Teachers’ Knowledge and Understanding of the Malaysian School-Based Oral English Assessment

Authors

  • Chan Yuen Fook Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Malaysia
  • Gurnam Kaur Sidhu Faculty of Education, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Malaysia
  • Azleena Mohamad SMK Dato’ Harun Tanjung Karang, Selangor, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2011.8.5

Keywords:

School based assessment, oral English test, school based oral English assessment

Abstract

Purpose â€“ The paper sought to investigate TESL teachers’ knowledge and understanding of the Malaysian School Based Oral English Assessment (SBOEA) after five years into its implementation in upper secondary ESL classrooms in Malaysian public schools
 
Method â€“ The descriptive study involved a total of 80 TESL trained teachers from the 19 schools located in a district in Selangor, Malaysia. The study employed a three-prong strategy to collect data which included a questionnaire, semi structured interviews and document analysis.
 
Findings â€“ The findings of the study indicated that there was a low compliance (58.7%) rate among teachers to the procedures laid out in the SBOEA Manual with regards to the implementation of SBOEA. The teachers also acknowledged their lack of knowledge and understanding of the SBOEA and a half of the teachers in the study admitted having problems with the scoring criteria. Some teachers highlighted that they felt the SBOEA lacked reliability and validity within and outside the schools.
 
Significance â€“ The paper explores the possible implications of the study to the enhancement of the implementation of the School Based Oral English Assessment in Malaysian public schools.

References

Bachman, L.F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Borich, G.D., & Tombari, M.L. (2004). Educational assessment for the elementary and middle school classroom. New Jersey: Pearson, Merill Prentice Hall.

Boud, D. and Falchikov, N. (2005). Redesigning assessment for learning beyond higher education, In Brew, A. and Asmar, C. (Eds.), Research and development in higher education 28. Sydney: HERDSA, 34-41.

Breeze, R. (2004). Book Review: Testing Second Language Speaking by Glenn Fulcher. In TESL-EJ Journal. Vol. 8 No. 1 Retrieved October 2, 2009, from http://www-writing.berkeley.edu.

Chan, Y.F., Sidhu, G.K., & Md. Rizal Md. Yunus. (2006). The knowledge and best practices of secondary school ESL Teachers in school-based assessment. Shah Alam: IRDC, UiTM.

Chaudhary, S. (2008). Testing spoken English for credit within the Indian university system. TESL-EJ, December 2008, 12 (3), 1-8.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2003). Research methods in education. New York: Routledge/Falmer.

Cunningham, G.K. (1998). Assessment in the classroom: Constructing and interpreting tests. London: The Falmer Press. http://mjli.uum.edu.my

Dalton, C., & Seidlhofer, S. (1994). Pronunciation. New York: Oxford University Press.

Derwing, T.M., & Rossiter, M.J. (2003). The effects of pronunciation instruction on the accuracy, fluency, and complexity of L2 accented Speech. Applied Language Learning, 13, 1-18.

Dietel, R.J., Herman, J.L., & Knuth, R. A. (1991). What does research say about assessment? Oak Brook: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory. Retrieved from http://www. ncrel./org.

Fulcher. G. (2003). Testing second language speaking. Harlow: Pearson Longman.

Fulcher, G. & R. M. Reiter. (2003). Task difficulty in speaking tests. Language Testing. 20 (3), 321–344.

Hartley, L. & M. Sporing. (1999). Teaching communicatively: Assessing communicatively? Language Learning Journal, 19, 73–79.

Lim, C. S., & Zhao, X. P. (2005). Assessment and examination system: A comparative study between Malaysia and Shanghai (China). Paper presented at the The Third East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education. Retrieved from http://math.ecnu.edu.cn.

Lo Yiu Chun (2006). Practice and challenges of school-based formative assessment. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Institute of Education.

Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing speaking. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In Linn, R. L. (Ed) Educational measurement. New York: Macmillan/ American Council on Education.

Ministry of Education, Malaysia. (2002). Pengendalian Ujian Lisan Berasaskan Sekolah (ULBS). Malaysia: KPM.

Moere, A. V. (2006). Validity evidence in a university group oral test. Language Testing, 23 (4), 411–440.

Neri, A., Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., & Boves, L. (2002). The pedagogytechnology interface in computer assisted pronunciation training. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 15(5), 441467.

New Straits Times. (2003, May 8). Malaysian education system to be less exam oriented. New Straits Times, p.7.

Parmjit, S., Y. F. Chan & G. K. Sidhu. (2006). A comprehensive guide to writing a research proposal. Selangor: Venton Publication. Teachers' Knowledge and Understanding of the Malaysian School-Based: 93-http://mjli.uum.edu.my

Pennington, M.C. (1999). Computer-aided pronunciation pedagogy: Promise, limitations, directions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12(5), 427-440.

Rae, J. (2006), Bringing innovation to the classroom. Insight. Retrieved from http://www.businessweek.com

Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.

Tan, E.L. (2010, October 17). School tests will be fair. The Star – Education supplement, p. E3.

Weir, C. J. (1993). Communicative language testing. London: Prentice – Hall.

Downloads

Published

31-01-2011

How to Cite

Fook, C. Y., Sidhu, G. K., & Mohamad, A. (2011). Teachers’ Knowledge and Understanding of the Malaysian School-Based Oral English Assessment. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 8, 93-115. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2011.8.5

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-23
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/mjli2011.8.5 OpenAlex W4378779403