FRAMEWORK FOR AN APPLIED PHYSICS LEARNING MODULE INTEGRATING STEM AND AUGMENTED REALITY

Authors

  • Renol Afrizon Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Department of Physics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Lilia Ellany Mohtar Department of Physics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak, Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Mohd Syahriman Mohd Azmi Department of Physics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak, Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Fuja Novitra Department of Physics, Universitas Negeri Padang, Padang, Indonesia, Department of Physics, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Perak, Malaysia, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2026.23.2.%25x

Keywords:

Applied physics, augmented reality, fuzzy Delphi method, STEM approach, learning module

Abstract

Purpose – This study addresses the limited quality of Applied Physics learning, which remains largely theoretical and lacks authentic contextual learning experiences for pre-service physics teachers. Integrating Augmented Reality (AR) and STEM through the Applied Physics (PhyARECi-STEM) learning module has the potential to address this need. However, the design of existing STEM learning modules remains suboptimal due to limited expert validation. Therefore, this study aims to develop a framework for the PhyARECi-STEM learning module as a foundation for an innovative 21st-century module. 

Methodology – This study employed the Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM). A total of 31 experts were selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using a valid and reliable questionnaire and analyzed using fuzzy statistical techniques. 

Findings – The findings identified 10 validated fundamental elements of the PhyARECi-STEM learning module, comprising learning outcomes (B.6), learning content (C.5), learning processes (D.1.1, D.2.1, D.2.2.2, D.2.3.3, D.3.2, D.4.1), and learning assessment (E.1.1, E.2.3). All fundamental elements achieved expert consensus exceeding 75%, resulting in validated framework with the potential to support physics problem-solving skills and scientific creativity of pre-service physics teachers.

Novelty – This study proposes a learning module framework constructed from systematically validated fundamental elements and grounded in established educational theories. 

Significance – This study provides practical guidance for lecturers and researchers in designing contextual, integrated, and systematic Applied Physics learning. It also strengthens the theoretical foundation for developing the learning modules for pre-service physics teachers and contributes to 21st-century Applied Physics pedagogy.

References

Abbass, K., Qasim, M. Z., Song, H., Murshed, M., Mahmood, H., & Younis, I. (2022). A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(28), 42539–42559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19718-6

Akhsan, H., Putra, G. S., Wiyono, K., Romadoni, M., & Furqon, M. (2023). Development of A STEM-Based Introduction to Quantum Physics Module on the Sub-Subject of Potential Variations in the Physics Education Study Program. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(9), 7408–7412. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.3577

Al-Rikabi, Y. K., & Montazer, G. A. (2024). Designing an E-learning Readiness Assessment Model for Iraqi Universities Employing Fuzzy Delphi Method. In Education and Information Technologies (Vol. 29, Issue 2). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11889-0

Al Mamun, M. A., & Lawrie, G. (2023). Student-content interactions: Exploring behavioural engagement with self-regulated inquiry-based online learning modules. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00221-x

Ammar, M., Al-Thani, N. J., & Ahmad, Z. (2024). Role of pedagogical approaches in fostering innovation among K-12 students in STEM education. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 9(January), 100839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100839

Arifanti, D. R., Thalhah, S. Z., Mafidapuspadina, M., & Muzaini, M. (2021). Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik Berbasis Stem Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Kreativitas Matematika. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(4), 2710. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i4.4258

Aris, N. M., Ibrahim, N. H., & Halim, N. D. A. (2025). Design and Development Research (DDR) Approach in Designing Design Thinking Chemistry Module to Empower Students’ Innovation Competencies. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 44(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.44.1.5568

Arık, M., & Topçu, M. S. (2022). Implementation of Engineering Design Process in the K-12 Science Classrooms: Trends and Issues. Research in Science Education, 52(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09912-x

Arora, N. K., & Mishra, I. (2023). Sustainable development goal 13: recent progress and challenges to climate action. Environmental Sustainability, 6(3), 297–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-023-00287-4

Awang, S., Ahmad, S., Alias, N., & Dewitt, D. (2016). Design of an instructional module on basic life support for homeschooled children. Cogent Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1188439

Bendraou, R. (2024). Critical Pedagogy: Investigating Critical Thinking Skills and Active Citizenship through Discourse Analysis in a Moroccan EFL Textbook. International Journal of English Language Studies, 6(1), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijels.2024.6.1.10

