Self-Assessment Metacognitive Strategies in a Spontaneous ESL Speech Production Context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2024.21.2.10Keywords:
English as a Second Language, metacognitive strategies, self-assessment, spontaneous speech context, dysfluency markersAbstract
Purpose – Self-assessment is regarded as a complex metacognitive process by scholars. Nevertheless, in the context of English as a Second Language (ESL) speaking, self-assessment practices often rely on assessment criteria and teacher commentaries. However, speaking involves spontaneous expression with limited access to external standards. Therefore, this case study aims to explore the metacognitive strategies that proficient ESL students use during selfassessment in spontaneous speech production contexts.
Methodology – Three participants, purposefully selected, participated in two spontaneous group discussions recorded on video. Instances of participants’ dysfluency served as prompts in stimulated recall interviews, complemented by video recordings to validate participants’ responses. The thematic analysis of interview data utilised a conceptual framework integrating O’Malley and Chamot’s (1990) metacognitive strategies and Kormos’ (2006) speech production model.
Findings – The analysis revealed that participants employed three key metacognitive strategies – organisational planning, selective attention, and self-monitoring to self-assess their spontaneous speech. Feedback sources, such as their proficiency in the second language (L2) and contextual factors, influenced the application and effectiveness of these strategies during self-assessment (SA).
Significance – This study offers insights into how proficient ESL students self-assess their spontaneous speech production, leveraging their available resources. In addition, this study identifies speech challenges the participants encountered and how they applied metacognitive strategies to address them.
References
Babaii, E., Taghaddomi, S., & Pashmforoosh, R. (2015). Speaking self-assessment: Mismatches between learners’ and teachers’ criteria. Language Testing, 33(3), 411-437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532215590847
Başak, H. (2019). Self-assessment of students’speaking skills [Master’s thesis, Middle East Technical University]. https://etd. lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12623025/index.pdf
Bhatti, N., & Nimehchisalem, V. (2020). A review of research on student self-assessment in second/foreign language writing. Indonesian JELT: Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 15(2), 125-151. https://doi.org/10.25170/ ijelt.v15i2.1846
Boud, D. (1999). Avoiding the traps: Seeking good practice in the use of self-assessment and reflection in professional courses. Social Work Education, 18(2), 121-132.
Bourke, R. (2014). Self-assessment in professional programmes within tertiary institutions. Teaching in Higher Education, 19(8), 908-918. https://doi.org/10.1080/1 3562517.2014.934353
Broos, W. P., Duyck, W., & Hartsuiker, R. J. (2016). Verbal self-monitoring in the second language. Language Learning, 66(S2), 132-154.
Brown, D. H., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (4th ed.). Pearson Education ESL.
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297-298.
De Jong, N. H. (2018). Fluency in second language testing: Insights from different disciplines. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(3), 237-254. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2018.1477780 Dolosic, H. N., Brantmeier, C., Strube, M., & Hogrebe, M. C. (2016). Living language: Self-assessment, oral production, and domestic immersion. Foreign Language Annals, 49(2), 302316. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12191
Dörnyei, Z., & Kormos, J. (1998). Problem-solving mechanisms in L2 communication: A psycholinguistic perspective. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(3), 349-385. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263198003039 http://www.jstor.org/stable/42923742
English Language Teaching Centre. (2020). Teacher guide Implementing the CEFR-aligned curriculum: Planning and managing learning (2nd ed.) [Online]. English Language Teaching Centre. http://eltc.edu.my/docs/2020%20Teacher%20 Guide%202nd%20Edition.pdf
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive– developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003066X.34.10.906
Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2016). Stimulated recall methodology in applied linguistics and L2 research. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315813349
Gráf, T. (2017). Repeats in advanced spoken English of learners with Czech as L1. Acta Universitatis Carolinae Philologica, (3), 6578. https://doi.org/10.14712/24646830.2017.34
Gürbüz, N. (2017). Understanding fluency and disfluency in nonnative speakers’ conversational English. Educational Sciences:
Theory & Practice. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2017.6.0071
Harris, L. R., & Brown, G. T. (2018). Using self-assessment to improve student learning. Routledge.
