MENEROKA TINGKAH LAKU UNIK PELAJAR PINTAR CERDAS BERBAKAT AKADEMIK (Exploring Unique Behavior of Gifted Students with Academic Talented)

Md Jais  Ismail; Hawa Aqilah  Hamuzan; Nurul Hafizah  Maarof

doi:10.32890/mjli2021.18.2.11

Authors

Md Jais Ismail Fakulti Muzik, Universiti Teknologi Mara, Shah Alam Selangor, Malaysia
Hawa Aqilah Hamuzan Pusat GENIUS@pintar Negara, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia
Nurul Hafizah Maarof Pusat GENIUS@pintar Negara, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2021.18.2.11

Keywords:

Pintar cerdas, tingkah laku unik, kualitatif, temu bual, analisis tematik

Abstract

Tujuan - Tanpa sokongan daripada pihak sekolah dan ahli masyarakat, anak-anak pintar cerdas terdedah dengan peminggiran sosial dan risiko masalah psikologi seterusnya gagal dalam pelajaran. Kajian lepas membuktikan bahawa pelajar-pelajar pintar cerdas memiliki tingkah laku unik yang boleh membantu meningkatkan pencapaian keseluruhan mereka. Kajian ini bertujuan meneroka tingkah laku unik pelajar pintar cerdas yang ditunjukkan semasa berada di rumah, proses pengajaran dan pembelajaran dalam kelas, dan pergaulan bersama rakan di sekolah.

Metodologi - Kajian dijalankan menerusi pendekatan kualitatif di Kolej GENIUS@Pintar Negara yang merupakan tempat pengajian pelajar pintar cerdas berbakat akademik dari seluruh Malaysia. Responden terdiri daripada lima orang ibu bapa pelajar pintar cerdas, tiga orang pensyarah, dan enam orang pelajar pintar cerdas. Pengumpulan data melalui kaedah temu bual mendalam dan temu bual kelompok mengikut protokol temu bual yang dianalisis menggunakan kaedah analisis tematik.

Dapatan - Keputusan menunjukkan tingkah laku unik pelajar pintar meliputi lakuan membaca dalam masa yang lama, suka menyendiri menyiapkan tugasan, kerap bertanya sehingga memperoleh jawapan yang konkrit, berbahas untuk mempertahankan jawapan, memberi komitmen yang tinggi, dan selalu melakukan aktiviti mencabar minda.

Signifikan - Kajian ini menjadi panduan kepada ibu bapa, guru-guru dan masyarakat untuk memahami pelajar pintar cerdas dengan lebih dekat lagi seterusnya mengelakkan risiko peminggiran pelajar pintar cerdas. Implikasi terhadap kaedah dan strategi pengajaran guru untuk disesuaikan dengan keunikan tingkah laku pelajar pintar cerdas di sekolah. Oleh itu, dapatan kajian ini dijangka dapat mengukuhkan program pendidikan pintar cerdas di Malaysia.

References

Al-Khayat, M. M., Al-Hrout, M. A., & Hyassat, M. A. (2017). Academically gifted undergraduate students: Their preferred teaching strategies. International Education Studies, 10(7), 155-161.

Agaliotis, I., & Kalyva, E. (2019). Motivational differences of greek gifted and non-gifted high-achieving and gifted under-achieving students. International Education Studies, 12(2), 45-56.

Azizi Y., Shahrin H., Jamaludin R., Yusof B., & Abdul Rahim H. (2006). Penyelidikan menguasai dalam pendidikan: Teori analisis dan interpretasi data. PTS Professional Publ. Sdn. Bhd.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2012). Thematic analysis. In H. Cooper, P. M. Camic, D. L. Long, A. T. Panter, D. Rindskopf, & K. J. Sher (Eds.), APA handbooks in psychology®. APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol. 2. Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological, (pp.57–71). American Psychological Association.

Clark, B. (2002). Growing up gifted. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

Cleveland, L. M. (2017). Examining the relationship between gifted behavior rating scores and student academic performance. Graduate Theses and Dissertation. Concordia University. Portland.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.

Cross, T. (2018). On the social and emotional lives of gifted children. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

Frey, J. H., & Fontana, A. (1991). The group interview in social research. The Social Science Journal, 28(2), 175-187.

Gagné, F. (2010). Motivation within the DMGT 2.0 framework. High Ability Studies, 21(2), 81-99.

Gagné, F. (2008). Building gifts into talents: Brief overview of the DMGT 2.0. F. Gagné.

Gross, M. U. (2004). Exceptionally gifted children. Routledge.

Hasan, M. A. (2006). Anak kita memang pintar cerdas: Panduan membina potensi diri anak-anak. PTS Publishing House.

