A Discovery on Malaysian ESL Teachers’ Adherence to Policy Mandates in Classroombased Assessment Practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2024.21.1.9Keywords:
Classroom-based assessment, English Second Language, teachers’ practices, policy implementation, language assessment, curriculum and instructionAbstract
Purpose – Although there exists a substantial body of research discussing the efficient implementation of classroom-based assessment (CBA), there is a dearth of knowledge regarding its application within the context of English as a Second Language (ESL)
education in Malaysia. The current study aimed to investigate the ESL teachers’ practices in implementing CBA, with a specific emphasis on the alignment of their assessment procedures with the policy requirements.
Methodology – Hence, this research utilizes a qualitative approach, employing data triangulation through semi-structured interviews,
classroom observations, and document analysis. Four ESL teachers from two public secondary schools in the northeast district of the
Malaysian city of Pulau Pinang were selected to participate in the study. The four ESL teachers taught the same grade (Form 2) at the
secondary level. The data collected were analyzed through thematic analysis procedures.
Findings – This research discovered that teachers demonstrate commendable practices in planning the CBA. They exhibited discernment by formulating instructional objectives in line with the curriculum document. However, a misalignment was observed
in teachers’ practices during the implementation phase. Despite employing various assessment methods, teachers predominantly
leaned towards formal assessments, with less emphasis on studentcentred approaches. Challenges surfaced when explicit learning
objectives were not effectively communicated, and the use of standardized rubrics, was not tailored to students’ diverse capabilities.
At the reporting phase, concerns were raised about an excessive focus on administrative data recording. This study brought to light that teachers relied on the accumulation of students’ grades and marks to determine the mastery levels, thus corroborating with the examoriented practices.
Significance – This study holds significant value for the field of ESL education in Malaysia by shedding light on the actual implementation of CBA and its alignment with policy directives. By providing information on how policies are implemented at the local level, contributes to the improvement of assessment policies that can be tailored to classroom realities.
References
Andrade, H. L., & Cizek, G. J. (2010). Handbook of formative assessment. Routledge.
Arumugham, K. S. (2020). Kurikulum, pengajaran dan pentaksiran dari perspektif pelaksanaan pentaksiran bilik darjah. Asian People Journal, 3(1), 152–161. https://doi.org/10.37231/ apj.2020.3.1.175
Azli, N., & Akmar, A. (2019). Implementation of CEFR-Aligned assessment tools in Malaysian ESL classroom. Asia Proceedings of Social Sciences, 4(2), 7–10. https://doi.org/10.31580/apss. v4i2.688
Baker, L. (2006). Observation: A complex research method. Library Trends, 55(1), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1353/lib.2006.0045
Black, P. (2000). Research and the development of educational assessment. Oxford Review of Education, 26(3-4), 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1080/713688540
Black, P. (2015). Formative assessment – an optimistic but incomplete vision. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(1), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/096959 4x.2014.999643
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2003). “In praise of educational research”: Formative assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 29(5), 623–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192032000133721
Brown. G. T., & Harris, L. R. (2016). Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment. Routledge.
Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods (Third ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chen, Q., May, L., Klenowski, V., & Kettle, M. (2014). The enactment of formative assessment in English language classrooms in two Chinese universities: Teacher and student responses. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(3), 271–285.
Cheng, L., Rogers, W. T., & Wang, X. (2008). Assessment purposes and procedures in ESL/EFL classrooms. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(1), 9-32.
Chin, H., Thien, L. M., & Chiew, C. M. (2019). The reforms of national assessments in Malaysian education system. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 4(1), 93-111. https://doi.org/10.24200/ jonus.vol4iss1pp93-111
Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson Education International.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (Fourth ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.
Curriculum Development Division. (2017). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran. Pendidikan Moral Tingkatan Dua. Putrajaya: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Ghavifekr, S., Kunjappan, T., Ramasamy, L., & Anthony, A. (2016). Teaching and Learning with ICT Tools: Issues and Challenges from Teachers’ Perceptions. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(2), 38–57. https://eric. ed.gov/?id=EJ1096028
Hajmi, H. H., & Jamaludin, K. (2022). Kesediaan guru dalam pelaksanaan pentaksiran bilik darjah di sekolah rendah. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 4(4), 119–125. https://myjms.mohe.gov. my/index.php/jdpd/article/view/20751
Harlen, W. (2007). The quality of learning. Routledge.
Hopfenbeck, T. (2018). Classroom assessment, pedagogy and learning – twenty years after Black and Wiliam 1998. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 545–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2018.1553695
Kampa, N., Wagner, H., & Köller, O. (2019). The standard setting process: Validating interpretations of stakeholders. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 7, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-019-0071-8
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics, 363-374.
Lembaga Peperiksaan. (2012). Panduan Pengurusan Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Leong, W. S. (2014). Knowing the intentions, meaning and context of classroom assessment: A case study of Singaporean teacher’s conception and practice. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 43, 70–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2013.12.005
Liu, J., & Xu, Y. (2017). Assessment for learning in English language classrooms in China: Contexts, problems, and solutions. Innovation in language learning and teaching: The case of China, 17-37.
Lumadi, M. W. (2013). Challenges besetting teachers in classroom assessment: An exploratory perspective. Journal of Social Sciences, 34(3), 211-221.
