Teaching Thinking Skills Through Visible Thinking Routines (VTRs): Shaping Dispositions of Pre-Service ESL Teachers

Authors

  • Joanna Joseph Jeyaraj Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia
  • Abu Bakar Razali Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2025.22.2.4

Keywords:

Critical Thinking, English language education (ELE), English as a second language (ESL), pre-service teachers, thinking skills, visible thinking routines

Abstract

Purpose - The teaching of thinking skills is not only dependent on pedagogical skills, but also on dispositions. In Malaysia, the teaching of thinking skills is prominent in policy documents, yet weakly embedded in subject teaching. Therefore, the aim of this study was to understand the dispositions of ESL pre-service teachers towards Visible Thinking Routines (VTRs), which are a collection of thinking tools that facilitate different types of thinking. The goal was to identify the salient features of VTRs which shaped the dispositions of ESL pre-service teachers towards teaching thinking.

Methodology - Data consisted of 117 written reflective accounts and four focus group discussions involving fifteen pre-service teachers. The participants had experienced VTRs in the following two ways: as learners and as “teachers”.

Findings - Participants were largely open and positive towards VTRs. Two main themes reflected this inclination, and they were related to the inherent quality of VTRs which fostered active learning environments, and the systematic framework for teaching thinking skills that VTRs provided. At the same time, there were some less favourable dispositions which were mainly due to finding the “right” routine and implementing VTRs, which resulted in the process being time-consuming.

Significance - To shape positive dispositions towards teaching thinking, pre-service teachers should be explicitly taught how to teach thinking and be immersed in a culture of thinking at the teacher education level. This might result in getting pre-service teachers’ acceptance and “buy-in” towards research-based thinking tools such as VTRs, which can be used to integrate thinking skills into subject teaching. Openness to use these tools could later result in “dispositions in action” in these pre-service teachers’ professional careers in the future.

References

Abdelhalim, S. M., & Aldaghri, A. A. (2024). Creating culture of thinking in language classrooms: An interpretive inquiry into Saudi university EFL instructor’s beliefs and practices. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(2), 396-407. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1502.08 Abdul Aziz @Ahmad, A., Ismail, F., Ibrahim, N. M., & Samat, N. A. (2017). Investigating the implementation of higher order thinking skills in Malaysian classrooms: Insights from L2 teaching practices. Sains Humanika, 9(4–2), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v9n4-2.1361

Aditomo, A., Goodyear, P., Bliuc, A. M., & Ellis, R. A. (2013). Inquiry-based learning in higher education: Principal forms, educational objectives, and disciplinary variations. Studies in Higher Education, 38(9), 1239–1258. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.616584

Akinoğlu, O., & Karsantik, Y. (2016). Pre-service teachers’ opinions on teaching thinking skills. International Journal of Instruction, 9(2), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2016.925a

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Chen, R. H. (2021). Fostering students’ workplace communicative competence and collaborative mindset through an inquiry-based learning design. Education Sciences, 11(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11010017

Chun, T. C., & Abdullah, M. N. L. Y. (2019). The teaching of higher order thinking skills (HOTS) in Malaysian schools: Policy and practices. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Management, 7(3), 1–18.

Couch, J. (2017). On the borders of pedagogy: Implementing a critical pedagogy for students on the Thai Burma border. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 57(1), 126–146.

Dajani, M. "Mohammed Y. (2016). Using thinking routines as a pedagogy for teaching english as a second language in Palestine. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 6(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.5590/jerap.2016.06.1.01

Dass, L. C., Abdullah, N., & Abu Samah, S. A. (2017). A project zero model classroom in a malaysian culture. International Journal of Modern Languages And Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.24191/ijmal.v1i1.7614

Dass, L. C., Hay, T., & Harun, Z. H. (2021). Project Zero: A framework for innovative pedagogy in the teaching of english in Malaysia? Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 18(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.52696/bqug1201

Dwee, C. Y., Anthony, E. M., Salleh, B. M., Kamarulzaman, R., & Kadir, Z. A. (2016). Creating thinking classrooms: Perceptions and teaching practices of ESP practitioners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 631–639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.

Evan-Winters, V. (2009). Leaders-cloaked-as-teachers: Toward pedagogies of liberation. In S. Groenke & J. Hatch (Eds.), Critical Pedagogy and Teacher Education in the Neoliberal Era : Small Openings (pp. 141–156). Springer.

Fard, E. E., & Vakili, A. (2018). The effect of problem-based learning on Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary learning. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 15(1), 208–261. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi. org/10.18823/asiatefl.2018.15.1.15.208

Garzon, E., & Castaneda-Pena, H. (2015). Applying the reader-response theory to literary texts in EFL-pre-service teachers’ initial education. English Language Teaching, 8(8), 187–198. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n8p187

Harvard Graduate School of Education. (2016). Project Zero’s thinking routine toolbox. http://www.pz. harvard.edu/thinking-routines

Hooper, T. (2015). Improving academic writing through thinking routines. Kwansei Gakuin University Humanities Review, 20, 47–63.

Hu, G. (2002). Potential cultural resistance to pedagogical imports: The case of communicative language teaching in China. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 15(2), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908310208666636

Joseph Jeyaraj, J. (2020). Possibilities for critical pedagogy engagement in higher education: Exploring students’ openness and acceptance. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21, 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-019-09605-0

Joseph Jeyaraj, J., Kiss, T., Perrodin, D. D., (2025). Situating ELT critical pedagogies in South East Asia: Challenges and opportunities. In J. Joseph Jeyaraj, T. Kiss, & D. Perrodin (Eds.), Critical Pedagogies in English Language Teaching and Learning in South East Asia (pp. 182–205). Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia.