Bonneuil, C., Choquet, P. L., & Franta, B. (2021). Early warnings and emerging accountability: Total’s responses to global warming, 1971–2021. Global Environmental Change, 71(October), 102386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102386

Bungum, B., & Mogstad, E. (2024). Building and programming a weather station: Teachers’ views on values and challenges in a comprehensive STEM project. Research in Science and Technological Education, 42(2), 450–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2103108

Cantlon, J. F., Becker, K. T., & DeLong, C. M. (2024). Computational Thinking During a Short, Authentic, Interdisciplinary STEM Experience for Elementary Students. Journal for STEM Education Research, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-024-00117-0

Chang, T. S., Wang, H. C., Haynes, A. M., Song, M. M., Lai, S. Y., & Hsieh, S. H. (2022). Enhancing student creativity through an interdisciplinary, project-oriented problem-based learning undergraduate curriculum. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 101173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101173

Chang, P. L., Hsu, C. W., & Chang, P. C. (2011). Fuzzy Delphi method for evaluating hydrogen production technologies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36(21), 14172–14179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.045

Chang, P. T., Huang, L. C., & Lin, H. J. (2000). The fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy statistics and membership function fitting and an application to the human resources. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 112(3), 511–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00067-0

Chen, C. T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.10.013

Cheng, C.-H., & Lin, Y. (2002). Evaluating the Best Main Battle Tank using Fuzzy Decision Theory. European Journal of Operational Research, 142, 174–186.

Chien, Y. H., Liu, C. Y., Chan, S. C., & Chang, Y. S. (2023). Engineering design learning for high school and college first-year students in a STEM battlebot design project. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00403-0

Chu, H. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2008). A Delphi-based approach to developing expert systems with the cooperation of multiple experts. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(4), 2826–2840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.05.034

Chua, C., Kosnin, A. M., & Yeo, K. J. (2024). Fuzzy Delphi method for A-level mathematics technological pedagogical and content knowledge module. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education , 13(1), 441–453. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i1.25982

DeCoito, I., & Estaiteyeh, M. (2022). Online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: exploring science/STEM teachers’ curriculum and assessment practices in Canada. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-022-00048-z

Donmez; Ismail. (2020). STEM education dimensions: From STEM literacy to STEM assessment. Research Highlights in Education and Science, 154–170.

Elliott, K. M., & Shin, D. (2002). Student satisfaction: An alternative approach to assessing this important concept. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 24(2), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/136008002200001351

Farihah, M. J., Norawi, A. M., & Jahan, A. N. (2021). Game-Based STEM Module Development for KSSM Science Teachers. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(2), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.63

Farwati, R., Metafisika, K., Sari, I., Sitinjak, D. S., Solikha, D. F., & Solfarina, S. (2021). STEM Education Implementation in Indonesia: A Scoping Review. International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability, 1(1), 11–32. https://doi.org/10.53889/ijses.v1i1.2

Fathurohman, A., Susiloningsih, E., & Arianti, A. (2021). Physics module based on STEM problem based learning on newton’s motion law material for senior high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1869(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1869/1/012155

Febriyanti, E., a, I., a, S., a, S., & Mahardika, Ik. (2018). THE EFFECTIVENESS of the MODULE-BASED STEM (SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING, MATHEMATICS) to STUDY PHYSICS AT VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL. International Journal of Advanced Research, 6(5), 1367–1370. https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/7168

Ferdiman, B., Al Akbar, H., Faturrahman, M. R., & Maulana, F. I. (2023). Development of Augmented Reality Application in Physics through Newton’s Laws and Object Interaction. Procedia Computer Science, 227, 699–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.574

Gao, X., Li, P., Shen, J., & Sun, H. (2020). Reviewing assessment of student learning in interdisciplinary STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00225-4

Geiger, V., Mulligan, J., Date‑Huxtable, L., Ahlip, R., Heath Jones, D., Julian May, E., Rylands, L., & Wright, I. (2018). An interdisciplinary approach to designing online learning: Fostering pre-service mathematics teachers’ capabilities in mathematical modelling. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 50(1–2), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0920-x

Goos, M., Carreira, S., & Namukasa, I. K. (2023). Mathematics and interdisciplinary STEM education: recent developments and future directions. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 55(7), 1199–1217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01533-z

