Exploring Science Teachers’ Translation of Nature of Science (NOS) Knowledge to Pedagogical Content Knowledge (NOS PCK)

Authors

  • Jasmine Jain School of Education, Taylor’s University Lakeside Campus, Malaysia
  • Mok Shu Jin School of Education, Taylor’s University Lakeside Campus, Malaysia
  • Lee Yee Ling School of Education, Taylor’s University Lakeside Campus, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2025.22.1.11

Keywords:

In-service science teachers, nature of science (NOS), nature of science pedagogical content knowledge (NOS PCK)

Abstract

Purpose - This study is part of a comprehensive investigation conducted in Malaysia, examining science teachers' understanding of the Nature of Science (NOS) and their ability to translate this knowledge into Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) for NOS. This paper specifically examines how teachers apply their NOS knowledge to develop NOS PCK in classroom settings.

Methodology - A qualitative approach was employed, involving observations of both practical and non-practical lessons, as well as semi-structured interviews with five in-service science teachers from a school in Petaling Perdana, Selangor. The teachers were chosen based on their experience in teaching science and their understanding of NOS. Lesson observations were guided by a structured checklist, while thematic analysis was used to interpret interview data, providing insights into the rationale behind their teaching methods related to NOS PCK.

Findings - The study found that Malaysian in-service science teachers face significant challenges in translating their understanding of NOS into effective teaching practices. There is a noticeable gap between teachers' conceptual knowledge of NOS and their PCK implementation. Teachers frequently missed opportunities to integrate key NOS concepts into their lessons and often portrayed scientific methods as fixed procedures while presenting science as static knowledge. These practices reflect a limited understanding of NOS principles.

Significance - The findings underscore the urgent need for ongoing professional development to improve teachers' NOS knowledge and their ability to integrate it into their teaching. The science curriculum should include clear guidelines to support the incorporation of NOS concepts, ultimately fostering improved scientific literacy among students.

References

Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2012). Teaching with and about nature of science, and science teacher knowledge domains. Science & Education, 22(9), 2087-2107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9520-2

Adams, W. (2015). Conducting semi-structured interviews. In J. S. Wholey (Eds.), Handbook of Practical Program (pp. 492-505). Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119171386.ch19

Akerson, V. L., Cullen, T. A., & Hanson, D. L. (2009). Fostering a community of practice through a professional development program to improve elementary teachers’ views of nature of science and teaching practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(10), 1090–1113. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20303

Bennetts, J. (2021). Leadership for professional learning: Developing teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for nature of science in New Zealand secondary schools. https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/ items/d2c5bdb1-8807-4f2b-8ec1-64304322fc1e

Bloom, M., Binns, I. C., & Koehler, C. (2015). Multifaceted NOS instruction: Contextualizing nature of science with documentary films. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 10(3), 405-428. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2015.252a

Chen, S. (2006). Views on science and education (VOSE) questionnaire. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 7(2). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26453414_Views_on_ science_and_education_VOSE_questionnaire

Clough, M. P., & Olson, J. K. (2007). Teaching and assessing the nature of science: An introduction. Science & Education, 17(2-3), 143-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-007-9083-9

Dani, D. (2009). Scientific literacy and purposes for teaching science: A case study of Lebanese private school teachers. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3), 289–299.

Demirdöğen, B., Hanuscin, D. L., Uzuntiryaki-Kondakci, E., & Köseoğlu, F. (2015). Development and nature of preservice chemistry teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for nature of science. Research in Science Education, 46(4), 575–612. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9472-z

Dogan, N., & Abd‐El‐Khalick, F. (2008). Turkish grade 10 students’ and science teachers’ conceptions of nature of Science: A national study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(10), 1083–1112. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20243 du Toit-Brits, C. (2022). Exploring the importance of a sense of belonging for a sense of ownership in learning. South African Journal of Higher Education, 36(5). https://doi.org/10.20853/36-5-4345

Fatin Aliah Phang, Noorzana Khamis, Nina Diana Nawi, & Jaysuman Pusppanathan. (2020). TIMSS 2019 Science Grade 8: Where is Malaysia standing? ASEAN Journal of Engineering Education, 4(2), 37–43.

