FRAMEWORK FOR AN APPLIED PHYSICS LEARNING MODULE INTEGRATING STEM AND AUGMENTED REALITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2026.23.2.5Keywords:
Applied physics, augmented reality, fuzzy Delphi method, STEM approach, learning moduleAbstract
Purpose – This study addresses the limited quality of Applied Physics learning, which remains largely theoretical and lacks authentic contextual learning experiences for pre-service physics teachers. Integrating Augmented Reality (AR) and STEM through the Applied Physics (PhyARECi-STEM) learning module has the potential to address this need. However, the design of existing STEM learning modules remains suboptimal due to limited expert validation. Therefore, this study aims to develop a framework for the PhyARECi-STEM learning module as a foundation for an innovative 21st-century module.
Methodology – This study employed the Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM). A total of 31 experts were selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using a valid and reliable questionnaire and analyzed using fuzzy statistical techniques.
Findings – The findings identified 10 validated fundamental elements of the PhyARECi-STEM learning module, comprising learning outcomes (B.6), learning content (C.5), learning processes (D.1.1, D.2.1, D.2.2.2, D.2.3.3, D.3.2, D.4.1), and learning assessment (E.1.1, E.2.3). All fundamental elements achieved expert consensus exceeding 75%, resulting in validated framework with the potential to support physics problem-solving skills and scientific creativity of pre-service physics teachers.
Novelty – This study proposes a learning module framework constructed from systematically validated fundamental elements and grounded in established educational theories.
Significance – This study provides practical guidance for lecturers and researchers in designing contextual, integrated, and systematic Applied Physics learning. It also strengthens the theoretical foundation for developing the learning modules for pre-service physics teachers and contributes to 21st-century Applied Physics pedagogy.
References
Abbass, K., Qasim, M. Z., Song, H., Murshed, M., Mahmood, H., & Younis, I. (2022). A review of the global climate change impacts, adaptation, and sustainable mitigation measures. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(28), 42539–42559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19718-6
Adly, M., Nasser, N., & Sharaf, N. (2021). PHYAR: Introducing a mixed/augmented reality platform for physics concepts. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Computer Supported Education (CSEDU 2021), 2, 338–345. https://doi.org/10.5220/0010496103380345
Afrizon, R., Mohtar, L. E., & Mohd Azmi, M. S. (2025). When studying applied physics: What problems are there, and do pre-service physics teachers need? International Journal of Advances in Applied Sciences, 14(3), 650–661. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijaas.v14.i3.pp650-661
Akhsan, H., Putra, G. S., Wiyono, K., Romadoni, M., & Furqon, M. (2023). Development of a STEM-based introduction to quantum physics module on the sub-subject of potential variations in the physics education study program. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(9), 7408–7412. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i9.3577
Al-Rikabi, Y. K., & Montazer, G. A. (2024). Designing an e-learning readiness assessment model for Iraqi universities employing fuzzy Delphi method. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 2217– 2257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11889-0
Al Mamun, M. A., & Lawrie, G. (2023). Student-content interactions: Exploring behavioural engagement with self-regulated inquiry-based online learning modules. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00221-x
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview Press.