Handayani, E. S., Yuberti, Saregar, A., & Wildaniati, Y. (2021). Development of STEM-integrated physics e-module to train critical thinking skills: The perspective of preservice teachers. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1796(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012100

Hasim, M. A., Jabar, J., Sufian, A., Ibrahim, N. F., & Khalid, F. A. (2023). Employing Fuzzy Delphi Techniques to Validate the Components and Contents of E-Learning Antecedents and Usage Behavior Towards E-Learning Performance. European Journal of Educational Research, 12(1), 467–480. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.1.467

Hedenqvist, C., Romero, M., & Vinuesa, R. (2023). Improving the Learning of Mechanics Through Augmented Reality. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28(1), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09542-1

Ilma, A. Z., Wilujeng, I., Widowati, A., Nurtanto, M., & Kholifah, N. (2023). A Systematic Literature Review of STEM Education in Indonesia (2016-2021): Contribution to Improving Skills in 21st Century Learning. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi, 13(2), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.02.17

Ismail, N. K., Mohamed, S., & Hamzah, M. I. (2019). The Application of the Fuzzy Delphi Technique to the Required Aspect of Parental Involvement in the Effort to Inculcate Positive Attitude among Preschool Children. Creative Education, 10(12), 2907–2921. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1012216

Jackson, C., Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., Bush, S. B., Maiorca, C., Roberts, T., Yost, C., & Fowler, A. (2021). Equity-Oriented Conceptual Framework for K-12 STEM literacy. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00294-z

Jolly, A. (2015). STEM by design. Strategies and activities for grades 4-8. In Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952. (Vol. 1, Issue April).

Jr, J. J. R., & Sulaiman, F. (2020). The Development of Integrated STEM-PBL Physics Module for Learning Classical Mechanics in Secondary Education. Solid State Technology, 63(6).

Karamustafaoğlu, O., & Pektaş, H. M. (2023). Developing students’ creative problem solving skills with inquiry-based STEM activity in an out-of-school learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 7651–7669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11496-5

Kariman, D., Harisman, Y., Sovia, A., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2019). Effectiveness of guided discovery-based module: A case study in Padang city, Indonesia. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(2), 239–250. https://doi.org/%0A10.22342/jme.10.2.6610.239-250

Khotimah, R. P., Adnan, M., Che Ahmad, C. N., & Murtiyasa, B. (2023). The effectiveness of the STEMDISLEARN module in improving students’ critical thinking skills in the differential equations course. Cogent Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2220233

Kurniawan, D., Samsura, D. A. A., & van Deemen, A. M. A. (2023). Exploring Expertise Criteria of University Academics. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 14(4), 75–107.

Landeta, J., & Lertxundi, A. (2024). Quality indicators for Delphi studies. Futures and Foresight Science, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.172

Lin, K. Y., Lu, S. C., Hsiao, H. H., Kao, C. P., & Williams, P. J. (2023). Developing student imagination and career interest through a STEM project using 3D printing with repetitive modeling. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(5), 2884–2898. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1913607

Lin, K. Y., Wu, Y. T., Hsu, Y. T., & Williams, P. J. (2021). Effects of infusing the engineering design process into STEM project-based learning to develop preservice technology teachers’ engineering design thinking. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1–15.

Markus, L., & Ishak, M. Z. (2022). Development Of The Secondary School Quantum Physics-Stem (SSQP-Stem) Instructional Module For Physics Teachers: A Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM) …. In International Research Journal of Education and Sciences (IRJES) (Vol. 6, Issue 2, pp. 16–29). https://www.masree.info/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Development-Of-The-Secondary-School-Quantum-Physics-Stem-SSQP-Stem-Instructional-Module-For-Physics-Teachers-A-Fuzzy-Delphi-Method-FDM-Approach.pdf

Martaningsih, S. T., Maryani, I., Prasetya, D. S., Prwanti, S., Sayekti, I. C., Aziz, N. A. A., & Siwayanan, P. (2022). Stem Problem-Based Learning Module: A Solution to Overcome Elementary Students’ Poor Problem-Solving Skills. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi, 12(4), 340–348. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.04.35

