Faktor Kecerdasan Pelbagai dalam Pembentukan Profil Remaja

Authors

  • Siti Rahayah Ariffin Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Roseni Ariffin Arbaiyah Md Zin Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Nik Noralhuda Nik Mohamed Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2011.8.9

Keywords:

Multiple intelligence, MyMICA 2006 (Malaysian Multiple Intelligence Check list for Adult 2006), teenager, gender, race, school category, stream, SES (Social Economic Status)

Abstract

Kajian ini bertujuan mengenal pasti sumbangan faktor-faktor kecerdasan pelbagai (KP) terhadap lapan kecerdasan pelbagai yang dipelopori oleh Gardner. Kajian ini juga bertujuan meninjau perbezaan faktor-faktor kecerdasan pelbagai berdasarkan jantina, bangsa, kategori sekolah, aliran dan SES (Social Economic Status). Kajian ini telah dijalankan secara tinjauan dan dianalisa secara kuantitatif ke atas 511 pelajar dengan menggunakan instrument MyMICA 2006 (Malaysian Multiple Intelligence Check list for Adult 2006). Analisis regresi linear menunjukkan kecerdasan Visual Ruang memberi sumbangan paling tinggi iaitu 97.8% terhadap kecerdasan Logik Matematik manakala kecerdasan Verbal Linguistik pula memberi sumbangan paling rendah iaitu 22.2% terhadap kecerdasan Muzik. Melalui analisis MANOVA, antara dapatan yang diperoleh ialah terdapat perbezaan yang signifi kan berdasarkan kategori sekolah dalam dua kecerdasan pelbagai iaitu Verbal Linguistik (F = 25.11, p < 0.01) dan Intrapersonal (F = 14.85, p < 0.01). Terdapat juga perbezaan yang signifi kan antara pelajar Melayu dan bukan Melayu pada dua kecerdasan pelbagai iaitu Muzik (F = 12.82, p < 0.01) dan Kinestatik (F = 9.58, p < 0.01). Implikasi kajian menunjukkan guru dan pentadbir sekolah perlu peka terhadap kecerdasan pelbagai yang berbeza bagi setiap individu pelajar. Guru seharusnya mengguna sepenuhnya kemudahan prasarana sekolah untuk mencungkil kecerdasan ini bagi memaksimumkan prestasi pelajar.
 
 

References

Chan, D.W. (2006). Perceived multiple intelligences among male and female chinese gifted students in Hong Kong: The structure of the student multiple intelligence profile. ProQuest Educational Journals, 50 (4), 325-338.

Franzen, R.J. (1999). Self perception of multiple intelligences among students from middle school in the midwest (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universiti South Dakota. http://mjli.uum.edu.my

Furnham, A., Hosoe, T., & Tang, T.L.P. (2002). Male hubris & female humility? Across cultural study of ratings of self, parental, and sibling multiple intelligence in America, Britain and Japan. Journal of Intelligence, 30, 101-115.

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: A theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Book.

Gardner, H. (1993). Multiple intelligences: The theory in practice. New York: Basic Book.

Gardner, H., & Hatch, T.(1989). Multiple intelligences go to school: Educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences. Educational Reasearcher, 18(8), 4-9. Hanizah Hamzah, Siti Rahayah Ariffin, & Ruhizan Mohd Yasin. (2006). Girl’s overachievement in the Mathematics National Examination : Can type of items be the cause? Journals of Science and Mathematics Education in Southeast Asia, 29(2).

Hanizah Hamzah. (2007). Gender-related differential item functioning (GDIF) on the Malaysia public examination (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Fakulti Pendidikan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Harms, G.D. (1998). Self-perceptions of MI among selected third-, seventh- and eleventh-grade students in South Dakota (Unpublished education thesis). Universiti of South Dakota.

Hyun Jin Kim. (2001). A validation study of MI measurement (Unpublished master’s thesis). South Korea National University.

Ibrahim Ahmad Bajunid. (2003). Kompetensi pelajar menghadapi pasaran pekerjaan. International Conference on Measurement and Evaluation in Education. Universiti Sains Malaysia. 5–7 Ogos.

Meers, G., & Wiseman, K. (2002). Designed successful learning. The Science Teacher, 69(8), 29-31.

Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum. (2002a). Projek Aplikasi Teori Multiple Intelligences (PATMI). Laporan Tahunan Unit Projek Khas. Kuala Lumpur: KPM.

Reaves, C.C. 1992. Quantitative research for the behavioral sciences. New York: John Wiley and Son, Inc.

Rodiah Idris, Siti Rohayah Ariffin, & Noriah Mohd Ishak. (2009). Pengaruh kemahiran generik dalam kemahiran pemikiran kritikal, penyelesaian masalah dan komunikasi pelajar Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM). Malaysian Journal http://mjli.uum.edu.my of Learning and Instruction (MJLI), 6, 103-140.

Spearman, C. (1904). “General intelligence” objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201–293.

Spearman, C. (1927). Nature of intelligence and the principles of cognition. London: McMillan. Siti Rahayah Ariffin, T. Subahan Mohd Merah, Norasmah Othman, & Ibrahim Mohamed Zin. (2004). Analisis Kecerdasan Pelbagai (Multiple Intelligences) di kalangan pensyarah di sebuah Institusi Pengajian Tinggi (IPT). Jurnal Teknologi, 41(E), 33–42. Siti Rahayah Ariffin, Roseni Arifin, Siti Fazriah Raja Mohamad & Akbariah Mohd Mahdzir. (2006). Multiple intelligences: Theory and application of the rasch’s model. Proceeding for Third International Conference On Measurement and Evaluation in Education (ICMEE), 287-289.

Siti Rahayah Ariffin, Noriah Mohd Ishak, & Abdul Ghafur Ahmad. (2006). Manual pengguna instrumen multiple intelligences. Bangi: Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Siti Rahayah Ariffin, Roseni Ariffin, & Hafsa Mohamed Makki. (2008). Faktor kontribusi kecerdasan pelbagai dalam kalangan pelajar remaja. Jurnal Pendidikan, 33, 35-46.

Siti Rahayah Ariffin, & Nor Azaheen Abdul Hamid. (2009). Profil kemahiran pemikiran kritikal antara pelajar aliran sains dan bukan sains. Jurnal Majlis Dekan Pendidikan Malaysia, 3, 23-36.

Soo Hee Ryue. (1996). A study on group defferences in multiple intelligences and relationships among MI, IQ and school achievement (Unpublished master’s thesis). Seoul National University.

Teele, S. (1992). Teele Inventory for Multiple Intelligence (TIMI). Teacher’s Manual Redlands: Sue Teele & Associates.

Teele, S. (1997). Teele inventory for multiple intelligence (TIMI). Redlands: Sue Teele & Associates.

Downloads

Published

31-01-2011

Issue

Vol. 8 (2011): Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction (MJLI) Vol. 8, 2011

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ariffin, S. R., Md Zin, R. A. A., & Nik Mohamed, N. N. (2011). Faktor Kecerdasan Pelbagai dalam Pembentukan Profil Remaja. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 8, 183-204. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2011.8.9

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-22
1 citations, from OpenAlex — the highest of the sources checked

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/mjli2011.8.9 OpenAlex W2995496126