Guerra-Ramos, MT., Ryder, J., & Leach, J. (2010). Ideas about the nature of science in pedagogically relevant context: Insights from a situated perspective of primary teachers’ knowledge. Science Education, 94(2), 282–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce/20361

Hanuscin, D. L., Lee, M. H., & Akerson, V. L. (2010). Elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for teaching the nature of science. Science Education, 95(1), 145–167. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20404

Herman, B. C., Clough, M. P., & Olson, J. K. (2013). Teachers’ nature of science implementation practices 2–5 years after having completed an intensive science education program. Science Education, 97(2), 271–309. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21048

Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2007). The nature of science education for enhancing scientific literacy. International Journal of Science Education, 29(11), 1347–1362. https://doi.org/10. 1080/09500690601007549

Jain, J., Lee, Y. L. & Mok, S. J. (2024). A systematic review of pedagogical content knowledge for teaching nature of science. Asian Journal of University Education, 20(1), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v20i1.25738

Jain, J., Lim, B. K., & Abdullah, N. (2013). Pre-service teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro. 2013.07.083

Jain, J. & Luaran, J. E. (2020). Conceptualisation of scientific theory-law relationship among pre-service teachers with different academic abilities in science. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(3), 208–219. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i3.10275

Kathirveloo, P., & Puteh, M. (2014). Effective teaching: Pedagogical content knowledge. In ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303940850_Effective_Teaching_Ped agogical_Content_Knowledge

Karakas, M. (2007). The influence of constructivism on nature of science as an area of research and as a classroom subject. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 8(2), 6th ser., 1–14. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/26516679_The_influence_of_constructivism_on _nature_of_Science_as_an_area_of_research_and_as_a_classroom_subject

Kartal, E., Cobern, W. W., Dogan, N., Irez, S., Cakmakci, G., & Yalaki, Y. (2018). Improving science teachers’ nature of science views through an innovative continuing professional development program. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0125-4

Khishfe, R. (2015). A look into students’ retention of acquired nature of science understandings. International Journal of Science Education, 37(10), 1639–1667. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500 693.2015.1049241

Klemenčič, E., Virtič, M. P., & Kovačič, J. M. (2023). The role of teacher education in the science literacy development. Athens Journal of Sciences, 1–22. https://www.athensjournals.gr/ sciences/2022-4882-AJE-STEAM-Klemencic-05.pdf

Kuhn, T. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.

Leden, L., Hansson, L., Redfors, A., & Ideland, M. (2013). Why, when and how to teach nature of science in compulsory school: Teachers’ views. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ Why%2C-when-and-how-to-teach-nature-of-science-in-%3A-Leden-Hansson/389532aa2ec60 e935bdcd62d442ff5fc646151b8

Lederman, N. G. (1999). Teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and classroom practice: Factors that facilitate or impede the relationship. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(8), 916–929. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199910)36:8<916::AID-TEA2>3.0. CO;2-A

Lederman, N. G., Abd‐El‐Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10034

Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as contexts for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(3), 138–147.

Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2019). Teaching and learning nature of scientific knowledge: Is it Déjà vu all over again? Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 1(6), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-019-0002-0

McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., & Almazroa, H. (1998). The role and character of the nature of science in science education. Science and Education 7(6), 511–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47215-5_1

Mohan, Rathakrishnan, Arumugam.Raman, Haniffa, M. A. B., Mariamdaran, S. D., & Haron, A. B. (2017). The drill and practice application in teaching science for lower secondary students. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counselling, 3(7), 100–108.

Mok, S. J., & Jain, J. (2023). Malaysian in-service science teachers’ conception of nature of science (NOS). In M. Koc, O. T. Ozturk & M. L. Ciddi (Eds.), Proceedings of ICRES 2023-- International Conference on Research in Education and Science (pp. 1049–1062), Cappadocia, Turkiye. ISTES Organization. National Science Teachers Association [NSTA]. (n.d.). Nature of science. https://www.nsta.org/nstas-official-positions/naturescience#:~:text=Nature%20of%20science%20(NOS)%20is,based%20 personal%20and%20societal%20issues

Nouri, N., Saberi, M., McComas, W. F., & Mohammadi, M. (2021). Proposed teacher competencies to support effective nature of science instruction: A meta-synthesis of the literature. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 32(6), 601-624. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1871206

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2023a). PISA 2025 Science Framework. https://pisa-framework.oecd.org/science-2025/assets/docs/PISA_2025_Science_ Framework.pdf

