The Measurement of Higher-Order Thinking Skills: A Systematic Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2025.22.1.6Keywords:
Cognitive domain of bloom's taxonomy, higher-order thinking skill, measurement, systematic review, thinking skillAbstract
Purpose - This article comprehensively examines the existing body of literature about the assessment tools employed for evaluating higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) in mathematics within the last five years. The study endeavors to offer a comprehensive overview of measuring instruments for HOTS in mathematics, utilizing precise and up-to-date global data.
Methodology - The research adheres to the PRISMA methodology, employing the systematic literature review (SLR) technique, encompassing ten distinct steps. By utilising the Scopus database, this review comprehensively analyses 18 scholarly articles written in English.
Findings - The results emphasize the significance of implementing a thorough evaluation approach that integrates standardized exams alongside other assessment methods to measure students' cognitive capacities in advanced mathematical reasoning precisely. The tendencies that have been observed provide valuable insights for the development of evaluation tools that can effectively measure effectiveness in many academic domains. Educators can augment instructional efficacy and foster heightened levels of cognitive reasoning in students by comprehending the equilibrium between evaluative and non-evaluative elements, while recognizing the significance of Bloom's taxonomy. Furthermore, this research presents opportunities for additional investigation, enabling scholars to delve into novel approaches and metrics, thus contributing to breakthroughs in education and improving student proficiencies in critical thinking and problem-solving.
Significance – This research provides the opportunity to enhance our comprehension of incorporating higher-order thinking skills in education, thereby promoting holistic cognitive growth.
References
Abdullah, A. H. (2017). Mathematics teachers’ level of knowledge and practice on the implementation of higher-order thinking skills (HOTS). Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n21p133
Abdullah, A. H. (2020). Using active learning with smart board to enhance primary school students’ higher order thinking skills in data handling. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(10), 4421–4432. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081009
Abdullah, A. H. (2021). Does the Use of Smart Board Increase Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS)? IEEE Access, 9, 1833–1854. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3042832
Abdullah, A. H., Fadil, S. S., Abd Rahman, S. N. S., Tahir, L. M., & Hamzah, M. H. (2019). Emerging patterns and problems of higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) mathematical problem-solving in the form-three assessment (PT3). South African Journal of Education, 39(2). https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v39n2a1552
Abdurrahman, M. S., Halim, A. A., & Sharifah, O. (2021). Improving polytechnic students’ high-order-thinking-skills through inquiry-based learning in mathematics classroom. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(3), 976–983. https://doi.org/10.11591/ IJERE.V10I3.21771
Ahmat, N., Azmee, N. A., Mohamed, N. H., Zamzamir, Z., Zahari, N. S., Shafie, S., Mohamed, N. A., & Shah, R. N. F. A. R. M. (2017). Knowledge, Skills and Attitude of Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers Towards Higher-Order Thinking Skills. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(4), 795–804. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.8.4.795
Alhadi, A., Dr Tom, B., & Yacine, R. (2025). Enhancing asset management: Integrating digital twins for continuous permitting and compliance - A systematic literature review. Journal of Building Engineering, 99, 111515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.111515
Alhassora, N. S. A., Abu, M. S., & Abdullah, A. H. (2017). Hindering factors in mastering higher-order thinkings skills: Application of Rasch measurement model. Man in India, 97(19), 275–280.
