Perhubungan antara Prinsip-prinsip TQM, Kepuasan Hati Staf, Kepuasan Hati Pelajar dan Pencapaian Akademik Pelajar: Satu Kerangka Konseptual

Authors

  • Lim Kong Teong Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Tang Swee Mei Universiti Utara Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2005.2.2

Abstract

Objektif artikel ini adalah untuk meneroka saling perhubungan antara prinsip-prinsip Pengurusan Kualiti Menyeluruh (TQM), kepuasan hati staf; kepuasan hati pelajar dan pencapaian akademik pelajar. Elemen-elemen utama bagi pengurusan kualiti dalam konteks pendidikan dihuraikan secara ringkas, dan satu kerangka konseptual diketengahkan untuk menjelaskan saling perhubungan yang dihipotesis antara prinsip-prinsip TQM, kepuasan hati staf (pelanggan dalaman), kepuasan hati pelajar (pelanggan luaran) dan pencapaian akademik pelajar. Penulis merumuskan bahawa prestasi organisasi pendidikan dalam aspek kepuasan hati staf dan pelajar serta pencapaian akademik pelajar merupakan ukuran yang relevan bagi segala usaha penambahbaikan kualiti pendidikan, dan menekankan kepentingan kepuasan hati pelanggan dalaman serta luaran sebagai pengantara dalam perhubungan prinsip-prinsip TQM dengan pencapaian akademik pelajar.

 

References

Argyris, C. (1990). Integrating the individual and the organization. NJ: New Brunswick.

Blazey, M. L., Davison, K. S., & Evans, J. P. (2000). Insights to performance excellence in education 2000: An inside look at the 2000 baldrige award criteria for education. Milwaukee, WI: ASQ Quality Press.

Boaden, R. J. (1997). What is total quality management... and does it matter? Total Quality Management, 8(4), 153-171.

Brown, M. G., Hitchcock, D. E., & Willard, M. L. (1994). Why tqm fails and what to do about it. New York: Richard D. Irwin, Inc.

Cho, K. (1994). Impact of total quality management (tqm) on organizational performance in the US: An empirical investigation of critical success factors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska.

Cohen, P. A. (1981). Student ratings of instruction and student achievement: A meta-analysis of multisection validity studies. Review of Educational Research, 51, 281-309.

Crosby, P. B. (1992). Completeness: Quality for the 21st century. New York: Dutton.

Davies, B., & West-Burnham, J. (1996). Reengineering & total quality in schools. London: Financial Times, Pitman Publishing.

Dean, J. W. Jr., & Evans, J. R. (1994). Total quality: Management, organization, and strategy. Minneapolis: West Publishing Company.

Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge: MA, MIT.

Divoky, J. J., & Taylor, R. W. (1996). Modeling change in curriculum: A total quality management perspective. Total Quality Management, 7(2), 173-182.

EFQM (1999). The european quality award 1999 information brochure. Brussels: European Foundation for Quality Management.

Evans, J. R., & Lindsay, W. M. (1993). The management and control of quality. St. Paul, Minneapolis: West Publishing Company.

MJLI VOL. 2, 1-16 (2003) www.mjli.uum.edu.my

Feigenbaum, A. V. (1991). Total quality control (edisi ketiga). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Freed, J. E., & Klugman, M. R. (1997). Quality principles and practices in higher education: Different questions for different times. Phoenix, Arizona: The Oryx Press. GOAL/QPC (1991). Total quality management in higher education: A critical assessment. Massachusetts: Methuen.

Grandzol, J. R., & Gershon, M. (1998). A survey instrument for standardizing TQM modeling research. International Journal of Quality Science, 3(1), 80-105.

Guolla, M. (1999). Assessing the teaching quality to student satisfaction relationship: Applied customer satisfaction research in the classroom. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7(3), 87-97.

Hansen, W. L., & Jackson, M. (1996). Total quality improvement in the classroom. Quality in Higher Education, 2(3): 211-217.

Herzberg, F. (1987). One more time: How do you motivate employees? Harvard Business Review, 65(5), 109-120.

Hradesky, J. (1995). Total quality management handbook. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.

Ishikawa, K. (1985). What is total quality control? The japanese way. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Ittner, C. D., & Larcker, D. E (1996). Measuring the impact of quality initiatives on firm financial performance. Advances in the Management of Organizational Quality, 1, 1-37.

Jauch, L. R., & Orwig, R. A. (1997). A violation of assumptions: Why TQM won’t work in the ivory tower. Journal of Quality Management, 2(2), 279-291.

Juran, J. M. (1989). Juran on leadership for quality: An executive handbook. New York: The Free Press.

Keller, G. (1992). Increasing quality on campus. Change, May/June, 24(3), 48-51.

Lawrence, J. J., & McCollough, M. A. (2001). A conceptual framework for guaranteeing higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 9(3), 139-152. DI Sa www.mjli.uum.edu.my

Lewis. R. G., & Smith, D. H. (1994). Total quality in higher education. Florida: St. Lucie Press.

