Communication accommodation strategies in TikTok: A study of bilingual interaction between Indonesian and Russian speakers in @Bagus Istri Shine Rusia (Strategi penyesuaian komunikasi di TikTok: Kajian interaksi dwibahasa antara penutur bahasa Indonesia dengan Rusia dalam akaun @Bagus Istri Shine Rusia)
Main Article Content
Abstract
The existence of social media makes the boundaries of time and space disappear. This phenomenon has led to the emergence of many people who are able to master more than one language as tool of communication, known as bilingualism, through language contact. This language contact phenomenon is evident in social media content, particularly on TikTok. Based on the phenomenon of language contact on TikTok, his study aims to explore how bilingual Indonesian-Russian speakers on TikTok employ communication accommodation strategies when interacting with native Indonesian speakers. This makes the study focusing on social media as a platform for language accommodation. This qualitative research applies a way of working that involves three strategic steps, namely collecting data, analysing data by identifying linguistic features using utterance analysis, and presenting the results of data analysis. The data used in this study amounted to 6 (six) videos obtained from the TikTok account @Bagus Istri Shine Rusia. This study concludes that @Bagus Istri Shine Rusia tends to use a communication accommodation strategy in the form of convergence like using English as more prestige language, with occasional use of divergence such as using slangs and non-formal form of the language. This shows that @Bagus Istri Shine Rusia in each video content tries to be similar and the same as the interlocutor and the audience. This research is beneficial to understand how bilinguals accommodate their communication with interlocutors of other languages.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-16Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
References
Ainie, L. Z., & Andajani, K. (2024). Kesalahan berbahasa indonesia oleh penutur asing dalam akun Youtube Tomohiro Yamashita. Disastra: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 5(1), 87–102.
Appel, R., & Muysken, P. (2005). Language contact and bilingualism. Amsterdam University Press.
Bhatia, T. K., & Ritchie, W. C. (2013). The handbook of bilingualism and multilingualism (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Dragojevic, M., Gasioek, J., & Giles, H. (2016). Accomodative strategies as core of the theory. In Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal relationships and social identities across contexts (pp. 36–59). Cambridge University Press.
Elhami, A. (2020). Communication accommodation theory: A brief review of the literature. Journal of Advances in Education and Philosophy, 4(05), 192–200. https://doi.org/10.36348/jaep.2020.v04i05.002
Enfield, N. J., & Levinson, S. C. (2006). Roots of human sociality. Berg.
Gallois, C., Gasioek, J., Giles, H., & Soliz, J. (2016). Communication accommodation theory: Integrations and new framework developments. In H. Giles (Ed.), Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal relationships and social identities across contexts (pp. 192–210). Cambridge University Press.
Gallois, C., Ogay, T., & Giles, H. (2005). Communication accommodation theory: A look back and a look ahead. In W. B. Gudykunst (Ed.), Theorizing about intercultural communication (pp. 121–148). Sage.
Gasiorek, J. (2016). Theoretical perspectives on interpersonal adjustments in language and communication. In H. Giles (Ed.), Communication accommodation theory: Negotiating personal relationships and social identities across contexts (pp. 13–35). Cambridge University Press.
Giles, H., Edwards, A. L., & Walther, J. B. (2023). Communication accommodation theory: Past accomplishments, current trends, and future prospects. Language Sciences, 99, 101571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101571
Giles, H., & Ogay, T. (2013). Communication accommodation theory. In B. B. Whaley & W. Samter (Eds.), Explaining communication: Contemporary theories and exemplars (pp. 293–310). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Giles, H., Coupland, N., & Coupland, J. (1991). Accommodation theory: Communication, context, and consequence. In H. Giles, N. Coupland, & J. Coupland, Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics (pp. 1–68). Cambridge University Press.
Giles, H., Mulac, A., Bradac, J., & Johnson, P. (1987). Speech accommodation theory: The next decade and beyond. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication yearbook (pp. 13–48). Sage.
Indriani, S. S., & Mulyana, D. (2021). Communication patterns of Indonesian diaspora women in their mixed culture families. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 22(4), 1431–1448.
Krisnuwardhana, M., & Yulistiowati, I. (2023). Akomodasi dan atribusi penggunaan eufemisme dan disfemisme dalam Pojok Kampung JTV: Kajian komunikasi linguistik. Jurnal Nomosleca, 9(2), 313–334. https://doi.org/10.26905/nomosleca.v9i2.11806
Labadorf, B. A. P. (2019). Bilingual language accommodation: A qualitative study [Paper presentation]. Carolinas Communication Association Annual Conference, Greensboro, NC, USA. https://carolinascommunication.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/2019-carolinas-communication-annual-xxxv.pdf
Littlejohn, S. W., Foss, K. A., & Oetzel, J. G. (2017). Theories of human communication (11th ed.). Waveland Press.
Marliana, N. L., Ekowati, S. H., & Handayani, K. R. (2024). Indonesian teaching materials for multicultural character education in Singapore Indonesian school. RENTAS: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastera dan Budaya, 3(1), 161–188. https://doi.org/10.32890/rentas2024.3.8
Meyerhoff, M. (2006). Introducing sociolinguistics. Routledge.
Mulyana, D. (2016). Ilmu komunikasi: Suatu pengantar. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Murniasih, S., & Casim. (2024). Analisis bilingualisme dalam interaksi sosial vanilla lovely (adik Vallene Laurencia selebgram tiktok). Disastra: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 4(1), 186–197.
Siemund, P. (2008). Language Contact: Constraints and common paths of contact induced change. Language Contact and Contact Language, 7(3), 3–11.
Suganda, D., Yuliawati, S., & Darmayanti, N. (2022). Expression of emotion as impoliteness markers in instagram comments section in Indonesia: A pragmatic study. RENTAS: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastera Dan Budaya, 1(1), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.32890/rentas2022.1.4
Wardhaugh, R., & Fuller, J. (2015). An introduction to sociolinguistics (7th ed.). Wiley Blackwell.
West, R., & Turner, L. H. (2014). Introducing communication theory: Analysis and application (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Zhang, Y. B., & Imamura, M. (2017, July). Communication accommodation theory and intergroup communication. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.484
Zhang, Y. B., & Giles, H. (2018). Communication accommodation theory. In Kim Yong Yun (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Intercultural Communication (pp. 95–108). Wiley. https://doi.org/0.1002/9781118783665.ieicc0156