Chinese Students’ Metaphorical Descriptions of Thai Teachers at a Thai University
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2022.19.1.8Keywords:
Chinese students’ metaphors, metaphors, metaphorical descriptions, metaphorical studyAbstract
Purpose – This paper discusses Chinese students’ negative and positive written feedback about Thai teachers using metaphorical descriptions and the links between it and their classroom experiences.
Methodology – An open-response questionnaire was employed to collect the data from 21 Chinese female students. The questionnaire provided both positive and negative “people” or “thing” metaphors of Thai teachers for students’ selection. In addition, students were allowed to use their own metaphors to describe their teachers. Data was analyzed by using open and axial coding techniques.
Findings – The results revealed that Chinese students were able to compare Thai teachers with either a “person” or “thing” metaphor and could write a metaphorical description that reflected different aspects of their instructors’ teaching, both positively and negatively. The quality of their descriptions was rich enough to link with their classroom learning experiences. Both positive and negative “people” and “thing” metaphorical descriptions were associated with three different viewpoints: academic, power dynamics, and emotion. The positive “people” metaphorical descriptions were linked to four classroom issues: knowledge and experience, teaching style, motivation, and guardian/protector. In contrast, the positive “thing” and negative “people” and “thing” metaphorical descriptions were linked to three classroom issues: knowledge and experience, teaching style, and emotion.
Significance – These findings help to strengthen Thai-Sino understanding of the relationship between Chinese students and Thai teachers. Findings also suggested that Chinese students’ metaphorical feedback should be used with the non-metaphorical assessment form to evaluate and improve Thai teachers’ instructional practices in the Thai-Chinese student exchange curriculum.
References
Akinoglu, O., & Eren, C. D. (2016). Comparison of pre-service teachers’ metaphors regarding the concept of “scientific knowledge”. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(7), 1672–1679. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.040720
Baş, M., & Bal-Gezegin, B. (2015). Teachers as patience stones: A metaphor analysis of students’ conceptualizations of EFL teachers in Turkey. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 1(3), 1–9. https://omeka.ibu.edu.ba/files/ original/e567382af27c499e7240f8b4a9d3cb3f.pdf
Botha, E. (2009). Why metaphor matters in education. South African Journal of Education, 29, 431-444. https://files.eric.ed.gov/ fulltext/EJ1147086.pdf
Cameron, L., & Maslen, R. (2010). Metaphor analysis: Research practice in applied linguistics, social sciences and the humanities. London: Equinox.
Carter, S., & Pitcher, R. (2010). Extended metaphors for pedagogy: Using sameness and difference. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(5), 579–589. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2010.49190
Danto, A. C. (1980). Neitzsche as philosopher. New York: Columbia University Press.
Dong, Y. R. (2004). Don’t keep them in the dark! Teaching metaphors to English language learners. The English Journal, 93(4), 29–35. https://doi.org/10.2307/4128977
Effendi, M. S. (2016). Teaching metaphor: Engaging student’s creativity in writing class. International Journal on Studies in English Language and Literature, 4(4), 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2347-3134.0404001
Ishiki, N. (2011). Trajectories of English learning: Through the use and analysis of EFL students’ metaphors. Proceedings-English Studies in Various Contexts: The 3rd International conference on Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Liberal Arts, Prince of Songkla University, 1–11. http://fs.libarts.psu.ac.th/ research/conference/proceedings-3/1pdf/004.pdf
Jitpranee, J. (2017). Metaphor analysis: Students’ metaphorical conceptualizations of English teachers at a university in Thailand. The Asian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 48–57. https://caes.hku.hk/ajal/index.php/ajal/article/ view/418/473
Kamberi, L. (2014). Using metaphors in language teaching and learning. European Journal of Research on Education, Special Issue: Contemporary Studies in Education, 92–97. https://paperzz.com/doc/8758550/using-metaphors-in-languageteaching-and-learning
Kesen, A. (2010). Turkish EFL learners’ metaphors with respect to English language coursebooks. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 4(1), 108–118. https://novitasroyal.org/ volume-4-issue-1-april-2010/
Kitikanan, P. (2010). Metaphors representing English classes: A comparison of Thai EFL and Filipino ESL students. The International Journal of the Humanities, 8(1), 281–292. https://doi.org/10.18848/1447-9508/CGP/v08i01/42815
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lowery, D. (2013). Helping metaphors take root in the EFL classroom. English Teaching Forum, 1, 12–17. https://americanenglish. state.gov/files/ae/resource_files/51_1_4_lowery.pdf Oxford, R. L., Tomlinson, S., Barcelos, A., Harrington, C., Lavine,
R. Z., Saleh, A., & Longhini, A. (1998). Clashing metaphors about classroom teacher: Toward a systematic typology for the language teaching field. System, 26(1), 3–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00071-7
Mouraz, A., Pereira, A.V., & Monteiro, R. (2013). The use of metaphors in the processes of teaching and learning in higher education. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(1), 99–110. https://www.fpce.up.pt/ciie/sites/ default/files/IOJES_1041.pdf
Nainby, K. E., & Fassett, D. L. (2008). Effacement and metaphor: Searching for the body in educational discourse. Liminalities: A Journal of Performance Studies, 4(3), 1–25. http://liminalities. net/4-3/effacement.pdf
Nikitina, L., & Furuoka, F. (2008). “A language teacher is like…”: Examining Malaysian students’ perceptions of language teachers through metaphor analysis. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 5(2), 192–205. https://files.eric. ed.gov/fulltext/ED509070.pdf
Ural, Ö., Aydemir, İ., Toker-Gökce, A., & Öztoprak-Kavak, Z. (2016). Metaphorical perceptions of secondary school students and teachers about learning and teaching concepts. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 5(2), 131–153. http://jtee. org/document/issue10/MAKALE%202.pdf
Schwab, J. J. (1973). The practical 3: Translation into curriculum. The School Review, 81(4), 501–522. https://www.jstor.org/ stable/1084423 Şimşek, M. R. (2014).Ametaphor analysis of English teacher candidates’ pre-and post-course beliefs about language and teaching. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22, 230–247. https://atif.sobiad.com/index.jsp?modul=makalegoruntule&id=AWqh_a2cfKVWzH81liQD
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Su, F. (2015). College EFL learners’ metaphorical perceptions of English learning. The Journal of ASIA TEFL, 12(3), 61–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2015.12.3.3.61
Yesilbursa, A. (2012). Using metaphor to explore the professional role identities of higher education English language instructors. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 468-472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.143
Yilmaz, N. Y. (2018). Students and teachers’ metaphors about classroom teachers. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(1), 245-257. http://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n1p245
Zhang, X. (2016). Examining English language teachers through metaphorical analysis. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 6(8), 1659-1664. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/ tpls.0608.20
Zhang, H., & Song, W. (2010). Metaphor analysis in the educational discourse: A critical review. US-China Foreign Language, 8(9), 42-49. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED514704.pdf
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
Research impact
Harvested 2026-09-09Counts differ between services because each indexes a different body of literature. None of them is the whole picture.