Mat Yusoff, S., Razak, R. A., Chin, H. L., & Marzaini, A. F. (2023). Exploring teachers’ conceptions of assessment: A quantitative study in a secondary school setting. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers and Teacher Education, 13(2), 59-72.
Marnizam, F., & Ali, S. (2021). Evaluation of the implementation of classroom assessment (PBD) among primary school mathematics teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 11(2), 81-94. https://doi.org/10.37134/jpsmm. vol11.2.7.2021
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass, Cop.
Ministry of Education (2017). Standard Based English Language Curriculum for Secondary School. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Ministry of Education (2019). Classroom Based Assessment Guidebook. Kementarian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Mohamad Hanapi, M. H., Zakaria, N., & Muner, S. (2021). Readiness level of primary school teachers in Klang district, Selangor in the implementation of in-class assessment from the aspect of knowledge. International Journal of Modern Education, 3(9), 01–08. https://doi.org/10.35631/ijmoe.39001
Mohamad Marzaini, A. F., Haslee Sharil, W. N. E., Supramaniam, K., & Mat Yusoff, S. (2023). Evaluating teachers’ assessment literacy in enacting cefr-aligned classroom-based assessment in Malaysian secondary schools ESL classroom. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(1), 661-675. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/ v12-i1/15691
Mohd Isa, A., Mydin, A.-A., & Abdullah, A. G. K. (2021). Road to school transformation 2025: A systematic literature review on teacher autonomy in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 10(3), 34-45. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v10-i3/10710
O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 228–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
Panadero, E., Fraile, J., Fernández Ruiz, J., Castilla-Estévez, D., & Ruiz, M. A. (2019). Spanish university assessment practices: examination tradition with diversity by faculty. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(3), 379-397.
Pastore, S. (2023). Italian teachers’ conceptions of large-scale assessment: What are the implications for assessment literacy?. Teacher Development, 27(2), 153-171.
Patallion Jr, A. P. (2016). The implications of learning theories to assessment and instructional scaffolding techniques. American Journal of Educational Research, 4(9), 695–700. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-4-9-9
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Pellegrino, J. W., DiBello, L. V., & Goldman, S. R. (2016). A framework for conceptualizing and evaluating the validity of instructionally relevant assessments. Educational Psychologist, 51(1), 59–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2016.1145550
Puspita, R. R., & Suyatno, S. (2020). Teacher observation assessment for primary education. ETERNAL (English Teaching Journal), 11(2), 78-82. https://doi.org/10.26877/eternal.v11i2.7565
Rahman, N. H. (2014). From curriculum reform to classroom practice: An evaluation of the English primary curriculum in Malaysia [PhD Thesis].
Rethinasamy, S., Ramanair, J., & Chuah, K.-M. (2021). English Medium Instruction at Crossroads: Students’ Voice and Way Forward. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(14), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i14/8533
Rojon, C., McDowall, A., & Saunders, M. N. (2015). The relationships between traditional selection assessments and workplace performance criteria specificity: A comparative meta-analysis. Human Performance, 28(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/089 59285.2014.974757
Sidhu, G. K., Kaur, S., & Chi, L. J. (2018). CEFR-aligned school-based assessment in the Malaysian primary ESL classroom. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 452-463. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i2.13311
Simpson, Z., & McKay, T. M. (2013). Assessment rubrics: Artefacts that speak in tongues? Per Linguam, 29(1), 15-32. https://doi.org/10.5785/29-1-539
Smith, J. K. (2003). Reconsidering reliability in classroom assessment and grading. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 26–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2003.tb00141.x
Stanford, B., & Reeves, S. (2009). Making it happen: Using differentiated instruction, retrofit framework, and universal design for learning. Teaching Exceptional Children Plus, 5(6), n6.
Suppian, Z., Mohd Isa, N. J., & Govindasamy, P. (2020). Penilaian kendiri guru pelatih terhadap tahap kemahiran pentaksiran bilik darjah (PBD). Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 2(4), 98–106. https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/jdpd/article/view/11774
Taneri, P. O. (2016). Exploring teacher candidates’ views on educational reform. Athens Journal of Education, 3(1), 19–31. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1216499
Tayyebi, M., Abbasabady, M. M., & Abbassian, G.-R. (2022). Examining classroom writing assessment literacy: A focus on in-service EFL teachers in Iran. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00161-w
Tee, D. D., & Ahmed, P. K. (2014). 360 degree feedback: An integrative framework for learning and assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(6), 579–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13562517.2014.901961
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Willis, J., Adie, L., & Klenowski, V. (2013). Conceptualising teachers’ assessment literacies in an era of curriculum and assessment reform. The Australian Educational Researcher, 40(2), 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-013-0089-9
Yan, Q., Zhang, L. J., & Cheng, X. (2021). Implementing classroom-based assessment for young EFL learners in the Chinese context: A case study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 541–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00602-9
Yeh, L. H. (2021). Challenges faced by visual art education with the existence of classroom based assessment in primary school within district of Hilir Perak. Kupas Seni, 9(1), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.37134/kupasseni.vol9.1.5.2021
Yigzaw, A. (2013). High school English teachers’ and Students’ perceptions, attitudes and actual practices of continuous assessment. Educational Research Review, 8(16), 1489-1498.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Zhao, X., Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. van den & Veldhuis, M. (2017, February 1). Using classroom assessment techniques in Chinese primary schools: Effects on student achievement. Hal. science. https://hal.science/hal-01949253/
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-13Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