Ali, N., Ullah, S., & Khan, D. (2022). Interactive laboratories for science education: A subjective study and systematic literature review. Multimodal Technologies and Interaction, 6(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/mti6100085
Ansari, B. I., Saleh, M., Nurhaidah, & Taufiq. (2021). Exploring students’ learning strategies and self-regulated learning in solving mathematical higher-order thinking problems. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 743–756. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.2.743
Azid, N., Ali, R. M., El Khuluqo, I., Purwanto, S. E., & Susanti, E. N. (2022). Higher order thinking skills, school-based assessment and students’ mathematics achievement: understanding teachers’ thoughts. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(1), 290–302. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i1.22030
Bilondi, H. T., Valipour, H., Khoshro, S., Jamilian, P., Ostadrahimi, A., & Zarezadeh, M. (2024). Corrigendum to the effect of caffeine supplementation on muscular strength and endurance: A meta-analysis of meta-analyses” [Heliyon 10(15), August 2024, e35025]. Heliyon, 10(23), e40064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40064
Boadu, E. F., Wang, C. C., & Sunindijo, R. Y. (2020). Characteristics of the construction industry in developing countries and its implications for health and safety: An exploratory study in ghana. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(11), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17114110
Brereton, P., Kitchenham, B. A., Budgen, D., Turner, M., & Khalil, M. (2007). Lessons from applying the systematic literature review process within the software engineering domain. Journal of Systems and Software, 80(4), 571–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2006.07.009
Bronkhorst, H., Roorda, G., Suhre, C., & Goedhart, M. (2022). Students’ use of formalisations for improved logical reasoning. Research in Mathematics Education, 0(0), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2021.1991463
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. Library of Congress Catalog.
Buang, Z., Mohamad, M. M., Ahmad, A., & Yuniarti, N. (2020). The earnings and employment of community colleges’ graduates: occupational field and gender analysis. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Dan Kejuruan, 26(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v26i1.29750
Budgen, D., & Brereton, P. (2006). Performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering, 1051–1052. https://doi.org/10.1145/1134285.1134500
Cáceres-Reche, M. P., Tallón-Rosales, S., Navas-Parejo, M. R., & De la Cruz-Campos, J. C. (2022). Influence of sociodemographic factors and knowledge in pedagogy on the labor market insertion of education science professionals. Education Sciences, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030200
Chambers, D., Rodgers, M., & Woolacott, N. (2009). Not only randomized controlled trials, but also case series should be considered in systematic reviews of rapidly developing technologies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(12), 1253-1260.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi. 2008.12.010
Charungkaittikul, S., Pathumcharoenwattana, W., & Kovitya, M. (2022). A study on the required work competencies of graduates in the non-formal education program. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 43(4), 825–832. https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2022.43.4.04
Conklin, W. (2012). Strategies for Developing Higher-Order Thinking Skills, Grades 6-12: Grades 6-12. Shell Educational Publishing.Inc.
Devlin, K. (2011). Mathematics Education for a New Era: Video Games as a Medium for Learning. A K Peters, Ltd.
Di, W., Danxia, X., & Chun, L. (2019). The effects of learner factors on higher-order thinking in the smart classroom environment. Journal of Computers in Education, 6(4), 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-019-00146-4
Dipitso, P. (2021). Work-integrated learning for mining engineering training and the employability nexus in traditional research universities. Journal of Comparative & International Higher Education, 12(6S1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.32674/jcihe.v12i6s1.2192
Erdogan, F. (2019). Effect of cooperative learning supported by reflective thinking activities on students’ critical thinking skills. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2019(80), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2019.80.5
Gavronskaya, Y., Larchenkova, L., Berestova, A., Latysheva, V., & Smirnov, S. (2022). The development of critical thinking skills in mobile learning: fact-checking and getting rid of cognitive distortions. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education (IJCRSEE), 10(2), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2022-10-2-51-
Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2021). What every researcher should know about searching – clarified concepts, search advice, and an agenda to improve finding in academia. Research Synthesis Methods, 12(2), 136–147. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1457
Hadiastriani, Y. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis for Development of Analytical Thinking Based Assessment. European Journal of Research and Reflection in educational sciences, 10(2), 52–64. http://www.idpublications.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/Full-Paper-BIBLIOMET RIC-ANALYSIS-FOR-DEVELOPMENT-OF-ANALYTICAL-THINKING-BASED-ASSE SSMENT.pdf
Harpster, R. A. (1999). How to take the out of FMEAs. Measuring Business Excellence, 3(3), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb025573
Henningsen, M., & Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 524–549. https://doi.org/10.2307/749690
Herayanti, L., Widodo, W., Susantini, E., & Gunawan, G. (2020). The effectiveness of blended learning model based on inquiry collaborative tutorial toward students’ problem-solving skills in physics. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(3), 959–972. https://doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.675819
Hidajat, F. A. (2021). Students creative thinking profile as a high order thinking in the improvement of mathematics learning. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 1907–1918. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1247
Higgins, J. P.., & Green, S. (2006). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4.2.6. September, 49–55.
