Science Epistemological Beliefs of Form Four Students and Their Science Achievement Using Web-Based Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2006.3.2Abstract
References
Bills, C. G. (1997). Effects of structure and interactivity on Internet-based instruction. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 416 317).
Brophy, J., & Good, T. L. (1987). Teacher behavior and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching. (3 rd ed.). pp. 328-375. New York: Macmillan.
Chen, C. (1998). Integrating Internet resources into the learning of English as a foreign language in a Taiwanese high school: A case study. (Ed. D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts). UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations Publication No. AAT 9909154. 48 MJLI VOL. 3 (2006)
Chen, C., & Rada, R. (1996). Interacting with hypertext: A meta analysis of experimental studies. Human-Computer Interaction, 11, 125-156.
Christianson, R. G. (1999). Comparison of student learning about diffusion and osmosis in constructivist and traditional classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 21(6), 687-698.
Cobern, W. W. (1991). World view theory and science education research. NARST Monograph No. 3. Manhattan, KS: www.mjli.uum.edu.my National Association for Research in Science Teaching. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 304 345).
Elder, A. D. (1999). An exploration of fifth-grade students’ epistemological beliefs in science and an investigation of their relation to science learning. UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertation No. AAT 9929819.
Filisetti, L., & Fives, H. (2003). The French connections: Examining the links among epistemological beliefs, goal orientations and self-efficacy. In H. Fives (Chair) Internationalizing the study of epistemology, goal orientations, and self-efficacy. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. [online]. www.education.umd.edu/Depts/EDHD/faculty/ Alexander/ARL /projects.html
Gatlin, L. S. (1998). The effect of pedagogy informed by constructivism: A comparison of student achievement across constructivist and traditional classroom environments (Science education). (Ph. D. Dissertation, University of New Orleans). UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations Publication No. AAT 9900967.
Hofer, B. K. (2001). Personal epistemology research: Implications for learning and teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology Review, 13(4), 353–383.
Honebein, P. C. (1996). Seven goals for the design of constructivist learning environments. In B. G. Wilson (Ed.), Constructivist learning environments: Case studies in instructional design. pp.11-24. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
Hueth, A. G. (1998). Adoption, diffusion, and optimal uses of computer technologies for instruction in higher education: A case study of a mid-west college. (Doctoral dissertation, MJLI VOL. 3 (2006) 49 University of Dayton). Dissertation Abstracts International-A 59/01.
Jacobson, M. J., & Spiro, R. J. (1995). Hypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: An empirical investigation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(4), 301-333.
Jamaludin Mohaiadin. (1999). Konstruktivisme: Aplikasinya dalam reka bentuk pembelajaran berasaskan web. In Yusup Hashim & Razmah Man. (Eds.), Teknologi instruksi dan pendidikan www.mjli.uum.edu.my bestari: Persediaan dan cabaran dalam alaf baru. pp. 1-14. Kuala Lumpur: Persatuan Teknologi Pendidikan Malaysia. Paper presented at the 12 th Educational Technology Convention in Port Dickson, 8-10 October 1999.
Jonassen, D. H. (1994). Thinking technology. Educational Technology, 34(4), 34-37.
Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Showers, B. (1992). Models of teaching. (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Lindner, R. W. (1993). Self-regulated learning, metacognition and the problem of transfer. Paper presented at the 48 th International Correctional Education Association Annual Conference, July 12, 1993, Chicago, IL. [online] www.wiu.edu/users/mfrwl/docs/ ceapre~1.htm
Miller, M. (1999). The opportunities and challenges of guided inquiry science for students with special needs. (Ph. D. dissertation, The University of Michigan). UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations Publication No. AAT 9938492.
Morris, K. A. (1998). A constructivist approach to exploring physical and chemical changes in the junior high science classroom. (M. S. Thesis, Michigan State University). UMI ProQuest Digital Dissertations Publication No. AAT 1392243.
Murphy, P. K., Buehl, M. M., Long, J. F., & Monoi, S. (2002). Understanding the achievement of inner-city, adolescents: The influence of epistemological beliefs and goal orientation on academic performance. In M. M. Buehl (Chair), What is the value of understanding beliefs: An exploration of beliefs related to academic achievement. Symposium presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans. [online]. www.coe.ohio-state.edu/pkmurphy/Beliefs goals and gpa.doc
Norjoharuddeen Mohd. Nor. (1996). The scientific attitudes and the understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge of in-50 MJLI VOL. 3 (2006) service secondary school teachers with science degrees. (Unpublished M. Ed. Thesis, University of Houston).
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.
Qian, G., & Alvermann, D. E. (1995). The role of epistemological beliefs and learned helplessness in secondary school students’ learning science from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 282-292. www.mjli.uum.edu.my
Qian, G., & Alvermann, D. E. (2000). Relationship between epistemological beliefs and conceptual change learning. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 16(1), 59-74.
Reeves, T. C. (1998). The impact of media and technology in schools: A research report prepared for the Bertelsmann Foundation. [online]. http://www.athensacademy.org/instruct/ media_tech/reeves0.html
Roth, W., & Roychoudhury, A. (1994). Physics students’ epistemologies and views about knowing and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(1), 5–30.
Roulet, R. G. (1998). Exemplary mathematics teachers: Subject conceptions and instructional practices. [online].http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/edoc/e/pome/thesis/abstract.htm
Rubba, P. A. (1977). Nature of scientific knowledge scale: Test and users’ manual. Carbondale: University of Southern Illinois. (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 146 225).
Rubba, P., & Anderson H. (1978). Development of an instrument to develop secondary students’ understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge. Science Education, 62(4), 449–458.
Saunders, G. L., Cavallo, A. L., & Abraham, M. R. (1999). Relationships among epistemological beliefs, gender, approaches to learning, and implementation of instruction in chemistry laboratory. [online]. www.educ.sfu.ca/ narstsite/conference/saunderscavalloabraham/ saunderscavalloabraham.html
Schommer, M. (1994). Synthesizing epistemological belief research: Tentative understandings and provocative confusions. Educational Psychology Review, 6(4), 293–319.
Schommer-Aikins, M., Mau, W., Brookhart, S., & Hutter, R. (2000). Understanding middle students’ beliefs about knowledge and learning using a multidimensional paradigm. Journal of Educational Research, 94(2), 120–127. MJLI VOL. 3 (2006) 51
Schreiber, J. B. (2004). A path analytic model of the affect of epistemological beliefs and retrieval tactics on test performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.[online].www.siu.edu/~epse1/schreiber/ SchreiberAERA04.pdf
Sipe, T. A. (1995). A meta-synthesis of educational achievement: A methodological approach to summarization and synthesis of meta-analyses (curriculum interventions). (Ph.D. www.mjli.uum.edu.my Dissertation, Georgia State University). DAI-A 56/12.
Songer, N. B., & Linn, M. C. (1991). How do students’ views of science influence knowledge integration? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 761–784. 52 MJLI VOL. 3 (2006)
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-10Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
- OpenCitations 0 View →
- Crossref 0 View →
- Scopus 0 not indexed View →
- Google Scholar no free count Search →
- Dimensions no free count Search →