OECD. (2023b). Malaysia (Student Performance, PISA 2022). Education GPS - The World of Education at Your Fingertips. https://gpseducation.oecd.org/CountryProfile?primaryCountry= MYS&treshold=10&topic=PI#:~:text=In%20mathematics%2C%20the%20main%20topic,476 %20points%20in%20OECD%20countries

Pompea, S. M., & Walker, C. E. (2017). The importance of pedagogical content knowledge in curriculum development for illumination engineering. 14th Conference on Education and Training in Optics and Photonics: ETOP 2017. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2270022

Popper, K. (1975). The Rationality of Scientific Revolutions. In R. Harré (Eds.), Problems of scientific revolution (pp. 80-106), Oxford University Press.

Rudolph, J. L. (2023). Scientific literacy: Its real origin story and functional role in American education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61(7). https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21890

Sarkar, S., & Gomes, D. (2010). Science teachers’ views of nature of science: A critical review of research. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 11–32.

Schiering, D., Sorge, S., Keller, M. M., & Neumann, K. (2023). A proficiency model for pre-service physics teachers' pedagogical content knowledge (PCK)—What constitutes high-level PCK? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 60(1), 136–163. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21793

Schwartz, R. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2002). “It’s the nature of the beast”: The influence of knowledge and intentions on learning and teaching nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 205–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10021

Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B., (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(4), 610–645. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10128

Shing, C. L., Mohd. Saat, R., & Loke, S. H. (2015). The knowledge of teaching – Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 3(3). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1085915.pdf

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x015002004

Sorge, S., Stender, A., & Neumann, K. (2019). The development of science teachers' professional competence. In A. Hume, R. Cooper & A. Borowski (Eds.), Repositioning pedagogical content knowledge in teachers' knowledge for teaching science (pp. 149–164). Springer Singapore.

Sumranwanich, W., & Yuenyong, C. (2014). Graduate students’ concepts of nature of science (NOS) and attitudes toward teaching NOS. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 2443–2452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.589

Supprakob, S., Faikhamta, C., & Suwanruji, P. (2016). Using the lens of pedagogical content knowledge for teaching the nature of science to portray novice chemistry teachers’ transforming NOS in early years of teaching profession. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(4), 1067–1080. https://doi.org/10.1039/c6rp00158k

Taber, K. S. (2019). Constructivism in education: Interpretations and criticisms from science education. In Early childhood development: Concepts, methodologies, tools, and applications (pp. 312–342). Information Science Reference/IGI Global. https://doi.org/4018/978-1-5225-7507-8.ch015

The Star (2023, August 13). Students lose interest in science, maths due to weak foundation, say dons. The Star. https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2023/08/13/students-lose-interest-in-science-maths-due-to-weak-foundation-say-dons

Vinodhen, V. (2020). The development of science education during the ability-driven phase in Singapore, 1997–2011. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 6(1), 207-227. https://doi.org/10. 1163/23641177-BJA00007

Wahbeh, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2014). Revisiting the translation of nature of science understandings into instructional practice: Teachers’ nature of science pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 36(3), 425–466. https://doi.org/10. 1080/09500693.2013.786852

Yahaya, Azizi & Chu, S. P. (2010). Teori-Teori Pembelajaran. Teori-Teori Pembelajaran, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. https://eprints.utm.my/10364/

Yuenyong, C., & Narjaikaew, P. (2009). Scientific literacy and Thailand science education. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3), 335–349. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ884401.pdf

Zhang, Y. (2015). Pedagogical content knowledge in early mathematics: What teachers know and how it associates with teaching and learning. Dissertations. 1499. https://ecommons.luc.edu/ luc_diss/1499

Downloads

Published

31-01-2025

How to Cite

Jain, J., Mok Shu Jin, & Lee Yee Ling. (2025). Exploring Science Teachers’ Translation of Nature of Science (NOS) Knowledge to Pedagogical Content Knowledge (NOS PCK). Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 22(1), 200-215. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2025.22.1.11

Research impact

Harvested 2026-09-08
5 citations, from Semantic Scholar — the highest of the sources checked

Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

Identifiers DOI 10.32890/mjli2025.22.1.11 OpenAlex W4407310912 Semantic Scholar CorpusID 276297787 Scopus 85218140360