The Roles of Social Support in Promoting Adolescents' Classroom Cognitive Engagement Through Academic Self-Efficacy

Authors

  • Sharifah Azizah Syed Sahil Insaniah University College, Malaysia
  • Rosna Awang Hashim College of Arts and Sciences, Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2011.8.3

Keywords:

Social support, cognitive engagement, self-efficacy, social cognition

Abstract

Purpose â€“ The main aim of the present investigation was to examine the role of teacher, peer, and parental academic and emotional support in predicting adolescent cognitive engagement, especially within the context of ESL classrooms.
 
Method â€“ The present study examined the availability of academic and emotional support from teachers, classmates and parents as perceived by adolescents, via instruments which were adapted from a number of established measures. This cross-sectional study utilized the survey method, and a total of 450 adolescents from 11 secondary schools in Malaysia, representing early and middle adolescence, took part in the survey. The study assessed each source of support namely teacher, peers and parents within one model.
 
Findings â€“ Findings from the structural equation modelling suggest that both teacher and parental support are significantly related to adolescent cognitive engagement through their academic efficacy, thus lending support for a full mediation model while peer support was directly related to cognitive engagement.
 
Significance â€“ Even though parents and teachers played important roles in influencing adolescent cognitive engagement (as suggested by previous studies), this study suggests that the relationship was through academic efficacy, which had served as a mediating variable. One of the contributions of this study is that its findings supported the inclusion of student motivational beliefs in explaining the relationship between support factors and engagement. This study had also examined the unique contribution of emotional support. Additionally, it was found that research should not disregard the importance of peers in promoting cognitive engagement directly.
 

References

Aber, M. S., Meinrathm, S. D., Johnston, J., Rasmussen, A.E., &

Gonzales, A. (2000). School climate survey: Middle School Version. Champaign, IL., University of Illinois at UrbanaChampaign.

Ahmed, W., Minnaert, A., van der Werf, G., & Kuyper, H. (2010). Perceived social support and early adolescent achievement: The mediational roles of motivational beliefs and emotions. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 39, 36–46.

Appleton, J. J., Christenson, S. L., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. L. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 427–445.

Archambault, I., Janosz, M., Morizot, J., & Pagani, L. (2009). Adolescent behavioural, affective, and cognitive engagement in school: Relationship to dropout. Journal of School Health, 79(9), 408–415.

Babbie, E. ( 2007). The practice of social research (11th ed.). Singapore: Thomson Learning.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and actions: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behaviour change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215.

Berndt, T. J. (1999). Friends’ influence on student adjustment to school. Educational Psychologist, 34, 15–28.

Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1986). Ecology of the family as a context for human development research perspectives. Developmental Psychology, 22(6), 725–742.

Buchanan, R.L., & Bowen, G.L. (2008). In the context of adult support: The influence of peer support on the psychological well-being of middle-school students. Child Adolescent Social Work Journal, 25, 397-407. The Roles of Social Support: 49-http://mjli.uum.edu.my

Chen, J.J. (2005). Relations of academic support from parents, teachers, and peers to Hong Kong adolescents’ academic achievement: The mediating role of academic engagement. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 131(2), 77–127.

Eccles, J. S. (2007). Families, schools, and developing achievement related motivations and engagement. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization (pp. 665–691). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

Eccles, J., Jacobs, J., & Harold, R. (1990). Gender role stereotypes, expectancy effects, and parents’ socialization of gender differences. Journal of Social Issues, 46(2), 183–201.

Eccles, J., Lord, S., & Midgley, C. (1991). What are we doing to early adolescents? The impact of educational contexts on early adolescents. American Journal of Education, 99, 521–542.

Eccles, J., & Midgley, C. (1989). State environment fit: Development appropriate classrooms for young adolescents. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Vol. 3, goals and cognitions (pp. 13–44). New York: Academic Press. Eccles, J., Wigfield, A., Midgley, C., Reuman, D., Maclver, D., &

Feldlaufer, H. (1993). Negative effects of traditional middle schools on student motivation. The Elementary School Journal, 93, 553–574. Eccles, J., Wigfield, A., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C.M.,

Reuman, D., & Flanagan, C. (1993). Development during adolescence: The Impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescent experience in schools and families. American Psychologist, 48, 90–101.