Higgins, S. (2017). Managing Higher-Order Thinking Skills. In Managing Academic Libraries (pp. 29–40). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-84334-621-0.00004-2
Huang, Y. M., Silitonga, L. M., Murti, A. T., & Wu, T. T. (2023). Learner engagement in a business simulation game: impact on higher-order thinking skills. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(1), 96–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221106918
Husain, F. N. (2023). Impact of multiple intelligences and 21st century skills on future work force. International Education Studies, 16(3), 16. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v16n3p16
Ibrahim, N. N., Ayub, A. F. M., & Yunus, A. S. M. (2020). Impact of higher order thinking skills (hots) module based on the cognitive apprenticeship model (CAM) on student’s performance. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 19(7), 246–262. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.19.7.14
Indah, P. (2020). Development of HOTS (High Order Thinking Skill) oriented learning through discovery learning model to increase the critical thinking skill of high school students. International Journal of Chemistry Education Research, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.20885/ ijcer.vol4.iss1.art4
Ioannou, A., & Makridou, E. (2018). Exploring the potentials of educational robotics in the development of computational thinking: A summary of current research and practical proposal for future work. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6), 2531–2544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9729-z
Ismail, S. N., Muhammad, S., Kanesan, A. G., & Ali, R. M. (2019). The influence of teachers’ perception and readiness towards the implementation of critical thinking skills (CTS) practice in mathematics. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 337–352. https://doi.org/10. 29333/iji.2019.12222a
Ismail, S. N., Muhammad, S., Omar, M. N., & Shanmugam, S. K. S. (2022). The practice of critical thinking skills in teaching mathematics: Teachers’ perception and readiness. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 19(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2022.19.1
Jaenudin, R., Chotimah, U., Farida, F., & Syarifuddin, S. (2020). Student development zone: higher order thinking skills (hots) in critical thinking orientation. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(9), 11. https://doi.org/10.18415/ ijmmu.v7i9.1884
Julius, E., Mun, S. H., Abdullah, A. H., Mokhtar, M., & Suhairom, N. (2018). Using digital smart board to overcome higher order thinking skills learning difficulties in data handling among primary school students. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 12(7), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v12i7.9644
Kania, N., Fitriani, C., & Bonyah, E. (2023). Analysis of students’ critical thinking skills based on prior knowledge mathematics. International Journal of Contemporary Studies in Education (IJ-CSE), 2(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.56855/ijcse.v2i1.248
Kania, N., & Juandi, D. (2023). Does self-concept affect mathematics learning achievement ? 17(3), 455–461. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v17i3.20554
Khan, D., Plopski, A., Fujimoto, Y., Kanbara, M., Jabeen, G., Zhang, Y. J., Zhang, X., & Kato, H. (2022). Surface Remeshing: A systematic literature review of methods and research directions. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 28(3), 1680–1713. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.3016645.
Koçak, D. (2020). Investigation of rater tendencies and reliability in different assessment methods with many facet rasch model. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 12(4), 349–358. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2020459464
Krulik, S., & Rudnick, J. A. (1999). Innovative Tasks to Improve Critical and Creative Thinking Skills. in L. Stiff & F. Curcio (Eds.), Developing Mathematical Reasoning in Grades K-12. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Lewis, A., & Smith, D. (1993). Defining higher order thinking. Theory Into Practice, 32(3), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849309543588
Maison, Hidayat, M., Kurniawan, D. A., Yolviansyah, F., Sandra, R. O., & Iqbal, M. (2022). How critical thinking skills influence misconception in electric field. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(2), 377–390.
Marchuk, L., & Yatsyna, O. (2020). Practices of informal education as a resource for self-realization of self-referential identities in a pandemic and post-pandemic period. Postmodern Openings, 11(2), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.18662/po/11.2/162
Maryani, I., Prasetyo, Z. K., Wilujeng, I., Purwanti, S., & Fitrianawati, M. (2021). HOTs multiple choice and essay questions: a validated instrument to measure higher-order thinking skills of prospective teachers. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(4), 674–690. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.