Ammar, M., Al-Thani, N. J., & Ahmad, Z. (2024). Role of pedagogical approaches in fostering innovation among K-12 students in STEM education. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 9, Article 100839, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100839
Arifanti, D. R., Thalhah, S. Z., Mafidapuspadina, M., & Muzaini, M. (2021). Pengembangan lembar kerja peserta didik berbasis STEM untuk meningkatkan kemampuan kreativitas matematika. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(4), 2710-2725. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i4.4258
Aris, N. M., Ibrahim, N. H., & Halim, N. D. A. (2025). Design and Development Research (DDR) approach in designing design thinking chemistry module to empower students’ innovation competencies. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 44(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.44.1.5568
Arık, M., & Topçu, M. S. (2022). Implementation of engineering design process in the K-12 science classrooms: Trends and issues. Research in Science Education, 52(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09912-x
Arora, N. K., & Mishra, I. (2023). Sustainable development goal 13: Recent progress and challenges to climate action. Environmental Sustainability, 6(3), 297–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-023-00287-4
Awang, S., Ahmad, S., Alias, N., & Dewitt, D. (2016). Design of an instructional module on basic life support for homeschooled children. Cogent Education, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2016.1188439
Babic, S., McNiven, A. L., Bezjak, A., Balogh, J. M., Mah, K., & Tsao, M. N. (2023). Evolution and evaluation of a structured applied physics course for radiation oncology and radiation physics trainees. Journal of Cancer Education, 38(3), 813–820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-022-02190-8
Bendraou, R. (2024). Critical pedagogy: Investigating critical thinking skills and active citizenship through discourse analysis in a Moroccan EFL textbook. International Journal of English Language Studies, 6(1), 98–109. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijels.2024.6.1.10
Bonneuil, C., Choquet, P. L., & Franta, B. (2021). Early warnings and emerging accountability: Total’s responses to global warming, 1971–2021. Global Environmental Change, 71, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2021.102386
Bungum, B., & Mogstad, E. (2024). Building and programming a weather station: Teachers’ views on values and challenges in a comprehensive STEM project. Research in Science and Technological Education, 42(2), 450–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2103108
Cantlon, J. F., Becker, K. T., & DeLong, C. M. (2024). Computational thinking during a short, authentic, interdisciplinary STEM experience for elementary students. Journal for STEM Education Research, 7(3), 425–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-024-00117-0
Chang, P. L., Hsu, C. W., & Chang, P. C. (2011). Fuzzy Delphi method for evaluating hydrogen production technologies. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 36(21), 14172–14179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.05.045
Chang, P. T., Huang, L. C., & Lin, H. J. (2000). The fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy statistics and membership function fitting and an application to the human resources. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 112(3), 511–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00067-0
Chang, T. S., Wang, H. C., Haynes, A. M., Song, M. M., Lai, S. Y., & Hsieh, S. H. (2022). Enhancing student creativity through an interdisciplinary, project-oriented problem-based learning undergraduate curriculum. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101173
Chen, C. T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.10.013
Cheng, C.-H., & Lin, Y. (2002). Evaluating the best main battle tank using fuzzy decision theory with linguistic criteria evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 142(1), 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00280-6
Chien, Y. H., Liu, C. Y., Chan, S. C., & Chang, Y. S. (2023). Engineering design learning for high school and college first-year students in a STEM battlebot design project. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00403-0
Chu, H. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2008). A Delphi-based approach to developing expert systems with the cooperation of multiple experts. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(4), 2826–2840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.05.034
Chua, C., Kosnin, A. M., & Yeo, K. J. (2024). Fuzzy Delphi method for A-level mathematics technological pedagogical and content knowledge module. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(1), 441–453. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i1.25982
Cumino, C., & Zich, U. (2021). Geometry to build models, models to visualize geometry. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 7, 149–166.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-020-00080-6
DeCoito, I., & Estaiteyeh, M. (2022). Online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: Exploring science/STEM teachers’ curriculum and assessment practices in Canada. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 4, Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-022-00048-z
del Río, J. A., Russell, J. M., & Juárez, D. (2020). Applied physics in Mexico: Mining the past to predict the future. Scientometrics, 125(1), 187–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03639-7
Donmez, I. (2020). STEM education dimensions: From STEM literacy to STEM assessment. In S. Idin (Ed.), Research highlights in education and science (pp. 154–170). ISRES Publishing.
