CHANGES IN TEACHERSâ€™ REFLECTION AFTER LESSON STUDY PROCESS
Keywords:in-service teacher, lesson study, levels of reflection, mathematics teacher, reflection
Purpose â€“ This qualitative study explores if there were any changes in teachersâ€™ reflection in terms of content and levels after participating in five lesson study cycles.
Method â€“ Case study method was employed in this study. Six mathematics teachers from a primary school participated in this study. They set up a lesson study group and conducted five lesson study cycles. In each lesson study cycle, the lesson study team members plan, teach and observe a research lesson. Qualitative data was collected through participatory observation, reflection sessions, collection of artefacts and interviews.
Findings â€“ Analysis of data revealed that there were some slight and slow changes in the teachersâ€™ reflection as they progressed from the first to the fifth reflection sessions. These changes included: (1) teachersâ€™ reflection became more specific and in-depth; (2) teachersâ€™ reflection about the pupilsâ€™ learning became more in-depth; (3) teachers reflected from pupilsâ€™ perspectives; and (4) teachers reflect athigher level of reflection.
Significance â€“ The study revealed that the criteria of lesson study, collaborative and classroom observation, made it feasible in promoting teachersâ€™ reflection. The educators could employ lesson study as an approach to promote teachersâ€™ reflection. However, the effectiveness of lesson study in promoting teachersâ€™ reflection is 146 Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction: Special Issues 2017: 145-172 affected by the number of lesson study cycles being carried out and the presence of the knowledgeable others.
How to Cite
The Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction (MJLI) has taken all reasonable measures to ensure that material contained in this website is the original work of the author(s). However, the Journal gives no warranty and accepts no responsibility for the accuracy or the completeness of the material; no reliance should be made by any user on the material. The user should check with the authors for confirmation.
Articles published in the Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction (MJLI) do not represent the views held by the editors and members of the editorial board. Authors are responsible for all aspects of their articles except the editorial screen design.