Mascia, M. L., Perrone, S., Bardi, D., Agus, M., Penna, M. P., & Lucangeli, D. (2018). Digital life, mathematical skills and cognitive processes. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in the Digital Age, CELDA 2018, Celda, 371–374.
Massetor, N. A., Rozali, M. Z., & Marian, M. F. (2021). K-workers practice in increasing graduate employability to overcome the challenges of the fourth industrial revolution. Research and Innovation in Technical and Vocational Education and Training, 1(1), 224–231. https://publisher.uthm.edu.my/periodicals/index.php/ritvet/article/view/261
MD-Ali, R., & Kim, K. M. (2018). Geogebra in learning of mathematics towards supporting “stem” education. Journal of Social Sciences Research, 2018(Special Issue 6), 776–782. https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.spi6.776.782
Moyo, S. E., Combrinck, C., & Van Staden, S. (2022). Evaluating the impact of formative assessment intervention and experiences of the standard 4 teachers in teaching higher-order-thinking skills in mathematics. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.771437
Nakakoji, Y., & Wilson, R. (2020). Interdisciplinary learning in mathematics and science: transfer of learning for 21st century problem solving at university. Journal of Intelligence, 8(3), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence8030032
NCTM. (2021). The Effective and Appropriate Use of Large-Scale Assessments in Mathematics Education to Guide Systemic Improvement and Equitable Student Learning Large-Scale Assessments Can Support Systemic Improvement Large-Scale Assessment Must Always Be Viewed Throug. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, March.
Newton, D., Wang, Y., & Newton, L. (2022). ‘Allowing them to dream’: Fostering creativity in mathematics undergraduates. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(10), 1334–1346. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2022.2075719
Nieminen, J. H., & Atjonen, P. (2022). The assessment culture of mathematics in Finland: A student perspective. Research in Mathematics Education, 0(0), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794 802.2022.2045626
Nisa’, K., Nasrullah, A., Hidayat, A., Mahuda, I., & Bhat, I. A. (2023). Problem-Based Learning in Improving Problem-Solving Ability and Interest in Learning Mathematics: An Empirical Study. 1, 206–217.
Paiva, A., Craveiro, R., Aroso, I., Martins, M., Reis, R. L., & Duarte, A. R. C. (2014). Natural deep eutectic solvents - Solvents for the 21st century. ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering, 2(5), 1063–1071. https://doi.org/10.1021/sc500096j
Phurikultong, N., & Kantathanawat, T. (2022). Flipping the undergraduate classroom to develop student analytical thinking skills. Emerging Science Journal, 6(4), 739–757. https://doi.org/10.28991/ ESJ-2022-06-04-06
Pollarolo, E., Størksen, I., Skarstein, T. H., & Kucirkova, N. (2022). Children’s critical thinking skills: Perceptions of Norwegian early childhood educators. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, May, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2022.2081349
Popham, W. (2008). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know (5th ed). Allyn and Bacon.