Elliott, K. M., & Shin, D. (2002). Student satisfaction: An alternative approach to assessing this important concept. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 24(2), 197–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/136008002200001351
Fadhilah, F., Effendi, Z. M., & Ridwan. (2021). Development of contextual teaching and learning (CTL) models in applied physics courses. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 8(3), 364–375. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i3.2425
Farihah, M. J., Norawi, A. M., & Jahan, A. N. (2021). Game-based STEM module development for KSSM science teachers. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(2), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.63
Farwati, R., Metafisika, K., Sari, I., Sitinjak, D. S., Solikha, D. F., & Solfarina, S. (2021). STEM education implementation in Indonesia: A scoping review. International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability, 1(1), 11–32. https://doi.org/10.53889/ijses.v1i1.2
Fathurohman, A., Susiloningsih, E., & Arianti, A. (2021). Physics module based on STEM problem based learning on Newton’s motion law material for senior high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1869(1), Article 012155. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1869/1/012155
Febriyanti, E., Indrawati, Supeno, Sutarto, & Mahardika, I. K. (2018). The effectiveness of the module-based STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics) to study physics at vocational high school. International Journal of Advanced Research, 6(5), 1367–1370. https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/7168
Ferdiman, B., Al Akbar, H., Faturrahman, M. R., & Maulana, F. I. (2023). Development of augmented reality application in physics through Newton’s laws and object interaction. Procedia Computer Science, 227, 699–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.574
Gao, X., Li, P., Shen, J., & Sun, H. (2020). Reviewing assessment of student learning in interdisciplinary STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00225-4
Geiger, V., Mulligan, J., Date‑Huxtable, L., Ahlip, R., Heath Jones, D., Julian May, E., Rylands, L., & Wright, I. (2018). An interdisciplinary approach to designing online learning: Fostering pre-service mathematics teachers’ capabilities in mathematical modelling. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 50(1–2), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0920-x
Goos, M., Carreira, S., & Namukasa, I. K. (2023). Mathematics and interdisciplinary STEM education: Recent developments and future directions. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 55(7), 1199–1217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01533-z
Handayani, E. S., Yuberti, Saregar, A., & Wildaniati, Y. (2021). Development of STEM-integrated physics e-module to train critical thinking skills: The perspective of preservice teachers. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1796(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012100
Harel, I., & Papert, S. (1991). Constructionism: Research reports and essays, 1985-1990. Ablex Publishing Coorporation Norwood.
Hasim, M. A., Jabar, J., Sufian, A., Ibrahim, N. F., & Khalid, F. A. (2023). Employing fuzzy Delphi techniques to validate the components and contents of e-learning antecedents and usage behavior towards e-learning performance. European Journal of Educational Research, 12(1), 467–480. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.1.467
Hedenqvist, C., Romero, M., & Vinuesa, R. (2023). Improving the learning of mechanics through augmented reality. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28(1), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09542-1
Ilma, A. Z., Wilujeng, I., Widowati, A., Nurtanto, M., & Kholifah, N. (2023). A systematic literature review of STEM education in Indonesia (2016-2021): Contribution to improving skills in 21st century learning. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi, 13(2), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.02.17
Ismail, N. K., Mohamed, S., & Hamzah, M. I. (2019). The application of the fuzzy Delphi technique to the required aspect of parental involvement in the effort to inculcate positive attitude among preschool children. Creative Education, 10(12), 2907–2921. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1012216
Ismet, Darmawijayo, Aisyah, N., Nawawi, E., Yusup, M., & Meilinda. (2020). How to support pre-service teachers’ conceptual understanding using hyperthermia as STEM context: A case study in sciences education department Universitas Sriwijaya. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1480(1), Article 012072. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1480/1/012072
Jackson, C., Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., Bush, S. B., Maiorca, C., Roberts, T., Yost, C., & Fowler, A. (2021). Equity-oriented conceptual framework for K-12 STEM literacy. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00294-z
Jolly, A. (2017). STEM by design: Strategies and activities for grades 4-8. Routledge.
JR, J. J. R., & Sulaiman, F. (2020). The development of integrated STEM-PBL physics module for learning classical mechanics in secondary education. Solid State Technology, 63(6), 19410–19433. https://solidstatetechnology.us/index.php/JSST/article/view/8174
Juandi, T., Kaniawati, I., Samsudin, A., Verawati, N. N. S. P., & Zahara, L. (2024). Learning problems of prospective teachers in lectures modern physics during the COVID-19 pandemic. KnE Social Sciences, 2024, 1221–1238. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i13.16064
Karamustafaoğlu, O., & Pektaş, H. M. (2023). Developing students’ creative problem solving skills with inquiry-based STEM activity in an out-of-school learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 7651–7669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11496-5
Kariman, D., Harisman, Y., Sovia, A., & Prahmana, R. C. I. (2019). Effectiveness of guided discovery-based module: A case study in Padang city, Indonesia. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(2), 239–250. https://jme.ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jme/article/view/3791
Kementerian Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional. (2024). Ringkasan eksekutif peta jalan pendidikan Indonesia tahun 2025–2045.
