The Effectiveness of Peer Tutoring in the Teaching of Mathematics

Authors

  • Siew Ling Gan Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Malaysia
  • Kian Sam Hong Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2010.7.6

Keywords:

peer tutoring, mathematics, interest to learn mathematics, mathematics self-effi cacy, perceptions, gender

Abstract

Purpose â€“ This study examined the effectiveness of peer tutoring in the teaching of Mathematics in a Malaysian government secondary school. This study also investigated the effects of peer tutoring on interest in learning mathematics, perceptions of instructional methods and mathematics self-efficacy, as well as gender differences for the various variables.
 
Method â€“ This study utilised the pretest-posttest with control group quasi-experimental research design. Two form four classes were randomly assigned to be taught using peer tutoring, and taught using lectures and exercises. The research instruments used in the study were a pretest, a posttest, and a questionnaire.
 
Findings â€“ Results showed that students who received peer tutoring had higher gain scores in the mathematics achievement tests compared to those receiving traditional instruction. In addition, female students performed better in the mathematics achievement tests. However, there was no interaction effect between gender and instructional methods used. Students in the peer tutoring groups showed higher interest in learning mathematics and mathematics self-efficacy. They also showed positive perceptions toward peer tutoring. In the peer tutoring group, female students showed higher interest in mathematics than male students. However, gender differences were not evident for mathematics self-efficacy and perceptions toward peer tutoring. Thus, it could be concluded that peer tutoring is a potentially effective instructional method that could be practised in secondary mathematics teaching and learning in Malaysian schools in tandem with other existing instructional methods.
 
Value â€“ Peer tutoring has not been widely studied in the context of the Malaysian classroom. This paper provides empirical findings supporting the effectiveness of peer tutoring as an instructional approach in enhancing students’ learning of mathematics irrespective of gender. In addition, peer tutoring can also augment students’ interest toward learning mathematics and their mathematics selfefficacy.

References

Adedayo, O. A. (1999). Differential effectiveness by gender of instructional methods on achievement in mathematics at tertiary level. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 37(1), 83-91.

Bettenhausen, S. (2002). Students as teachers. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 38(4), 188-190.

Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (2001). Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other. United Kingdom: Kogan Page.

MJLI VOL. 7 (2010) http://mjli.uum.edu.my

Callahan, L. G., & Clements, D. H. (1984). Sex differences in rotecounting ability on entry to first grade: Some observations. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 15, 378-382. Calhoon, M. B., Al Otaiba, S., Greenberg, D., King, A., & Avalos,

A. (2006). Improving reading skills in predominantly Hispanic title 1 first grade classrooms: The promise of peerassisted learning strategies. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 21(4), 261-272.

Cheung, C. C., & Winter, S. (1999). Classwide peer tutoring with or without reinforcement: Effect on academic responding, content coverage, achievement, intrinsic interest and reported project experiences. Educational Psychology, 19(2), 191-205.

Early, J. W. (1998). The impact of peer tutoring on self-esteem and Texas assessment of academic skills mathematics performance of tenth grade Students (Unpublished master's thesis). Texas A&M University, Commerce.

Evans, W., Flower, J. & Holton, D. (2001). Peer tutoring in firstyear undergraduate mathematics. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 32(2), 161-173.

Fuchs, L., Fuchs, D., Bentz, J., Phillips, N. B., & Hamlett, C. L. (1994). The nature of student interactions during peer tutoring with and without prior training and experience. American Education Research Journal, 31, 75-103.

Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Karns, K. (2001). Enhancing kindergartners’ mathematical development: Effects of peerassisted learning strategies. Elementary School Journal, 101, 495-510.

Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Mathes, P. G., & Simmons, D. C. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsible to diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 174-206.

Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Yazdian, L., & Powell, S. R. (2002). Enhancing first-grade children’s mathematical development with peer-assisted learning strategies. School Psychology Review, 31(4), 569-583.

Golding, P., Facey-Shaw, L., & Tennant, V. (2006, October). Effects of peer tutoring, attitude and personality on academic performance of first year introductory programming students. Paper presented at The 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education

Conference, San Diego. Retrieved November 9, 2009, from http://www.fie-conference.org/fie2006/papers/1692.pdf

MJLI VOL. 7 (2010) http://mjli.uum.edu.my

Griffin, B. W. & Griffin, M. M. (1997). The effects of reciprocal peer tutoring on graduate student achievement, test anxiety and academic self-efficacy. The Journal of Experimental Education, 65(3), 197-210.

Ismail H., & Alexander, J. M. (2005). Learning with scripted and non-scripted peer tutoring session: The Malaysian context. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(2), 67-77.

LoGerfo, L., Nichols, A., & Chaplin, D. (2006). Gender gaps in math and reading gains during elementary and high school by race and ethnicity. Retrieved November 9, 2009, from http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/411428_Gender_Gaps.pdf

Meech, J. L., & Jones, M. G. (1996). Gender differences in motivation and strategy use in science: Are girls rote learners? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(4), 393-406. Ng, L.Y., Bakar, K. A., Roslan,S., Wong, S. L., & Rahman, P. Z. M.

A., (2005). Predictors of self-regulated learning in Malaysian smart schools. International Educational Journal, 6(3), 343-353.

Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory (2001). Peer and cross-aged tutoring. Retrieved July 31, 2007, from http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/9/c018.html

Presbitero, N. L. (2002). Peer tutoring and mathematics achievement (Unpublished master's thesis). University of Nueva Caceres.

Richardson, J. (2001). An evaluation of virtual learning environments and their learners: Do individual differences affect perception of virtual learning environments. Interactive Educational Multimedia, 3, 38-52.

Robinson, D. R, Schofield, J. W., & Steers-Wentzell, K. L. (2005). Peer and cross-age tutoring in math: Outcomes and their design implications. Educational Psychology Review, 17(4), 327-362.

Rohrbeck, C., Ginsburg-Block, M., Fantuzzo, J., & Miller, T. (2003). Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 240-257.

Schwartz, W., & Hanson, K. (1992). Equal mathematics education for female students. Retrieved November 9, 2009, from http://www.ericdigests.org/1992-4/equal.htm

Terwilliger, J. S., & Titus, J. C. (1995). Gender differences in attitudes and attitude changes among mathematically talented youth. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39(1), 29-35.

MJLI VOL. 7 (2010) http://mjli.uum.edu.my

Topping, K. J. (1996). The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literature. Higher Education, 32, 321-345.

Topping, K. J., Campbell, J., Douglas, W., & Smith, A. (2003). Cross-age peer tutoring in mathematics with seven- and 11-year-olds: Influence on mathematics vocabulary, strategic dialogue and self-concept. Educational Research, 45(3), 287308.

Topping, K. J., Peter, C., Stephen, P., & Whale, M. (2004). Crossage peer tutoring of science in the primary school: Influence on scientific language and thinking. Educational Psychology, 24(1), 57-75.

MJLI VOL. 7 (2010)

Downloads

Published

31-01-2010

How to Cite

Gan, S. L., & Hong, K. S. (2010). The Effectiveness of Peer Tutoring in the Teaching of Mathematics. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 7, 113-132. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2010.7.6

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-09
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/mjli2010.7.6