Joseph Jeyaraj, J., & Wald, N. (2020). Students’ reflections on barriers to promoting higher education’s social purposes in the classroom. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(8), 976–991. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1625320

Kiss, T., & Mizusawa, K. (2018). Revisiting the pedagogy of multiliteracies: Writing instruction in a multicultural context. Changing English, 25(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/1358684X. 2017.1403283

Lei, Y., & Joseph Jeyaraj, J. (2023). Developing critical thinking in EFL through visible thinking routines : Experiences of teachers in a Chinese international school. International Journal of English Language Education, 11(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v11i1.20894

Li, L. (2023). Critical thinking from the ground up: Teachers’ conceptions and practice in EFL classrooms. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 29(6), 571–593. https://doi.org/10. 1080/13540602.2023.2191182

Lin, A. M.. (2004). Introducing a critical pedagogical curriculum : A feminist reflexive account. In B. Norton & K. Toohey (Eds.), Critical Pedagogies and Language Learning (pp. 271–290). Cambridge University Press.

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013). Malaysia education blueprint 2013-2025 (Preschool to Post-Secondary) (pp. 1–268).

Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. SAGE Publications.

Petek, E., & Bedir, H. (2018). An adaptable teacher education framework for critical thinking in language teaching. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 28, 56–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. tsc.2018.02.008

Phonekeo, S. (2020). Implementing a culture of thinking in Lao EFL Pre-Service Teacher Education : A case of reading. Victoria University of Wellington.

Phonekeo, S., & Macalister, J. (2021). Reading performance and perceptions of Lao EFL pre-service teachers following a culture of thinking implementation. Reading in a Foreign Language, 33(1), 55–77.

Puteh-Behak, F., Darmi, R., & Mohamed, Y. (2015). Implementation of a western-based multiliteracies pedagogy in Malaysia: A socio-cultural perspective. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 15(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.17576/GE

Ramos-Vallecillo, N., Murillo-Ligorred, V., & Lozano-Blasco, R. (2024). University students’ achievement of meaningful learning through participation in thinking routines. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 14(4), 1012–1027. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14040066

Ritchhart, R. (2002). Intellectual character: What it is, why it matters, and how to get it. Jossey-Bass.

Ritchhart, R. (2015). Creating cultures of thinking: The 8 forces we must master to truly transform our school. Jossey-Bass.

Ritchhart, R., & Church, M. (2020). The Power of making thinking visible: Practices to engage and empower all learners. Jossey‐Bass.

Ritchhart, R., Church, M., & Morrison, K. (2011). Making thinking visible: How to promote engagement, understanding and independence for all learners. Jossey-Bass.

Ruslina Othman, Nor’ain Mohd Tajudin, & Mazlini Adnan. (2021). Needs analysis for developing a thinking-based learning module in mathematics learning. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(4), 1165–1172.

Salmon, A. K. (2008). Young english language learners making thinking and language visible. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 10, 126–141. https://doi.org/10.14483/22487085.101

Sepulveda Larraguibel, Y., & Venegas-Muggli, J. I. (2019). Effects of using thinking routines on the academic results of business students at a chilean tertiary education institution. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 17(4), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/dsji.12191

Singh, C. K. S., Gopal, R., Ong, E. T., Masa Singh, T. S., Mostafa, N. A., & Ambar Singh, R. K. (2020). ESL teachers’ strategies to foster higher-order thinking skills to teach writing. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 17(2), 195–226. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2020.17. 2.7

Song, X., Razali, A. B., Sulaiman, T., & Joseph Jeyaraj, J. (2025). Effectiveness of online project-based learning on Chinese EFL learners’ critical thinking skills and reading comprehension ability. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 101778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2025.101778

Sung, K., & Pederson, R. (2012). Critical practices in ELT as a project of possibilities or a banal discourse. In K. Sung & R. Pederson (Eds.), Critical ELT practices in Asia: key issues, practices and possibilities (pp. 153–169). Sense Publishers.

Thornton, H. (2006). Dispositions in action: Do dispositions make a difference in practice? Teacher Education Quarterly, 33(2), 53–68. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23478934

Tishman, S., Jay, E., & Perkins, D. N. (1993). Teaching thinking dispositions: From transmission to enculturation. Theory Into Practice, 32(3), 147–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/0040584930 9543590

Tishman, S., & Palmer, P. (2005). Visible thinking. Leadership Compass, 2(4), 1–4.

Wolberg, R. I., & Goff, A. (2012). Thinking routines. Journal of Museum Education, 37(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/10598650.2012.11510718

Xu, J. (2024). Developing emotional intelligence in children through dialogic reading, self-made books, and visible thinking routines. Early Childhood Education Journal, 52(7), 1693-1705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-023-01520-9

Yeh, Y. C., Chiang, J. L., Chang, S. L., Ting, Y. S., Wang, C. M., & Peng, Y. Y. (2024). Integrating visible thinking and design thinking strategies to improve creativity and growth mindsets. Educational technology research and development, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11423-024-10429-y

Yuan, R., Yang, M., & Lee, I. (2021). Preparing pre-service language teachers to teach critical thinking: Can overseas field school experience make a difference? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 40, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100832

Downloads

Published

31-07-2025

How to Cite

Joseph Jeyaraj, J., & Abu Bakar Razali. (2025). Teaching Thinking Skills Through Visible Thinking Routines (VTRs): Shaping Dispositions of Pre-Service ESL Teachers. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 22(2), 82-100. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2025.22.2.4

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-21
0 citations recorded so far

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/mjli2025.22.2.4 OpenAlex W4412712299 Scopus 105037528519