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2022a). Pedoman penerapan kurikulum dalam rangka pemulihan pembelajaran (Kepmendikbudristek No. 56 Tahun 2022).
Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi. (2022b). Standar proses pada pendidikan usia dini, jenjang pendidikan dasar, dan jenjang pendidikan menengah (Permendikbudristek No. 16 Tahun 2022)
Khotimah, R. P., Adnan, M., Che Ahmad, C. N., & Murtiyasa, B. (2023). The effectiveness of the STEMDISLEARN module in improving students’ critical thinking skills in the differential equations course. Cogent Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2220233
Kurniawan, D., Samsura, D. A. A., & van Deemen, A. M. A. (2023). Exploring expertise criteria of university academics. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 14(4), 75–107. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/224811/
Landeta, J., & Lertxundi, A. (2024). Quality indicators for Delphi studies. Futures and Foresight Science, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.172
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
Lin, K. Y., Lu, S. C., Hsiao, H. H., Kao, C. P., & Williams, P. J. (2023). Developing student imagination and career interest through a STEM project using 3D printing with repetitive modeling. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(5), 2884–2898. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1913607
Lin, K. Y., Wu, Y. T., Hsu, Y. T., & Williams, P. J. (2021). Effects of infusing the engineering design process into STEM project-based learning to develop preservice technology teachers’ engineering design thinking. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00258-9
Markus, L., & Ishak, M. Z. (2022). Development of the Secondary School Quantum Physics-STEM (SSQP-STEM) instructional module for physics teachers: A Fuzzy Delphi Method (FDM) approach. International Research Journal of Education and Sciences, 6(2), 16-29. https://www.masree.info/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Development-Of-The-Secondary-School-Quantum-Physics-Stem-SSQP-Stem-Instructional-Module-For-Physics-Teachers-A-Fuzzy-Delphi-Method-FDM-Approach.pdf
Martaningsih, S. T., Maryani, I., Prasetya, D. S., Prwanti, S., Sayekti, I. C., Aziz, N. A. A., & Siwayanan, P. (2022). STEM problem-based learning module: A solution to overcome elementary students’ poor problem-solving skills. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 12(4), 340–348. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.12.04.35
Mayasari, T., Susilowati, E., & Winarno, N. (2019). Practicing integrated STEM in renewable energy projects: Solar power. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(5), Article 052033. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/5/052033
McArthur, J. (2023). Rethinking authentic assessment: Work, well-being, and society. Higher Education, 85(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00822-y
Melisa, M., Susilowati, E., & Dewantara, D. (2021). Development of electronic modules based on STEM to train students’ creativity: Validity and practicality analysis. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 9(3), 335. https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v9i3.10440
Mesutoglu, C., Bayram-Jacobs, D., Vennix, J., Limburg, A., & Pepin, B. (2024a). Exploring multidisciplinary teamwork of applied physics and engineering students in a challenge-based learning course. Research in Science and Technological Education, 42(3), 639–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2154334
Mesutoglu, C., Bayram, D., Vennix, A., & Limburg, A. (2024b). Boundary interactions of applied physics and mechanical engineering students in a challenge-based learning course. European Journal of Engineering Education, 49(4), 752–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2024.2326438
Mistler, W. (2025). Formal assessment in STEM higher education: A general analysis and recommendations for improvement. The Journal of Technology Studies, 50(1), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.21061/jts.429
Mohd Jamil, M.R & Mat Noh, N. (2021). Kepelbagaian metodologi dalam penyelidikan reka bentuk dan pembangunan (3rd ed.). Qaisar Prestige Resources.
Mohd Khalli, M. N., Sintang, S., & Kamu, A. (2022). The framework of socio-religious harmony in Sabah, East Malaysia: An application of fuzzy Delphi method. Heliyon, 8(8), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09976
Mokmin, N. A. M., Hanjun, S., Jing, C., & Qi, S. (2024). Impact of an AR-based learning approach on the learning achievement, motivation, and cognitive load of students on a design course. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(2), 557–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00270-2
Montes, R., Zuheros, C., Morales, J., Zermeño, N., Duran, J., & Herrera, F. (2023). Design and consensus content validity of the questionnaire for b-learning education: A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic Delphi based decision support tool. Applied Soft Computing, 147, Article 110755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110755
Nasrudin, D., Rochman, C., Suhendi, H. ., Helsy, I., Rasyid, A., Aripin, I., Utama, W., & Mayasri, A. (2020). STEM education for pre-service teacher : Why and how? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1563(1), Article 012039. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1563/1/012039
Neher-Asylbekov, S., & Wagner, I. (2023). Effects of out-of-school STEM learning environments on student interest: A critical systematic literature review. Journal for STEM Education Research, 6(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-022-00080-8
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Prentice-Hall.