Mayasari, T., Susilowati, E., & Winarno, N. (2019). Practicing integrated STEM in renewable energy projects: Solar power. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/5/052033

McArthur, J. (2023). Rethinking authentic assessment: work, well-being, and society. Higher Education, 85(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00822-y

Melisa, M., Susilowati, E., & Dewantara, D. (2021). Development of Electronic Modules Based on STEM to Train Students’ Creativity: Validity and Practicality Analysis. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 9(3), 335. https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v9i3.10440

Mohd Khalli, M. N., Sintang, S., & Kamu, A. (2022). The framework of socio-religious harmony in Sabah, East Malaysia: An application of Fuzzy Delphi method. Heliyon, 8(8), e09976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09976

Mohd Ridhuan, M. J., & Nurulrabihah, M. N. (2021). Kepelbagaian Metodologi Dalam Penyelidikan Reka Bentuk dan Pembangunan Cetakan Ketiga. Shah Alam, Selangor: Qaisar Prestige Resources.

Montes, R., Zuheros, C., Morales, J., Zermeño, N., Duran, J., & Herrera, F. (2023). Design and consensus content validity of the questionnaire for b-learning education: A 2-Tuple Fuzzy Linguistic Delphi based Decision Support Tool. Applied Soft Computing, 147, 110755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110755

Neher-Asylbekov, S., & Wagner, I. (2023). Effects of Out-of-School STEM Learning Environments on Student Interest: a Critical Systematic Literature Review. In Journal for STEM Education Research (Vol. 6, Issue 1). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-022-00080-8

Niancai, L., Zhuolin, F., & Qi, W. (2024). Education in China and the World. In Education in China and the World. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5861-0

Nkopodi, N., Jakovljevic, M., & Photo, P. (2024). Criteria for enhancing student wellbeing in STEM classrooms : ICT and indigenous knowledge in South African higher education. Discover Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00251-2

Noh, N. M., Siraj, S., Halili, S. H., Jamil, M. R. M., & Husin, Z. (2019). Application of fuzzy delphi method as a vital element in technology as a tool in design thinking based learning. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 34(d), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.21315/apjee2019.34.7

Nugraha, M. G., Kidman, G., & Tan, H. (2023). Pre-service teacher in STEM education: An integrative review and mapping of the Indonesian research literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(5). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13155

Nurtanto, M., Pardjono, P., Widarto, W., & Ramdani, S. D. (2020). The effect of STEM-EDP in professional learning on automotive engineering competence in vocational high school. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2), 633–649. https://doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.645047

Ong, Y. S., Koh, J., Tan, A. L., & Ng, Y. S. (2024). Developing an Integrated STEM Classroom Observation Protocol Using the Productive Disciplinary Engagement Framework. Research in Science Education, 54(1), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10110-z

Ortiz-Revilla, J., Greca, I. M., & Arriassecq, I. (2022). A theoretical framework for integrated STEM education. Science & Education, 31(12), 383–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00242-x

Palid, O., Cashdollar, S., Deangelo, S., Chu, C., & Bates, M. (2023). Inclusion in practice: a systematic review of diversity-focused STEM programming in the United States. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00387-3

Pertiwi, N. P., Saputro, S., Yamtinah, S., & Kamari, A. (2024). Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills through STEM Problem-Based Contextual Learning: An Integrated E-Module Education Website with Virtual Experiments. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 23(4), 739–766.

Putri, R. O. E., & Feriyanto, F. (2020). Pengembangan bahan ajar geometri berbasis science technology engineering and mathematics (STEM) untuk mendukung kemampuan spasial. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 09(04), 1205–1212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2019.e00146

Radu, I., Huang, X., Kestin, G., & Schneider, B. (2023). How augmented reality influences student learning and inquiry styles: A study of 1-1 physics remote AR tutoring. Computers & Education: X Reality, 2(November 2022), 100011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2023.100011

Rahayu, P., & Wulandari, I. A. (2021). Defining e-portfolio factor for competency certification using fuzzy delphi method. Procedia Computer Science, 197(2021), 566–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.174

Reynante, B. M., Selbach-Allen, M. E., & Pimentel, D. R. (2020). Exploring the Promises and Perils of Integrated STEM Through Disciplinary Practices and Epistemologies. Science and Education, 29(4), 785–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00121-x