Ismail, M. J., Loo, F. C., & Anuar, A. F. (2021). Learning music through rhythmic movements in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 18(1), 241-263. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2021.18.1.10

Ismail, M. J., & Anuar, A. F. (2020). The significance of music to gifted students. Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(4), 33-43. http://qjoest.com/qjssh/index.php/ qjssh/article/view/21

Jablonski, S., & Ludwig, M. (2019, February). Mathematical arguments in the context of mathematical giftedness–analysis of oral argumentations with toulmin. In Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (No. 18). Freudenthal Group; Freudenthal Institute; ERME.

Khalip, M., & Hariza, A. H. (2015). Kemahiran interpersonal guru dan hubungan dengan pencapaian akademik pelajar (Interpersonal teacher skill and it’s relationship with students’ academic achievement). Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia (Malaysian Journal of Education), 40(2), 89-99.

Manning, S. (2006). Recognizing gifted students: A practical guide for teachers. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 42(2), 64-68.

Marzni, M. M., Rohizani, Y., Fadzilah, A., & Marni, J. (2018). Analisis tematik dalam pembelajaran dan pemudahcaraan (PDPC) proses penulisan karangan argumentatif berasaskan KBAT: pemahaman dan amalan pedagogi guru Bahasa Melayu tingkatan empat. Prosiding Seminar Kebangsaan Majlis Dekan Pendidikan Universiti Awam 2018. Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Malaysia.

Md Jais, I., Azu Farhana, A., & Rorlinda, Y. (2020). Exploring giftedness: Traits of cognitive and practical skills of a gifted child. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 5(34), 189-196.

Md Jais, I., & Azu Farhana, A. (2020). The significance of music to gifted students. Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(4), 33-43.

Md Jais I., Rorlinda Y., & Loo F. C. (2018). Proper musical activities during music instructional process for gifted and talented students in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 3(5), 30-40.

Merrotsy, P. (2017). Gagne’s differentiated model of giftedness and talent in Australian education. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education, 26(2), 29.

Mofield, E., & Parker Peters, M. (2019). Understanding underachievement: mindset, perfectionism, and achievement attitudes among gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 42(2), 107-134.

Neihart, M., Reis, S. M., Robinson, N., & Moon, S. (2002). The social and emotional development of gifted children: What do we know?. Washington: Sourcebooks, Inc.

Ogurlu, U., & Sarıçam, H. (2018). Bullying, forgiveness and submissive behaviors in gifted students. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 27(9), 2833-2843.

Post, G. (2016). Intelligence denied: When gifted children’s abilities are ignored. http://www.davidsongifted.org/search-database/ entry/a10878

Rambo, M. C. D., & Fernandes, S. H. A. A. (2019). A proposal of enriching activities for students with indicative of high skills/ giftedness in Mathematics. Acta Scientiae, 21(5), 128-144.

Renzulli, J. S. (2020). Promoting social capital by expanding the conception of giftedness. Talent, 10(1), 2-20.

Renzulli, J. S. (2016). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In S.M. Reis (Ed). Reflections on gifted education (pp. 55-86). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.

Rinn, A. N., Mullet, D. R., Jett, N., & Nyikos, T. (2018). Sensory processing sensitivity among high-ability individuals: A psychometric evaluation of the highly sensitive person scale. Roeper Review, 40(3), 166-175.

Majid, R. A., & Alias, A. (2010). Consequences of risk factors in the development of gifted children. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 63-69.

Shore, B. M., Chichekian, T., Gyles, P. D., & Walker, C. L. (2019). Friendships of gifted children and youth: Updated insights and understanding. The SAGE handbook of gifted and talented education, 184-195 (pp.184-195). SAGE.

Siegle, D., DaVia Rubenstein, L., & McCoach, D. B. (2020). Do you know what I’m thinking? A comparison of teacher and parent perspectives of underachieving gifted students’ attitudes. Psychology in the Schools, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22345.

Smutny, J. F., Walker, S. Y., & Meckstroth, E. A. (2000). Teaching young gifted children in the regular classroom. ERIC Clearinghouse on Disabilities and Gifted Education.

Sorrentino, C. (2019). Creativity assessment in school: Reflection from a middle school Italian study on giftedness. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(2), 556-562.

Ummu Aiman B. I. (2018). Kajian ciri personaliti kreatif dalam kalangan murid pintar akademik. Disertasi Ijazah Sarjana Pendidikan (Pendidikan Khas). UPSI.

U. S. Department of Education, (1993). National excellence: A case for developing America’s talent. Washington, DC.

Wai, J. (2015, September 15). How do academically gifted students spend their time? https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/09/ how-do-academically-gifted-students-spend-their-time.

Wood, P. F. (2008). Reading instruction with gifted and talented readers: A series of unfortunate events or a sequence of auspicious results? Gifted Child Today, 31(3), 16-25.