Niancai, L., Zhuolin, F., & Qi, W. (2024). Education in China and the world: Achievements and contemporary issues. Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-5861-0
Nkopodi, N., Jakovljevic, M., & Photo, P. (2024). Criteria for enhancing student wellbeing in STEM classrooms: ICT and indigenous knowledge in South African higher education. Discover Education, 3, Article 152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00251-2
Noh, N. M., Siraj, S., Halili, S. H., Jamil, M. R. M., & Husin, Z. (2019). Aplikasi teknik fuzzy Delphi terhadap keperluan elemen teknologi sebagai wadah dalam pembelajaran berasaskan pemikiran reka bentuk. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 34, 129–151. https://doi.org/10.21315/apjee2019.34.7
Nugraha, M. G., Kidman, G., & Tan, H. (2023). Pre-service teacher in STEM education: An integrative review and mapping of the Indonesian research literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(5), Article em2262. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13155
Nugraha, M. G., Kidman, G., & Tan, H. (2024). Interdisciplinary STEM education foundational concepts: Implementation for knowledge creation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(10), Article em2523. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/15471
Nurtanto, M., Pardjono, P., Widarto, W., & Ramdani, S. D. (2020). The effect of STEM-EDP in professional learning on automotive engineering competence in vocational high school. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2), 633–649. https://doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.645047
Ong, Y. S., Koh, J., Tan, A. L., & Ng, Y. S. (2024). Developing an integrated STEM classroom observation protocol using the productive disciplinary engagement framework. Research in Science Education, 54(1), 101–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10110-z
Ortiz-Revilla, J., Greca, I. M., & Arriassecq, I. (2022). A theoretical framework for integrated STEM education. Science and Education, 31(2), 383–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00242-x
Palid, O., Cashdollar, S., Deangelo, S., Chu, C., & Bates, M. (2023). Inclusion in practice: A systematic review of diversity-focused STEM programming in the United States. International Journal of STEM Education, 10, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00387-3
Pertiwi, N. P., Saputro, S., Yamtinah, S., & Kamari, A. (2024). Enhancing critical thinking skills through STEM problem-based contextual learning: An integrated e-module education website with virtual experiments. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 23(4), 739–766. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/24.23.739
Pittman, C., & LaViola, J. J. (2020). PhyAR: Determining the utility of augmented reality for physics education in the classroom. 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW), 761–762. https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW50115.2020.00231
Pusdatin. (2021). Petunjuk teknis kihajar STEM tahun 2021. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Pusdatin. (2022). Petunjuk teknis kihajar STEM tahun 2022. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Radu, I., Huang, X., Kestin, G., & Schneider, B. (2023). How augmented reality influences student learning and inquiry styles: A study of 1-1 physics remote AR tutoring. Computers & Education: X Reality, 2, Article 100011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2023.100011
Rahayu, P., & Wulandari, I. A. (2021). Defining e-portfolio factor for competency certification using fuzzy Delphi method. Procedia Computer Science, 197, 566–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.174
Reynante, B. M., Selbach-Allen, M. E., & Pimentel, D. R. (2020). Exploring the promises and perils of integrated STEM through disciplinary practices and epistemologies. Science and Education, 29(4), 785–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-020-00121-x
Roberts, T., Maiorca, C., Jackson, C., & Mohr-Schroeder, M. (2022). Integrated STEM as problem-solving practices. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 14(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2021.2024721
Roehrig, G. H., Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Ring-Whalen, E. (2021a). Beyond the basics: A detailed conceptual framework of integrated STEM. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 3(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-021-00041-y
Roehrig, G. H., Dare, E. A., Ring-Whalen, E., & Wieselmann, J. R. (2021b). Understanding coherence and integration in integrated STEM curriculum. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00259-8
Ropawandi, D., Halim, L., & Husnin, H. (2022). Augmented reality (AR) technology-based learning: The effect on physics learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.2.1596
Saffie, N. A. M., Shukor, N. A. M., & Rasmani, K. A. (2016). Fuzzy Delphi method: Issues and challenges. 2016 International Conference on Logistics, Informatics and Service Sciences (LISS). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/LISS.2016.7854490