Empat Pelajar SMPs dibuang sekolah. (2008, October, 29). Berita Harian, p.5.

Felner, R. D., Aber, M. S., Primavera, J., & Cauce, A. M. (1985). Adaptation and ulnerability in high-risk adolescents: An examination of environmental mediators. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13, 365–379.

Fredericks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.

Fredericks, J. A., & Eccles, J. (2002). Children’s competence and value beliefs from childhood through adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 38(4), 519–533. http://mjli.uum.edu.my

Feldlaufer, H., Midgley, C., & Eccles, J. S. (1988). Student, teacher, and observer perceptions of the classroom environment before and after the transition to junior high school. Journal of Early Adolescence, 8, 133−156.

Furman, W., & Buhrmester, D. (1992). Age and sex differences in perceptions of networks of personal relationships. Child Development, 63(1), 103–115.

Goodenow, C. (1993). Classroom belonging among early adolescent students: Relationship to motivation and achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence, 13, 21–43.

Gutman, L.M., & Eccles, J. (2007). Stage-environment fit during adolescence: Trajectories of family relations and adolescents outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 43, 522-537. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham,

R. L. (2006). Multivariate Analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Hargreaves, A., Earl, L., & Ryan, J. (1996). Schooling for change: Reinventing education for early adolescents. Bristol, PA: Falmer.

Jennings, G. (2003). An exploration of meaningful participation and caring relationships as contexts for school engagement. California School Psychologist, 8, 43–52.

Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R., & Anderson, D. (1983). Social interdependence and classroom climate. Journal of Psychology. 114, 135–142.

Kids on the Street. (2010, July 18). New Straits Times, p.1

Krejcie, R.W., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 608–619.

Kuperminc, G.P., Leadbeater, B.J., Emmons, C., & Blatt, S.J. (2001). School social climate and individual differences in vulnerability to psychopathology among middle school students. Journal of School Psychology, 39(2), 141–159.

Lakey, B., & Cohen, S. (2000). Social support theory and measurement. In S. Cohen, L. G. Underwood, & B. H. Gottlieb (Eds.), Social support measurement and intervention: A guide for health and social scientists (pp. 29–52). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.

Little, T.D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K.F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151–173. The Roles of Social Support: 49-http://mjli.uum.edu.my

Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P.R. (2003). The role of selfefficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 119–137.

Lorsbach, A. W., & Jinks, J. L. (1999). Self-efficacy theory and learning environment research. Learning Environments Research, 2, 157–167.

Marks, H. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in elementary, middle and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 153–184.

McNeal, R.B., Jr. (1999). Parental involvement as social capital: Differential effectiveness on science achievement, truancy, and dropping out. Social Forces, 78, 117-144.

Midgley, C., & Edelin, K.C. (1998). Middle school reform and early adolescent well-being: The good news and the bad. Educational Psychologist, 33, 195-206.

Midgley, C., Feldlaufer, H., & Eccles, J.S. (1989). Student/teacher relations and attitudes toward mathematics before and after the transition to junior high school. Child Development, 60, 981-992. Midgley, C., Maehr, M.L., Hicks, L., Roeser, R., Urdan, T.,

Anderman, E.M., & Kaplan, A. (1996). Patterns of adaptive learning survey (PALS). Manual. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. Midgley, C, Kapan, A., Middleton, M., Maehr, M.L., Urdan, T.,

Anderman, E., & Roeser, R.W. (1998). Development and validation of scales assessing student achievement goal orientations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 113–131. Midgley, C., Maehr, M.L., Hruda, L.Z., Anderman, E., Anderman,

L., & Freeman, K. E. (2000). Manual for the patterns of adaptive learning scales (PALS). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.

Muller, C. (1998). Gender differences in parental involvement and adolescent mathematics achievement. Sociology of Education, 71(4), 336–356.