Roberts, T., Maiorca, C., Jackson, C., & Mohr-Schroeder, M. (2022). Integrated STEM as problem-solving practices. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 14(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2021.2024721

Roehrig, G. H., Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Ring-Whalen, E. (2021). Beyond the basics: a detailed conceptual framework of integrated STEM. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-021-00041-y

Roehrig, G. H., Dare, E. A., Ring-Whalen, E., & Wieselmann, J. R. (2021). Understanding coherence and integration in integrated STEM curriculum. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00259-8

Ropawandi, D., Halim, L., & Husnin, H. (2022). Augmented Reality (AR) Technology-Based Learning: The Effect on Physics Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.2.1596

Saffie, N. A. M., Shukor, N. A. M., & Rasmani, K. A. (2016). Fuzzy delphi method: Issues and challenges. 2016 International Conference on Logistics, Informatics and Service Sciences, LISS 2016. https://doi.org/10.1109/LISS.2016.7854490

Saido, G. A. M., Siraj, S., DeWitt, D., & Al-Amedy, O. S. (2018). Development of an instructional model for higher order thinking in science among secondary school students: a fuzzy Delphi approach. International Journal of Science Education, 40(8), 847–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1452307

Saleem, A., Anwar, S., Nawaz, T., Fahad, S., Saud, S., Ur Rahman, T., Khan, M. N. R., & Nawaz, T. (2024). Securing a sustainable future: the climate change threat to agriculture, food security, and sustainable development goals. Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Applied Sciences, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43994-024-00177-3

Sari, M. R., Sutarto, S., Sudarti, S., Indrawati, I., & Budiarso, A. S. (2020). STEM-CP (Sains, Technology, Engineering Mathematics-Contextual Problem) Based Physics Module to Increase Student Literacy Skills at Vocational High School. Pancaran Pendidikan, 9(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.25037/pancaran.v9i1.271

Septiadevana, R., & Abdullah*, N. (2024). Designing a STEM Project-Based Learning Module for Scientific Literacy and Critical Thinking Elementary School Students. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 12(3), 662–682. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v12i3.38255

Siew, N. M., & Ambo, N. (2020). the Scientific Creativity of Fifth Graders in a Stem Project-Based Cooperative Learning Approach. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 78(4), 627–643. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/20.78.627

Simarro, C., & Couso, D. (2021). Engineering practices as a framework for STEM education: a proposal based on epistemic nuances. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00310-2

Sivaraj, R., Ellis, J. A., Wieselmann, J. R., & Roehrig, G. H. (2020). Computational participation and the learner-technology pairing in K-12 STEM education. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.220

Sivaraj, R., Ellis, J., & Roehrig, G. (2019). Conceptualizing the T in STEM: A Systematic Review. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 1245–1254. http://www.learntechlib.org/p/207803/

Siverling, E. A., Guzey, S. S., & Moore, T. J. (2017). Students’ science talk during engineering design in life science-focused STEM integration units. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE, 2017-Octob, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2017.8190670

Siverling, E. A., Suazo-Flores, E., Mathis, C. A., & Moore, T. J. (2019). Students’ use of STEM content in design justifications during engineering design-based STEM integration. School Science and Mathematics, 119(8), 457–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12373

Sırakaya, M., & Alsancak Sırakaya, D. (2022). Augmented reality in STEM education: a systematic review. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(8), 1556–1569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1722713

Skulmoski, G.J & Hartman, F. . (2007). The Delphi method for graduate research. Journal of Information Technology Education, 6(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47847-7_10

Steffensen, L. (2024). (2024). Developing responsible citizenship through integrated STEM education activities. In The Contribution of Mathematics to School STEM Education: Current Understandings, 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2728-5_17

Stewart, C. O. (2022). STEM Identities: A Communication Theory of Identity Approach. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 41(2), 148–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X211030674

Stretch, E. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2021). Framing Failure: Leveraging Uncertainty to Launch Creativity in STEM Education. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 7(2), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.7.2.123-133

Sukma, M., & Halim, A. (2022). Implementation of e-Learning Module Based on Science Technology Engineering Mathematics on Solar Cells Topic. Jipf (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 7(1), 60–70.