Likert, R. (1967). The human organization: Its management and value. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Lim, K. T., Rushami Zien Yusoff, & Zainal Ariffin Ahmad (2003). The impact of total quality management principles on students’ academic achievement: An empirical study. Proceedings of the Association of the Southeast Asia of Higher Learning (ASAIHL) Annual Seminar (CD_ROM), 9th - 11th December. Indonesia: Universitas Indonesia.

Lim, K. T., & Tang, S. M. (2002). Hubungan antara kualiti pengajaran dan pembelajaran dengan kepuasan pelajar: Satu tinjauan. Utara Management Review, 3(1), 67-85.

Lozier, G. G., & Teeter, D. J. (1996). Quality improvement pursuits in American higher education. Total Quality Management, 7(2), 189-201.

MAMPU (2000). Garis panduan permohonan anugerah kualiti perdana menteri sektor awam. Unit Permodenan Tadbiran Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur: Jabatan Percetakan Negara.

Marsh, H. W., & Overall, J. U. (1980). Validity of students’ evaluations of teaching effectiveness: Cognitive and affective criteria. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 468-475.

McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Montes, F. J. L., Jover, A. V., & Fernandez, L. M. M. (2003). Factors affecting the relationship between total quality management and organizational performance. International Journal of Quality & Reliability, 20(2), 189-209.

NIST (2001). The malcolm baldrige national quality program: 2001 criteria for performance excellence. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Oakland, J. S. (1993). Total quality management: The route to improving performance (edisi kedua). Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann. www.mjli.uum.edu.my

Oakland, J. S., & Oakland, S. (1998). The links between people management, customer satisfaction and business results. Total Quality Management, 9(4/5), 185-190.

Ostroff, C. (1992). The relationship between satisfaction, attitudes, and performance: An organizational level analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, Disember: 963-974.

Potocki, K., Brocato, R., & Popick, P. R. (1994). How tqm works in a university classroom. The Journal for Quality and Participation, 17(1), 68-75.

QHE (1993). Quality assessment in higher education: Collected paper of the quality in higher education project. Birmingham: QHE.

Robbins, S. P. (1998). Organizational behavior. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall International, Inc.

Sallis, E. (1996). Total quality management in education (edisi kedua). London: Kogan Page.

Saraph, J. V., Benson, P. G., & Schroeder, R. G. (1989). An instrument for measuring the critical factors of quality management. Decision Sciences, 20(4), 810-829.

Schmit, M. J., & Allscheid, S. P. (1995). Employee attitudes and customer satisfaction: Making theoretical and empirical connections. Personnel Psychology, 48(3), 521-529.

Seymour, D. T. (1992). On Q: Causing quality in higher education. New York: American Council on Education, Macmillan.

Sherr, L. A., & Teeter, D. J. (Eds.). (1991). Total quality management in higher education, No. 71, 18(3). New Directions for Institutional Research, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Inc., Publishers.

Straus, J. A. (1996). The impact of total quality management on student achievement and school improvement team performance in an urban elementary setting. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Virginia: Old Dominion University.

Tompkins N. C. (1992). Employee satisfaction leads to customer service. HR Magazine, 37, 93-95.

Tornow, W. W., & Wiley, J. W. (1991). Service quality and management practices: A look at employee attitudes, customer www.mjli.uum.edu.my satisfaction, and bottom-line consequences. Human Resources Planning, 14, 105-116.

West-Burnham, J. (1997). Managing quality in schools — effective strategies for quality based school improvement. London: Financial Times, Pirman Publishing.

Wiley, J. W. (1991). Customer satisfaction and employee opinions: A supportive work environment and its financial costs. Human Resource Planning, 14, 117-127.

Wilson, K., & Lizzio, A. (1997). The development, validation and application of the course experience questionnaire. Studies in Higher Education, 22(1): 33-52.

Yeager, S. J. (1981). Dimensionality of the job descriptive index. Academy of Management Journal, 24(1), 205-212. Zainal Ariffin Ahmad, Zuraidah Mohd Zain, Dzulkifli Abdul Razak, & Ismail Baba (1997). Aplikasi TQM di Universiti Sains Malaysia: Satu kajian kes akademik dan pentadbiran. Laporan Projek, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Malaysia.

Zink, K., & Schmidt, A. (1995). Measuring universities against the european quality award criteria. Total Quality Management, 6(5/ 6), 547-561.

Downloads

Published

31-01-2005

How to Cite

Teong, L. K., & Mei, T. S. (2005). Perhubungan antara Prinsip-prinsip TQM, Kepuasan Hati Staf, Kepuasan Hati Pelajar dan Pencapaian Akademik Pelajar: Satu Kerangka Konseptual. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 2, 17-37. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2005.2.2

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-20
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/mjli2005.2.2 OpenAlex W7032925417