predominantly concentrated in the social sciences and humanities. The most prominent thematic concentrations are on political discourse, nationalism, populism, gender, and European Union debates. While Critical Discourse Analysis stands out as the dominant methodological approach, innovative techniques such as multimodal analysis or corpus-based methods appear to be insufficient. An examination of language preferences reveals that English is overwhelmingly preferred for global visibility, while Turkish remains an important local production language. Institutional performance analyses reveal that Bilkent, Koç, and Boğaziçi universities hold leading positions in terms of both publication volume and citation impact. An examination of collaborative networks among authors reveals that individuals such as Deniz Zeyrek and Bedrettin Yazan play a central role. However, it is also true that a significant portion of the 2,883 authors remain outside these collaborative networks. International collaborations and citation rates demonstrate that the integration of researchers in Türkiye with the global academy is becoming increasingly stronger, but this interaction can be further enhanced. The study also points to significant gaps in the existing literature. The limited number of discourse studies in the fields of Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics, the inadequate research in contemporary contexts such as digital platforms and artificial intelligence, and the limited methodological diversity are among the most prominent shortcomings.

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Bozkurt, F. (2026). A bibliometric mapping of discourse analysis research in Türkiye: Trends, collaboration and scholarly impact: (Pemetaan bibliometrik penyelidikan analisis wacana di Türkiye: Trend, kolaborasi dan impak kesarjanaan). RENTAS: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastera Dan Budaya, 5(1), 112-134. https://doi.org/10.32890/rentas2026.5.1.7

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-14
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/rentas2026.5.1.7 OpenAlex W7171981927 Semantic Scholar CorpusID 290812287

References

Ali, K. K. (2022). A discourse on the Malay cultural identity within the Malaysian society. Kajian Malaysia: Journal of Malaysian Studies, 40(1), 87-107.

Alkhammash, R. (2023). Bibliometric, network, and thematic mapping analyses of metaphor and discourse in COVID-19 publications from 2020 to 2022. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1062943. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1062943

Chen, C. (2020). Visualizing the knowledge domain of multimodal discourse analysis (2009–2019): A bibliometric review. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 2(1), 57–70.

Çelebi, A. (1990). Söylem çözümlemesi: Gazetelerin haber oluşturma ve gündem belirleme işlevlerine eleştirel bir yaklaşım (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ankara University, Institute of Social Sciences.

Dağtaş, B. (1992). Structure of foreign news in Turkish popular and opinion papers (Application of discourse analysis methodology on the basis of news portrayal of ‘Malta summit’). [Unpublished master thesis]. Middle East Technical University, Institute of Social Sciences.

Darwalis Sazan. (2025). Kuasa dan ideologi visual satira politik dalam media sosial: Kajian berpandukan wacana kritis dan semiotik sosial. RENTAS: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastera dan Budaya, 4(1), 53-79. https://doi.org/10.32890/rentas2025.4.1.3

Demir, Z. (2008). Bir dini söylem analizi (psikolojik bir yaklaşım) [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Cumhuriyet University, Institute of Social Sciences.

Du, L., & Chen, W. (2022). Political discourse and translation studies: A bibliometric analysis in international core journals. SAGE Open, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221082142

Ertan-Keskin, Z. (1997). Siyasal yolsuzluklar ve basın: Türk basınında yolsuzluk haberlerinin temsili üzerine söylem çözümlemesi. [Unpublished master thesis]. Ankara University, Institute of Social Sciences..

Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 3(2), 193–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926592003002004

Foucault, M. (2002). The archaeology of knowledge (4th ed.). Routledge.

Garfield, E. (1977). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. ISI Press. http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/ci/title.pdf

Glänzel, W., & Moed, H. F. (2002). Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics, 53(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014848323806

Groth, P., & Gurney, T. (2010, April). Studying scientific discourse on the Web using bibliometrics: A chemistry blogging case study. Paper presented at the WebSci10: Extending the Frontiers of Society On-Line, Raleigh, NC, United States.

Gürtaş, A. (1994). Haber metinlerinin söylemsel analizi üzerine bir çalışma: Haberin tarafsızlığı açısından Türk basınında temizlik işçileri grevi [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Gazi University, Institute of Social Sciences..

Harris, Z. S. (1952). Discourse analysis. Language, 28(1), 1–30.

Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507 655102

İnal, A. (1992). An analysis of Turkish daily press: Event selection, text construction and news production [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Middle East Technical University, Institute of Social Sciences.

Kubilay, Ç. (2021). Türkiye’de iletişim çalışmalarında eleştirel söylem çözümlemeleri: Lisansüstü tezler üzerine bir inceleme. Türkiye İletişim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 38, 455–476.

Liu, L. (2024). Exploring the emerging trends of energy discourse: A bibliometric analysis. Energy Strategy Reviews, 52, 101338.

Moed, H. F., Burger, W. J. M., Frankfort, J. G., & Van Raan, A. F. J. (1985). The use of bibliometric data for the measurement of university research performance. Research Policy, 14(3), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(85)90012-5

Mohamad Jamil, S. N. (2021). ‘Malaysia belongs to the Malays’(Malaysia ni Melayu Punya!): Categorising ‘us’ and ‘them’in Malaysia’s mainstream Malay-language newspapers. Critical Discourse Studies, 18(6), 671-687.

Özer, Ö. (1997). Krizin engellenmesi ve haber söylemi: Türkiye’deki İranlı muhaliflere yönelik siyasal şiddet haberleri (1985-1996). [Unpublished master thesis]. Ankara University, Institute of Social Sciences.

Palacı, H. (1998). Yazılı basında memur eylemleri egemen söylemin yeniden inşaası üzerine bir örnek olay çalışması [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Ankara University, Institute of Social Sciences.

Perianes-Rodriguez, A., Waltman, L., & Van Eck, N.J. (2016). Constructing bibliometric networks: A comparison between full and fractional counting. Journal of Informetrics, 10(4), 1178-1195.

Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349.

Rajandran, K., & Lee, C. (2023). Politics in Malaysia: A discourse perspective. In Discursive approaches to politics in Malaysia: Legitimising governance (pp. 1-15). Springer Nature Singapore.

Salini, S. (2016). An introduction to bibliometrics. In T. Greenfield & S. Greener (Eds.), Research methods for postgraduates (pp. 130–143). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118763025. ch14

Sözen, E. (1999). Söylem: Belirsizlik, mübadele, bilgi/güç ve refleksivite. Paradigma Yayınları.

Ülkü, G. (1992). A Textual analysis of news in the Turkish press [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Hacettepe University, Institute of Social Sciences.

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Wang, G., Wu, X., & Li, Q. (2022). A bibliometric study of news discourse analysis (1988–2020). Discourse & Communication, 16(1), 110–128.

Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (2015). Methods of critical discourse analysis (3rd ed.). Sage.

Xiao, H., & Li, L. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of critical discourse analysis and its implications. Discourse & Society, 32(4), 482–502.

Zamimah Osman & Mohamad Zakuan Tuan Ibharim. (2025). Analisis bibliometrik domain bahasa, sastera dan budaya: Perbandingan makalah berindeks Scopus dengan RENTAS: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastera dan Budaya. RENTAS: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastera dan Budaya, 4(1), 349-378. https://doi.org/10.32890/rentas2025.4.1.14

Zhao, X., & Sun, L. (2024). Ten years’ development of critical discourse analysis research: A bibliometric analysis. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4766725/v1