Muller, C., Katz, S.R., & Dance, L.J. (1999). Investing in teaching and learning: Dynamics of the teacher-student relationship from each actor’s perspective. Urban Education, 34(3), 292–337.

National Education Blueprint. (2008). Retrieved from http:www. moe.edu.my. http://mjli.uum.edu.my

Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 533–578.

Parson, J. E., Adler, T. F. & Kaczala, C. M. (1982). Socialization of achievement attitudes and beliefs: Parental influences. Child Development, 52, 310–321.

Pintrich, P. R., Roeser, R., & De Groot, E. (1994). Classroom and individual differences in early adolescent motivation and selfregulated learning. Journal of Early Adolescence, 14, 139–161.

Pintrich, P.R., & DeGroot, E.V. (1990). Motivational and selfregulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40. Ponteng: Lokasi dan persekitaran sekolah perlu diteliti. (2001, October 18). Utusan Malaysia, p. 6.

Roeser, R.W., Eccles, J.S., & Sameroff, A.J. (1998). Academic and emotional functioning in early adolescence: Longitudinal relations, patterns, and prediction by experience in middle school. Developmental and Psychopathology, 10, 321–352.

Roeser, R. W., Eccles, J. S., & Sameroff, A. J. (2000). School as a context of early adolescent academic and social-emotional development: A summary of research findings. The Elementary School Journal, 100, 443–471.

Rosna Awang-Hashim & Fauziah Abdul Rahim (2005). Gender differences in motivational orientations, approaches to studying and academic achievement among undergraduates. (Unpublished research report), Sintok, UUM. Rosna Awang-Hashim, Zahyah Hanafi, Harshita Aini Haroun,

Azlina Murad Sani, & Hamida Bee Abdul Karim. (2006). Socio-psychological determinants of adolescent school engagement (Unpublished IRPA project). Sintok, UUM.

Rosna Awang-Hashim & Azlina Murad Sani (2008). A confirmatory factor analysis of a newly integrated multidimensional school engagement scale. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 5, 21-40.

Schunk, D. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and achievement behaviors. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 173–208.

Schunk, D.H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207–231.

Schunk, D. (1996). Goal and self-evaluative influences during children’s cognitive skill learning. American Educational Research Journal, 33, 359–382. The Roles of Social Support: 49-http://mjli.uum.edu.my Sinclair, M. F., Christenson, S.L.

Lehr, C.A., & Anderson, A.R. (2003). Facilitating student engagement: Lessons learned from check and connect longitudinal studies. California School Psychologist, 8, 29–42.

Student crime on the rise. (2005, August 1). New Straits Times, p. 4.

Wentzel, K.R. (1998). Social relationships and motivation in middle school: The role of parents, teachers and peers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 202-209.

Wenz-Gross, M., Siperman, G. N., Untch, A. S., & Widaman, K. F. (1997). Stress, social support, and adjustment of adolescents in middle school. Journal of Adolescence, 17, 129–15.

Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., & Pintrich, P. R. (1996). Development between the ages of 1 and 25. In D.C. Berliner & R.C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 148-185). New York: Simon & Schuster / Macmillan.

Winemiller, D.R., Mitchell, M.E., Sutcliff, J., & Cline, D.J. (1993). Measurement Strategies in social support: A descriptive review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 49, 638–648.

Wooley, M. E. & Bowen, L. B. (2007) In the context of risk: Supportive adults and the school engagement of middle school students. Family Relations, 56, 92–104.

Zimmerman, B.J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1986). Development of structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 613–628.

Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated learning: Relating grade, sex, and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 51–59. http://mjli.uum.edu.my

Downloads

Published

31-01-2011

How to Cite

Syed Sahil, S. A., & Awang Hashim, R. (2011). The Roles of Social Support in Promoting Adolescents’ Classroom Cognitive Engagement Through Academic Self-Efficacy. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 8, 49-69. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2011.8.3

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-22
16 citations, from OpenAlex — the highest of the sources checked

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/mjli2011.8.3 OpenAlex W158987367