The Investigation of Best Practices on Symbolic Mathematical Communication: A Comparative Study in Japan, Lao PDR, and Thailand

Sampan Thinwiangthong; Duangmanee Ya-amphan; Phailath Sythong; Hiroki Ishizaka

doi:10.32890/mjli2024.21.1.3

Authors

Sampan Thinwiangthong Mathematics Education Program, Faculty of Education, Khon Kaen University, Thailand
Duangmanee Ya-amphan Mathematics Education Program, Faculty of Education, Khon Kaen University, Thailand
Phailath Sythong Savannakhet Teacher Training College, Savannakhet, Lao PDR, Lao People's Democratic Republic
Hiroki Ishizaka Naruto University of Education, Japan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2024.21.1.3

Keywords:

Best practices, comparative study, interactive and collaborative learning, primary school students, symbolic mathematical communication, symbolic notation, mathematics teachers

Abstract

Purpose – This comparative study sought to identify best practices concerning symbolic mathematical communication between primary school teachers and students in Japanese, Laotian, and Thai classrooms.

Method – The target groups were 18 teachers and 671 students in Grade 1 to Grade 6 mathematics classrooms in Japan, Lao PDR, and Thailand. A total of 18 classrooms were inspected, one from each grade; thus, the unit of analysis was a classroom. Research instruments included a video recorder, a camera, and field notes. The data was gathered by videotaping, photographing, and taking notes. A descriptive analytics method was used to examine the data, following Pirie's mathematical communication framework (Pirie, 1998).

Findings – Based on cultural norms and educational approaches in each country, the country-specific practices of symbolic communication were found to differ significantly among the mathematics teachers from the three countries. Owing to the education system in Japan placing a strong emphasis on discipline and respect, their teachers were found to focus on students’ symbolic explanations, particularly allowing students to elaborate on the meaning of complex mathematical ideas and concepts using symbolic communication. Laotian teachers tended to explain the answers using symbolic mathematical communication. This is because the country-specific practices in the Laotian local context concerning mathematical concepts are contextualized to relate to students’ daily lives and experiences, making abstract symbols more meaningful. Finally, Thai teachers were found to focus on the students’ answers rather than the learning process or operations. This suggests that Thai teachers often focus on memorising and repeating of mathematical procedures and formulas.

Significance – The study findings offer a substantial understanding of the role of culture in education by investigating symbolic communication in mathematics classrooms in Japan, Laos, and Thailand. This implies the potential to improve teaching practices,
enhance student learning experiences, and promote cultural sensitivity and inclusion in educational settings.

References

Chiangkul, W. (2016). The status of Thai Education, Years 2014-2015: How to reform Thai Education to keep pace with the world in the 21st Century. Bangkok: Pimdee Printing. [in Thai]

Cooke, B. D., & Buchholz, D. (2005). Mathematical communication in the classroom: A teacher makes a difference. Early Childhood Education Journal, 12(6), 365-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10643-005-0007-5

Cristobal, J. A., & Lasaten, R. C. S. (2018). Oral communication apprehensions and academic performance of grade 7 students. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 6, 5-16.

Fu, J., Gao, J., & Xu, C. (2022). Compact representation and reliable classification learning for point-level weakly-supervised action localization. IEEE Trans Image Process, 2022(31), 7363-7377. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2022.3222623.

Grégoire, J. (2016). Understanding creativity in mathematics for improving mathematical education. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 15(1), 24-36. https://doi.org/10.1891/1945-8959.15.1.24

Hoffert, S. B. (2009). Mathematics: The universal language? Mathematics Teacher, 103(2), 130-139.

Isoda, M., & Nakamura, T. (2010). Mathematics education theories for lesson study: Problem-solving approach and curriculum through extension and integration. Journal of Japan Society of Mathematical Education, 92, 5.

Inprasitha, M. (2022). Lesson study and open approach development in Thailand: A longitudinal study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 11(5), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1108/ IJLLS-04-2021-0029

Inprasitha, M., Pattanajak, A., & Inprasitha, N. (2012). A study of student’s mathematical communication in teacher professional development. Journal of Modern Education Review, 2(1), 38-46.

Khaing, T. T., Hamaguchi, K., & Ohtani, M. (2007). Development of mathematical communication in the classroom. Paper presented at The Third APEC-Tsukuba International Conference Innovation of Classroom Teaching and Learning through Lesson Study III - Focusing on Mathematical Communication, CRICED, University of Tsukuba.

Kharde, U. (2016). The symbolic language of mathematics. The Explorer, 1(1), 117-118.

Maulyda, M. A., Annizar, A. M., Hidayati, V. K., & Mukhlis, M. (2020). Analysis of students’ verbal and written mathematical communication errors in solving word problems. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1538(012083). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1538/1/012083.

Ministry of Education and Sport, Lao PDR. (2015). Student learning outcomes in primary education in Lao PDR. Vientiane, Lao PDR: Ministry of Education and Sport.

Mitchelmore, M., & White, P. (2007). Abstraction in mathematics learning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217452

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Virginia: NCTM.

Pimkaew, P. (2007). An investigation on characteristics of mathematical communication of students in open-ended problem-solving. Master Thesis in Mathematics Education, Graduate School, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

Premprayoon. K. (2007). Students’ cognitive process of mathematical communication in open-ended problem-solving. Master Thesis in Mathematics Education, Graduate School, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

Pirie, S. (1998). Crossing the gulf between thought and symbol: Language as (slippery) stepping-stones. In H. Steinbring, M. Bartolini Bussi and A. Sierpinska (Eds.), Language and Communication in the Mathematics Classroom. (pp. 7-29). Reston, VA: NCTM.

Pongboriboon, Y. (2010). Case study. Journal of Education Khon Kaen University, 33(4), 42-50.

Ramadhani, I., & Dwi, E. M. (2018). Study mathematics communication skills of junior high school students in solving circle problems. The Maldives Journal, 2, 52-60.

Schmidt, W. H. (2004). A vision for mathematics. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 6-11.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Academic Press.

Steinbring, H., Bartolini Bussi, M. G., & Sierpinska, A. (1998). Language and communication in the mathematics classroom. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving Education in the classroom. Free Press.

Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (2004). Improving mathematics teaching. Educational Leadership, 61(4), 12-17.

Takahashi, A. (2006). Characteristics of Japanese mathematics lesson. Tsukuba Journal of Educational Study in Mathematics, 25(special issue), 37-44.

Thinwiangthong, S. (2012). Small-group mathematical communication in the classroom within lesson study and open approach context. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

Vance, J. (2021). Precision and perceptual clarity. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 99(2), 379-395. https://doi.org/10.108 0/00048402.2020.1767663

Whitin, P., & Whitin, D. J. (2003). Developing mathematical understanding along the yellow brick road. Young Children, 58(1), 36-40.

Wilson, B. (2019). Mathematical communication through written and oral expression. Journal of Mathematics Education, 23, 122-134.

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research design and methods (5th ed.). Sage.

Zulhelmi & Anwar (2021). Mathematical communication skills in solving block and cube problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012065