Saido, G. A. M., Siraj, S., DeWitt, D., & Al-Amedy, O. S. (2018). Development of an instructional model for higher order thinking in science among secondary school students: A fuzzy Delphi approach. International Journal of Science Education, 40(8), 847–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1452307
Saleem, A., Anwar, S., Nawaz, T., Fahad, S., Saud, S., Ur Rahman, T., Khan, M. N. R., & Nawaz, T. (2024). Securing a sustainable future: The climate change threat to agriculture, food security, and sustainable development goals. Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Applied Sciences, 11, 595-611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43994-024-00177-3
Sari, M. R., Sutarto, S., Sudarti, S., Indrawati, I., & Budiarso, A. S. (2020). STEM-CP (sains, technology, engineering mathematics-contextual problem) based physics module to increase student literacy skills at vocational high school. Pancaran Pendidikan, 9(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.25037/pancaran.v9i1.271
Satanassi, S., Branchetti, L., Fantini, P., Casarotto, R., Caramaschi, M., Barelli, E., & Levrini, O. (2023). Exploring the boundaries in an interdisciplinary context through the family resemblance approach: The dialogue between physics and mathematics. Science and Education, 32(5), 1287–1320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-023-00439-2
Septiadevana, R., & Abdullah, N. (2024). Designing a STEM project-based learning module for scientific literacy and critical thinking elementary school students. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 12(3), 662–682. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v12i3.38255
Siew, N. M., & Ambo, N. (2020). The scientific creativity of fifth graders in a STEM project-based cooperative learning approach. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 78(4), 627–643. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/20.78.627
Simarro, C., & Couso, D. (2021). Engineering practices as a framework for STEM education: A proposal based on epistemic nuances. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00310-2
Sivaraj, R., Ellis, J., & Roehrig, G. (2019). Conceptualizing the T in STEM: A systematic review. Proceedings of the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1245–1254). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
Sivaraj, R., Ellis, J. A., Wieselmann, J. R., & Roehrig, G. H. (2020). Computational participation and the learner-technology pairing in K-12 STEM education. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 387–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.220
Siverling, E. A., Guzey, S. S., & Moore, T. J. (2017, October). Students’ science talk during engineering design in life science-focused STEM integration units. 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1-9). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2017.8190670
Siverling, E. A., Suazo-Flores, E., Mathis, C. A., & Moore, T. J. (2019). Students’ use of STEM content in design justifications during engineering design-based STEM integration. School Science and Mathematics, 119(8), 457–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12373
Sırakaya, M., & Alsancak Sırakaya, D. (2022). Augmented reality in STEM education: A systematic review. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(8), 1556–1569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1722713
Skulmoski, G. J., Hartman, F. T., & Krahn, J. (2007). The Delphi method for graduate research. Journal of Information Technology Education, 6(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47847-7_10
Steffensen, L. (2024). Developing responsible citizenship through integrated STEM education activities. In J. Anderson, & K. Makar (Eds.), The contribution of mathematics to school STEM education: Current understandings (pp. 295–311). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-2728-5_17
Stewart, C. O. (2022). STEM identities: A communication theory of identity approach. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 41(2), 148–170. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X211030674
Stretch, E. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2021). Framing failure: Leveraging uncertainty to launch creativity in STEM education. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 7(2), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlt.7.2.123-133
Sukma, M., Halim, A., & Evendi, E. (2022). Implementation of e-learning module based on science technology engineering mathematics on solar cells topic. JIPF(Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 7(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v7i1.2237
Tabarés, R., & Boni, A. (2023). Maker culture and its potential for STEM education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 33(1), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09725-y
Tang, K. (2024). Climate change education in Indonesia’s formal education: A policy analysis. Npj Climate Action, 3(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-024-00143-z
Taylor, E. (2020). We agree, don’t we? The Delphi method for health environments research. Health Environments Research and Design Journal, 13(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586719887709