Hennink, M., Hutter, I., & Bailey, A. (2020). Qualitative research methods. Sage.
Kahng, J. (2014). Exploring utterance and cognitive fluency of L1 and L2 English speakers: Temporal measures and stimulated recall. Language Learning, 64(4), 809-854. https://doi.org/10.1111/ lang.12084
Khonamri, F., Králik, R., Vítecková, M., & Petrikovicová, L. (2021). Self-assessment and EFL literature students’ oral reproduction of short stories. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 10(1), 77-88.
Kim, D. R. (2019). Emergence of proactive self-initiated self-repair as an indicator of L2 IC development. Applied Linguistics, 41(6), 901-921. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amz047
Kim, T. (2021). Intermediate and advanced ESL speakers’ pause and repair use in the Finnish National Certificate of Language Proficiency Speaking Test: A mixed methods study. (MA thesis). University of Turku, Finland.
Knoblauch, H., Tuma, R., & Schnettler, B. (2014). Video analysis and videography. The SAGE handbook of qualitative data analysis, 435-449.
Komalah, T., Adelina, A. B., & Lim, W. J. (2022). Self-repetition in ESL spontaneous speech: Self-assessment metacognitive strategies to enhance non-evaluative speech production. In 11th Melta International Research Conference in English Language Education.
Kormos, J. (2006). Speech production and second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kosmala, L., & Morgenstern, A. (2017). A preliminary study of hesitation phenomena in L1 and L2 productions: A multimodal approach. In Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech 2017.
Lambert, C., Kormos, J., & Minn, D. (2017). Task repetition and second language speech processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 39(1), 167-196. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0272263116000085
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. MIT Press.
Maria, H. E. R. (2021). Self-assessing students’ videos to improve speaking skills [Master’s thesis, Universidad Casa Grande. Departamento de Posgrado]. http://dspace.casagrande.edu. ec:8080/bitstream/ucasagrande/2672/1/Tesis2846HIDs.p
McMillan, J. H., & Hearn, J. (2008). Student self-assessment: The key to stronger student motivation and higher achievement. Educational Horizons, 87(1), 40–49. http://www. jstor.org/stable/42923742
Nakatsuhara, C. F., Tavakoli, P., & Awwad, A. (2019). Towards a model of multi-dimensional performance of C1 level speakers assessed in the APTIS speaking test. British Council.
O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524490
Panadero, E., Brown, G. T., & Strijbos, J. W. (2015)The future of student self-assessment: A review-of known unknowns and potential directions. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 803-830. -https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9350-2
Rodríguez, M., & Rocio, D. (2023). The influence of self-assessment to improve adult speaking (Master’s thesis, Universidad Casa Grande. Departamento de Posgrado).
Shank, C. (2020). A brief overview of conversational repair. LING 5206.
Sigua, S. J. Y. (2022). Self-assessment influence on improving speaking skills (Master’s thesis, Universidad Casa Grande. Departamento de Posgrado).
Simard, D., French, L., & Zuniga, M. (2017). Evolution of self-repair behaviour in narration among adult learners of French as a second language. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20(2), 71-89.
Simpson, R., Eisenchlas, S., & Haugh, M. (2013). The functions of selfinitiated self-repair in the second language Chinese classroom 1. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 23(2), 144-165. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2012.00323.x
Suzuki, S., Kormos, J., & Uchihara, T. (2021). The relationship between utterance and perceived fluency: A meta-analysis of correlational studies. The Modern Language Journal, 105(2), 435-463.
Trofimovich, P., Isaacs, T., Kennedy, S., Saito, K., & Crowther, D. (2016). Flawed self-assessment: Investigating self-and otherperception of second language speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 19(1), 122-140.
Williams, S. (2022). Disfluency and proficiency in second language speech production. Springer Nature.
Yan, Z., & Brown, G. T. (2017). A cyclical self-assessment process: Towards a model of how students engage in self-assessment.
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(8), 12471262. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2016.1260091
Yin, R. K. (2015). Qualitative research from start to finish. Guilford Publications.
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-20Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.