Tabarés, R., & Boni, A. (2023). Maker culture and its potential for STEM education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33(1), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09725-y

Tang, K. (2024). Climate change education in Indonesia’s formal education: a policy analysis. Npj Climate Action, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-024-00143-z

Taylor, E. (2020). We Agree, Don’t We? The Delphi Method for Health Environments Research. Health Environments Research and Design Journal, 13(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586719887709

Thees, M., Kapp, S., Strzys, M. P., Beil, F., Lukowicz, P., & Kuhn, J. (2020). Effects of augmented reality on learning and cognitive load in university physics laboratory courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 108, 106316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106316

Trevallion, D., & Trevallion, T. (2020). STEM: Design, Implement and Evaluate. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change., 14(8), 2020. www.ijicc.net

Tuyet, T. L. T., Thi, K. N., Duc, H. T., Giao, X. T. T., Thi, N. V., Tuong, V. H. K., Nhu, U. D. T., & Mai, A. L. T. (2024). STEM education in primary schools of Southeast Asian countries: An analysis of scientific publications in the Scopus database from 2000 to 2022. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14432

Wells, R. S., Chen, L., Kimball, E., Annan, B., Auerbach, S. M., & Fermann, J. T. (2024). Improving the Perceived Utility Value of Teamwork and Collaboration among STEM Undergraduates. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10471-5

Wilson, K. (2021). Exploring the Challenges and Enablers of Implementing a STEM Project-Based Learning Programme in a Diverse Junior Secondary Context. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(5), 881–897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10103-8

Winarno, N., Rusdiana, D., Samsudin, A., Susilowati, E., Ahmad, N., & Afifah, R. M. A. (2020). The steps of the Engineering Design Process (EDP) in science education: A systematic literature review. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(4), 1345–1360. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.766201

Xu, L., Fang, S. C., & Hobbs, L. (2023). The Relevance of STEM: a Case Study of an Australian Secondary School as an Arena of STEM Curriculum Innovation and Enactment. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(2), 667–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10267-5

Xue, X., Ahmad, N. J., & Liu, X. (2023). The Development and Validation of an EDP-STEM Module-Taking Heat Transfer, Mechanics, and Buoyancy as Examples. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 20(4), 649–668. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2023.037

Yakob, M., Hamdani, H., Sari, R. P., Haji, A. G., & Nahadi, N. (2021). Implementation of performance assessment in stem-based science learning to improve students’ habits of mind. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 624–631. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21084

Yang, H. W., Harradine, C., Lim, C. I., Clements, D. H., Vinh, M., & Sarama, J. (2024). Reporting and Analyzing Demographics in U.S.-American Early STEM Intervention Literature: A Systematic Review. Early Childhood Education Journal, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-024-01739-0

Yin, T. T., & Hanif, H. (2024). Fuzzy Delphi Method: A Step-by-Step Guide to Obtain Expert Consensus on MUETBot Functionalities. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(4), 1097–1104. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v14-i4/21307

Yulianti, D., Sugianto, & Ngafidin, K. M. (2022). Scratch Assisted Physics Learning With a Stem Approach in the Pandemic Era To Develop 21St Century Learning Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(1), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i1.32607

Yulkifli, Y., Yohandri, Y., & Azis, H. (2022). Development of physics e-module based on integrated project-based learning model with Ethno-STEM approach on smartphones for senior high school students. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 6(1), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v6i1.6316

Yusoff, A. F. M., Hashim, A., Muhamad, N., & Hamat, W. N. W. (2021). Application of Fuzzy Delphi Technique to Identify the Elements for Designing and Developing the e-PBM PI-Poli Module. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(1), 292–304. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i1.12625

Zakiyah, N. A., & Sudarmin. (2022). Development of E-module STEM Integrated Ethnoscience to Increase 21st Century Skills. International Journal of Active Learning, 7(1), 49–58. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/ijal/article/view/34410

Zhan, Z., & Niu, S. (2023). Subject integration and theme evolution of STEM education in K-12 and higher education research. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02303-8

Downloads

Published

31-07-2026

How to Cite

Afrizon, R., Mohtar, L. E., Mohd Azmi, M. S., & Novitra, F. (2026). FRAMEWORK FOR AN APPLIED PHYSICS LEARNING MODULE INTEGRATING STEM AND AUGMENTED REALITY. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 23(2), 83-113. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2026.23.2.%x

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-26
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/mjli2026.23.2.%x