Prakash, O., & Kumar, K. (2016). Higher education: Informal learning for unorganized sector. International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 4(2), 103. https://doi.org/10.5958/ 2322-0465.2016.00012.5
Presseisen, B.. (1985). Thinking Skills Throughout The Curriculum: A conceptual Design. Research for Better Schools
Ramlee, N., Rosli, M. S., & Saleh, N. S. (2019). Mathematical HOTS cultivation via online learning environment and 5E inquiry model: Cognitive impact and the learning activities. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(24), 140–151. https://doi.org/10.3991/ ijet.v14i24.12071
Resnick, I. (2016). Developmental growth trajectories in understanding of fraction magnitude from fourth through sixth grade. Developmental Psychology, 52(5), 746–757. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000102
Rintayati, P. (2020). Development of two-tier multiple choice test to assess indonesian elementary students’ higher-order thinking skills. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 555–566. https://doi.org/10.29333/IJI.2021.14133A
Setiawan, J., Sudrajat, A. A., Aman, A., & Kumalasari, D. (2021). Development of higher order thinking skill assessment instruments in learning Indonesian history. In International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) (Vol. 10, Issue 2, p. 545). Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.20796
Sidiq, Y., Ishartono, N., Desstya, A., Prayitno, H. J., Anif, S., & Hidayat, M. L. (2021). Improving elementary school students’ critical thinking skill in science through hots-based science questions: A quasi-experimental study. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(3), 378–386. https://doi.org/10.15294/JPII.V10I3.30891
Suanto, E., Maat, S. M., & Zakaria, E. (2023). The effectiveness of the implementation of three dimensions geometry kara module on higher order thinking skills (HOTS) and motivation. International Journal of Instruction, 16(3), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.1636a
Sukholova, M. A. (2020). Formal and non-formal education in Ukraine in the context of new socio-cultural challenges. Innovative Solution in Modern Science, 7(43), 61. https://doi.org/10. 26886/2414-634x.7(43)2020.5
Suprapto, E. (2020). The analysis of instrument quality to measure the students’ higher order thinking skill in physics learning. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(4), 520–527. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.42
Susilo, F. J., Usodo, B., & Sari, D. (2023). The profile of high-order thinking skills of junior high school students. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education, 1(1), 77–82. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.56855//ijmme.v1i1.266
Tajudin, N. M., Puteh, M., & Adnan, M. (2018). Guiding principles to foster higher order thinking skills in teaching and learning of mathematics. International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE), 7(4), 195–199. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.15.21445
Tambunan, H., & Naibaho, T. (2019). Performance of mathematics teachers to build students’ high order thinking skills (HOTS). Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 13(1), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v13i1.11218
Tanujaya, B., Prahmana, R. C. I., & Mumu, J. (2021). Mathematics instruction to promote mathematics higher-order thinking skills of students in Indonesia: Moving forward. TEM Journal, 10(4), 1945–1954. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM104-60
Thompson. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ interpretation of higher-order thinking in bloom’s taxonomy. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(2). 96-109. https://doi.org/10. 29333/iejme/221
Wahidin, D., & Romli, L. A. M. (2020). Students critical thinking development in the national sciences and mathematics competition in Indonesia: A descriptive study. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(1), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i1.22240
Wahono, B., Lin, P.-L., & Chang, C.-Y. (2020). Evidence of STEM enactment effectiveness in Asian student learning outcomes. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00236-1
Wilson, D. M., & Narasuman, S. (2020). Investigating teachers’ implementation and strategies on higher order thinking skills in school based assessment instruments. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(1), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i1.8991
Yaacob, Y., Atika, K., & Zawawi, M. (2021). An Automated Symbolic Package to Enhance Higher Order Thinking Skills ( HOTS ): Critical Thinking. 2–3.
Yayuk, E., & Husamah, H. (2020). The difficulties of prospective elementary school teachers in item problem solving for mathematics: Polya’s steps. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.665833
Yeager, J., Sommer, L., Faughnan, J., & Geerkens, C. (2015). Prototype Modeling vs. Item Response Theory – A Paradigm Shift for Measurement Professionals. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2013.1455
Yigletu, A., Michael, K., & Atnafu, M. (2023). The effect of assessment for learning on pre-service mathematics teachers’ higher-order thinking skills in algebra. Arhiv Za Farmaciju, 7(1), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202317679
Yuliati, S. R., & Lestari, I. (2018). Higher-order thinking skill (HOTS) Analysis of Students in Solving HOTS Question in Higher Education. In Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan (Vol. 32, Issue 2, pp. 181–188). Universitas Negeri Jakarta. https://doi.org/10.21009/pip.322.10
Zhou, Y., Gan, L., Chen, J., Wijaya, T. T., & Li, Y. (2023). Development and validation of a higher-order thinking skills assessment scale for pre-service teachers. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 48, 101272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101272
Zumbo, B. D., & Hubley, A. M. (2016). Bringing consequences and side effects of testing and assessment to the foreground. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(2), 299–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1141169
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-08Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