Thees, M., Kapp, S., Strzys, M. P., Beil, F., Lukowicz, P., & Kuhn, J. (2020). Effects of augmented reality on learning and cognitive load in university physics laboratory courses. Computers in Human Behavior, 108, Article 106316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106316
Tuyet, T. L. T., Thi, K. N., Duc, H. T., Giao, X. T. T., Thi, N. V., Tuong, V. H. K., Nhu, U. D. T., & Mai, A. L. T. (2024). STEM education in primary schools of Southeast Asian countries: An analysis of scientific publications in the Scopus database from 2000 to 2022. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/14432
Wells, R. S., Chen, L., Kimball, E., Annan, B., Auerbach, S. M., & Fermann, J. T. (2025). Improving the perceived utility value of teamwork and collaboration among STEM undergraduates. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 23(2), 515–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-024-10471-5
Widiastuti, I., Budiyanto, C. W., & Ramli, M. (2020). Pre-service teacher conceptions of integrated STEM using the engineering design approach. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Teaching, Assessment, and Learning for Engineering (TALE) (pp. 106–111). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE48869.2020.9368382
Wieselmann, J. R., Menon, D., Price, B. C., Johnson, A., Asim, S., Haines, S., & Morison, G. (2025). What is STEM? Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of integrated STEM education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 165, Article 105108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105108
Wilson, K. (2021). Exploring the challenges and enablers of implementing a STEM project-based learning programme in a diverse junior secondary context. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19(5), 881–897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-020-10103-8
Winarno, N., Rusdiana, D., Samsudin, A., Susilowati, E., Ahmad, N., & Afifah, R. M. A. (2020). The steps of the Engineering Design Process (EDP) in science education: A systematic literature review. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(4), 1345–1360. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.766201
Xu, L., Fang, S. C., & Hobbs, L. (2023). The relevance of STEM: A case study of an Australian secondary school as an arena of STEM curriculum innovation and enactment. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(2), 667–689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-022-10267-5
Xue, X., Ahmad, N. J., & Liu, X. (2023). The development and validation of an EDP-STEM module-taking heat transfer, mechanics, and buoyancy as examples. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 20(4), 649–668. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2023.037
Yakob, M., Hamdani, H., Sari, R. P., Haji, A. G., & Nahadi, N. (2021). Implementation of performance assessment in STEM-based science learning to improve students’ habits of mind. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 624–631. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21084
Yang, H. W., Harradine, C., Lim, C. I., Clements, D. H., Vinh, M., & Sarama, J. (2024). Reporting and analyzing demographics in U.S.-American early STEM intervention literature: A systematic review. Early Childhood Education Journal, 53(6), 2287-2301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-024-01739-0
Yin, T. T., & Hanif, H. (2024). Fuzzy Delphi method: A step-by-step guide to obtain expert consensus on MUETBot functionalities. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 14(4), 1097–1104. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v14-i4/21307
Yulianti, D., Sugianto, & Ngafidin, K. M. (2022). Scratch assisted physics learning with a STEM approach in the pandemic era to develop 21st century learning skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(1), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i1.32607
Yulkifli, Y., Yohandri, Y., & Azis, H. (2022). Development of physics e-module based on integrated project-based learning model with ethno-STEM approach on smartphones for senior high school students. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 6(1), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v6i1.6316
Yusoff, A. F. M., Hashim, A., Muhamad, N., & Hamat, W. N. W. (2021). Application of fuzzy Delphi technique to identify the elements for designing and developing the e-PBM PI-Poli module. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(1), 292–304. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i1.12625
Zakiyah, N. A., & Sudarmin. (2022). Development of e-module STEM integrated ethnoscience to increase 21st century skills. International Journal of Active Learning, 7(1), 49–58. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/ijal/article/view/34410/12633
Zaky, M., Alit, K., & Untara, A. (2025). Enhancing student creativity in applied physics through RO filter and heating filament learning media development. Ideguru: Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 10(1), 635– 641. https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v10i1.1539
Zhan, Z., & Niu, S. (2023). Subject integration and theme evolution of STEM education in K-12 and higher education research. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02303-8
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-10-16Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

